Onslaught: Champion Spotlight with Context

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 30

  • @OsFan8
    @OsFan8 Před 8 měsíci +12

    I definitely want to see a “so you have to fight Onslaught” video. I have him as a 6* r5 sig 200 and I still hate him.

  • @OYC2316
    @OYC2316 Před 8 měsíci +3

    Was glad to see this! Thanks for posting this DLL! Who designed Onslaught?

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +5

      Kabam Lex (most recently Iron Man)

    • @OYC2316
      @OYC2316 Před 8 měsíci +3

      @Daddylonglegs93 He's got a gift for design just like you do. All of the champion designers are talented but Onslaught definitely sticks out this year right along with Absorbing Man, Kate, OG IM, and Photon. Thanks for the info.

  • @AustinMCoC
    @AustinMCoC Před 8 měsíci +2

    Took shocker to r2 just to counter this goober, props to the designer for making a defender that will be relevant for a long time

  • @CharleyEll
    @CharleyEll Před 8 měsíci +1

    I really love this series. Thanks for doing them!

  • @Stig1215
    @Stig1215 Před 8 měsíci +2

    I don’t think it was mentioned but with the neuroshocks he can’t miss too which Is a big strength

  • @spiderman-2416
    @spiderman-2416 Před 8 měsíci +3

    If you dont mind me asking why does it seem like Kabam despises Nimrod? 😂

  • @andyfox2057
    @andyfox2057 Před 8 měsíci

    Been waiting for this!

  • @DeadPool-qx8pr
    @DeadPool-qx8pr Před 8 měsíci

    Hi
    Thanks for another great video. Personal openion " The statement unblockable means cannot be blocked and feels kind of cheating if separated from Cannot be blocked" .

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      I do not agree. It's a pretty common templating distinction in other complex games (like Magic the Gathering), where "cannot" is more absolute. And this is same distinction we already have between unstoppable and cannot be interrupted. It's going to happen.

  • @MrPabIito
    @MrPabIito Před 8 měsíci +1

    Thanks for these videos! I'd love a "how to fight" video since this guy is pretty overwhelming. Been practicing my sp1 dex on the 3 star, but can't get the punish right. Do you know if the sp1 can be punished with correct spacing?

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      I don't think it's reliable without root, no. He's quite tough.

    • @MrPabIito
      @MrPabIito Před 8 měsíci

      ​@@Daddylonglegs93 Found more succes dexing the sp2! Crushed sometimes makes it hard to push him to sp2 though. Still eager to hear what you'll have to say about fighting him (: Happy holidays!

  • @pikapika3
    @pikapika3 Před 8 měsíci

    since nobody plays shocker in AW as attacker and especially againts boss node, im more curious if he can stun on sp2 since its stun immune node. Would be great option as boss killer if it does.

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      I think you need to reexamine your first assumption lol. He's tactic and newly a 7* - Shocker is definitely going to war. But no, passive stuns do not apply to someone who is stun immune.

  • @andyfox2057
    @andyfox2057 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Why does monster of physic energy not have immunity to reverse controls when Prof X does? Madness. Was the question of giving it to him even brought up?

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      This is a really good example of why you have to be careful designing by lore. Because you know what's madness? Giving this guy any more utility. He has the psychic shielding tag, so there's your nod (given he does have the literal helmet that inspired the tag), but I don't think he needed immunity.

    • @andyfox2057
      @andyfox2057 Před 8 měsíci

      @@Daddylonglegs93 how far do we go though until we are just playing kits dressed as characters we know that bear no correlation. I think Loki not being immune to frost or Phoenix not being incinerate immune is the biggest injustice. Literally fire made flesh 🤦🏻‍♂️ My only hope is if at least it was acknowledged somewhere along the line and it was decided to be removed then it’s a conscious decision and not blatant ignorance.

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      Loki is older than the coldsnap effect and Phoenix is older than incinerate, so those aren't great examples. Why would someone be immune to something that doesn't yet exist? If we buffed them, I'm sure they'd have those immunities, but come on. Not a great reason to jump to "ignorance."

    • @andyfox2057
      @andyfox2057 Před 8 měsíci

      @@Daddylonglegs93 That's absolutely fair enough if those effects didn't exist at the time. I was sat in the car about to drop off presents and trying to find the right word. By ignorance i meant you didn't even think or know he should have it in the first place. Better word might be overlooked? Was it a conscious decision made or was it not even a consideration is what I was getting at. And Merry Christmas!

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +1

      Gotcha. Yeah i'm pretty sure it was a conscious decision, since the psychic shielding had to be intentional, and we had discussions about how he was accumulating a spooky amount of utility haha

  • @OsFan8
    @OsFan8 Před 8 měsíci

    And I’m not sure if it’s intentional but the video is locked to channel members only.

    • @Daddylonglegs93
      @Daddylonglegs93  Před 8 měsíci +3

      I mentioned this in the last Livestream, but CZcams has a new feature that allows me to schedule vids for general release but leave them open to members as soon as the upload finishes, so you'll see that more.

    • @OsFan8
      @OsFan8 Před 8 měsíci

      I obviously missed that. I’m glad it was intentional. Enjoy your holiday!

  • @jonf5679
    @jonf5679 Před 8 měsíci

    Havok melts him

  • @tc_kaballin2715
    @tc_kaballin2715 Před 8 měsíci

    So... og daredevil OP? Gotcha