Hello, thank you for this video. But, may i ask a question? If we make a tree diagram structure of Incomparable? I was confused about the root word? IN COMPARA ABLE? CAN YOU HELP ME
That means transitive verb, and it is a type of verb that requires one or more objects to complete its meaning. In other words, a transitive verb is an action verb that acts upon something or someone. The object receives the action of the verb.For example:"She read the book." ("read" is the transitive verb, "the book" is the object)"He kicked the ball." ("kicked" is the transitive verb, "the ball" is the object)Without the object, the sentence would be incomplete or unclear:"She read." (What did she read?)"He kicked." (What did he kick?)
To create a syntactic structure tree, we must first understand what a sentence is made of - words! Sentences are constructed from words. Consider the following sentence: "The cat is sleeping on the mat." To construct a syntactic structure tree, we must first identify the major parts of speech: nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections. In this sentence, we can identify the following parts of speech- "cat" (noun), "is sleeping" (verb phrase), "on" (preposition), and "mat" (noun). Next, we need to group these words based on their relationships in the sentence. For example, "The cat" is a noun phrase, and "is sleeping on the mat" is a verb phrase. We then draw a tree that separates each word or phrase based on its relationship with the others. For example, "The cat" would be drawn as a branch from the main sentence node, and "is sleeping on the mat" would be another branch. Within the "is sleeping on the mat" branch, we would draw a sub-branch for "is sleeping" and another for "on the mat." In this way, we can develop a syntactic structure tree that accurately represents the relationships between words and phrases in a sentence. I hope it helps!
Dear professor,I'm an english linguistics student and I want to know what's the difference between the syntactic structure tree (Binding theory) and the syntactic structure tree (X-Bar theory) ?!
I can clarify the differences between the syntactic structure trees of Binding Theory and X-Bar Theory as a professor of English linguistics. Pronouns and other anaphoric phrases, including reflexive pronouns, are understood in sentences according to the binding theory. According to the binding theory, a pronoun can only be understood as referring to a specific entity if certain requirements are met. These requirements are based on the grammatical connections between the pronoun and other sentence components, such as clauses and noun phrases. According to the binding theory, a pronoun can only be understood as referring to a specific entity if certain requirements are met. These requirements are based on the grammatical connections between the pronoun and other sentence components, such as clauses and noun phrases. Binding Theory's syntactic structure tree uses labeled nodes connected by lines to express these relationships. An individual grammatical unit in the sentence, such as a noun phrase or a verb phrase, is represented by each node in the tree. The relationships between these components, such as subject-verb agreement or noun phrase alteration, are depicted by the lines that link the nodes. Generally, X-Bar Theory concentrates on the overall structure of phrases in language, whereas Binding Theory concentrates on the interpretation of pronouns and other anaphoric expressions in sentences. While the syntactic structure tree of the X-Bar Theory reflects the hierarchical organization of phrases in language, the syntactic structure tree of the Binding Theory represents the interactions between grammatical units in a sentence.
@@GracerodV Thanks a lot prof. for your explanation,I have one more question,is an illustration about the antecedents,anaphors,nodes c-command,the govern & the immediate/exhaustive domination.
The subject is "The window," which is a noun phrase consisting of the determiner "The" and the noun "window." The verb phrase is "was broken by Ahmed," where "was" is a verb, "broken" is a past transitive verb, and "by Ahmed" is a prepositional phrase with "by" as the preposition and "Ahmed" as the noun phrase. "Ahmed" is a proper noun, and "broken" is a past transitive verb because it takes an object ("window").
Question: What is the solution to this sentence? Please answer because I urgently need it. Thank you for the understandable and simplified solution the sentence is: Some writers are tormented and have unhlthy lifestyles🎉😊
This is the breakdown: S (Sentence): The entire structure can be considered as an S (Sentence). Conj (Conjunction): "and" Det (Determiner): "Some" VP (Verb Phrase): "are tormented" and "have unhealthy lifestyles" are both verb phrases. Noun: "writers," "lifestyles" Verb: "are," "tormented," "have" Adj (Adjective): "Some," "tormented," "unhealthy" NP (Noun Phrase): "Some writers," "unhealthy lifestyles"
In this sentence, "broke" is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object to complete its meaning. It stands alone without needing an object to receive the action.
I cannot thank you enough. thank you so much for providing us with such a good material. you did a very good job on it.
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks a lot!
That's amazing 💞
Hello, thank you for this video. But, may i ask a question? If we make a tree diagram structure of Incomparable? I was confused about the root word? IN COMPARA ABLE? CAN YOU HELP ME
Amazing 😍😍😍
Feels like ASMR
Thanks dear!
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Amazing 🧡 but in verb phrase what's the meaning of t(vt) and,m(adv.m)
(VT) means Verb-Transitive, and (Adv.m) is an adverb of manner.
I like
what does "VT" stand for?
That means transitive verb, and it is a type of verb that requires one or more objects to complete its meaning. In other words, a transitive verb is an action verb that acts upon something or someone. The object receives the action of the verb.For example:"She read the book." ("read" is the transitive verb, "the book" is the object)"He kicked the ball." ("kicked" is the transitive verb, "the ball" is the object)Without the object, the sentence would be incomplete or unclear:"She read." (What did she read?)"He kicked." (What did he kick?)
dear professor i'm a student in english and i really don't understand this syntactic structure tree can you please help me ???😪
To create a syntactic structure tree, we must first understand what a sentence is made of - words! Sentences are constructed from words.
Consider the following sentence: "The cat is sleeping on the mat."
To construct a syntactic structure tree, we must first identify the major parts of speech: nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections.
In this sentence, we can identify the following parts of speech- "cat" (noun), "is sleeping" (verb phrase), "on" (preposition), and "mat" (noun).
Next, we need to group these words based on their relationships in the sentence. For example, "The cat" is a noun phrase, and "is sleeping on the mat" is a verb phrase.
We then draw a tree that separates each word or phrase based on its relationship with the others. For example, "The cat" would be drawn as a branch from the main sentence node, and "is sleeping on the mat" would be another branch.
Within the "is sleeping on the mat" branch, we would draw a sub-branch for "is sleeping" and another for "on the mat."
In this way, we can develop a syntactic structure tree that accurately represents the relationships between words and phrases in a sentence.
I hope it helps!
Dear professor,I'm an english linguistics student and I want to know what's the difference between the syntactic structure tree (Binding theory) and the syntactic structure tree (X-Bar theory) ?!
I can clarify the differences between the syntactic structure trees of Binding Theory and X-Bar Theory as a professor of English linguistics.
Pronouns and other anaphoric phrases, including reflexive pronouns, are understood in sentences according to the binding theory. According to the binding theory, a pronoun can only be understood as referring to a specific entity if certain requirements are met. These requirements are based on the grammatical connections between the pronoun and other sentence components, such as clauses and noun phrases.
According to the binding theory, a pronoun can only be understood as referring to a specific entity if certain requirements are met. These requirements are based on the grammatical connections between the pronoun and other sentence components, such as clauses and noun phrases.
Binding Theory's syntactic structure tree uses labeled nodes connected by lines to express these relationships. An individual grammatical unit in the sentence, such as a noun phrase or a verb phrase, is represented by each node in the tree. The relationships between these components, such as subject-verb agreement or noun phrase alteration, are depicted by the lines that link the nodes.
Generally, X-Bar Theory concentrates on the overall structure of phrases in language, whereas Binding Theory concentrates on the interpretation of pronouns and other anaphoric expressions in sentences. While the syntactic structure tree of the X-Bar Theory reflects the hierarchical organization of phrases in language, the syntactic structure tree of the Binding Theory represents the interactions between grammatical units in a sentence.
@@GracerodV
Thanks a lot prof. for your explanation,I have one more question,is an illustration about the antecedents,anaphors,nodes c-command,the govern & the immediate/exhaustive domination.
Can you help me please to drow the tree diograme of the ph will fall
Give me more details, please.
@@GracerodV ok the teacher told us drow the tree diograme of this sentense
That shelf will fall
الحمد لله تعلمت كيف أرسم الخط بشكل صحيح ايه دا 😂
عظيم أنا سعيد🙂
I thought a tree diagram was drawning a tree and putting names as apples 💀💀
🤣
😂😂😂😂😂😂
What is np and VP?
Noun phrase and verb phrase
Hello prof
I have a question
Please ,can you answer ? I need solution to the sentence .
Question: the window was broken by Ahmed .
The subject is "The window," which is a noun phrase consisting of the determiner "The" and the noun "window."
The verb phrase is "was broken by Ahmed," where "was" is a verb, "broken" is a past transitive verb, and "by Ahmed" is a prepositional phrase with "by" as the preposition and "Ahmed" as the noun phrase.
"Ahmed" is a proper noun, and "broken" is a past transitive verb because it takes an object ("window").
Question: What is the solution to this sentence? Please answer because I urgently need it. Thank you for the understandable and simplified solution the sentence is:
Some writers are tormented and have unhlthy lifestyles🎉😊
This is the breakdown:
S (Sentence): The entire structure can be considered as an S (Sentence).
Conj (Conjunction): "and"
Det (Determiner): "Some"
VP (Verb Phrase): "are tormented" and "have unhealthy lifestyles" are both verb phrases.
Noun: "writers," "lifestyles"
Verb: "are," "tormented," "have"
Adj (Adjective): "Some," "tormented," "unhealthy"
NP (Noun Phrase): "Some writers," "unhealthy lifestyles"
@@GracerodV thank you so much
Vt??
Vp (Verb Phrase)
@@GracerodV u kinda wrote Vt. above 'entered', so I maybe he wonders what it meant
@@nininormanTransitive verb
I would have gotten .5 off for not putting adj.p above adj
" THE GLASS BROKE" The-Det, Glass-Noun but for "broke" is for what? Please help me😢
In this sentence, "broke" is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object to complete its meaning. It stands alone without needing an object to receive the action.
@@GracerodV so for tree diagram i should put it under Verb?
@@NurHidayah-pk6yg ok
@@GracerodVthank you so much ❤