Nikon D500 & more: the FOUR BEST Sports, Action, Wildlife, & Event LENSES recommendation
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 01. 2017
- Nikon D500 & more: the FOUR BEST Sports, Action, Wildlife, & Event LENSES recommendation
IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS, YOU CAN MAKE A KIND DONATION OF $2 OR $5 VIA PAYPAL LINK HERE: www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
(paypal email: kenw111@insightbb.com)
Man I love your videos Keep it up you're a great help!
Backyard birding with my D5500 & 200-500 is so enjoyable and a great value.
I bought the 70-200 2.8E FL ED VR when it's on sale ($650 off). The lens is incredibly sharp. AF with D500 is super fast. Many complained the zoom ring placement. I actually like the design. With battery grip on D500, it's very natural to hold the lens without touching the focus ring. I used it to shoot sports and got great results. I am looking for a 17-55 2.8 but it seems it has no match to the 70-200 2.8 FL.
Thumbs up for the "tougher than woodpecker lips" description. Lost my coffee over that one ; )
Whahahahahah
Thanks for this great video too
Entertaining,thk you.
Great vid! As epic a lens as the 200-500 is (I own it, it's epic!) I do think you need to get a review in of the Tamron 150-600 G2. (has to be G2) I've seen a lot of posts in your vids asking about it and I don't think there's another person on youtube that'll do it properly like you. The flickr page for the Tamron has some amazing shots and in particular Rowe's BIF page on the lens is ridiculous and I mean ridiculous... so it might be worth putting it through the cycle! With Tamron having a few other really nice SP lenses I think a lot of people are wondering if the 150-600 is a dud like the 15-30 or dud. Thanks Ken love your work!!
Great energy - thank you! My daughter plays bball and I often shoot where light dies. I have had success using a 1.8 nifty fifty but considering a 2.8 24-70. Please share your thoughts. Thank you in advance!
Ive always shot sports and wildlife with a 70-200 2.8 VR II and the the 300mm 2.8 VR. The 300mm is kinda heavy but not too bad, I did a whole day at a zoo carrying it and was fine - no damage to my D700 and got some really epic shots. The only time I notice a big lens like the 300 2.8 is when I sot down for a cofee and its on the table.
I know you hate the Nikon 80-400mm but to be honest it works fine for me but agree the 200-500mm is a good lens and costs a lot less. Keep up the good work.
What is the model number of the $600 lens that is attached to the camera? I'm looking for a replacement (under $1,000) for the 70-300mm vr lens that I dropped. I used it to take bird photos with a Nikon D850.
This channel has been very helpful! Thanks!
Theoria Apophasis, in your opinion how does the Nikon 200-500 holds up to the150-600 lenses of Sigma and Tamron?
Is the fact that it is also from Nikon makes the D500 more optimized for Nikon lenses like the 200-500?
What is the first lens that you are talking about? I keep missing the size of the lens. I know you said it was awesome. But what size is it?
aaand the FX 70 300 VRII 4.5 5.6 is a good choice for wildlife and portraits?
Do you like 500mm PF? Compared to the classics 500 f4, etc .. So far I observe, the image quality is not as perfect, but very very good. Better than 200-500 and the 300f4 AFS ? And the size & weight are woow ...
Hiii, how about tamaron 70-200 f2.8 g2 for wildlife photography on NikonD500?
So is the D500 the best for sports action? I'm new to this world so any suggestions on bodies and lenses would be great! Love your videos man. :)
it is, yes
Thanks 😀
love my 17-55 on your recommendation...I'm thinking about the tamron 150-600. how does it compare to the Nikon 200-500?
all reports are the same the 200 500 is superior, i know the VR for sure the hell is
l was sure that you were going to recommend the 70-300mm af-s vr
I used that lens on a Nikon D90 (crop sensor) for aerial photography. The auto focus was fast enough. The image rendition was a little flat. The reach was good, though 400mm on the long end could have come in handy. I wonder how it compares to the 200-500mm on a full frame?
Swapped my zoom for Nikon 500mm pf f5.6. With d500 it's the dogs dangly bits
Where can I see your photography work
Most game systems are loss leaders. It's a known thing in the gaming world, when new systems come out - the companies lose around $100 a system. Only to make it back in software sales.
What is your recommendation for using Nikon TC 1.4 iii for bird photography on Nikon d500 with 200mm-500mm 5.6 lens?
never a telecon on a zoom lens, no
what about the 300 AF-S F4 D ?? before u said that was your favourite but here you recommend the 300 F4 E PF
what bout it?
What do you actually think about the new sigma 500mm f4? I got the money to buy that and sell my 80-400mm lens. I will use it for bird photography :). Alternatively, I was considering a used Nikon 500mm f4.
Theoria Apophasis, would you be able to do a comparison between the AF-S 70-200 f/2.8E FL ED VR and AF DC-NIKKOR 105mm f/2D?
now thats some radical apples to oranges comparison :) ease and speed and convenience are the only reason id grab the 70 200 over the 105
however ease and speed and convenience happen all the time as necessities, dont they
So which one would you take if you had the two of them to choose from?
Brian Hawkshaw pardon the interference, but I'd grab the 70-200 FL anyday, overall, it's much better, I have the vr2 version, and I'm looking forward to upgrade after seeing the results from the FL lens
Wait did he actually talk about the lens on the body at all or did I miss something
Money is never irrelevant .
But which lenses would help produce the next great image in portrait ( low light but low ISO ) , portrait ( out door , natural light ) and landscape at night ...
for some people it IS……especially working pros that need the best, period…..and for those people its a tax write off anyway
best portrait image? the Voigt 58mm 1.4 Noct
Will this work on a Nikon D3200? Meaning the 1400$ version ...
Nice tips! I really enjoyed the video! Why do you say AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR sucks? I have one... And i do not have many complains about it.... The only downside I found is its mediocre build quality... Dust gets inside it... But apart from that, I have nothing to complain about these lenses...
Hey Angry, exactly why is the Nikon 80-400 a POS?
Will you review the Nikon 120-300 f2.8 lens, please
i wont be, no
love and drool over that 200-500 its soo sexy.. someday
I have taken great wildlife pics with the 200-400mm, birds on the wing, even using a TC, how does it suck?
TC if a bird is close is fine in good light, even the hated 2X.
I even have the original version, sure, it's a 5.6, If one uses it properly it is not a bad lens at all.
What, do people not realize the limitations, a 400 is not going to be great for any object that is too far away and any 5.6 is not great in low light.
. The 300mm 2.8 sets in the tripod, the 200-400 is around my neck on another camera without the tripod mound, it's light and I don't even worry about damage to the camera.
And why would I prefer a 400 3.5 over a 400 2.8 using a TC other than price?
I know this is an older video, but do you have a recommendation for a low light telephoto for American football? Is there anything that is price comparable to the 200-500 for low light?
200 500 and monopod
Thank you for replying 👍. I have learned so much from watching your videos. I really appreciate what you have given us.
I've tried a D500 with that new 70-200 f2.8 & it's unreal. However I still think Canon has the best wildlife telephoto the EF 100-400 f4-5.6 mark 2 lens, sharp & more compact.
bobbintonn could I ask you? if I have choice between d500 d750 canon 6d for family and life around
what will be your advice?
thanks
On those 3 , probably still the D750 over the D500 as DX doesn't have many wide angle lenses , but otherwise D500 is a good choice. As for Canon I'd wait for a 6D Mark 2 , there are many great L lenses for Canon & 3rd party . Maybe Nikon will soon update the D750 as well.
bobbintonn thank you so much!
but tell me please also about nikon technical support . if I buy any nikon camera. not from official shop. and I'll get some trouble with camera. service centre of nikon will fix my camera? because I heard something. but maybe it is rumours? !))))
#Evos I have never dealt with the technical support of any camera company so I can't help you there. Not even my D600 had the famed oil leak of You Tube. I'll also add I have never bought a camera online or grey market & I happy to support actual physical store where you can try physical cameras. Otherwise I'd probably have bought camera like the original em 5 or Fuji XT1 both of whom I don't get on with the ergonomics & controls. Equally thanks to physical stores I can say the Canon 5D Mark 4 is quite an enjoyable camera to use.
i hear you mention sometimes that you own a few copies of the same lens... why is this?
i find em cheap and i cant resist,
PF lenses don't work for night and astrophotography - gives lights and stars halos.
Is there any money in macro photography?
if the job calls for it, of course. i shoot lots of macros during weddings, and if someone has a small product they want photographed in detail, whip out the macro lens.
What do you think Ken?
there is, yes, most of it product work like jewelry and watches……small market
Yes I agree. No big bucks.
I seen one guy taking images of a little tiny screw that was maybe 2mm long. He had a ton of extension on the lens and was filling the frame with it. I think he said he was for a catalogue. It amazes me that a screw can be manufactured that tiny. Like those tiny screws holding your macbook together.
No money in birding photography?
almost none, no
dude. never gave the model of the 70-200. wth???
Hmmm...money no object...easy...get a real Pro to take your photos instead lol 😃😁☺
Boring. The only reviewer that does outdoor photography sitting on his butt. And believes he's funny.See real photographers like Steve Perry and Mark Smith
i shot over 250 GIGS of pics over the past 4 weeks, and it was WILDLIFE>....... so, apparently youre CLUELESS