Ship 31 FAILED Cryo Test, Huge Electric Fire! Why? FAA to Investigate KSC | Episode 39

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
  • Yesterday, at approximately 7:00 PM, SpaceX conducted cryogenic testing on Starship 31 (S31) at Massey's test site. Unfortunately, the testing did not proceed as planned, resulting in a potential failure and subsequent electrical fire. This incident has raised concerns and sparked a thorough investigation.
    During the cryo testing, S31 experienced some major issues, which led to an electrical fire. The exact cause of the failure is still unknown and is currently under investigation. A drone inspection was promptly conducted to assess the damage and gather critical information.
    While the incident may raise concerns, it's essential to acknowledge that setbacks like this are an inherent part of the testing and development process. SpaceX has experienced similar incidents during the early stages of their prototype development, and this incident is likely a minor setback in the grand scheme of their progress.
    For Educational Purpose Only.
    Note: This channel is not affliated with SpaceX anyway.
    Followed CZcams's fair usage policy when reusing content for this video: bit.ly/3OSpiws
    All the videos, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them.
    Chapters:
    0:00 - Intro
    0:17 - Ship 31 Cryo Testing
    2:51 - KSC Launch Site FAA Investigation
    4:50 - EIS Review
    6:40 - Public Opinions
    8:41 - Outro
    Thumbnail Credit:
    LabPadre
    StarshipGazer
    Image Credits:
    SpaceX
    StarshipGazer
    RGV Aerial Photography
    Video Credits:
    LabPadre
    SpaceX
    Starship Gazer
    / starshipgazer
    / @starshipgazer
    RGV Aerial Photography
    / rgvaerialphotos
    / @rgvaerialphotography
    LabPadre Space
    / @labpadre
    #starshiplaunch #spacex #starship
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 103

  • @Kneedragon1962
    @Kneedragon1962 Před 25 dny +43

    Look ~ this is WHY you test. This is not a fail, this is a win. They found an issue long before it became a show-stopper. I would be curious what actually happened, but I guess we're only going to know that if Space-X tell us.

    • @executivesteps
      @executivesteps Před 24 dny +1

      If this were Starliner would you be so…understanding?

    • @warrenwhite9085
      @warrenwhite9085 Před 24 dny

      Starship is another NASA unaffordable, unsustainable, dead-end 1970s tech throwback, 4 yrs late, $410 million per flight, flies every 2 years, and the rocket it flys on isn’t in production anymore.
      Other than that it’s great.
      Defund bloated, pork-driven, failed Federal Agency NASA. Go efficient, innovative, spirited private enterprise SpaceX.

    • @rogerrussell9544
      @rogerrussell9544 Před 24 dny +12

      @@executivesteps Yes, nobody was flying in it, and no whistle blowers died.

    • @Fogmeister
      @Fogmeister Před 24 dny +4

      Better to test and find an issue like this than not test and discover the issue while it’s on its way to orbit with a crew onboard.

    • @Comin_at_U_Live
      @Comin_at_U_Live Před 24 dny

      Unlike the days of NASA with every thing being Top secret.. the public was always treated like mushrooms.. kept in the dark and fed bullshit...

  • @Fatpumpumlovah2
    @Fatpumpumlovah2 Před 25 dny +16

    Normally we have like 8 eyes and 10 cameras each static fire, and here we have some long lost camera out in the boondocks.

  • @phoenixmotorsport647
    @phoenixmotorsport647 Před 24 dny +3

    Why would that cause concern in testing? isnt this the point of testing - to find the flaws before you send that monster to space?

  • @michaeljomy1733
    @michaeljomy1733 Před 25 dny +6

    Thanks for the quick update. My guess is some kind of short circuit with the electrical system....

  • @danielnogrady9004
    @danielnogrady9004 Před 25 dny +14

    Top Notch Company SpaceX, Why do you think they test?!

  • @someguyfromafrica5158
    @someguyfromafrica5158 Před 24 dny +6

    Why can't SpaceX's plans be approved for periods in advance of the current date instead of causing delays???

    • @Fedaygin
      @Fedaygin Před 24 dny +3

      Indeed... 🤔

    • @user-kg2jw3we6b
      @user-kg2jw3we6b Před 24 dny

      as space x takes a lot of risks and some are almost deadly

    • @rogerrussell9544
      @rogerrussell9544 Před 13 dny

      @@user-kg2jw3we6b What dead? Who has died because of SpaceX?

  • @Just1heyU
    @Just1heyU Před 24 dny

    Checks and balances to ensure reliability and longevity is just growing pains. Go SpaceX 🌎

  • @anim8torfiddler871
    @anim8torfiddler871 Před 24 dny +1

    Testing to Failure is the only way to absolutely confirm the integrity or maximum sustainable stress of a developing design. Some industries, like the construction of warships and passenger aircraft, impose much more demanding test regimes than others, because the consequences of failure can result in unacceptable losses.
    At the same time, this week's SEVEN X-class solar flares, almost all of which generated separate Coronal Mass Ejections, seem the likely proximate cause of the Excess static electricity responsible for unanticipated electrical discharges between the tower and the craft. The extraordinary extent of the Auroras, both Northern and Southern, are merely the most VISIBLE signs of Titanic current flows being directed into the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, crust and mantle.

  • @jessec3609
    @jessec3609 Před 24 dny +1

    Thank Gawd it didn’t completely blow up!! Can you imagine😳

  • @diaman_d
    @diaman_d Před 24 dny +2

    small Carrington event with all the recent solar activity ?

  • @alexgemmell7629
    @alexgemmell7629 Před 24 dny +4

    Why is the Federal AVIATION Administration conducting an Environmental review? What is the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY doing? I would prefer the FAA concern itself with flight safety and leave the environment to the EPA.

    • @rogerrussell9544
      @rogerrussell9544 Před 24 dny +6

      Clearly a stalling tactic to punish Elon.

    • @warrenwhite9085
      @warrenwhite9085 Před 24 dny

      This administration weaponizes every Federal Agency to undermine, obstruct Elon Musk & his companies as payback/punishment for exposing administration directed Twitter censorship & for allowing free speech on X.

    • @anim8torfiddler871
      @anim8torfiddler871 Před 24 dny +2

      There are people in the government who dislike the owner/head of the company for his politics.

    • @gregedmand9939
      @gregedmand9939 Před 24 dny

      ​@@rogerrussell9544Musk needs to remember that SpaceX relies a great deal on tax payer funding. If he conducts himself to irritate a huge block of voters, he deserves push back. His campaign to give hate speech and Anti-Semitism a platform on Xitter, isn't winning him any new fans. Even so: the FAA isn't just "punishing" him as some petty campaign. They have a job to do like every government agency.

    • @user-kg2jw3we6b
      @user-kg2jw3we6b Před 24 dny

      They do this with a lot of airports and other launch sites with multiple accidents. this has less to do with sea turtles and more to do with not having humans blow up.

  • @RePetesBees
    @RePetesBees Před 24 dny

    Future craft will be even safer now. SpaceX has been doing a phenomenal job! And at such a fast pace its just absolutely amazing. Everything they do just feels like its so well thought through, right down to the impact on the surrounding area.

  • @WyoSavage1976
    @WyoSavage1976 Před 24 dny +1

    That's why you test.

  • @hawkdsl
    @hawkdsl Před 24 dny +2

    Bad ground.

  • @paulbrunton877
    @paulbrunton877 Před 22 dny

    A failure of electrical testing before full load applied could have caused the fire, or sabotage, but hopefully not, thank goodness the Starship was not full of fuel and lox, someone needs to explain why it happened and who was the electrician. 🤔😯🚀🚀🚀🚀

  • @robertfarr9186
    @robertfarr9186 Před 24 dny +1

    I’m thinking some kind of failure is what everyone has come to expect from elmo and everything he touches.

    • @TheMoneypresident
      @TheMoneypresident Před 24 dny

      As soon as it works he will demand a huge bonus and cash out.

  • @wegder
    @wegder Před 24 dny

    According to Musk, hyperloop would be useful on Mars as no tubes would be needed because Mars' atmosphere is about 1% the density of the Earth's at sea level.

  • @michaelslater8667
    @michaelslater8667 Před 24 dny +8

    another excuse for the FAA to delay issuing a launch license.

  • @alancoker1459
    @alancoker1459 Před 24 dny +1

    Dont need another Challenger mishap

    • @davidbate6346
      @davidbate6346 Před 24 dny

      That was not a mishap. Nasa was notified that the temperature outside was to low for the seals by engineers. The flight controller, most likely under political pressure, let the ship launch.

  • @user-im7sj7gr2v
    @user-im7sj7gr2v Před 24 dny

    Gracias que noooo estaba abordó de la nave estelar. 🥶Thank you nooo I was on board the starchip. 🥶

  • @jerrycris8769
    @jerrycris8769 Před 25 dny +6

    1 million lost, ship 31 to scrap yard! Now ship 32

    • @danharold3087
      @danharold3087 Před 25 dny +5

      Maybe. An electrical fire may not be cause to scrap it.

  • @PDLM1221
    @PDLM1221 Před 24 dny +5

    This is not an issue that’s why they test test test, no story like they said , they’ll fix it.

    • @drosendahl
      @drosendahl Před 24 dny +4

      Of course its an issue, something going wrong is always an issue. But it does not have to be a major one. (Best case scenario, there was a production issue that can be easy fixed with some minor adjustments and more QC. A little bigger issue if it was a design issue that might affect more prototypes, maybe even those that has passed the test earlier)

  • @jessec3609
    @jessec3609 Před 24 dny

    Can you imagine if we were able to just get the FAA approval right away every time!? What starship launch# do you think we’d be on by now?! Hell we could be on the moon by now!🤷‍♂️ just sayin

  • @jeffjeff4477
    @jeffjeff4477 Před 24 dny +5

    Thats why they call them tests

  • @DonaldF73
    @DonaldF73 Před 24 dny +2

    They should move to area51 Groom Lake test site

  • @billsharp8992
    @billsharp8992 Před 23 dny

    I smell a rat.....or perhaps a mouse. There are at least 5 species of rodents living along the Gulf coast of Texas and they all have one thing in common....they love to chew on wiring insulation. Having rodents chew the wiring harness on local vehicles that are in storage is not unusual. Crank up your motorhome after it has been sitting for a while and you might get sparks or smoke. With all the human activity going on at Starbase, rodents are likely in this area and the preassembled wiring harnesses have to stored with great care. Even partially assembled Starships need to be protected from mice and rats.

  • @airgliderz
    @airgliderz Před 24 dny +3

    Where is the big news Artimus / Starliner fail to launch investigation and big launch environmental study?? FJB

    • @Clutch275
      @Clutch275 Před 24 dny

      FJB?? you mean Boeing and ULA???.
      Last I checked Biden is not the president of Boeing or United Launch Alliance...
      MAGAT.... FDJT 20-24 years in prison

  • @john-qq7hb
    @john-qq7hb Před 24 dny +2

    i9f the American Government FAA will not permit SpaceX to test and develop it's rockets without serious regulatory delays, then SpaceX will need to find a country that will permit them to develop the rocket. (China or French Guiana may be top for consideration)

    • @executivesteps
      @executivesteps Před 24 dny

      As long as Musk refunds the $4.1 billion dollars of taxpayer money awarded by the Biden Administration for Starship R&D and construction.

    • @leroy420b
      @leroy420b Před 24 dny

      😂😂 yeah that's not a possibility whatsoever space x has contracts with the United States military and government. They are not allowed to show or give anything to China nor cooperate with China in any way, shape or form

    • @Clutch275
      @Clutch275 Před 24 dny

      send him back to africa.........

    • @Arturo4586
      @Arturo4586 Před 24 dny

      Yes I agree, as a Bolivian, with a knowledge of the infrastructure in La Paz, There is a distinct possibility that in the low populated area, south of Copacabana next to the Copacabana international airport a launch facility can be built, without the interference of the FAA.
      President Luis Arce would have to be asked to clear the way, Keeping in mind that to the west there is a deep water port, Arica , from which an adequate highway exists to San Andrés, allowing structures to be transported.
      Important is that the southern latitude is around 17.5° at a possible site with an elevation about 13000 feet.
      This increases the engine's specific impulse, when larger skirts are used, in addition to a 94% contribution of the earth's equatorial velocity.
      Check this out.
      Copacabana is on the shores of clean lake Titicaca, with a river carrying enough water for the launch pad, Desaguadero is the river .

    • @leroy420b
      @leroy420b Před 12 dny

      ​@@Arturo4586 That is absolutely not possible. SpaceX has contracts for the United States government. We do not allow rocket technology to leave our country, especially not to some country like yours

  • @Clutch275
    @Clutch275 Před 24 dny

    ahhahhahaha

  • @qigong1001
    @qigong1001 Před 24 dny +3

    Put some duct tape on it, it'll be fine.

    • @Wirmish
      @Wirmish Před 24 dny +2

      It's SpaceX, not Boeing...

  • @buzzlightyearg3580
    @buzzlightyearg3580 Před 25 dny +1

    Charlie fire!!!!!!Oh shit co2 extinguisher

  • @larky368
    @larky368 Před 24 dny +1

    These Musk ass-sniffers are hilarious. Every explosion is called a success because they learned another way to avoid an explosion. Do you think maybe we should find a better way to launch rockets other than trial and error?

    • @TheMoneypresident
      @TheMoneypresident Před 24 dny

      The best are when they think he is doing the engineering and paying out of his pocket.

  • @georgeageorgopoulos
    @georgeageorgopoulos Před 24 dny

    USA spaceX,NASA,and others,,,,Dont have Understanding of Rockets and Space Tech!

  • @mfcobb1
    @mfcobb1 Před 24 dny +1

    The same people that hate SpaceX, hate Tom Brady, and Tebow.

    • @Clutch275
      @Clutch275 Před 24 dny

      we dont h8 spacex.. we h8 ellen musty....

    • @larky368
      @larky368 Před 24 dny

      And Motherhood and apple pie.

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537
    @gdutfulkbhh7537 Před 24 dny +2

    When it's a video about Elmo Musk's efforts, I always think the 'K' in KSC is 'Kerbal'.

  • @dhen-marccastillon923
    @dhen-marccastillon923 Před 25 dny +1

    HELLO MAHAL❤ELON DILI MAG AMPO MGA TAWO DAUTAN KAY LOOY TANAN MAWALA SA MARS GA TRAVEL PALAYO LANG NA DIYOS KO GINOO ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @ginog5037
    @ginog5037 Před 24 dny

    Welcome to the Woke environment and DEI...

  • @rogerphelps9939
    @rogerphelps9939 Před 24 dny +4

    Oh dear. Another 6 months of delay. Beginning to sound like Boeing.

    • @XxmillerniaxX
      @XxmillerniaxX Před 24 dny +8

      You do know that ship 30 not 31 is next on the flight line, and it has passed all its tests..

    • @fredmapes8414
      @fredmapes8414 Před 24 dny

      Boing's problem is internal, Space-X's is Biden's, administration.

  • @davidsoom1551
    @davidsoom1551 Před 24 dny +3

    Why didn't the Saturn have all these development problems back in the rocket stone age? Because failure was not an option. Now, with Starship, failure is called success. Waste of taxpayer and investor funds for a vehicle with no real market.

    • @leighganschow5652
      @leighganschow5652 Před 24 dny +2

      Saturn 1 had a fatal fire, killing 3 astronauts, which required a total redesign of the capsule and delaying the program substantially. Your lack of knowledge of history and faith in government (of all things!) Is disturbing.

  • @willevalle9371
    @willevalle9371 Před 25 dny +6

    Space x is taking L after L

    • @mightyoaks77
      @mightyoaks77 Před 25 dny +3

      😂😂😂OK.....

    • @woutgaming9685
      @woutgaming9685 Před 24 dny +5

      W after W you mean, progress=progress

    • @leroy420b
      @leroy420b Před 24 dny +3

      Yeah, taking a nail while cashing big fat checks for being the most advanced space company on Earth. The only company that has reusable rockets you're the one taking the L

    • @rogerrussell9544
      @rogerrussell9544 Před 24 dny +1

      @@leroy420b Sounds like a Boeing hack whining.

    • @Clutch275
      @Clutch275 Před 24 dny +1

      EVERY PENNY SPACEX HAS MADE FROM FALCON IS SPENT ON STARSHIP.. SPACEX IS NOT LIQUID AND SURVIVES ON FEDERAL HANDOUTS... LOL

  • @dynomotivedyno9194
    @dynomotivedyno9194 Před 24 dny +2

    CRAZY the basic shit these guys can't get don't. 5 years behind the moon mission because of Musk!!

    • @user-kg2jw3we6b
      @user-kg2jw3we6b Před 24 dny

      ah SLS is 16 years behind advertised planning without space x.

  • @mikebaldwin5978
    @mikebaldwin5978 Před 24 dny +6

    Starship = Challenger 2.0

    • @leighganschow5652
      @leighganschow5652 Před 24 dny

      Who are these techno Luddites commenting on this thread? You're just a NPC spouting ignorant blathers.

  • @mattblack9069
    @mattblack9069 Před 24 dny +1

    Sabotage no doubt

  • @WiilyDerbbinphlatte
    @WiilyDerbbinphlatte Před 24 dny +2

    Haha! Love it. SpaceX, just leave space flight to those who know what they're doing.

    • @derekmillar5407
      @derekmillar5407 Před 24 dny

      What a dummy ,, if it was not for Musk and SpaceX the USA would not have the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy ,, the most reliable launch vehicle on the planet.
      Just go back to flipping Burgers. 😂✌

    • @BaldGeek83
      @BaldGeek83 Před 24 dny +3

      You love problems? May you have many and enjoy laughing at yourself.. Based on the number of successful launches and landings, OVER 300 for the F9 since 2013, no other gov or company has more or even an equal number. Ergo, no other company or gov knows more about launches AND landings than Musk and SpaceX.
      What disturbs you the most, that SpaceX is a free enterprise or Musk enjoys free speech and voices his own opinion? (Soyuz has over 1,000 launches but NO landings and its cadence has been reduced to almost zero by the success of the F9. Russia is working as hard and fast as it can to create a reusable launch vehicle)