Giant Ichthyosaur Discovery - The Largest Marine Reptile...EVER
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 05. 2024
- Check out these papers by Lomax et el to learn more about the incredible Ichthyotitan Severnensis, the largest marine reptile ever to roam our seas!
Latest publication: journals.plos.org/plosone/art...
2018 publication: journals.plos.org/plosone/art...
My socials:
Instagram: / em_gems_
Twitter: Em_Gems_?s=09
Email: emgemssyt@gmail.com
All non-licensed photos used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes.
#ichthyosaur #giantichthyosaur #paleontology
I believe ichthyosaurs are also found in Utah and Nevada which, during the Mesozoic, were on the (then) West coast of North America.
thanks Emma. Great video, Paul
Thank you Paul! Congratulations again 🥳🍾
Quite fascinating - and scary. btw, looking sharp, Em.
Yes, beautiful dress!
Beau Travail comme d'habitude🎬🍀🙏🌌
That’s so cool a new species 😊
Jadore em vidéo super 😊😊
Good "set in stone" pun.
About the size of a blue whale 🐋. Maybe a little shorter than some. Still very impressive size!
Those figures of size are truly impressive. I hope its you who stumbles across the rest of their body Emma. I would just love to see your face light up😁💘
35 meters long and still growing 😱!
Theres also another legendary ichthyosaur from new zealand that remains are in a museum now apparently, its called hectors ichthyosaur and if the estimates are true its 40+ meters
20 m long! That's crazy! 🤯 As much as I like primeval animals, I'm still glad I don't live in the mesozoic era! 😅
😯 i remember u! 😍
u disappeared off my youtube for some reason :(
what was the name of ur other channel again??
I have 4K footage of aust beach if you want it.
How do you they know that it was a reptile and not a giant fish?
I have to keep reminding myself that ichthyosaurs are not cute dolphin creatures
they are more like dolphin shaped snakes
I can see this exceptionally captivating stylish young lady on big time tv shows enthralling us in the future, think Alice Roberts/Janina Ramirez.
10 out of 10
I am annoyed with this paper for two reasons: 1) an isolated surangular is not a good basis for a species definition. This naming will lead to future taxonomic headaches and I am not happy with that. 2) the histological basis to prove it was still growing is flawed. The authors largely base this on the absence of an EFS, but an EFS has never been found in any ichthyosaur, even those which have clearly approached asymptotic growth. If I had reviewed, I would have rejected it, in its current form.
Meters? Washing machines is the preferred measurement