A great monk, a very towering personality with incredible humility. My soulful regards to Swami Sarvapriyananda Maharaaj!! Having a glimpse of this Sannyasi Maharaj is just as joyful as '' ঝলক দর্শন" in Vrindavana 🌹🌹
The most fundamental aspect of creation to which material science (physics, maths etc) can reach i.e. spacetime is well described in the most basic of the Hindu philosophy i.e.Nyaya-Vaisheshika. There the subtlest spacial dimension [dik] and time dimension [kal] are considered as material [dravya] along with mind [mana]. These in turn are made up of more fundamental qualities [guna]. These subtle materials interact to produce "material ideas" [bhaba] in emergent fashion like "action" [karma]. This is akin to QM where probability waves collapse to material reality when observed [i.e. by the mind] or reality emerges from interaction/correlation of more fundamental waves in hierarchic fashion. However one should remember that “physical mind” itself is made up of the same material which it plays with so its action/perception will be limited to the same ingredients that it interacts with. So any appearance of material reality is in the mind of the observer. As Swami Vivekananda says, the mind is the ultimate and supreme energy converter which converts unmanifest energy into its myriad manifestation to appear as external reality. So the entire creation from the unmanifest to spacetime to the system of galaxies down to planetary system, living beings and human society is nothing but a hierarchial emergent system of interacting waveforms changing at every instant as manifest time “emerges” unidirectionally. The all pervasive unmanifest quantum field organises (i.e gets different direction) under the impetus of time which it assimilates (similar to prana in vedanta) into energy channels. Then it is the interaction/correlation/arrangement of these which manifests us and our conceivable universe. Its like how strings [information] make a shirt [our universe]. Only when the strings are arranged in a specific way [parallel to each other but not otherwise, nyaya] can the shirt evolve. Also note that the strings don’t have to be in contact with each other but its their relation (fundamentally ''action'' or karma) and relative position that is producing the fabric.(samanya in nyaya) By other specific such arrangement, different shirts can be produced.(vishesha in nyaya). Time is intricately entangled into everything.(samavyaya in nyaya) The two most fundamental building blocks [science] of creation are physics and mathematics, both having their inception at the concept of zero [big bang in physics and number system in maths]. In philosophy, zero [sunyo] means both "infinity" and number zero. The infinitely infinite symmetrical unmanifest [brahma in vedanta] constricts to a point by a imaginary boundary [maya] which is round [parimandala parimana]. For the infinite to become finite, the circular shape is the most appropriate as it is [finitely] infinite symmetrical about its centre. The other platform where science and philosophy are very near is the concept of information, quantum thermodynamics [heat] and entropy all of which are entangled in creation. The Upanishad says "the sun is veritably the life energy or pran " and physics has discovered that the earth was formed from the sun and it is maintaining all vitality here by continuously supplying "low entropy" via sunlight. In philosophical realms, for manifesting reality, the unmanifest first undergoes symmetry breaking into 50 alphabets/sounds [most fundamental information] "inspired" by the creative force [prana, heat] which by permutation/ combination/arrangements in different ways give rise to the reality describable by those alphabets.
Quantum mechanics is based on experimental observation. Any similar thinking without experimental proof shouldn't be mixed up with quantum mechanics just because words are similar.
Then the question will come, why we are trying to understand quantum mechanics? And one more thing, nothing is proved definitely by this double slit experiment.
I am not sure what you are trying to say here, Science is based on observations of nature from materialistic perspective including study of consciousnes, but the hard problem of consciousness is yet to be solved. Now the ancient rishis spoke from self realization perspective, which gives the point of view of consciousness being a fundamental property of universe. If you do not want to agree, you are at Liberty to do so but cannot stop others from trying to marry the two again as a thought experiment.
@@ravindudilshan3041 he spoke about Nagarjuna and the concept of Shunyata in shunyavada Buddhism. I know he is a hindu monk. I have been following his work for years but thank you for the invaluable comment though.
In 6 Vedic Darshan, Samkhya Yog & Vedant Have Especial Position , Samkhya More Talks on Suffering , While Yog Darshan on Meditation , Vedant Consist Upnishad, Bhagwat Geeta , Brahm Sutra and Advait Vedanta Books , Vedanta have Central Topic About Brahman or Arman The Shunya of NagaArjun is Very Very Similar to Brahman of Brihadarnyak Upnishad and Mandukya Upnishad I think NagaArjun Gave A Great Strong Position To Buddhism in Debate , I don't Know How Without Shunyawaad of NagaArjun One can Prove Nirvan Logically , Naga Arjun was A Brahmin Lateron he converted to Buddhism
Very interesting conversation. Lot of research is going on in this…Swamiji is correct about colonial mindset. Such esteemed researchers are pulled down by so called experts in quantum physics where such things are named under pseudoscience. Western people and scientists are researching our ancient scriptures inundated with such knowledge but Indians especially getting their degrees abroad and considered so called experts in such field call this quackery.
How can u replace electrons with cells? cells are much complex matter composed numerous molecules, whereas electrons are charged particles inside an atom.
Cell doesn't have to be replaced by electrons...you yourself have given the answer...cell is composed of numerous molecules...and molecules are composed of atoms be it by similar atoms or dissimilar atoms.... and atoms are made of Subatomic particles that is proton neutron and electrons and many others 😂😂😂 matlab kuch bhi kehte ye log
By the way, quantum mechanics, i reckon, doesn't work for macroscopic [rather supra-atomic] things, at least not in the way it works for such minuscule stuff as photons ...
Double slit experiment is for light and subatomic particles, if you throw something massive like cell it will produce no inference bands, because cell is made up of million atoms and mass trillion time higher than electron or photons. Not getting why he asked this question.
Guys please read Triupra Rahasya and Yoga Vasistha. They have concepts very similar to the quantum concept Schrodinger Cat experiment. Especially Tripura Rahasya guys. I'm not kidding.
lets say, you are walking on the road all alone while no one is observing you, Your conduct would be somewhat carefree. BUT the very moment you suspect someone is watching you, instantaneously your conduct would change from carefree to rigidity...wont it be so?!..i presume this is what electrons are doing and YES living cells would also exhibit the same behavioral pattern like that of electrons when being observed!
@@KnowtoGrow4354 First things first, I am neither a QP and/or a QM scientist. In my humble understanding, at the most basic level all organisms are made up of atoms, right? And any atom consists of electron, right? May it be an electron passing through the double-slit OR an electron present in a living cell, it would presumably change its behavior upon being observed, right? Microcosm constitutes the Macrocosm, right? Such being the case, isn’t there a possibility of a human, made up of living cells which are in turn made up of atoms, exhibit behavioral change when being observed consciously!?
You are neither spiritual nor a civilized human being...Every knowledge arrives from God, be it the knowledge that gets human free from cycle of birth, death that is Parā Vidyā and the knowledge by dint of which you will know the nature that is Virāt roop of God as per Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad...😂😂😂 Tamiz naam ki koi chiz hai kya apke pass?
Where all our noble prizes have gone? This guy is just throwing in some terms and pretending he understands cutting edge physics also. I am told he has attended some course on theology at Harvard. Nothing to do with science.
Swami Sarvapriyananda ji had already said that he is not a man of physics or genomics. He just quoted eminent Physicist Carlo Rovelli. Don't shout without listening properly
Sad. Either you haven't really understood the Swamiji's response to the question or you are already prejudiced and have therefore taken on an aggressive stance. By the way, I'm not Indian or Hindu and nor do I follow any religious doctrine, but I give credit where it is due and this Swami has brought some hope to the world via his talks and presence on the net. I hope you find peace.
Nagarjuna specifically rejected vedas as a wrong view as did Buddha. If that swami accepted the superiority of Nagarjuna's philosophy he is literally accepting that Vedanta is a wrong view.
@@Prashant-ci7vs study both Advaita and Buddhism, you would get the answer. But here the problem is that you don't understand either of them, and commenting carelessly.
@@theunusual4566 What you said applies to you. Here is a quote of Buddha from Tevijja sutta: "..But here *the brahmins proficient in the three Vedas* sink down where they have sat, only to drift apart, while imagining they’re crossing over to drier ground. [ I wonder if this is a satire on the idea of upaniṣad (“sitting near”); even as they affirm their commitment to their texts, they drift apart (visāra) into separate schools and ideologies.] That’s why *the three Vedas of the brahmins are called a ‘salted land’ and a ‘barren land’ and a ‘disaster’* ”
By listening to Swami Sarvapriyananda ji , I can assume the level of Swami Vivekananda's depth of knowledge
You cannot, nobody can! Not even the swamijis can.
@@user-tf6eb4nl9w he said he can assume, he didn't say he "knows"
@@user-tf6eb4nl9w exactly
@@user-tf6eb4nl9wSwami Vivekananda himself did not like hero worship.
Hidden Buddhist , read vivekananda books
A great monk, a very towering personality with incredible humility. My soulful regards to Swami Sarvapriyananda Maharaaj!! Having a glimpse of this Sannyasi Maharaj is just as joyful as '' ঝলক দর্শন" in Vrindavana 🌹🌹
That's real wisdom -- never claims to know everyTHING ...
I think the person, who is questioning, didn't read his question carefully. What kind of question is this? A cell is made off millions of electrons.
Agreed
The most fundamental aspect of creation to which material science (physics, maths etc) can reach i.e. spacetime is well described in the most basic of the Hindu philosophy i.e.Nyaya-Vaisheshika. There the subtlest spacial dimension [dik] and time dimension [kal] are considered as material [dravya] along with mind [mana]. These in turn are made up of more fundamental qualities [guna]. These subtle materials interact to produce "material ideas" [bhaba] in emergent fashion like "action" [karma]. This is akin to QM where probability waves collapse to material reality when observed [i.e. by the mind] or reality emerges from interaction/correlation of more fundamental waves in hierarchic fashion. However one should remember that “physical mind” itself is made up of the same material which it plays with so its action/perception will be limited to the same ingredients that it interacts with. So any appearance of material reality is in the mind of the observer. As Swami Vivekananda says, the mind is the ultimate and supreme energy converter which converts unmanifest energy into its myriad manifestation to appear as external reality. So the entire creation from the unmanifest to spacetime to the system of galaxies down to planetary system, living beings and human society is nothing but a hierarchial emergent system of interacting waveforms changing at every instant as manifest time “emerges”
unidirectionally.
The all pervasive unmanifest quantum field organises (i.e gets different direction) under the impetus of time which it assimilates (similar to prana in vedanta) into energy channels. Then it is the interaction/correlation/arrangement of these which manifests us and our conceivable universe. Its like how strings [information] make a shirt [our universe]. Only when the strings are arranged in a specific way [parallel to each other but not otherwise, nyaya] can the shirt evolve. Also note that the strings don’t have to be in contact with each other but its their relation (fundamentally ''action'' or karma) and relative position that is producing the fabric.(samanya in nyaya) By other specific such arrangement, different shirts can be produced.(vishesha in nyaya). Time is intricately entangled into everything.(samavyaya in nyaya)
The two most fundamental building blocks [science] of creation are physics and mathematics, both having their inception at the concept of zero [big bang in physics and number system in maths]. In philosophy, zero [sunyo] means both "infinity" and number zero. The infinitely infinite symmetrical unmanifest [brahma in vedanta] constricts to a point by a imaginary boundary [maya] which is round [parimandala parimana]. For the infinite to become finite, the circular shape is the most appropriate as it is [finitely] infinite symmetrical about its centre.
The other platform where science and philosophy are very near is the concept of information, quantum thermodynamics [heat] and entropy all of which are entangled in creation. The Upanishad says "the sun is veritably the life energy or pran " and physics has discovered that the earth was formed from the sun and it is maintaining all vitality here by continuously supplying "low entropy" via sunlight. In philosophical realms, for manifesting reality, the unmanifest first undergoes symmetry breaking into 50 alphabets/sounds [most fundamental information] "inspired" by the creative force [prana, heat] which by permutation/ combination/arrangements in different ways give rise to the reality describable by those alphabets.
🙏❤️🙏
Quantum mechanics is based on experimental observation. Any similar thinking without experimental proof shouldn't be mixed up with quantum mechanics just because words are similar.
Then the question will come, why we are trying to understand quantum mechanics? And one more thing, nothing is proved definitely by this double slit experiment.
I am not sure what you are trying to say here, Science is based on observations of nature from materialistic perspective including study of consciousnes, but the hard problem of consciousness is yet to be solved. Now the ancient rishis spoke from self realization perspective, which gives the point of view of consciousness being a fundamental property of universe. If you do not want to agree, you are at Liberty to do so but cannot stop others from trying to marry the two again as a thought experiment.
Sarvapriyananda one of the great teachers of Buddhism in our time.. and I really mean it. Great explanation on the notion of shunyata. Thank you.
This is not Buddhism
He is a hindu advaita vedan5in monk
I know exactly what he is. The comment is a compliment on his knowledge and insight on Buddhism.
@@ravindudilshan3041 he spoke about Nagarjuna and the concept of Shunyata in shunyavada Buddhism. I know he is a hindu monk. I have been following his work for years but thank you for the invaluable comment though.
In 6 Vedic Darshan, Samkhya Yog & Vedant Have Especial Position , Samkhya More Talks on Suffering , While Yog Darshan on Meditation , Vedant Consist Upnishad, Bhagwat Geeta , Brahm Sutra and Advait Vedanta Books , Vedanta have Central Topic About Brahman or Arman
The Shunya of NagaArjun is Very Very Similar to Brahman of Brihadarnyak Upnishad and Mandukya Upnishad
I think NagaArjun Gave A Great Strong Position To Buddhism in Debate , I don't Know How Without Shunyawaad of NagaArjun One can Prove Nirvan Logically , Naga Arjun was A Brahmin Lateron he converted to Buddhism
Very interesting conversation. Lot of research is going on in this…Swamiji is correct about colonial mindset. Such esteemed researchers are pulled down by so called experts in quantum physics where such things are named under pseudoscience. Western people and scientists are researching our ancient scriptures inundated with such knowledge but Indians especially getting their degrees abroad and considered so called experts in such field call this quackery.
🙏🙏🙏
How can u replace electrons with cells? cells are much complex matter composed numerous molecules, whereas electrons are charged particles inside an atom.
I agree
Cell doesn't have to be replaced by electrons...you yourself have given the answer...cell is composed of numerous molecules...and molecules are composed of atoms be it by similar atoms or dissimilar atoms.... and atoms are made of Subatomic particles that is proton neutron and electrons and many others 😂😂😂 matlab kuch bhi kehte ye log
People differentiating between Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism do not understand either.
And what's the point of asking that genomics question?
By the way, quantum mechanics, i reckon, doesn't work for macroscopic [rather supra-atomic] things, at least not in the way it works for such minuscule stuff as photons ...
Yes
Double slit experiment is for light and subatomic particles, if you throw something massive like cell it will produce no inference bands, because cell is made up of million atoms and mass trillion time higher than electron or photons. Not getting why he asked this question.
Agreed.
Really..n he claims to be studying some bio science..
Haha, yes, that a stupid person in a wrong place.
Our handicapped nature doesn't allow us to dig down to the rich scientific resource present underneath ancient foundation.
Why not start from yourself by breaking this myth. 😌
@@amitbiswas1885 Why not? Afterall Seva begins at home.
There is not quantum mechanics in our scriptures
@@ayenpatel3738 🙏
@@ayenpatel3738 Ghar ka bhedi lanka dhaye
Einstein famously rejected quantum mechanics saying that God does not play with dice.
Then He applied very basics of the quantum mechanics to explain photo electric effect 😊
Lmao, I don't knowing what to say
He is hindu monk not Buddhist monk.
Yes
Guys please read Triupra Rahasya and Yoga Vasistha. They have concepts very similar to the quantum concept Schrodinger Cat experiment. Especially Tripura Rahasya guys. I'm not kidding.
lets say, you are walking on the road all alone while no one is observing you, Your conduct would be somewhat carefree. BUT the very moment you suspect someone is watching you, instantaneously your conduct would change from carefree to rigidity...wont it be so?!..i presume this is what electrons are doing and YES living cells would also exhibit the same behavioral pattern like that of electrons when being observed!
Kindly elucidate a little more
@@KnowtoGrow4354 First things first, I am neither a QP and/or a QM scientist. In my humble understanding, at the most basic level all organisms are made up of atoms, right? And any atom consists of electron, right? May it be an electron passing through the double-slit OR an electron present in a living cell, it would presumably change its behavior upon being observed, right? Microcosm constitutes the Macrocosm, right? Such being the case, isn’t there a possibility of a human, made up of living cells which are in turn made up of atoms, exhibit behavioral change when being observed consciously!?
Please dont mix spirituality with science..
Go bro and learn about schrondinger
Shankracharya stolen buddiest philosphy
@@Himyug859 Buddhist are just a branch of Sanatan Dharma. All powerful political followers of Buddhism made it into a separate religion.
No proof , moreover buddha had a strong influence of upanishadnic rishis .
क्या चाटोगे क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स को लेकर जब मौत सामने खड़ी होगी। फ़ालतू की बकवास ।
किया करोगे यूट्यूब कमेंट्स करके जब मौत हो सामने। सरासर समय की बर्बादी
You are neither spiritual nor a civilized human being...Every knowledge arrives from God, be it the knowledge that gets human free from cycle of birth, death that is Parā Vidyā and the knowledge by dint of which you will know the nature that is Virāt roop of God as per Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad...😂😂😂 Tamiz naam ki koi chiz hai kya apke pass?
@@KnowtoGrow4354 Thanks
Where all our noble prizes have gone? This guy is just throwing in some terms and pretending he understands cutting edge physics also. I am told he has attended some course on theology at Harvard. Nothing to do with science.
Swami Sarvapriyananda ji had already said that he is not a man of physics or genomics. He just quoted eminent Physicist Carlo Rovelli. Don't shout without listening properly
If you want to live under some magic spell of bald head, saffron clad magician so be it.
@@jpelx81May you be illumined.
@@jpelx81if u hv some typical personal enmity against bald head n saffron clad, then keep it with you only, don't chatter over here.
Sad. Either you haven't really understood the Swamiji's response to the question or you are already prejudiced and have therefore taken on an aggressive stance. By the way, I'm not Indian or Hindu and nor do I follow any religious doctrine, but I give credit where it is due and this Swami has brought some hope to the world via his talks and presence on the net. I hope you find peace.
Nagarjuna specifically rejected vedas as a wrong view as did Buddha. If that swami accepted the superiority of Nagarjuna's philosophy he is literally accepting that Vedanta is a wrong view.
You need to open your mind a bit.
@@theunusual4566 you need to open your mind.
@@Prashant-ci7vs study both Advaita and Buddhism, you would get the answer.
But here the problem is that you don't understand either of them, and commenting carelessly.
@@theunusual4566 What you said applies to you. Here is a quote of Buddha from Tevijja sutta:
"..But here *the brahmins proficient in the three Vedas* sink down where they have sat, only to drift apart, while imagining they’re crossing over to drier ground. [ I wonder if this is a satire on the idea of upaniṣad (“sitting near”); even as they affirm their commitment to their texts, they drift apart (visāra) into separate schools and ideologies.] That’s why *the three Vedas of the brahmins are called a ‘salted land’ and a ‘barren land’ and a ‘disaster’* ”