Did We Really Land On The Moon?
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 11. 2022
- The primary goal of Apollo 11 was to complete a national goal set by President John F. Kennedy on May 25, 1961: to land a crewed spacecraft on the moon and return to Earth.
On July 16, 1969, Apollo 11 lifted off from Cape Kennedy, carrying Commander Neil Armstrong, Command Module Pilot Michael Collins, and Lunar Module Pilot Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin into an initial Earth-orbit of 114 by 116 miles. On July 20, 1969, an estimated 650 million people saw Armstrong's televised image and heard his voice describe the event as he took "...one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind."
During their two-hour moonwalk, Armstrong and Aldrin installed a device to measure the composition of solar wind reaching the Moon, a device to receive laser beams from astronomical observatories on Earth to determine the exact distance between the two bodies, and a passive seismometer to measure moonquakes and meteor impacts long after the astronauts had returned home. They also collected about 23 kg (50 pounds) of rock and soil samples, took numerous photographs, and communicated constantly with mission control in Houston, Texas. The astronauts used Eagle's ascent stage to return it to lunar orbit after 21 hours and 38 minutes on the Moon's surface. Eagle docked with Collins again after a series of maneuvers.
Let’s see how the Apollo 11 mission unfolded.
Join our CZcams channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/ - Věda a technologie
Of course we did!
Debatable.
How did you know that?
Why not go again... with a camera and livestream it on insta?
@Wayne Thomas Well go again... #Livestream #ElonMusk
And we can't go back to the moon half a century later because NASA "lost the technology"?
Uh-huh...
If I was on the doubting side... I would say 1960s technology would in no way get a rocket to the moon. I'm not picking a side but I am skeptical about that.
The 1960’s was a time of great technological development as British Prime Minister Harold Wilson pointed out in his ‘white heat’ of this ‘scientific revolution’ speech in 1963. From an aeronautical perspective there was supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, spacecraft, satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Amongst a myriad of aircraft, the U.S. produced the hypersonic X15, the supersonic SR71, the HL10 re-entry vehicle and the first operational variable geometry swing wing aircraft - the F111. In Europe we had the supersonic Concorde and Harrier VTOL ‘Jump Jet’.
On what basis though? What info do you have that justifies your doubts? Do you have a background in aeronautics or physics?
@@stormjoe505".. Yeah tell me bout it,😂 he's just another one of 🐑 following da herd, PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters cult"..
Always believe Wikipedia to provide them with professional n logical answers provide by goat herders themselves, 🤡💯
We didn’t go to the moon. It’s completely asinine to believe otherwise
@@icepick859 Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 😎
My question is....Why haven't we gone a second time, in all this time? This is my cause of doubt.
Apollo program cost the US $28 billion (roughly $280 billion in today’s money) and more than 400,000 people were employed. NASA’s current budget is about $14 billion today. There are plans for another launch by 2026 :)
@@mahmoud1999PALE4EI’m sure US is capable of raising the fund in the last 50 years..
Actually it was 6 crewed missions with 12 astronauts landed on the Moon, between 69 and 72.
I am more curious about why we didn’t go after 72 and also, if you check the dates and achievements of the space war, Russians literally won every aspect before that.
Then Kennedy announced in 61 that they will get safely Americans to the Moon by end of the decade. And how surprising that in 69 they did and they “won” the space war.
Sounds quite sus, tbh
We went 7 times!
@@lao-ce8982 Theres nothing on the moon and its expensive!
Phone call to the moon with no delay in 1969????
That's called Magicuu...🤣🤣
Hehehehe
Have you ever actually timed the delay?
@@dsdy1205 even bluetooth has a delay and the phone's right in my pocket....
@@harvey4893 That's a processing overhead, and has nothing to do with the physical separation between your phone and the system. Bluetooth signals and indeed many networking signals have ridiculously low signal-to-noise ratios, so a lot of processing time is needed to tease out the digital info from the received signal, to say nothing of all the other verification / security functions that are needed to maintain a privileged channel
The Apollo engineers got around this by not really having invented the Bluetooth protocol yet, so a lot of the signal transmission was analog or via comparatively simple signal-processing equipment which operates much quicker. They also had the advantage of having a honking huge antenna in Australia pointed directly at the moon to help them out in the signal to noise aspect
It would be great if you made a video on the technology and engineering that enabled a live voice call to be made from the moon to the whitehouse.
Wow I didn’t even think of that, huh…I’m sure there’s a logical explanation or reasoning though.
Or a video on the technology that according to NASA, has been lost which is why they can't go back to the moon
The White House put a phone call through to Mission Control in Houston. The phone call was then patched through on the radio. I understand radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s.
@@22Hammy "Or a video on the technology that according to NASA, has been lost which is why they can't go back to the moon"
After Apollo 11, public interest in space travel fell quickly. People complained about the cost and demanded NASA's budget be reallocated to projects on Earth. Congress responded by cutting NASA's budget. NASA cancelled the last three planned Apollo missions. Knowing they weren't going to sell any more hardware to NASA, the contractors shut down their production lines and reallocated their staff and factory space to other projects. The paperwork was packaged into boxes and put into storage. Any questions?
@@maxfan1591 to the moon???
I am so proud of Apollo 13 because of them I am now in 2023 drinking my Starbucks coffee from the moon and enjoying the view of earth
Yes I was in junior school at the time. One little question, Why wasn’t there a time delay when President Nixon was talking to the astronauts?
That’s far too much logic there…
@@user-yy9hp6rc8f There is a significant delay of between 5-6 seconds in the replies of Nixon and Armstrong.
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
(( american moon )) time delay
@@yoskarokuto3553
That has been explained to you repeatedly. You always ignore it. Why do you keep posting the same nonsense?
All done in a studio
1969: “Who you on the phone to babe?”
“Ahh just a couple of guys on the moon! Clear as a diamond!”
2023: “Who you on the phone to babe?”
“No idea, hun? Signal is terrible!”
The title of this video is misleading.
How so?
I love it when idiots point out "you see no stars" well It's broad daylight when they landed on the moon. Thats the Sun lighting the Moon just like it does here on Earth.walk outside when it's daylight,now count all the stars you can.. It will be ''0''
Daylight?? I am not seeing sun rays
And where are the clouds ?
@@darts-multiverse The moon doesn't have clouds, the moon has no weather.
@@user-bk9fk2tq2z Exactly, you get it.
lol yeah okay . No one went to the moon. Why people would ever defend NASA is beyond me but please stop spreading this ridiculous bullshit that we went to the moon
Using what technology to speak live over that distance?
Using what technology to take photos and protect them against radiation?
I'm genuinely curious.
The incredible technologies you are referring to are :
- radio communications
- cameras
- protective layers
No need to thank me
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial 😂 Have you ever used radio comms over long distances? That's hilarious and didn't even come slightly close to anything resembling an intelligent response. Please have a go at describing how to use and transport film in a high radiation atmosphere. I eagerly await your intellectual input.😂😂😂
@@hopebear06 please explain to me how distance would affect radio signals then
@@hopebear06 , the Apollo radio communications were line-of-site, and had the additional advantage of huge radio telescopes at one end, which were used to collect and amplify the weak signals coming from Apollo 11, and probably used to amplify the signals being sent to Apollo. A very entertaining movie was made about one of those radio telescopes, which was located in Australia. And I can't recall for sure, but I think the Houston/LEM communication may not even have been direct, but was instead relayed through the Command Module still orbiting the moon.
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial o..k.... and they used all these things LIVE and in REAL TIME for it to be aired on tv at the same
time???..... I see. Even my wifi and bluetooth connections gives me issues in my 1st floor flat. lol
They made all this shit in studio 😂😂😂
only a person with a head full of the stuff knows what shit is...
People who think we went to the moon are so naive and ignorant. Do what you’re told monkey
I don't think we ever went for the very simple reason.....we never went back.
Who was going to pay for it? The Apollo program was expensive, and when public support for the space program fell after Apollo 11, Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget was both cheap and popular. Without a large budget NASA simply couldn't keep buying Apollo and Saturn hardware, so they cancelled Apollo. With Apollo cancelled, the contractors shut down their production lines and redeployed their staff to other projects (or dismissed them). It's that simple.
The reason this isnt real is the phone call from the President. I dont even get service in the woods or in a basement.😂
So, you think they used cell phones? Huh? How is this argument anything besides "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake"?
These guys landed in Universal Studios Hollywood on the Star Trek set and next to the animation department.
Do you realize there are over 70 hours of video of men on the moon, many of which can be seen on You Tube? That's the equivalent of 35 full length motion pictures!
That's a lot of studio work!
@@KPL400 and ever noticed how clean the landing pods, the spacesuits, shoes, and area around the land site are? Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?
"and ever noticed how clean the landing pods"
Well, sometimes. But, certainly not every time. Why is this important to you?
"the spacesuits,"
Is this a joke? Have you not looked at the photos of the spacesuits after walking on the moon? How about AS17-140-21390? Enough dirt for you?
"shoes"
Yes, the shoes also got very dirty.
"and area around the land site are?"
It's completely dust and rocks. What in the world are you talking about?
"Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?"
They aren't. You have fallen for a conspiracy video that told you that was the case. They wore overshoes while on the moon. You are looking at the inside layer shoes, just like the makers of your favorite conspiracy videos want you to. You've never once looked at the photo archive for yourself to verify if what they're telling you is true or not. Nope. If they say it, you repeat it.
2023, I still have problems with the WiFi connection between floor 1 and 2. 😂 It was better before.
Maybe you need an 85 foot dish like NASA used...
@@maxfan1591 that will not be enough for my wiki 😉
maybe you need to spend a few hundred million dollars to custom build it like NASA did...
@@gives_bad_advice i prefer a cable instead 👍😂
you got a billion dollar budget and giant radio dishes??
Yes, I was alive. I was only four, but I still remember it. I was looking for cartoons, but they were showing the same thing on all three channels!!! They were showing a boat, but I got upset because the picture kept shaking the whole time.
The 48k zx spectrum I had in 1985 was more powerful than computer on the ship that landed on the moon. How they did it is beyond me
It's kinda like being surprised that a pocket calculator can do all those arithmetical functions 🙂
@@Jan_Strzelecki 😂 I’m not saying they didn’t go it’s just an unbelievable achievement with the technology that was available to them at the time
They didn't. It never happened.
@@daryllect6659 Sure they did.
@@Jan_Strzelecki You just keep telling yourself that.
NASA loves you.
The video title alone killed me😂😂
Did we go to the moon? That’s a tough one…I guess if there’s frozen astronaut turds on the surface, then yes we probably did.
I think they wore a type of diaper while on the moon, so prospecting for Astro Turds would be a losing endeavor.
There is sadly human poo left on the moon in containers, disgusting.
One of the biggest problems is, naturally, when the astronauts land back on the earth, they can’t walk down themselves but need to use the wheelchair or lying down, that’s because during the journey in the space where has no gravity, human’s muscles and bone would change and get less dense which are not as supportive as they were on the earth. But funnily, the NASA astronauts, after they just arrived the earth, they confidently walked out through the door themselves and even wave their hands to the camera. Isn’t that odd? Well but maybe they have way better tech that can beat the effects of the non-gravity environment than modern day, I mean since it’s the American.😂
A 10 day day round trip to the Moon is not long enough to atrophy muscles. Gemini VII was a long duration flight for 14 days in 1965.
@@gunternetzer9621 LIARS!!!
@@yoskarokuto3553 That's not a very scientific response.
@@yoskarokuto3553🙃🤥".. Still liven in fantasy 🧚♂️ fairytale".. he must be another one of these colt's PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters..
NASA= Not A Secret Anymore".. 😂🤪🙃🤤
How did the USA president talk to people on the moon using a telephone. And it sounded like there was no latency in the transmission at all🤔🤔😳😳😳
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
I wanna know why that silicon disk was only 1 and a half inch
We've been too the moon more than u can ever understandddd
Go one more time and i will believe since now the space shuttle is more advance than those time
The space shuttle has not flown for roughly ten years.
1:16 Saturn “vee”… really? 😂😂😂
we are living in a controlled environment, sometimes change in weather conditions interrupt signaling system, in 1960 How could they telecast live..? does not it require launching pad to come back to earth.
NASA: Not A Secret Anymore"..
from earth to moon it will take 3 days
How many people realize a telephone calls were transmitted through Wire Transmission.
I call b.s. that the president was on the telephone speaking with the astronauts on the moon.
Wire ? do you know that we can also transfert phone call with signals (antenna, satellite) ?
Radio signals didn’t exist ? 😂
Not the only skeptical point.
Good lord you conspiracy theorists suck all the fun out of scientific discovery
morons. . . sometimes i feel like i'm surrounded by morons. . .
Playing with water while surrounded by electrical switchgear 😂
Artimas astronauts will verify.
Yes
Did he just use a regular telephone to speak with the astronauts...well Im getting genuinely doubted now
And also while that capsule dropping on the ocean did it not create any steam since it would be very hot while landing to earth due to gravity?
You do not understand how a phone call can be patched into a radio network????
Space is a vacuum a walkie talkie can send a signal from the moon to earth with barely any interference.
@4.02 That is not Aldrin and that is not Apollo 11. It is John Young, Commander of Apollo 16 taken by Charlie Duke.
But where is John Young's shadow? The man lost his shadow.
@@asifrpoco770
This is cropped. Find the original image of him jumping, the shadow is clearly visible.
Berfikir dan berakal untuk menganalisis para Astronot pernah mendarat di Bulan.
1. Para astronot diluncurkan ke Bulan menggunakan roket pendorong dilandasan pacu. Kegiatan ini penuh dengan Evoria diliput dan dipublikasikan oleh berbagai media cetak dan elektronik.
2. Selanjutnya para astronot mendarat di bulan mereka mengkonfirmasikan keberadaan dan pendaratan di Bulan serta mendokumentasikan segala macam kegiatanya selama berada di Bulan dengan berselfi dan berfoto ria di bulan.
3. Dan setelah batas waktu yang telah ditentukan, dan saat yang dinanti-nantikan atas kembalinya para kru astronot dari Bulan menuju tanah kelahiran di Bumi, namun tidak pernah ada publikasi baik dari media cetak maupun elektronik tentang kembalinya para kru astronot tersebut yakni :
a. Kapan saat mereka kembali ke bumi :
Hari, jam, tanggal, bulan dan tahun.
b. Tempat pendaratanya di bumi : turun dan
kembali di landasan pacu, di Bandara, atau
mereka mendarat di lapangan terbuka atau
di lapangan golf, atau mereka kembali
mendarat di bumi dalam keadaan sunyi
dan senyap dimana manusia sedang tidur
lelap.
c. Kendaraan yang digunakan untuk kembali
ke bumi : apakah berbentuk berbentuk
kapsul, berbentuk angkot, berbentuk bus,
atau berbentuk seperti pesawat Garuda.
Dari uraian diatas apakah benar pencapaian keilmuan dan peradaban manusia melalui para astronot betul adanya bisa mendarat ke Bulan dan kembali lagi ke Bumi.
Apakah anda sependapat dengan kami.
Do you speak Moonyan?
Hard to explain why they could go to the Moon to walk jump and drive a rover using 60s technology and yet ithereafter till to date, there is no subsequent Moon landings by Man.
Put simply staggering costs, very high risk factors and the loss of public interest...but humans will be returning to the moon in the next few years...
Do you find it hard to believe that, a few decades ago, you could buy a supersonic airliner ticket to cross the Atlantic at mach 2, but, today, you can't? Why not? Because the Concorde program was terminated due to ridiculous costs. Every single flight lost money, and had to be subsidized by European governments to keep flying. Well, Apollo was far worse. It was a tremendous cash drain, and they ended the program. Is it that hard to understand?
It's very easy to explain.
Once Apollo 11 had returned from the Moon and Kennedy's goal had been achieved, cutbacks began and continued into the early 1970’s during a widescale retreat from technology projects due to competing demands e.g. Vietnam War, economic recession, public apathy, and a grassroots Republican backlash against what was seen as an over-reaching of federal government into the nation’s affairs.
It was extremely expensive; each mission cost $1 billion to put two men on the Moon for a maximum of 3 days, a sum which was not financially sustainable, and it was also extremely dangerous. Out of 12 manned Apollo missions, including a ground test, there was one catastrophic failure (Apollo 1) and a mission failure (Apollo 13), that’s a terrible ratio.
The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige.
There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
Space may be the final frontier but it’s made in Hollywood basement
they must have been so peeved with buzz aldrin for not getting a good pic of neil armstrong ..as he did for buzz..unless this was neils way of showing us it wasnt real
people people people.... please think... (1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol). (2)- the battery from your home radios was the size of an apple and to build an electric car you needed batterys the size bigger than the car itself ( NASA sends electric skinny car on the Moon lol) (3)- just for winning the word cup in footbal, you are all smile and happy for long long time ( NASA's astronauts of apollo 11 at the Press Conference look like War Crimes Trial lol) and finally (4)- When apollo 12 live landings interupts a popular tv series "I love lucy", people started to complain and NASA decides to add more mistery and drama on next mission Apollo13 lol - cherry on top - a big fire starts at Nasa's depots and only the telemitrics documents of apollos missions are destroy... the documents of other missions before and after apollo are just fine.. lol
1. The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module. As long as they had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon there was no problem. A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and have towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
2. The lunar rover was powered by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries. These were not in widespread commercial use due to the high cost.
3. After splashdown the astronauts were transferred to the mobile quarantine facility on the aircraft carrier Hornet. After cleaning up they spoke to President Nixon and their families, where you see them elated, smiling and waving. After this they went through extensive debriefing in isolation and by the time they appeared at the press conference on August 12th, were simply tired and bored after the grind they had been through and the comedown from such a high. Stoic military men born in 1930 were also not natural performers on TV and answered questions in this stilted manner. If you watch the whole press conference it lightens up a lot and they start smiling and joking.
4. That's an urban myth.
5. NASA did not lose the telemetry tapes from Apollo 11 but rather the taped recordings of raw analogue video transmitted back from the spacecraft. The tapes were made using specially designed, high-capacity recording gear in order to capture the raw transmissions at the point of receipt in case anything should go wrong with the elaborate system used to convert them to a standard broadcast signal. Nothing did go wrong, and once the conversion and transmission was complete, the recordings were no longer needed for their original purpose.
Any magnetic recording media has a limited life. The magnetic fields of the stored data decay over time. For this reason, and because high-grade tapes were very expensive, they were never considered an archival medium. It may seem odd today, but in 1969, the second-hand copies filmed off specially built, flat screen CRT displays were considered the archival copies, and we still have a number of these, including some shot by NASA and some shot third or fourth hand by television networks and affiliates.
"1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol)"
if your t.v. cost a few hundred million dollars, you might have a point.
@@gives_bad_advice The point I was trying to make is that people today question the transmissions from the Moon because their own cell phones drop out. NASA had immeasurably greater resources and technology for a one off event which were/are not commercially available to the public (they had to invent S Band) and an advantage that people don't have day to day - line of sight, as you're transmitting across a void.
If you are really interested in this subject I would recommend:
Books
Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, 1971)
A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts (Andrew Chaikin, 1998)
NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual 2019)
Documentaries
The Other Side of the Moon 1979 - (available on You Tube
To the Moon 1997 - (available on You Tube)
These all explain the science, procedures, equipment and historical context.
@@gunternetzer9621 you're preaching to the choir here. maybe you meant this for mihai?
3. Have you seen the other interviews they gave? Armstrong still looks "depressed" during interviews he gave after Gemini missions years in advance.
4. .... why? They don't get anything from doing this because their missions are already paid for in advance, and the likelihood of getting caught is high because only an idiot wouldn't realize there'd be an investigation before they even landed. All they accomplished was incentivizing Congress to shut them down faster.
There is tons of stuff we left on the moon including a rover and footprints all over the place. You can see everything on video shot from radio telescopes. Duh.
You're right. I've seen two Lunochod's. Can't understand why the Russians don't claim that their cosmonauts left them there. Possibly that's ability making difference between cosmonaut and astronaut
Yea?!?
He said Saturn V. 😮 OMG it's 5.
They could setup a mirror to point a laser to measure the distance to the moon. Why cant the photograph the remnants of the moon landing from earth or even from low earth orbit.
Makes you think, doesnt it.
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
@@jean-baptistepoquelin5116 The video said they installed a mirror.
@@circusserpent9466 😅
🙈🙉🙊
A high-power astronomical pointing laser as found on most observatories, only gets back a couple (literally, you can count them) of photons from the retroreflector. I challenge you to assemble a working picture of, well, anything with just 10 points of light.
@@dsdy1205 whats your point????
The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one . One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie . Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios . I doubt men lended on the moon !
The had booties with tread that went over the boots that match it perfectly.
"The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one ."
Yes, they wore "overshoes" over the inner boot while walking on the moon, then took those off inside the craft.
"One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie ."
Nonsense. A hair got into one of the prints, and caused a "C" shape. They took two photos in a row of the same rock, and only one of those two prints had the "C." The other didn't. I mean, seriously, they went around labeling thousands of rocks? Get real.
"Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios ."
Same happens on Earth. If you have distant mountains in the background, you can move 100 yards in the foreground and not notice any change in the background. Yes, of course they had the same backgrounds across each mission. Why wouldn't they?
"I doubt men lended on the moon !"
Well, you don't know anything, so, why are you proud of this?
14 years old👋
Bill nye even said going to outer space is impossible
⚔️ I was fifteen years old and I watched the moon landing on TV in Orlando, Fl. I really love how the flag waves in the wind on the moon.
😱 🇺🇲 👽
NASA SP287 " WHAT MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? "
" of course , the way we got this job done was with meeting , big meetings , little meeting hundreds of meetings ! " the thing we always tried to do in these meetings (( was to encourage every one no matter how shy to speak out !!! " )) not training ? , not tech development ?
WHY encourage every one NO MATTER HOW SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT !!! IS ULTIMATE SECRET TO " MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? "
YOU CAN GO TO THE MOON WITH " DON'T SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT ??? " " shy for speak what ???
you really should make better use of the limited internet access you have in your psych ward...
🙃🤥".. Still liven in fantasy 🧚♂️ fairytale".. he must be another one of these colt's PRO: Pro Astronaut Nutters
NASA= Not A Secret Anymore".. 😂🤪🙃🤤
It's a fairy tale......
The V is the number 5, and S-IVB is pronounced S-4B. Please review these things before making your videos. It detracts from an otherwise solid presentation.
US people stepped on the Moon. But after that US people show no interest to walk on the Moon again because it is too boring.
They not only walked. What about Lunar Rovers? Next time they could do kind of Tour the France, as the professional cycling become more popular in the USA. Just don't invite bully Armstrong and it will be O.K. I mean Lance, not Neil.
I don't know if _we_ landed on the moon, but I know that _I_ didn't.
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
But the mirrors reflect the laser pulses much better, allowing for better measurements.
"The Moon has an exceptionally low albedo, giving it a reflectance that is slightly brighter than that of worn asphalt."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon
This is like saying, is your father your father. Do you really know, you only know what you have been led too.believe
You can find out whether your father is your father by taking a DNA test. The reality of Apollo can be tested by explaining the Apollo rocks.
i thought this will be on new nasa lunar mission artemis and turned out like a old video. i think this is not the right time for this.
Yes america landed hollywood studio. Nice conspiracy and nice film.
People came rlogether and the unpopular war in Vietnam was of little interest
How did they come back to earth?
Depends on which theory is right: by capsule sitting on the top of Lunar Lander, or by some red neck's pickup if it was filmed in Cannon base.
Fake
Real
Today in 2024, we can't get that good of phone / internet service for a phone call from one cellphone to another in the same city of the United States of America, I don't understand how I could I possibly believe they went to the moon & had full communication with people on Earth
Wow. I mean, most moon landing deniers use the "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake" argument without realizing it. Not you, though. You spell it right out. You don't understand it, therefore it's fake.
How much reading have done on the subject?
The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The ‘unified S-Band system’ involved a staff of 4,500 distributed among 15 tracking stations and numerous switching centres around the globe. The telemetry and tracking system is explained on pages 78-79 in ‘Invasion of the Moon 1957-70’ (Peter Ryan). The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module.
They also had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon.
A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and has towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
@@gunternetzer9621
😂😂😂".. Still getting all y'all answers/information on Wikipedia I see"..
@@Not-A-Space-Agency No, try
Books
Exploring the Planets - (Ian Nicolson BSc, astronomer, 1970), Rockets and Missiles - (John W. R. Taylor, writer & aircraft designer, 1970), The Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, Fellow of the British Interplanetary Society, 1971), The Observer’s Book of Manned Spaceflight (Reginald Turnill, 1972), A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts - (Andrew Chaikin, 1998), The Man Who Ran the Moon - (Piers Bizony, 2007), Moon Hoax: Debunked! - (Paolo Attivissimo 2013), NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual, 2019)
Documentaries & Film
The Other Side of the Moon 1979, The Men Who Walked on the Moon 1979, Moon Shot 1994, To the Moon 1999 - (all available on You Tube)
yes we did
😂".. PRO= Pro AstroNOT Nutter".. 🙃🤥🤪
That’s very fake
That's very real.
I was but an unborn fetus when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon.
More than likely it didn't happen
hoax forever
Well, no. Scientists from around the world have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last half century. They know the rocks can't be from Earth as they show signs of having formed in a low-gravity vacuum, which isn't the case with Earth rocks. They know the Apollo rocks can't be lunar meteorites because of obvious differences in appearance between them. And they know the rocks can't have been collected by unmanned sample retriever missions, because there's simply too much material.
Then there is the video record. There is simply no way to fake the videos of the Apollo astronauts interacting with a low-gravity vacuum with distant horizons in uncut videos lasting sometimes more than 30 minutes at a time.
No they did not. Because if they have that technology back then. Then now why it is taking that long for them to go again even with this much advanced technology 😅
Because technology isn't the problem. Funding is the problem.
@@rockethead7 lol how did they get that much funding that time 😅. Its the same country with a lot lot more finance than that time
@@rockethead7 no absolutely wrong they have funding but there technology is not ready yet that's why they targeted for 2025. They are under process of developing a technology
Why would you be so proud to know nothing whatsoever about the topic? Dewdrop, back in the mid-1960s, NASA's funding was about 4.5% of the entire federal budget, plus about another 2% equivalent in international support and soft costs. Almost the entirety went into Apollo. After congress canceled Apollo, they dropped NASA's budget to about 0.45% of the federal budget. That's a tiny fraction of the funding. And, congress no longer allocated such a large percentage of NASA's money to go into one big project. They spread it among hundreds of projects.
They funded Artemis in 2019. And, yes, it's proceeding. It's got a tiny fraction of Apollo's budget (adjusted for inflation). But, I don't even understand your objection. Yes, they are developing new technology for new mission requirements. So what?
@@JaatAshishKumar The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige.
There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
Il faudra expliquer à la NASA comment y retourner, ils ont des problèmes avec les tenues spatiales, la sécurité des astronautes en cas d'éruptions scolaires et démission de rayonnement solaire nocif.
Ils veulent plutot avoir des technologie + safe et moins moins moins ... moins couteuse que celle d'avant car etant plus en periode de guerre froide, elle n'a plus autant de budget qu'avant
@@malidevGames ça coûte cher les effets spéciaux !
@@Grey_92 Ah oui, des effet speciaux qui sont tel qu'ils ont reussi a` berner le gouvernement de l'URSS et l'agence spatial de l'URSS et que meme maintenant toute les Agence spatiales et entreprise spatiales continuent a les croire.
Qu'a tu decouvert qu'ils n'ont pas vu ?
@@malidevGames J'ai pu discuter avec les hommes rats de la terre creuse, et ils m'ont tout dit!
MI PREGUNTA E S SABER SI SE PUEDEN VER DESDE LA TIERRA LOS RESTOS DEL APOLLO EN LA LUNA.
No, we cannot see them from Earth, because they are too small for Earth-based telescopes to resolve.
@@maxfan1591 COMPRARÍA ESA FOTOGRAFÍA.....
@@faiverparamoruiz7743 Which photograph?
Can someone explain to me why there is over 400,000 pounds of man-made items on the moon to this day unless we've been there?
For example Lunochod's. And Soviets would never claim any Gagarin landed there.😀
You have seen it? Can you prove anything, or do you just believe it because someone told you?
@@brianramirez4953 That's like asking me if I was on the moon.
@@johnrhansonsr So, you don't know it's 400,000 pounds of it, you just confirmed it's only your believing? Anyway, it would be hard to deliver 400,000 pounds by all ridiculously poor rockets landed on the Moon, including doubtfull Apollos.
@@jazemkrzysio All of the people that don't believe it happened is because that's what they believe without any real evidence. Throughout our lives we have to believe things in the blind daily. Do I have questions, yes, of course I do. And I'm sure I don't believe in things that you don't believe in such as 9/11 events. I had someone try to tell me the towers didn't go down because JP-4 jet fuel could never burn that hot. Well, if you have 60,000 pounds of JP-4 igniting all at once I can tell you without a doubt it will be hot enough to melt anything on this earth. Thanks for your response.
the truth is "man can not land on moon".
The rocks that they brought back and shared with the world say otherwise.
NO
All faked wasn’t it?
I agree with your wife...
Well, no. Scientists from around the world have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last half century. They know the rocks can't be from Earth as they show signs of having formed in a low-gravity vacuum, which isn't the case with Earth rocks. They know the Apollo rocks can't be lunar meteorites because of obvious differences in appearance between them. And they know the rocks can't have been collected by unmanned sample retriever missions, because there's simply too much material.
Then there is the video record. There is simply no way to fake the videos of the Apollo astronauts interacting with a low-gravity vacuum with distant horizons in uncut videos lasting sometimes more than 30 minutes at a time.
If Nasa spacecraft really did land on the moon with the Apollo back then that looks like trash bag, why dont they get back to the moon with good looking spacecraft? LOL
Aerospace engineering is governed by physics not aesthetics.
why not go back? for the same reason they haven't faked it in the past 50 years.
@@yassassin6425
Good. Then that ship look like trash bag can be build again and landing more and more in the moon. Can't wait to hear it.
@@gives_bad_advice
They realized people have known their mistake
@@BangNong - even more reason to do it, to put to rest the rumors. the u.s. govt can surely do quite a sophistication job of it this time.
but for a long as every credible institution in the world that has an aerospace program has failed to bring any significant inconsistencies to light, in nearly 51 years... I doubt NASA is concerned what a minority of laypeople believe.
its all a farce 😂
may the farce be with you..
No!
Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!! TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever) Phone to the Moon (LOL) O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house... Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh
strange how we could fly mach 2 at 60,000ft sipping champagne in 1981 but can't in 2023....REALLY..?
@@apocalips8008 LOL.. Totally with you on that one... Concorde..!!
"Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!!"
After Apollo 11, public support for the space program fell quickly. Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget would be politically popular, and did so. NASA responded to the budget cut by cancelling Apollo. The contractors responded to the cancellation of Apollo but shutting down their production lines and redeploying or dismissing their staff. The staff responded by doing other work and not bothering to remember everything they learned about Apollo.
"TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever)"
Pretty sure there is no TV from Mars. At best there are multiple images which can be joined together movie-style. I'm pretty sure bandwidth is an issue.
"Phone to the Moon (LOL)"
What's so hard to comprehend about the idea of patching a phone call through to a radio? Radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s.
"O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house..."
Maybe you need an 85 foot dish like NASA has (three of, around the world).
"Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh"
I'm happy to believe what the scientists from around the world say, who have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last 50 years. They have no doubt that the Apollo rocks are from the Moon and were collected by people.
@@vickyjacobs9680 "LOL.. Totally with you on that one... Concorde..!!"
So if you accept that Concorde is technology we had in 1969 but don't have now, why is it so different with Apollo?
The individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost after such a long time. Much of the equipment is archaic, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” and have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. However, it takes years to build up that sort of expertise and NASA is going through the same problems it had in the early to mid-60’s.
Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. There is also no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around. The question of phone signals has been answered many times before to the point of boredom..
Welp. All I can say about this ATM is that it would’ve been a lot harder to fake the moon landing and get that past the Russians than actually getting there in the first place. 😏
Also President Nixon speaking to them on the Moon , Nixon would never do anything dishonest.
No , it's much easier to fake such a giant achievement than to actually do it , there is no hell way anyone could have landed on the moon with 60s technology
@@josephforest7605only if Nixon knew the truth
You never heard of the movies?
well, I am still in doubt because why did it take us this long to land another human on moon,
Could it be that there is something fishy
That's bcoz , the cold war that led to space race is over. So, no need to spend billions of dollars and risk human lives to go there again. Just for the purpose of going there. US decided to go to the moon, bcoz Soviet union launched a satellite. US wanted to exhibit her own superiority too. What more glamorous way to do that, than going out of this planet.
@@africa_everyday little wonder..... I see
I love the way you express ur doubt , that's y I took my time to explain it to u. And u seem sensible and knowledgeable. To some people, no explanation is good for them. They'll just insist on their assumption without any concrete evidence.
Lemme ask a simple question,why is that, no country on earth doubt the mission ? Most especially enemies of US like Sviet union,China,Cuba etc that can use it to embarrass US.
@@africa_everyday ☺
If I have no evidence why should I insist that I am correct, we learn everyday ☺
Well, I don't know why they do not doubt the mission, I don't think any other country attempted such mission again
@@olanrewajuadam7499 I don't mean you. I meant some people.
Countries don't go again bcoz of the amount of money needed, the risk of human lives and nothing to really gain like the first country that went there. If u wish to learn more. I can share some links with you.
What if they left Earth, orbited the moon and came back without landing? Any proof?
Well, it would be one small step for man but one giant leap of faith for mankind!
Yes, there's a ton of proof. But, before I could answer, I'd first ask what type of proof you'd expect and accept. I'm not going to write an encyclopedia here. So, name the proof you think should exist, and I'll answer.
They brought back rocks
It had to be Nixon to make that fake call lmao 🤣
What 'fake call'? Oh, you don't understand that a landline can be relayed via microwave link to DSN network and transmitted by S band radio?
Righto.
I finf it Hard to belive they went to the mon
Yeah it's a pretty incredible accomplishment. But they did.
Nope...Never landed. Just flew low, took a few photos, scooped up some water to top off their tanks, and then rocketed back to earth. Of course, prior to so doing, emptied their waste tanks prior to punching the 'Go' button.
Yes I believe we went to the moon it was proven by all the receivers around at the time
No one can reach the moon for 💯 reasons
And every one of those "reasons" is incongruent with the reality.
Every time someone says the moon landings were fake I throw up in my mouth a little.
The truth will do that to you!
@@danielafreedman If you study this subject and understand the science, historical perspective and the equipment and procedures used, you will come to the conclusion that limited spaceflight was perfectly possible in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, and that the United States did in fact put men on the Moon.
It was one of the most public events of the 20th century, viewed around the world. Any conspiracy would had to have involved hundreds of different people from many different countries over decades, including Great Britain, the former Soviet Union, France, Australia, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, China, Japan and India, from which not one credible witness has ever emerged. It would also have been impossible to cover up for such a length of time; the Watergate conspirators couldn’t keep their escapade silent for more than a few months.
There are no ‘anomalies’ that cannot be explained scientifically and there is much third-party corroboration; for example, the spacecraft were tracked to the Moon, the rock and soil samples have been authenticated by many different scientists around the world for decades, the dust from the rover falls back in a way only possible in a 1/6g vacuum and Chinese, Japanese and Indian probes have photographed and or observed the equipment left behind at various Apollo landing sites.
😂😂😂".. Another PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters as usual".. It's easier to come to a conclusion straight out, " It's easy to fool people, then to convince them they have been fooled".. 🤫🤐".. do y'all self a favour Yankee, obviously you haven't done your homework on this subject clearly your a 🐑 following the rest of the herd.. there's no coming back from a 🧚♂️ fairytale fantasy, I really feel sorry for you, NA why should I.. 🤡".. I can already no what you gonna say your a flatearther 😂😂, all conspiracy theoryist are flatearthers, my profile picture will set you straight,"..
@@danielafreedman ❤
@@Not-A-Space-Agency If this is directed at me I'm not a Yankee. I've done my homework since 1971. Amongst other things:
Books
Exploring the Planets - (Ian Nicolson BSc, astronomer, 1970), Rockets and Missiles - (John W. R. Taylor, writer & aircraft designer, 1970), The Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, Fellow of the British Interplanetary Society, 1971), The Observer’s Book of Manned Spaceflight (Reginald Turnill, 1972), A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts - (Andrew Chaikin, 1998), The Man Who Ran the Moon - (Piers Bizony, 2007), Moon Hoax: Debunked! - (Paolo Attivissimo 2013), NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual, 2019)
Documentaries & Film
The Other Side of the Moon 1979, The Men Who Walked on the Moon 1979, Moon Shot 1994, To the Moon 1999 - (all available on You Tube)
I'm laughing once again, every time I see this clip of the LM @ 2:30 what a joke who took the video and again at 4:20, I understand it's sped up and looks like a model, anyway its now 2023 and they haven't even managed to solve the problem to provide enough protection on the Orion capsule, I mean you wouldn't want to harm those astronauts venturing past the VAB now would you, once they solved this then they will fly humans to the moon.
"every time I see this clip of the LM @ 2:30 what a joke who took the video and again at 4:20,"
Michael Collins in the Command Module had a film camera mounted in a bracket in one of the CM's windows. He was very specifically instructed to film the LM immediately after undocking and immediately prior to docking.
"I understand it's sped up and looks like a model,"
But unless you're an aerospace engineer, what it looks like to you is irrelevant. Aerospace engineers don't have any problems with the appearance of the LM.
"anyway its now 2023 and they haven't even managed to solve the problem to provide enough protection on the Orion capsule, I mean you wouldn't want to harm those astronauts venturing past the VAB now would you,"
Standards for protection against radiation are higher today than they were 50 years ago. And you might have noticed that permeates all aspects of life - things people did routinely back then are often illegal today. And the Orion's electronics are more susceptible to radiation than Apollo's electronics.
"once they solved this then they will fly humans to the moon."
Hooray!
Philip, the issue on Orion is the computers, not radiation poisoning. Apollo used core rope memory, which is inherently radiation resistant. Magnetic core memory is obsolete and was replaced in the 70s because the integrated circuits that make all of those super fast, super tiny computers you use possible are cheaper and faster despite being extremely weak to radiation.
The whole event was a big launch, low earth orbit and re-entry....and lots of cover-up.
Human beings cannot survive the radiation levels outside the magnetosphere, or the Van Allen belt...even if you could survive passing through the van Allen belt, your life expectancy would be dramatically reduced.
The film would have been impacted by radiation, there was no such thing as auto focus on the cameras. The astronauts on the moon in the sunlight without any radiation protection and some to cool them down would have taken a huge amount of BTUs (energy).
During the Apollo missions, the spacecraft were outside the Earth’s protective magnetosphere for most of their flight. However, they were not exposed to particle radiation for long enough on a short 8-12 day round trip for it to be a significant risk. In 1968 the Russian Zond 5 sent a number of biological samples around the Moon and back, including two turtles and these specimens were recovered alive upon their return to Earth.
Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.
The surface camera was modified to be used with gloves. The shutter speed was fixed at 1/250th of a second and the ISO rating of the film was calculated to properly expose the surface of the moon. The astronauts had a limited choice of aperture (f5.6, f8 & f11 depending on whether they were shooting down-sun, cross-sun or into shadow) and a choice of near, medium or far focus. The camera was fitted with a wide-angle lens to help with framing and had a larger than normal shutter release and an aiming arrow or paddle on the top of the lens barrel. The astronauts also trained extensively with them, even taking them on holiday.
The radiation exposure level on the Moon from the distance of space was not enough to damage the film. It was much less than that of an airport x-ray machine’s direct radiation from a distance of less than a few feet. It had the same effect equivalent to leaving the film on a shelf for six months on Earth. And in 1969, film was often left on shelves for far longer in many cases and still used. Furthermore, there are signs of radiation contamination in some of the images, if you look carefully; for example lines running through the film, bright spots and a decrease in contrast and colour response. These effects are not easily detectable to the untrained eye and without access to the original material.
There are only two ways heat can transfer on the Moon. The first is radiation, both directly from the Sun and from the Sun’s reflection on the surface. The astronauts’ spacesuits were designed to reflect almost 90% of the light, so very little heat would have transferred to them. The second is by conduction from direct contact with the surface. This is also an ineffective process as the dust, soil and rock on the lunar surface is loose and doesn’t conduct heat well and the astronauts’ boots were insulated, slowing down conduction even further.
Water from a tank in the backpack flowed through the Liquid Cooled Garment (a web of fine tubing within the spacesuit) into a heat exchanger and then out through tiny pores in a metal sublimator plate (turning from a solid directly into a gas) where it was exposed to the vacuum of space. The consequent pressure drop froze the water, forming a layer of ice on the outside of the plate. Once the water left under the plate cooled to a user-comfortable temperature, it was returned to the LCG and the water in the plate would re-freeze, sealing the plate and stopping the cooling process. Thus, heat rejection with automatic temperature control was accomplished with no sensors or moving parts to malfunction. 12lb of feedwater gave about eight hours of cooling.
The spacesuit in Apollo mission was designed to reduce radiation
@@dientutran3414 Then astronauts must have been weightlifters
Kinda sorta hahahahaha
Six times
No.
No one went to moon ever😂😂
The Rocks they brought back and shared with the world say otherwise.
@@pov1698could be picked by others
".. 🙄🤫🥱🤥".. Yeah ok 👌 if y'all say so ALWAYS believe in what they tell you on TV "..😂😂
they managed to communicate with someone on the moon from earth, and i couldn't even get a signal in a subway... kind of fishy
I don't understand it, therefore it's fake.
No it was big lie
and repeated 9 times...
Explain this Phone call....
They used radio.
Er… V = 5
There is wind in moon !!!
Lots of weird conspiracy theorists in the comments
yeah, i really cant believe any of them actualy got an education. or like played with a radio, or like learned any physics. going to the moon is hard and expensive, but you don't need to fake it. actually you cant even fake it in 1969. i would much rather know how they faked it, if they really belive they did.
@Wayne Thomas That sums it up, education has gone astray.
No way.