@@masomemaleki389 Of course I do. He's similar to Carlin. His stock in trade is making people of midling intellect feel special about being more in the know and thus, righteous than "the ignorant masses". Without seeing the irony of it
"We" cant do jackshit my friend, only watch; and people in power who can do anything will simply not in order to retain such power. Stop blaming the individual, that's stupid
1:37 convergence towards single price and wage has declined 2:14 Adam Smith: free circulation of labor required for free trade 3:23 Movement of capital has increased
Hey, I would like to now when and where this conference took place, I need this informations to cite it for schoolwork. Could you please tell me if you know ?
Chomsky's Philosophy Este mensaje , es para pedirles si pudiesen ponerles subtítulos en castellano a los vídeos , así podemos disfrutar de este enorme pensador , NOAM CHOMSKY . Muchas gracias .
@@federicadiblasio9348 it's a bit late now I imagine, but here it is: Chomsky, N. (2002). Peering into the Abyss of the Future. Lecture, Stanford University, California.
Partially abridged and paraphrased but identically in meaning. The passage you asked for marked: *Globalization just used neutrally, just means international integration.* Everybody is in favour of it. (...) now term has been apropriated by a narrow sector of power and priviledge to mean theit version of Globalization. Investor rights version. It makes sense for them to own the term , so everybody opposed to their version becomes some kind of primitive who wants to go back to the stone age,
This guy first changed what globalization meant then attacked his own definition. As a linguistics professor either he shouldn't be or is doing it on purpose or he shouldn't be commenting on economics
Most people are against political and/or economic globalisation for many good reasons. International labour movements - and movement - often overstep the mark and end up greatly weakening national labour movements.
Noam Chomsky is right about Globalization because of what Adam Smith said and the Mexico example that he gave. Globalization is just a another word for Americanization. The former Soviet Union tried the same thing and partial succeed by sovietisation or the establishment of communism [see, Julius Evola Revolt Against The Modern World, Part Two, Chapter 37 The End of the Cycle, Subchapters Russia and America and Victor Suvorov The Ice Breaker, The Last Republic, The Day M, The Shadow of Victory, The Purge].
Julius Evola was a demented degenerate. Taking walks around Vienna while it was getting turned to rubble by bombs deserves a Darwin Award, no wonder the shrapnel hit his spine and he became paralyzed from the legs down until the end of his life.
Trade across a national border is different to transporting items across state boarders, obviously. If you engage in basic rudimentary thinking instead of ideological rhetoric you will quickly determine that. He just said that manufacturering items from base materials in a different country to then be imported elsewhere to produce goods is the same as transportation within a country.....a absolute joke of a professor
Immigration is but one of the (and among the less important) reasons why working populations are being decimated in the West. But no party ever talks about globalization or automation.
Tom Martin Movement of labour and capital enabled by economic globalization have 'taken away' jobs especially from the working class. Automation is also a factor which displaced 3 million jobs (if I remember the figures correctly) in US agricultural industry alone since the 60's. Yet the working class are being manipulated to scapegoat immigrants as a source of economic woes.
"Not 'everybody' "Chomsky"... The Left isn't 'everybody', you wish Mr. Now it all..." Not surprising at all that a comment that goes for an ad hominem attack is also one that doesn't have elementary spelling of its focus word.
Edit it again. This was taken a decade ago, when hating globalization of private power and globalization, period which is private power's fault, was not the norm. Try again.
@@dionysianapollomarx nah, it was a big deal a decade ago, it was a big deal two decades ago. There used to be (before Trump) massive protests at every IMF, WTO meeting. It was a big thing to boycott companies who had cruel and unfair work practices overseas. You hear so much less about it now.
@@ragefury1817 actually, no I'm not. I'm talking about the 90s and early 2000s. I actually know nothing about the movement you're talking about, can't even find it on google.. I'm talking about the boycotting of Nike and Nestle etc, of the massive protests against the IMF, WTO that I was a part of. When we still thought we were changing the world by writing letters for Amnesty International, and I was in the process of getting my masters in IR. You don't remember or know of the 1999 Seattle protests? The ones in France? And Geneva?
This mans speeches are worth gold.
he's a demagogue
@@goyonman9655 not really
@@MrFlinchenstein
He is
@@goyonman9655 why you think that?
@@masomemaleki389
Of course I do.
He's similar to Carlin.
His stock in trade is making people of midling intellect feel special about being more in the know and thus, righteous than "the ignorant masses".
Without seeing the irony of it
This man sees things as they are and relates them to us, if we only listened and moved on this we could make the world a much better place.
"We" cant do jackshit my friend, only watch; and people in power who can do anything will simply not in order to retain such power. Stop blaming the individual, that's stupid
Exactly, let's globalise workers rights and wealth. ✊🏾
0:01 Definition
2:06 Less circulation of people and more circulation of capital
Hey man,
I love your videos.
I would appreciate it if you also included the info about the setting of the speeches in your videos.
Thanks for sharing!
1:37 convergence towards single price and wage has declined
2:14 Adam Smith: free circulation of labor required for free trade
3:23 Movement of capital has increased
Thanks a lot
Hey, I would like to now when and where this conference took place, I need this informations to cite it for schoolwork. Could you please tell me if you know ?
+Steph Anie California, March 2002.
Thank you !
Chomsky's Philosophy Este mensaje , es para pedirles si pudiesen ponerles subtítulos en castellano a los vídeos , así podemos disfrutar de este enorme pensador , NOAM CHOMSKY . Muchas gracias .
@@chomskysphilosophy I am not sure what place is this, can you please explain? I need a complete bibliographic reference. Thank you
@@federicadiblasio9348 it's a bit late now I imagine, but here it is: Chomsky, N. (2002). Peering into the Abyss of the Future. Lecture, Stanford University, California.
What did he say at the beginning? I only understand the word 'neutrally'
Partially abridged and paraphrased but identically in meaning. The passage you asked for marked:
*Globalization just used neutrally, just means international integration.* Everybody is in favour of it. (...) now term has been apropriated by a narrow sector of power and priviledge to mean theit version of Globalization. Investor rights version. It makes sense for them to own the term , so everybody opposed to their version becomes some kind of primitive who wants to go back to the stone age,
Who put a thumbs down on this Oh...
This guy first changed what globalization meant then attacked his own definition. As a linguistics professor either he shouldn't be or is doing it on purpose or he shouldn't be commenting on economics
the goloblisation : ::
Most people are against political and/or economic globalisation for many good reasons. International labour movements - and movement - often overstep the mark and end up greatly weakening national labour movements.
❤️🇵🇹❤️
do you have some advices for life, please?... i´m from Paraguay - southamerica 15/09/2020
have fun
marry and reproduce
Noam Chomsky is right about Globalization because of what Adam Smith said and the Mexico example that he gave. Globalization is just a another word for Americanization. The former Soviet Union tried the same thing and partial succeed by sovietisation or the establishment of communism [see, Julius Evola Revolt Against The Modern World, Part Two, Chapter 37 The End of the Cycle, Subchapters Russia and America and Victor Suvorov The Ice Breaker, The Last Republic, The Day M, The Shadow of Victory, The Purge].
globalization is another world for Zionism!
You niggas just quoted a fascist, acting like Chomsky wouldn’t slap your class reductionist asses silly
Julius Evola was a demented degenerate. Taking walks around Vienna while it was getting turned to rubble by bombs deserves a Darwin Award, no wonder the shrapnel hit his spine and he became paralyzed from the legs down until the end of his life.
@@alextvmantvman3894 Hitlerist !
@@alextvmantvman3894 As a pro-palestinian... NO.
Inverted totalitarianism.
Global Britain ha ha hahaha ha Oh. we are f*cked. Anyway global .......
Trade across a national border is different to transporting items across state boarders, obviously. If you engage in basic rudimentary thinking instead of ideological rhetoric you will quickly determine that. He just said that manufacturering items from base materials in a different country to then be imported elsewhere to produce goods is the same as transportation within a country.....a absolute joke of a professor
Immigration is but one of the (and among the less important) reasons why working populations are being decimated in the West.
But no party ever talks about globalization or automation.
????
Tom Martin Movement of labour and capital enabled by economic globalization have 'taken away' jobs especially from the working class. Automation is also a factor which displaced 3 million jobs (if I remember the figures correctly) in US agricultural industry alone since the 60's. Yet the working class are being manipulated to scapegoat immigrants as a source of economic woes.
Except in a convoluted way. Fear about the loss of American jobs to create xenophobia without a systemic view.
Andrew Yang
Not 'everybody' "Chomsky"... The Left isn't 'everybody', you wish Mr. Now it all...
"Not 'everybody' "Chomsky"... The Left isn't 'everybody', you wish Mr. Now it all..."
Not surprising at all that a comment that goes for an ad hominem attack is also one that doesn't have elementary spelling of its focus word.
Edit it again. This was taken a decade ago, when hating globalization of private power and globalization, period which is private power's fault, was not the norm. Try again.
@@dionysianapollomarx nah, it was a big deal a decade ago, it was a big deal two decades ago. There used to be (before Trump) massive protests at every IMF, WTO meeting. It was a big thing to boycott companies who had cruel and unfair work practices overseas. You hear so much less about it now.
@@Mikathedog100 your thinking of the 1970s and the movement was called NAM. check your facts again
@@ragefury1817 actually, no I'm not. I'm talking about the 90s and early 2000s. I actually know nothing about the movement you're talking about, can't even find it on google.. I'm talking about the boycotting of Nike and Nestle etc, of the massive protests against the IMF, WTO that I was a part of. When we still thought we were changing the world by writing letters for Amnesty International, and I was in the process of getting my masters in IR. You don't remember or know of the 1999 Seattle protests? The ones in France? And Geneva?