Did Dinosaurs Really Go Extinct?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2024
- Welcome to… Jurassic Pluck
Subscribe: bit.ly/iotbs_sub Twitter: @DrJoeHanson @okaytobesmart
↓ More info and sources below ↓
Most people are taught that dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago when a giant meteor crashed into the Yucatan peninsula. I'm here to tell you that's wrong. Dinosaurs are alive and well today, and you don't have to go to Jurassic World to see them (although hanging out with Chris Pratt would be cool)
We have living dinosaurs all around us. We just call them "birds". Yes. Birds are dinosaurs.
Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/PBS...
The tetrapod playlist: • Playlist
Special thanks to Scott Hartman (www.skeletaldra...) for the great Deinonychus and Archaeopteryx illustrations
More info/sources:
Great Audubon article on dinosaur-bird evolution www.audubon.org...
Dig deeper with this hour-long Yale lecture by Dr. Richard Prum: • 10/8/05 Richard Prum ...
Dr. John Hutchinson's research on dinosaur/bird posture
whatsinjohnsfre...
Chickens wearing prosthetic tails, for science!
journals.plos.o...
T. rex had a wishbone: www.smithsonian...
Did prey grasping of dinosaurs evolve into bird flight stroke? www.ucmp.berkel...
Reconstructing dinosaur sounds www.sandia.gov/...
Great TED-Ed video on the evolution of feathers in dinosaurs: • How did feathers evolv...
Brian Switek on dinosaur feathers: www.smithsonian...
What do birds see? www.nwf.org/new...
Tetrachromacy and feathers in dinosaurs: www.sciencemag....
Have an idea for an episode or an amazing science question you want answered? Leave a comment or check us out at the links below!
Follow on Twitter: / okaytobesmart
/ drjoehanson
Follow on Tumblr: www.itsokaytobe...
Follow on Instagram: / drjoehanson
Joe Hanson - Creator/Host/Writer
Joe Nicolosi - Director
Amanda Fox - Producer, Spotzen IncKate Eads - Associate Producer
Andrew Matthews - Editing/Motion Graphics/Animation
Katie Graham - Director of Photography
John Knudsen - Gaffer
Theme music: "Ouroboros" by Kevin MacLeod
Other music via APM
Stock images from Shutterstock, stock footage from Videoblocks
Birds of paradise clips via PBS Nature
A giant rooster is more terrifying than a T. rex.
Helluva wake-up call too
Guess nobody ever heard of a cockatrice.
zeiitgeist The Mythological Chicken-Lizard beast?
Blühende Blume Yes, the giant feathered chicken lizard thing that breathes fire.
Oh yeah, it breathes fire, that too.
Safe to say that the asteroid robbed us of some epic fried chicken..
Huge drumsticks
Or saved us from being epic fried not-so-chicken chicken
😂😂
KFC
KFD
Beefy chicken
Remember, kids. When the bully from school calls you a chicken, just remember that chickens come from dinosaurs, and you can just eat that bully's face any time you want.
Kk
Moonbeam ... that chickens _are_ dinosaurs ...
GojiPlayz56 KKK
+alhanaei a They evolved from dinosaurs, and they are dinosaurs! Theyre just a new spiecies...
Joshua Lowrie Maybe two new species.
"i'm so glad birds don't have teeth anymore"
me, thinking of geese: "You sure?"
Geese don't technically have teeth, they have tomia, keratin serrations lining their bills and mouths.
@@richardblazer8070 oh that's neat! Still terrifying though XD
E
T9,q8aop
Goosanders: U forgot me
I have teeth
"NOT AS SCARY?"
A giant chicken is pretty scary ... I already am afraid of the normal ones ..
***** Cassowaries have killed people.
***** Do you know about terror birds? Those things were horrifying, and they died out only about 2.5 million years ago.
***** Got that right. Velociraptors with feathers. Check out Jacanas as well.
Me too
Dave Power #6 But terrorbirds were actually herbivores
So, in a sense, Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds was the original Jurassic Park.
This comment needs more recognition.
@@alexwuntch3368 100%
Today the idea of the movie could seem dumb, yet the suspense is real and the movie is great.
Saw it as a kid and never really liked birds , long before I learned they were dinosaurs.
Totally different.
@@ChristmasLore Observation: birds ARE dinosaurs.
So, KFC should be changed into Kentucky Fried Dinosaurs.
Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo
Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo
Rata Touille KFD
although people might confuse it for Kentucky Fried Dicks
XD
Rata Touille kfd Lol
Rata Touille ha that's funny lol
"You'll never look at birds the same way" - Dr. Alan Grant, jurassic park
actually some goose species have teeth and some even have them on their tongue
Dapper Parraper wtf I’m scared lol
I didn't think they were teeth, more like serrated edges on their beaks.
thanks, i hate it
thats horrifying
i have anatidaephobia now
I like the ending, they are not LIKE dinosaurs they ARE dinosaurs. Good stuff
@Martin G lmao then what's YOUR answer since apparently the most scientifically plausible theory is completely false
@Martin G Good joke hahahaha
@Martin G
I love how your only argument is saying: "Sorry, It's false"
In that case here is my argument.
God isn't real.
They are not dinosaurs. That's such a stupid thing to say. How does anyone with a brain believe the stupidity presented in this video. Watch it again and see if one single fact is presented. There are no facts presented in this video. Nothing but fantastical opinions.
@Martin G evolution is a fact.
Well in 1993 the theory of dinosaurs having feathers wasn't as strong as today so what they do is now their just continuing without the feathers so it not weird how they just randomly get feathers.
Finally, someone understands
No wonder why I used to think that velociraptors might’ve well evolved into 🦎 but nope they are related to birds 🦅
JP scientists also used amphibian dna to fill up the holes in broken dino dna. Afaik, there are no feathery amphibians. So the continuation of featherless or proto plumage dinosaurs makes sense.
On another note, while the Velociraptors are assumed to be Mongoliensis because of the supposed location the DNA was found, it's actually based off Velociraptor Antirrhopus aka Deinonychus.
So the size discrepancy often brought up is a non-argument too.
JP was still ahead of it's time as doctor Grant actually acknowledged the fact that velociraptors were more like birds and less like other reptiles, also he acknowledged that brachiosaurus and other dinosaurs were warm blooded.
3:06 The most hilarious experiment was actually when scientists put ants on stilts to see if they counted their steps
And do they?
@@cuca_ they do
Honey! a dinosaur hit the window again!
XD
Sparkles-kun fuxake
... I wouldn't mind a chicken of that size. Imagine how much meat there would be on a chicken wing!
Emil Tang The muscles would need to be strong enough to support it's entire weight, so the meat would be tough and chewy.
Kinky Fish Which is my favorite kind
RoScFan **Perv face**
Kinky Fish Wouldn't a chicken that size simply not fly at all? Chickens can barely fly at their current size anyway.
Emil Tang Err...what? No-one mentioned flight.
Holy crap this intro was phenomenally well done! Props to whoever put that together
I've said for years my chickens are yard dinosaurs...
Lmao
Actually, many dinosaurs being feathered was not an agreed upon conclusion when the first two Jurassic Park movies were made, not becoming widely discussed intil the late 90s, and not being widely accepted until the 2000s, AFTER Jurassic Park III was made. And Velociraptor itself wasn't confirmed to have feathers until 2007, well after the films were made.
The first book itself actually explicitly had a deliberately built-in loop hole for scientific inaccuracies which was discussed, and argued about by the characters, in the book. The scientists didn't know what the DNA was, so they found out by growing it and seeing what they got. When it wasn't what they expected or wanted, they tweaked the DNA and grew another dino from it. So since it was based on their expectations, it naturally wouldn't be accurate. This was not discussed in the first three films but got mentioned in a very clearly laid our rant by Dr. Wu in Jurassic World complaining about being forced to make the park dinosaurs look "cooler".
And... the Velociraptor itself was not the Velociraptor mongoliensis mentioned in this video, but a new species (created by the park scientists), in the same genus, called Velociraptor antirrhopus that was actually based on Deinonychus antirrhopus in the books (due to a, now rejected, idea being mulled over at the time that the two species were in the same genus) and the newly discovered but unnamed (at the time) species Utahraptor ostrommaysorum in the movies. Which nearly got called Utahraptor spielbergi in honor of the film.
good info
But Jurrasic World has no excuse!
Actually, it does. Remember at the end of the movie they said that all of their dinosaurs are modified to look cooler. So the "Velociraptors" in the movie have had their feathers genetically removed to look cooler.
+Nevan Lowe I meant that they can't say that "this is 100% velociraptor" and they have to make up dumb excuses to make there Dinos not fluffy.
+Anthony Di Santo bruh... in the movies they specifically talk about how the their dinosaurs are different than the prehistoric dinosaurs because they had to use DNA of living animals like frogs to complete the various DNA sequences.
So you're telling me the national bird of the US is a dinosaur? Dope.
Well... ANY national bird is...
@Ameen Shindoli they are not lizard but giant killer bird
All national birds would be.
So....... We humans eat chickens, who’re actually Dinasaurs. Which means we tiny guys eat the once strongest predators on the planet? Savage.
K. Reimin
No, because birds aren’t “the strongest predators.” Ik this is a joke, but I just wanna clarify dinosaurs aren’t all preds.
TAC TIMES I’m tired of you, just shut the frick up.
K. Reimin
No, he responded to dozens of comments with this same exact copy-paste message.
K. Reimin it’s just kind of annoying that if you look on almost all of the comments that are saying the exact same thing over and over again spamming
RinsibleRelic - Gaming, Geckos, Hedgehogs and more!
Especially since they’re wrong.
5:30 polly want a lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂
So if i'm understanding this correctly. There is a very strong possibility. That dinosaurs were delicious.
I wanted to replied to the situation of t by e monarchy holdinnn
Stephen - You didn't pay attention to the video.
What would the actual muscles and flesh of dinosaurs have been like? In other words, would they taste like chicken?
Peregrine JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE PLS ANSWER THIS GUY.
Red, as they're heavy and needed a lot of oxygen to energize their muscles, which requires a lot of blood. I'm not an expert, but I've read somewhere that birds got white meat for endurance and light weight. High likely that it tasted more like beef.
Singleraxis is probably correct. Ostrich meat tastes similar to beef.
Maybe somewhere between ostrich and crocodile meat
+Singleraxis wrong , they do not were heavy , hollow bones and air sacs inside like the birds ,
Apparently, T-Rex was meant to of had feathers, which personally makes it even more terrifying.
Yeah, think a giant kiwi with a rat tail and a mouth full of 6 inch teeth.
Ryoushi Anschauer it looked more like a mane
@@ryoushii Giant Cassowary
@@aravdogra4192 Actually with some of the imprints we have found showing scales I wouldn't be surprised if the rex were slightly feathered more towards the backside.
More like a giant chicken.
“Life finds a way”
“Life Uh, finds a way”
wish your videos were like an hour long, I can watch these all day.
I feel you there.
Ok, dinosaurs had feathers uh-huh some dinosaurs fly.. There were birds, they didn’t fuse into them, did you even listen or even watch it?
TAC TIMES this wasn’t even related to the dinosaurs 🤬
Same
Imagine a flying Dinosaur with wings. Sounds badass? It's called a bird.
Captain Stroon XD
Now imagine an eagle, a vulture, a hawk, or one of those giant patrels if they were the size of an elefant or even the size of a car. You wouldn't want to step outside...
Captain Stroon ever heard of pterosaurs?
like pterodactyl? never knew it started with a P
uncle freddie Pterosaurs are flying reptiles NOT dinosaurs
This is such a good episode! Just the combination of great graphics and editing and breadth of content was fab!
Sally Le Page Thanks Sally!
Even with feathers dinosaurs have a very Distinct and unique feel to them. I surprisingly like both 'versions' of the idea of the Dinosaurs alot.
so does this mean a T-Rex tastes like chicken? I'm sorry I'll leave now.
😂😂
Are you serious
czcams.com/video/U2OwT6ZUKOU/video.html
@@BestBibleStories bruh
@@BestBibleStories SHUT UP YOU UNEDUCATED BASTARD
2:20 Deinoychus was not a scaly reptile either. It was a warmblooded heavily feathered raptor.
Facts. It was very active if that is the case.
XD was so confused on the opening sketch ddnt realize it was Joe, I was like, Who the hell is that guy? I dnt remember him being in jurassic park XD
Me reading thumbnail: don’t laugh, don’t laugh
Sus
Go ahead, I won't judge.
HOLY MOLY, I ATE A DINOSAUR THIS MORNING.
I JUST ATE A COW ...
oh wait.
I'm addicted to dinosaur flesh specifically from the carnivorous saurischains because for some reason, sauropods are saurischains and not ornithischains like every other herbivorous dinosaur. This explains why Spinosaurus is my favourite dinosaur.
Goku Sonfan Why do you eat meat in the morning....
Goku Sonfan LOL
MrAsiris23 eggs are not meat😂
This video was criminally short. We need more dino-birds in our lives.
So my grandmother is Dinosaur farmer
Oh god , the dinos , they have learned to play amogus
sussy
I think the reason the JP movies go without the plumage is that the first conclusively feathered fossils were found after the first movie, and by then they had already gone without feathers in the movies and wanted to keep a coherent aesthetic.
I can't believe you did that. I've always made jokes about how Jurassic park would be way less scary if the T-rex sounded like a chicken because there really is no accurate way to know what they sounded like and it's their closest ancestor.
So... Since flying birds are relatives of dinosaurs, that kind of makes them....
Dino-soars!
😁
。-。
Not really. Dinosaurs are a clade, so everything that came from dinosaurs are dinosaurs, by definition. Fish are not a clade, so even though humans came from fish, we're not fish.
@@Raison_d-etre Come off it, he's just having some fun.
@@christopherherr7561 - It's stupid.
@@Raison_d-etre wait, so nothing is a fish?
It's become my life's work now correcting this error. Nothing "GOES" extinct. Things "BECOME" extinct. Being extinct is a 'state' that a species reaches, they don't 'go there', it's not a place. Using the verb 'go' with extinction is like saying "I lost my job so I went depressed". You would always say "I lost my job so I became depressed". Tell your friends.
Who was that masked man?
Isn't pedantry fun!
ARK Survival Evolved brought my childhood interest in dinosaurs back stronger than ever.
same
Too bad it isn't scientifically accurate in its portrayals of the animals. I suppose it's up to the player to decide if they want to study further I suppose!
Still a fun game though.
Dinosaurs did not evolve into birds. Anyone who says so is either stupid or lying. It's so sad to see nearly 2 million people are subscribed to such ridiculous nonsense. Feel free to subscribe to my channel if you have any interest in truth.
Idk if that will make anyone sub to you if you say “Anyone who says that is either stupid or lying” that’s not nice.
TheDodoEnthusiast yussssss ark is amazing I am addict to it
Honestly I ALREDY knew that they didn’t go extinct but I wanted to hear him talk about it anyway
alredy?
Yeah they live in Africa still
Just a note: The makers of Jurrasic Park did not know that some Therepods had feathers when the first movie(s) came out, so in the newer ones they wanted to keep the style. They found their mistake, but they wanted to keep the style so it didn't seem weird =U
Alligators and Komodo look alikes were around when dinosaurs were alive. Sloths and beavers were 20 feet tall once upon a time.
I've always thought dinosaurs had feathers. Not all of them but some of the depictions of them always looked like they would look better with feathers. And it always bugged me as a kid that they knew what color dinosaurs were until i learned they were pretty much guessing
yeah, looking at a velociraptor without feathers, I just feel like it's naked, velociraptor doesn't strike me as scaly
t rex does strike me as scaly though
This might have been one of your most well-done episodes yet. Creativity and editing was just superb.
(thumbnail for context) THEY ARE STILL *WHAT?*
⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌
⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌
⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌
⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪
⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡
⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐
⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔
⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘
⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎
⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗
⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷
⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟
⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰
⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊
⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌
⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁
⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀
⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀
⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟
⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾
⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽
(bum) bum bum bum bum bum bum bum... badumbum
That cold open was one of the funniest I've ever seen
Yes! I love this video! When my dad rescued a baby duck I told people that we had a baby dinosaur. :)
Anyway, want more proof that birds are dinosaurs? Look up the Hoatzin. It's a bird that's alive today that is still born with claws! It looses its claws by adulthood, but as a baby it uses them to climb, which is helpful in case it falls out of its nest into the water that it lives above. Isn't that so cool! :D
Just googled it and the scientific names is Opisthocomus hoazin. They are indeed awesome and look like phoenixes lol
Gustavo Ramos Oh my god, they do! I never noticed that before! To me they look like dinosaurs during the transition to birds.
Cool! I've never seen those before! Thanks! Hey, have you ever seen the claws on a plucked ostrich/emu wing? Check this out: blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/ratites-in-trees-the-evolution-of-ostriches-and-kin-and-the-repeated-evolution-of-flightlessness-ratite-evolution-part-ii/
craig youngman Holy shit! I had no idea there were still clawed adult dinosaurs! This makes me so happy! :D
Never heard of those things before but yeah...almost like a baby Archaeopteryx! (Well not quite, but you know what I mean.) As for ostriches...you ever seen one of those things in person? ONE good look at a bird at that size, with the same scaly legs they've always had but scaled way up from the little brown birds on your porch, and you don't have to be told by scientists--you KNOW you're in the presence of a dinosaur.
I mean, technically you are every time you're near any bird ever...but you know what I mean. Make it bigger, walking, and even _shaped_ like some dinosaurs (Struthomimus aka _ostrich mimic_, anyone?) and suddenly bam! a big ugly mean bird becomes a dino with a fluffy bit in the middle. :)
Waait what? mammals are technically "older" than reptiles? I always thought that was the other way round.
Kram1032 To put it most accurately, the *common ancestor* of all mammals branched off back then, that's not quite the same as saying mammals suddenly sprang into being
It's Okay To Be Smart well I suppose so but I thought the common ancestor of mammals came after the common ancestor of reptiles. Or to say it differently, that there already have been "proto-reptiles" which later branched off into actual reptiles and "proto-mammals".
But apparently not?
Kram1032 Both reptiles and mammals split off from basal amniotes. As these basal amniotes started diverging, they started to resemble what we see today. But actually, these two lineages split off at exactly the same time (and this is a necessary part of cladistics). You could say that "mammals are older than reptiles", but that's not really true, as the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of reptiles split at exactly the same time. And really, what is a mammal? Dimetrodon, the reptile-like synapsid, is actually on the "mammal" side of the synapsid/sauropsid divide. But that doesn't mean it was a mammal. If you include it as a mammal (which it isn't), then it's older than the dinosaurs. But if you include the proto-dinosaurs with the dinosaurs, then they go back farther, too. This is similar to how a lungfish is more related to a dog than to a shark. But a lungfish is not a dog, of course...just like proto-mammals (basal synapsids) were not mammals. (Anyway, you are correct that animals _resembling_ reptiles in form were around before animals resembling mammals in form, although some _reptile-like animals_ were actually on the line to becoming mammals...or in most cases dying off without leaving descendants.) I hope this helps! Also, feel free to check this out:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amniote#Cladogram
Rationalific I see, that makes sense. Thanks for this detailed explanation :)
Kram1032 No problem!
When the asteroid showed up all the dinos disappeared. The asteroid, who had been hoping for a good fight, asked the locals "What are you chicken?"
@Ameen Shindoli Those are the reptilians, dinosaurs aren't reptiles, try again.
@@Dexuz wait, they are not reptiles?
@@paulusrafaelis4337 No they aren't the thing ks that reptile is not a taxonomical name at all, the scientifical community doesn't use it because its unnacurate.
Dinosaurs are related to birds, not to lizards.
@@Dexuz so whats the right taxonomical name for them?
@@paulusrafaelis4337 dinosaurs, there are no other taxonomical names for them as they are their own clade, because if dinosaurs were reptiles then so would mammals be since mammals evolved from reptiles
4:00 when the dinosaur fell there was a fire work outside my house. And it was perfect timing
You guys are doing an amazing job with the videos. They are entertaining and appealing for people of all ages.
boy am I glad Canada geese don't have teeth.
Actually chickens (I'm not sure if they're the only birds) have teeth and claws at one point when they're developing in the egg
Technically, that's not true. Chickens only develop teeth when the talpid2 gene expresses itself in the embryo. The problem is that talpid2 is lethal and the embryo is automatically terminated before birth.
I hate geese normally.
SkyWolfAlpha where I live geese do have teeth. I felt it on my butt once ;-; still scared of water birds.
They DO have teeth. The also have teeth on the sides of their tongues. The inside of a goose's mouth is terrifying.
god I love studying birds and dinosaurs. did you know that birds could be considered reptiles? biologists use two classification systems, linnaean and phylogenetic. under the linnaean system, which classified things based off features, birds aren't reptiles. but under the phylogenetic system, which classifies things based off ancestry, birds are indeed reptiles. in fact birds closest living relatives are actually crocodiles. each of these systems have good uses and are used frequently. so, not only are birds living breathing dinosaurs, they could also be considered reptiles. a sparrows or bluejays closest non bird relative is a crocodile and I think that's so wild
Phylogenetic is still the best because you can map the Linnaean classification in the phylogenetic but you can not map the phylogenetic in the Linnaean classification.
Phylogenetic is also objective, conclusive, and consistent.
This makes perfect sense. anyone who spends time around birds can really see it. Anyone see a shoehorn bill? those things look like living dinos. Also nightmare fuel to look at them.
Have seen a aseel they are the cool looking chickens
This explains how the cuccos in the legend of zelda can kill you so easily.
The parasaurolophus is my favorite dino… it’s just so neat looking with the crest on its head😀
Chickens get hypnotized and freeze from seeing a line drawn on the ground, and a dinosaur is a chicken.
So...
Easiest way to survive a dinosaur encounter?
Draw a line on the ground and that "big chicken" will freeze.
Bassicly survival tactics in mesozoic
Very unlikely but it wouldn't matter...a 5+ tons predator wouldn't waste time and stamina for trying to hunt a small and not enough nutritional animal. So if you wouldn't invade their territory (in case they were territorial) they shouldn't mind you.
Lunch - He never said that dinosaurs are chickens.
dinosaurs aren't chickens, chickens are dinosaurs
Kinda sus thumbnail
among sus
AMOGUSSSSS
sussy
"I'm so glad birds don't have teeth any more"
Then came to my mind a duck 😢
Huh?
the roar of the bird was sooo incredible awsome
Dinosaurs never roar
Clon King Fun fact: that roar was made from an elephant sound for The movie JP
*in its head* I am birb. HEAR ME ROARRRR!!! *cockadoodledoo* whoops....
When I was in 6th grade in 1971-72, I wrote a report titled "T-Rex was a Big Chicken" . I received an F and science was my favorite subject. I compared terapods, Archaeopteryx and chickens and argued for 30 minutes of why my arguments were sound.The teacher only raised my grade to a D-. I'm actually glad she gave me a D- cause now I feel fully vindicated and have a good story to tell.
geese are all the proof you need
Sister Hecate they are EVIL
Seagulls are more evil
Hissing bastards.
i mean they dont have true teeth but close enough
still TERREFYING
I'm being nit-picky but: In the beginning of the video he says turtles were more related to lizards and snakes (lepidosaurs), but this is only one hypothesis, and there is so much recent evidence placing them with (or as a sister taxon to) archosaurs. There are so many hypotheses to turtle phylogeny, too, so it kinda makes me uncomfortable to see a science video try and state something like that as fact when scientists are constantly butting heads about it.
Anyway, it's not the main point of the video, but it kinda urks me lol.
(Also you guys talk about archeopteryx as a transition from other more dinosaur-y theropods and modern birds, but it wasn't even technically a bird. I think there's evidence now that birds are more closely related to velociraptors? Could be wrong with that one, though.)
Well, _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds than it is to _Velociraptor_. Search up a phylogeny of Maniraptora.
Maybe in some phylogenies. I'm not an expert in that subject (hence the "i think" part), but I had an ornithologist tell me there was recent evidence that velociraptors were more closely related to modern birds. Phylogeny changes over time with more evidence, so who knows.
The _current scientific consensus_ is that _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds. I wouldn't trust an ornithologist; they generally don't have a lot of background in palaeontology.
That's fine but considering I stated it as a "could be wrong, not sure" statement and admitted I didn't know a lot about it, you probably could have responded with a bit less attitude. Maybe you didn't mean to come across that way, but the italics and "don't trust other scientists I know better" message was a little harsh and could have been stated in a nicer tone when trying to educate someone who's admitting their ignorance. But thanks for the correction.
Emphasis and a general statement that is usually true, but I can't speak on behalf of my audience.
It's Okay To Be Second
and first
In defense of Jurassic Park, the original was released in 1993 and it wasn't until 2008 that paleontologists noticed quill knobs on a velociraptor's forearm fossil, thus proving they had feathers. Granted, Archaeopteryx was discovered in 1861, but paleontologists have been slow to accept changing perceptions about dinosaurs (for example, many theropods having feathers, more bird-like than reptile-like, semi-warm blooded). It's good to be skeptical to major changes in science, but all I'm saying is that that impacted in filmmakers' decisions in Jurassic Park.
Those clever girls should've been covered in feathers...
AMONG US??? SUS!!!
sus
That means dino nuggets are made of real dinosaur meat
It indeed does. Thanks for planting that thought in my head.
Dinosaurs would’ve tasted more like beef or crocodile, just because there related to birds doesn’t mean there the exact same.
@@jgthejason8089nope. Birds ARE dinosaurs.
@@shattermelon496that’s not the point of the comment, I meant as a reply dinosaurs would have tasted more like red meat, at least the bigger ones, despite them being much closer to birds, but their meat wasn’t the exact same.
The way he says archaeopteryx hurts me...Great video regardless!
I know! It's like fingernails on a chalkboard.
They are still AMONG US 😳😰📕$U$
SUS
sussy
Oml that intro was really really well made
65 million years ago lol. He needs to learn a lot from ken ham
+DOUBLEAGENTcity sarcasm?
+Karlo Marcos Reyes lol yes
DOUBLEAGENTcity xD
It isn't exactly 65, its different in some books (65.5) and...
Miguel pmpm the asteroid impacted 67 my
Big animals start to going to extintion between the impact and after the Mesozoic
Yes, we had land's runners crocodilians after the KT and maybe some non avian dinos survive few time after that mark of 65 my
But.... mammal's revolution and unfavorable conditions let to their extintion
Time to enjoy eating our past treat , chicken 😎 it tastes like dinosaur , smell like a dinosaur , it is classified as a dinosaur....
Just enjoy the juice of revenge!!!
So much fun! Robert Bakker deserves a great deal of the credit for the shift in view of the bird - dinosaur relationship. "The Dinosaur Heresies" came out circa 1980,and as good science so often does, predicted the future and was vindicated. Shortly after,a treasure trove of Chinese dinosaur fossils with ample evidence of feathers was discovered.
It's unwise to use the term "Mammals" in context of tetrapod evolution as Mammaliaformes is only a crown group. The animals you're thinking of when you said "Mammals" are basal synapsids. All mammals are synapsids, but not all synapsids are mammals. _Dimetrodon_, Gorgonopsians, _Dicynodon_, _Edaphosaurus_, _Cynognathus_, and kin are all basal synapsids. Yeah, they're the ancestors of mammals but that doesn't make them mammals proper. Mammal refers to any synapsid within the crown group Mammaliaformes so any synapsids outside of this group are not mammals and are usually just called Stem-mammals, Mammal-grade synapsids, mammal-line pelycosaurs, etc.
Just make sure the synapsid is actually within Mammaliaformes before you call it a Mammal.
Kawaii Dinosaurs!
Come on Japan, I'm waiting
See: Dinosaur King. It's already a thing.
I already know it :P
But we need more!!!
Gojira
You will see godzilla in Japan
You Are Umasou
Dinosaurs are _AMONG US_ 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖
among us
sus
dinosaurs among us? idk man sounds kinda
SUS
I pointed to a robin outside the window and told my 7 year old niece "Look! There's dinosaur". lol
Amogus
@@phyclopsphyclops
Sus
@@zenmaster8826 What?
@@phyclopsphyclops
Amogus
5:31 "Polly want a lawyer!" LOL!
A- AMONG US!!!
AMONG US!!!!!!!!!!
SUS
As a bird lover, it’s time to show this video to everyone who thought birds are not dinosaurs.
Who cares that you're a bird lover?
@@jonhohensee3258 Rude.
@@archive2500 - Oh my goodness. 😑
So, raptors were raptors? #MindBlown #PenisInWait
Boglenight “pen is in wait”, please say it was that....
May-Fly The Protogen if he would have meant that he would have typed is like this(Is) and not like this (is)
Maybe I'm just too high but that bit with the tiny bird roaring like a t-rex had me fkn rolling lmao
If birds are dinosaurs, then by transitive property, your mom is a bird!
think about that one for a second.
Wow... looking back, this is the stupidest think i have ever commented. I know birds are different from humans, I'm not a moron. It was meant to play off the insult of calling someone a dinosaur, meaning they're really old. But this is just stupid....
I'm ashamed that I'm alive.
I would delete this comment, except that I deserve to suffer, knowing it's out there, haunting my existence.
lol i gotta use that one on some jerks sometime soon. 😂 I'll be sure to write it down *dead serious rn*
If I hunt birds, then I'm a dinosaur hunter.
If I farm chickens, then I'm a dinosaur *FARMER!!!!!*
Raptor Herder!!!
6 minutes just to say “No. birds are theropods, a type of dinosaur.”
Theropod is just a classification of dinosaurs based on their bone structure. Technically there are still theropods although majority of birds have 4 toes aposed to 3 toes. A better term would be *avian* dinosaurs which is modern day birds following the evolutionary traits of the archaeopteryx.
Ethan Saraiva big brain
Birds are birds, a type of dinsaur. Fixed it.
@@ethan.saraiva actually archaeopteryx was related, but not really an ancestor of the bird lineage, kind of like gorgonopsids were mammal like but branched off before mammals
@@ethan.saraiva they are still theropds, but they have derived characteristics. It's the same way we're mammals, but rather than having fur like are the ancestral characteristics of mammals, we have hair. It was just modified a bit, however, we are still mammals.
1:01 😂😃 roar little bird! 😆
0:27 HEY HEY JURASSIC CHICKEN PARK IS MY IDEA DON'T YOU TAKE IT!!!!
K
"not as scary but scientifically speaking, it makes sense"
-talking about giant chicken
*square cube law tho*
@A Thing Brilliant, I've been waiting two whole years.. but now I know that my opinion is finally valid. Thankyou my friend, I owe you one
@A Thing thanks man
4d beings have to deal with square-cube-tesseract law
In jurassic park they didnt use feathers cause the dinosaurs werent perfect they where clones not natural dinos is my theory
Feathered dinosaurs weren't really accepted until the early-mid 2000's, so Jurassic Park was actually pretty accurate for its time. Jurassic World attempts to explain these "inaccuracies" when Dr. Wu explains that many of the animals don't actually resemble the real thing, and InGen was more interested in attracting visitors than being scientifically accurate (also the whole weaponized raptor subplot wouldn't have worked with 'real' velociraptors).
Yeah, you're right about the reason the dinosaurs were featherless. It was the amphibian DNA that did it. During the lab tour scene where the baby raptor is born Dr Satler questions how Henry Wu knows what specific dinosaur it is and he responds with "we don't know until they hatch". Basically, the movie explains to the viewer that the scientists don't even know what dinosaurs are actually being born and what they will look like. That scene is also the key to understanding that the raptors aren't even Velociraptors. Stephen Spielburgh and Michael Chriton knew that they weren't, that was the point. The entire book and movie is basically a case why we shouldn't mess with genetics because even when we think we have control, we really have none.
A knee high velociraptor still sounds absolutely terrifying.
A land pirrania
3:24 Excuse me, what, wait a second, WHAT?
5ick5imon The name "Velociraptor" sounds cool, so they used it, despite the fact that Velociraptors were about the size of turkeys. They probably could have used Utahraptor, the largest of the dromaeosaurids, except that it wasn't found until 1993, and they filmed the movie in 1992. (Fun fact, the only known species is Utahraptor ostrommaysorum, but for a while, it was going to be called Utahraptor spielbergi. Spielberg didn't fund the research like they thought he would, though.) Deinonychus would have been closer than Velociraptor, as it could be up to 11 feet long, but that would have been a harder name to say.
5ick5imon You sir might need some new info on dinnosaurs.
Spinnosaurs is way different, many had feathers, T-Rex even had some, pterodactyls and others aren't dinnosaurs, etc...
Im sorry
5ick5imon There are some good comments already (and I also posted another one you can search for), but the short answer is that the "Velociraptor" in the movie was based off of "Deinonychus" (which was occasionally also known as Velociraptor). In fact, the small dinosaur known as Velociraptor is only found in Asia, while the larger Deinonychus was found in America, so they couldn't have been excavating that small Asian variant in the movie. Deinonychus was quite a bit larger than Velociraptor, but still not quite Jurassic Park size. However, Utahraptor is at least as large if not larger than the "Velociraptors" in the movie.
5ick5imon We can also consider that Hammond's park bred monster hybrids, not actual dinosaurs.
5ick5imon Dinosaurs similar to velociraptors in Jurassic Park include Deinonychus. Large human-sized raptors did exist, although they were probably feathered as well. Just not velociraptors. Deinonychus lives in North America, Velociraptors in China.
We can say most dinosaurs went extinct. But then the therapods evolved and branched out. Dinosaurs still rule the roost!
No seriously, look at parrots, they’ve got their humans wrapped around their claws.
Great video by the way.
Non-avian dinosaurs died out. A small number of avian dinosaurs survived and irradiated.
Their CLAWS?
@@jonhohensee3258 Yes. 😜
@@spacecat3198 - That doesn't make sense.
Dinosaurs are birds. Birds are dinosaurs that made it.
You have it mixed up on the first part
dinosaurs are not birds. birds are a type of theropod & a triceratops or ankylosaurus isn't a theropod.
0:40 "What have they got in there? King Kong?" - Ian Malcom