I found this to be quite interesting. It teaches quite a bit about animal behaviors, and particularly the bond between a parent to its offspring and specifically how that bond is formed. One thing I found strange is when they did the experiment with the ducklings that were 30 hours old, although they clearly weren't imprinting on the objects that were introduced to them I found it interesting that they were still making the distress call and seemed to be looking for something other than the object in their vicinity. My question is why would they be making a distress call and searching for something if they won't imprint on anything at 30-hours old and up until that point no animal or object was ever introduced or otherwise shown to them?
We know more about this now than when the video was made. Ducklings imprint on their siblings but still need a "parent", and that object must be larger than them to trigger that instinct. As they get older it takes more exposure for them to imprint on a parent object because they develop a fear of novelty. The toy probably frightened them so they would have had to be around it for much longer to imprint on it.
@@daniellahl5809 I kind of did. The ducklings don't have a parent object but are still looking for one when they are in distress; such as when frightened by this new stimulus. It's just instinct for them to seek their parent out in these situations because they are pretty defenseless without someone to protect them from danger. This is why actually all of the ducklings make a distress call when first placed in the enclosure. They are alone, and to a duckling that is terrifying. In order to imprint after the critical period, they need to first overcome this fear, which takes time. This is why some domestic duck owners will spend a lot of time handling their ducklings to make it happen. During the critical period, it is believed they haven't developed this neophobia yet; it comes later so as not to interfere with the process of imprinting on their mother during their first day of life when they are still in the nest.
I just hatched one 2 days ago who was stuck in the egg. I helped it out and spent the majority of its first day with it. Guess what! It thinks I’m it’s mom. I never believed this until actually experiencing it.
I have 2 baby ducklings at home and they imprinted on me they go crazy when im not around,distress calling and when i show up they show quiet little peeps, follow me around and hop on me and lay on me. Its actually really cute its weird tho cause i got them when they were 4 days old so the imprinting was late but almost immediate after. The one is a runt and hes missing half of his beak he relies on me more than his sister does.
Just was watching some guys getting followed by ducks on some CZcams shorts, pondered why this was quite common & boom this wonderful slice of information presents itself. Love the internet sometimes.
"On wobbly legs, it seems to look for something, even though there is virtually nothing to see in the experiment's featureless environment" is just such a funny line. the 2:32 segment is hilarious!
They know thier families the way we know ours. The smell of the egg probably smells like thier family and they can recognize them easily once they find them.
A simple example is that when US ppl think all Asians look same but they don't actually look same if u live with Asians U'll find out that they have so much different features in their faces and look...😅(no offense to nobody) besides...animals have strong sense of smell
The experiment with the rabbit was dangerous as bunnies can turn around and stomp their feet really fast ... it’s dangerous for the baby duck to be in that
I have a rabbit and she stomps her feet when she's distressed or afraid. It makes a good thump but I doubt it could genuinely hurt anything. Also I've never heard of a rabbit biting someone out of the few dozen I've seen, so I don't think anything would happen. Rabbits will run away before they fight.
@@shoelacy7101 yes, me too. but they can get spooked by small noises or something and run (claws and their strength is in their feet) and hurt the ducky by accident.
They will be side by side until they grow up , never apart. When they get separated they make their little call/cry and take turns chirping 3x back and forth until they are close enough to find their way back to one another. So cute.
It is cruel, but it is also helpful in the pursuit of diminishing cruelty. We understand what distresses these animals better now, and can work towards mitigating these factors. We are kind of horrible creatures in that aspect, learning so much of kindness through our own ventures into cruelty. But science is an absolutely vital tool for us to progress into a future as kinder creatures
@@PimpolloMorales its not cruel, other species would just eat the ducks, humans are curious, they play with things to learn, they don't want the ducks just for their energy content, they actually care about what ducks do. ironically the concept of cruelty is something entirely human, there's no cruelty in nature, from the point of view of the duck, the object was really his parent, it would be cruel separating it after the imprinting, doing the experiment isn't cruel.
I think it would be more interesting for the duck to have no interactions whatsoever. For their food and water to be provided to them but nothing more. Would they bond with their food containers?
they probably wouldn't because the object of imprinting needs to be moving (although it's possible to imprint on inanimate objects if that's your question)
No one ever forgets their mother, even if she is a toy train.
I wish I could forget mine
Toy train mom deserves mom of the year
I found this to be quite interesting. It teaches quite a bit about animal behaviors, and particularly the bond between a parent to its offspring and specifically how that bond is formed.
One thing I found strange is when they did the experiment with the ducklings that were 30 hours old, although they clearly weren't imprinting on the objects that were introduced to them I found it interesting that they were still making the distress call and seemed to be looking for something other than the object in their vicinity. My question is why would they be making a distress call and searching for something if they won't imprint on anything at 30-hours old and up until that point no animal or object was ever introduced or otherwise shown to them?
We know more about this now than when the video was made. Ducklings imprint on their siblings but still need a "parent", and that object must be larger than them to trigger that instinct. As they get older it takes more exposure for them to imprint on a parent object because they develop a fear of novelty. The toy probably frightened them so they would have had to be around it for much longer to imprint on it.
@@andrewmoore7014you didn't answer on his question
@@daniellahl5809 I kind of did.
The ducklings don't have a parent object but are still looking for one when they are in distress; such as when frightened by this new stimulus. It's just instinct for them to seek their parent out in these situations because they are pretty defenseless without someone to protect them from danger.
This is why actually all of the ducklings make a distress call when first placed in the enclosure. They are alone, and to a duckling that is terrifying.
In order to imprint after the critical period, they need to first overcome this fear, which takes time. This is why some domestic duck owners will spend a lot of time handling their ducklings to make it happen. During the critical period, it is believed they haven't developed this neophobia yet; it comes later so as not to interfere with the process of imprinting on their mother during their first day of life when they are still in the nest.
I just hatched one 2 days ago who was stuck in the egg. I helped it out and spent the majority of its first day with it. Guess what! It thinks I’m it’s mom. I never believed this until actually experiencing it.
I have 2 baby ducklings at home and they imprinted on me they go crazy when im not around,distress calling and when i show up they show quiet little peeps, follow me around and hop on me and lay on me. Its actually really cute its weird tho cause i got them when they were 4 days old so the imprinting was late but almost immediate after. The one is a runt and hes missing half of his beak he relies on me more than his sister does.
Moving toy train: exists
Duckling: mommy🥹🥹
Just was watching some guys getting followed by ducks on some CZcams shorts, pondered why this was quite common & boom this wonderful slice of information presents itself. Love the internet sometimes.
I am a year 4 zoology student and looked for this video to understand imprinting in animal behavior and this is wonderful!
How will I be able to do these experiments.
Taking the toy away from her and listening to all those distress calls 😭
As all experiments on animals are this was so sad 😭
This makes my heart melts soo cute
The person that planned this study is a GENIUS!
I don't want to die without talking to the researchers that conducted this experiment so well.
I wanna be adopted by a baby duck now 🥺
Behaviourism will never not be cool.
"On wobbly legs, it seems to look for something, even though there is virtually nothing to see in the experiment's featureless environment"
is just such a funny line.
the 2:32 segment is hilarious!
Its SCIENTIFIC!
poor ducks lol
So many open questions... What happens when the object stops moving at all? What happens when u give the ducks a real duck mother afterwards?
Those poor chickies I want to adopt them all🥺
Thanks TikTok now I’m watching this 12min experiment 😑
your Duck Studies diploma is in the mail
Same here, it was very interesting.
You too
Hahaha same. I just saw a TikTok of ducks playing with a dog and it got me looking in to duck behavior 😂😂
We are monsters indeed
Indeed
Oh shut up
@@youngeshmoney what about you hunny 💋 shut the f up 💋💋
Nope no more than the ducks or lions or snakes.
this is so wholesomeee
Buttt all ducks look & sound the same... how do they not get confused??? Is it also by smell?!?!
They know thier families the way we know ours.
The smell of the egg probably smells like thier family and they can recognize them easily once they find them.
A simple example is that when US ppl think all Asians look same but they don't actually look same if u live with Asians U'll find out that they have so much different features in their faces and look...😅(no offense to nobody) besides...animals have strong sense of smell
It makes me really uncomfortable watching this but sometimes in science you have to do some cruel things
No shit
Where can I find that reseacher? I want to hire that team!
social animals need something, or someone, period.
Awesome and fascinating video, may i ask, Who did this tudy? thanks btw
Intresting🐣
The triple peep is just so cute...
The experiment with the rabbit was dangerous as bunnies can turn around and stomp their feet really fast ... it’s dangerous for the baby duck to be in that
it would be dangerous if the rabbit would bite the duck
In that case..they will not include the experiment in the video.
It will be deleted and edited
I have a rabbit and she stomps her feet when she's distressed or afraid. It makes a good thump but I doubt it could genuinely hurt anything. Also I've never heard of a rabbit biting someone out of the few dozen I've seen, so I don't think anything would happen. Rabbits will run away before they fight.
@@shoelacy7101 yes, me too. but they can get spooked by small noises or something and run (claws and their strength is in their feet) and hurt the ducky by accident.
@@katskye11 That's fair.
Wow.. Its really helpful.video. About imprinting (animal behavior)
Oof soul crushing
If this is your jam,
check out Harlow's rhesus monkey experiments
I am here from Stanford's Ethology lecture, I got really interested and searched this video
So what happens to the duck that followed the toys?
Really interesting , thanks !
Awesommee ❤😍
This is pretty neat
Works with humans too! Literally the same with weaboos falling in love with anime character
Hi! Thanks for the video! Can I get the article please.. Thank you!
What if u do a duckling on a duckling?
That's a good question.
9:50 watch it, altough it is quite obvious
They will be side by side until they grow up , never apart. When they get separated they make their little call/cry and take turns chirping 3x back and forth until they are close enough to find their way back to one another. So cute.
Where is all the feces?
Exceelente !
What happend to the poor little ducks after ?
Probably dumped after used or put down.
@@TinyBewPuppy I would have brought all of them to my home 🥲
omg.this is so sad...
They forgot to put a red ribbon on the red balloon
Sadly depressing.
Only if you allow yourself to be depressed by this 40+ year old video.
This feels cruel
Without this kind of experiments, animal ethics wouldn't exist as they exist now? Research on animal behavior is vital treating animals.
It is cruel, but it is also helpful in the pursuit of diminishing cruelty. We understand what distresses these animals better now, and can work towards mitigating these factors. We are kind of horrible creatures in that aspect, learning so much of kindness through our own ventures into cruelty. But science is an absolutely vital tool for us to progress into a future as kinder creatures
@@PimpolloMorales its not cruel, other species would just eat the ducks, humans are curious, they play with things to learn, they don't want the ducks just for their energy content, they actually care about what ducks do.
ironically the concept of cruelty is something entirely human, there's no cruelty in nature, from the point of view of the duck, the object was really his parent, it would be cruel separating it after the imprinting, doing the experiment isn't cruel.
@@monad_tcp will the object feed it ?
The experiment is cruel
@@kingwrongs I guess something will have to
What year is this?
5:24 🥺🥺🥺
this sounds like a cool experiment to try at home
Rollo tomasi brought me here
I don't feel like eating duck anymore
I think it would be more interesting for the duck to have no interactions whatsoever. For their food and water to be provided to them but nothing more. Would they bond with their food containers?
they probably wouldn't because the object of imprinting needs to be moving (although it's possible to imprint on inanimate objects if that's your question)
Okay thank you now give them to the mama
V
When the objects are taken and experiment is over are the ducks traumatized?
This is torturous for the poor baby ducks and for the viewers!
Just give them thier momma's 😭
They don’t have any, that’s the thing
They killed their mommas cause America
@@alan_decker All living creatures, either born or hatched, has a mom.
@@lorriefox9774 as in they are probably dead
The life of these poor experiment ducks is a lie 😢
Here for tik tok 😭🤚🤚
Nice same
explain?
@@MentalHealthTreatment me too haha, someone posted a clip from this video on tiktok so we came to watch the whole video :) it’s pretty neat
I thought I was the only weirdo from tiktok 😂👽
@@MentalHealthTreatment vm.tiktok.com/ZSsPkVvT/
Replace the duck with any newborn and those toys with Christianity. Same result.
So much this. Basically growing up in any belief system will have humans acting like these ducklings.
same with nationality, or any other system, which we think gives security.
Christophobic
lmao...isn't this kinda sad?