Why We Can't See Stars in Space
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 06. 2024
- The universe is an awe inspiring and mesmerizing place. We know stars, galaxies, nebulae, and nearly infinite points of light in the sky exist. We can look up from Earth and see them for ourselves with out own eyes. But why can't we see stars or anything at all in space when we're actually in space? Let's discuss exactly why this happens.
Videos Featured:
Astronaut Bruce McCandless II Floats Free in Space
• Astronaut Bruce McCand...
Grandes Missões da NASA Ep 04 - Exploradores da Lua // When We Left Earth Ep 04 - The Explorers
• Grandes Missões da NAS...
Inspiration4 crew opens Dragon's cupola for the first time
• Inspiration4 crew open...
International Space Station: Off the Earth, for the Earth, and Beyond.
• International Space St...
William Shatner's Journey to Space
• William Shatner's Jour...
Apollo 11 Press Conference
• Apollo 11 Press Confer...
Apollo 11 Moonwalk 20 July 1969 - restored footage
• Apollo 11 Moonwalk 20 ...
Apollo 11: One Small Step on the Moon for All Mankind
• Apollo 11: One Small S...
ISS - International Space Station - Inside ISS - Tour - Q&A - HD
• ISS - International Sp...
See stars from the space station in breathtaking time-lapse
• See stars from the spa...
Music credits: Melodysheep
Please visit their channel and say hello:
/ @melodysheep
If you found this helpful or entertaining, let us know in the comments and don't forget to leave a like.
Also, follow us on social media.
TikTok - www.tiktok.com/@officialinter...
Facebook - / officialinterstellarnews
Twitter - / interstellrnews
Instagram - / officialinterstellarnews - Věda a technologie
Quick correction: I stated all three Astronauts landed on the moon. I meant to say they all went to the moon. Michael Collins never step foot on the moon's surface.
Yeah, I noticed that. Great video! I think it will be heartbreaking for conspiracy theorists to watch 😂
To summarize: Just because you're in space doesn't mean you're not standing in full sunlight. The stars become visible when the sunlight is blocked.
Nice
Well spoken Daniel S.
I'm really upset it took 8 minutes for him to say that.
@@desired117 they explained it in more detail. An 8 minute lesson isn't that long.
@A B is not that it was too long. It's that I had the thought that it would be for the same reason you can't see stars in the day time at minute 2. They explained it in more detail but unnecessary detail in some spots.
Michael Collins did not set foot on the moon. He was in orbit. Because of that, Collins is often called the "forgotten astronaut''
Then how come you remember him!
I can’t imagine being alone orbiting the moon by yourself
@@AD-ur1fk Great view...though
Why didn’t he?
@@AD-ur1fk Image him having to come home to Earth all on his own! That’s what would have happened if the Assent Engine failed to fire on the LEM. Neil and Buzz would have been stranded on the Moon with no hope of any rescue, as it wasn’t possible for Michael Collins to dock with the LEM while it was on the Moon’s surface. At a certain point, due to Oxygen supply, Fuel, and a host of many other factors, Collins would have had no choice but to leave his two colleagues ; Commander Neil Armstrong and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, to their eventual tragic fete on the Moon, and return to Earth on his own!
Anyyone who lived in an Eastern Canadian or US city during the 2003 power grid failure has experienced this first hand. I always thought I still saw stars in the city until I saw the sky during a 3 night period without being diluted through the city's ambient light. It was literally breathtaking.
Few of us truly see the night sky in the 21st century.
Come to Australia. I live just outside Darwin and see the night sky lit up often.
In older literature and text, you often hear people refer to the sky as the heavens. In my short time on this earth, the night sky has always been dark and uninteresting. If you wanted to find a star, you would have to stare at some point in space for a moment before being able to pick up on faint light. That is why it never made sense why people would call something as uninteresting as the sky, "the heavens". I now believe that if I could see the night sky in its full glory, I would also be calling it as such.
I have to drive at least 100 miles away just to go to a dark enough area to get some great milky way shots on my cameras (Pixel 6 Pro and Fuji X-T4) and 200 miles just to be far enough from civilization and no light pollution.
@@niko6248 Take a trip to the Rockies and spend a night in a tent, you"ll see all the beautiful lights in the Creators Firmament.
Too much light pollution from cities ruins a truly wonderful view. Go out into the wilderness and look at how breathtaking the night sky can be.
As a upcoming developer of a game where it takes places in space, you've defeated my dilemma I had about whenever should player see the stars outside spaceship windows or not. It seems like I would need to hide the distant stars if spaceship is near bright objects like planet or star, or the inside is well lit, but then reveal the beauty of space when player is in total darkness. Definitely a complex task technicality-wise, but I'd like to include as much as realism as possible for immersion purposes, which means needing to learn how things work in space, like from this video.
Niiice, I'm also planning on becoming a game designer, along with getting into the space and scifi genre of gaming. While having as much realism as I can get.
That actually sounds cool if implemented correctly
How about some sort of automatic exposure setting like in Cyberpunk, where when you walk out of a building everything is white and it takes your characters eyes a second to adjust to the change.
Could perhaps use some sort of system like that?
We're all gonna save up alot of time now because of this man showing us the great video
what's your game called?
My family went on a cruise when I was 16. We had one of the big rooms with a balcony and nothing could have prepared for the night sky in the Atlantic. OMG I was floored. I cried so hard. The darkness of the ocean mixed with the brightness of the stars in the sky brought me to tears. My ancestors used the night sky as a map & it all came kind of full circle for me. I encourage everyone to please try to see the night sky as clear as possible. Our very own galaxy is visible to our own eyes. Beautiful.
Interesting--my ancestors did the same thing.
My ancestors too.... mankind
I went on a cruise and couldn't even see the stars! The lights on the dang cruise ship were way to bright!
If you haven't been to a dark sky to look at the stars, I suggest you take a trip to a dark sky zone. It's breathtaking. Seeing the milky way in photos does not do it justice compared to your own eyes. It's well worth driving a few hours to see, just make sure its a clear night with no moon
This. I have gone to the star parties at Cherry Springs in PA and it's just stunning. Nothing compares to seeing it with your own eyes.
Just go to space
@@youtubeperson199 No you are in fact looking at the milky way (example: 8:36) if you look in and within the brown-gold-ish line. Anywhere else is likely not the milky way. Why i say "likely" is because if you look just outside the brown-gold-ish lines there is a bunch of stars close enough to be "in" the milky way, just not visually from our perspective.
@@youtubeperson199 You can literally see the core of the Milky Way; Sagittarius A*
i really thought until like a month ago that all those pretty night sky photos with the milky way visible were edited or had a ton of exposure, i thought "why isnt the milky way visible from earth??" like i knew light pollution was bad but not THAT bad
I love how far humans have come. Out there, the space is scary, dark, almost empty and lifeless, yet it still holds beauty. That's why i love Science, Space and Astronomy
This video deserves a million of views
you dont know space is lifeless theres tons of planets out there we not that important to be the only ones in the universe
@@daedaedonedidit5634 That's what seperates Globeheads from FE'ers.Our lives have Devine Value.
Bud we're still stuck on the internal combustion engine. Haven't advanced beyond boom boom goes vroom vroom intelligence. How far we've come.
We've never been to space I've seen so many leaked videos from nasa 😂
@@A315.
That was an extremely convoluted way of saying you can't see stars while in direct sunlight, but I appreciate the romanticism. Indeed, even relatively meagre levels of light from our cities makes it much more difficult to see the stars at night compared to the pitch-black countryside.
I live in the city. And when the wind blows out the dust in the atmosphere after a windy day and the air is clean, you can see much more of the space. :-)
December 2021, there was a devastating typhoon that hit the Visayan islands of the Philippines, that destroyed much, and left little. I was privileged enough to have been safe, and when night came, the lack of clouds meant an unhindered view of the night sky, and the beautiful stars sprawled out over the lightless urban landscape. Those were unforgettable days.
During a stay in a small town hundreds of miles from a big city I specifically took my kids miles out from that small town so they could see the stars. Seeing the Mikly Way for the first time in her life moved my teenage daughter to tears. It was a beautiful experience.
Wonderment should of replaced tears.Nothing to cry about.
@@ronpapi9539 have should replace of. Not knowing proper English grammar IS something to cry about
@@neilbond2483 - Funny that a person who is correcting a person's grammar writes "have should replace of" which makes absolutely no sense.
@@neilbond2483 Neil should be spelled kneel to Speculative Space scientists who offer Squat.
@@ronpapi9539 keep talking. You're just proving what an idiot you are👍
I literally thought I was watching a Vox video and it wasn't until I looked at the channel name that I realised I wasn't. Hoping your channel continues to grow, this was very well made
Thats quite the compliment! Thats the level of quality I was going for! We will strive to keep up this production quality going forward.
vox is trash. stop watching them
I agree, it was very well done - instructive and beautiful. … But let’s talk about why there are no pictures of Michael Collins walking on the moon. 🤔
@@brianarbenz1329 Globeheads are silent on issues that corner them.
@@ronpapi9539 It's amusing how you are perfectly willing to state such asinine things in the security and anonymity of the Internet. Social media both allow you to hide, and encourage people such as yourself to make absurd declarations which are Grade A click bait. In a realm that rewards intelligence, instead of preposterousness, people like Ron Papi and election deniers would be without the support system that their statements grab them, but which they don't warrant. You'd have to show maturity and sincerity to make the acquaintance of others.
The cameras from the Apollo missions werent good enough to see all those tiny dots. Even some cameras nowadays on earth have trouble seeing some. The biggest factor is light pollution from the sun. The sun is too bright to allow other stars to be seen easily, since there's nothing blocking sunlight in space. I think I remember hearing somewhere that when the astronauts of Apollo went behind the moon, they could see the most brilliant stars of all, since there was no sunlight to blot out the other stars.
And yet they forgot to video tape their orbit around the backside of the Moon.What no cameras aboard? FE'ers aren't drinking the Koolaid.
The Hassleblad cameras used on the moon were plenty capable of exposing for the stars. To do so would require a very long exposure and a tripod which they didn't have.
So where's the photos?
@@TomGrubbe NASA I'll equipped them.
The moon doesn't have an atmosphere to pollute with light ,so all you need is Shade ...to SEE the Stars . Was there shade ?
On a scout trip my sons and I did sky watching and saw so many stars, you could not see constellations anymore. We saw the galactic arm. In the city, you only see a few stars. Lighting is key to visibility.
Going to any "dark sky park" will change a person's life. It's wonderful that you could do that for kids!
I read somewhere that Jim Lovell was telling how in the Apollo 13 emergency rescue and return to earth there was a time where they had to fire rockets to line up the ship in between the moon and earth. They had to try and do it without the computer and they were going to try and navigate by constellation. The problem being they could not tell where the constellations were as it looked like
SOLID STARS. They saw so many stars they saw all of them . He said the only thing they could go by was the earth and moon.
This channel is one of the reasons why I love space....
That view of cosmos, without any light pollution....
So glad our videos help inspire! 🙏🏻
@@officialinterstellarnews 👍🙏
u do realize that every image u see is a CGI Construct????
@@bradbixler1801 prove it
@@bradbixler1801 Npc
It's almost the same reason why we can't really see stars during the day. Thank you for this, the way you explained it was beautiful.
Thank you so much! Really enjoyed putting it together ☺️
during a total solar eclipse you can see the brighter stars during the day, it's insane
@@chrism3784 Man I want to experience that.
Not really because there is atmosphere here to scatter light, not atmosphere in space
I really enjoyed that, thanks. And I even began getting like evil tingles (ya know, like when you’re watching a scary movie) when they started describing the black velvet looking texture of the rest of space above them
Was a pleasure to make it! Space is pretty terrifying. I get the same feeling sometimes when I look at certain photos.
@@officialinterstellarnews Absolutely. Agreed. The nature of the unknown; particularly with astronomy, is pretty astounding and scary. Like how black holes defy the laws of physics. Or how dark energy and dark matter are just vague labels we've assigned to hypothetical forms of matter that we in no way understand, but do know that one makes up for nearly 85% of all universes matter, and the other is unexplainably making everything everywhere continually expand out, at insane and increasing speeds...... really freaks me out.
You mean goosebumps?💀
@@officialinterstellarnews A quick question I totally believe we went to the moon and I fully understand the limitations of dynamic range of a photograph or video, not allowing that extreme of dynamic light range. It is interesting though that we have hundreds of hours of video of spacewalks and every 45 minutes the astronauts go into darkness and you still don't see the stars. Why is that?
I had the same feeling. It must have been an awe inspiring kind of deep terror they were feeling. At least, I think that's how I would have felt.
Most of us can't even really see stars on the surface due to light. I've been out in rural Nevada. There's so many stars in the sky it's insane.
In a nutshell, you can't see starlight while under direct sunlight. Wow, mind blown.
An astronaut photographer would really capture some amazing shots in space.
Read Darren Romano's comments.
It explains why photos taken on the Moon and in orbit around Earth by the astronauts DO NOT show the stars!
Space telescopes have hardware to get around the glare issue.
Space telescopes already exist. Like hubble
Same reason you can't see stars in space is the same reason you can't see stars during day. It's f-ing bright
You should have 1 mil subscribers by now. You’re doing great man
Greenport, Long island, NY had the most beautiful starry night sky I’d ever seen. Away from the city lights So many stars were visible it was an amazing experience for me ☺️
Makes perfect sense, what can we see of the universe during the day, aside from the earth, the moon and the sun? Night sky on reveals itself at night.
Pretty cool explaining.
Also, I was lucky to live in the middle of nowhere. I didn't know not being able to see stars at night was rare. Grew up in a place when I saw stars nightly.
Easiest way to understand this is that you can't see the stars during the day and it was daytime on the Moon when they were there.
Thank you. You explained it well.
a camera like my D750 can shoot the stars requiring that I find a rare place of minimal light pollution.
Then with a tripod, fast lens and proper settings It becomes a reality only after a 20 second exposure.
Keep this style up! Want to see more!
We’ll try!
Boy, you answered a question that plagued me forever! So, the Sun cuts out our view, no matter what. We need the shadow of night even up there to see the stars. BTW, if the images of the moon landing had been faked, I think the "makers" would have assumed we viewers would expect to see the stars and therefore would have "included" a starry sky, to make it presumably convincing.
The ending made me shiver. I would love so much to see the universe from above earth but I will never have to millions for it.
As someone who lives in Southern Arizona, the stars here are beautiful at night as we don't have much light pollution
I've been through Southern Arizona and Southern California in the desert regions and the stars were magnificent.
I was over here thinking I saw stars in every one of those photos. Then I realized that was dust on my laptop screen lol
This video was well-rounded, informative & well-spoken. You covered all the basics. As an avid astronomy nerd myself, you have earned a new subscriber 👍🏻
When I went to Ecuador & the Galapagos in 2018, school science trip, we went to a beach , we did something similar. No light objects & let our eyes adjust to the stars 😍 I’ve done the same in the states but there you could see constellations 🌌
If you see shadows, it's not night time, it's day time. You can't see the stars during the day. It's really that simple.
2am this morning, everyone was asleep, it was dark, the street lamps were on, yet the moon cast my shadow. Now I know it wasn’t actually nighttime but daytime. Today I’m going to see how much daytime I get after the sun has set. I’m expecting at least another 8 hours.
@@Malpriorvids If you are on the moon, can it cast a shadow on itself?
@@Malpriorvids the hell??
You can't see stars in the day because the atmosphere scatters the sun light
correction: micheal collins never landed on the moon. he was still in the command module so they both could dock properly.
The fact that he was floating loads off miles away in emptyness all alone is a terrifying idea.
@@guenthersteiner9252 yeah
@guenthersteiner9252 It definitely would give me a weird feeling In the gut but also I bet it was beautiful outside!
You gave the best explanation I've ever saw. It's still so bizarre to me that people can still believe the landing was fake, or that the earth is flat. All the proof has been given. Thank you for such an amazing explanation. I always wondered why it was pitch black in space, but on the ground on earth, you could see stars quite well
People are not mugs! You need more than cgi, data, formulas and numbers how about some actual real footage!
@@JaySingh-fv3tr they recently sent a satellite around the moon, then used the excuse that they had poor cameras when asked why they hadn’t filmed the landing locations.
Who on earth spends billions of dollars on a project to film the moon from its orbit, and then fit poor cameras? Surely, considering the controversy, they’d at least fit one decent camera that could focus on places of interest?
@@Malpriorvids it's all a mockery they know loads of dummies will continue making excuses for them, they could end the debate with a live record, but they don't want to give the game away
Buzz Auldron (idk how to spell his name) already came out and explained there was no moon landing
You attracted all the crazies with this one lol
I swear when the image is “too blown out” you can see the stars. 1:34
At 5:29 you can also see the stars in the video until the camera is pointed out of the window directly
The only time I was amazed by the cosmos was on a cold winter night in the heart of the Sierra Nevada mountains. I never had seen so many stars before. The snow on the mountain was literately bathed in starlight. That was a very exhilarating experience.
It's truly beautiful. I really wish to see those beautiful stars.
you're criminally underrated man
Hopefully not for long. Appreciate you! 🙏🏻
When you are in a plane at night, you can totally see the sky covered with stars.
Though limited in small window still its breathtaking.
Basically the same question as "why don't we see stars when it's day outside"
I truly enjoyed this video. I hope we see more deep dives like this in the future.🙏
Oh they are coming my friend. Cooking them up now
Ya'll can go up to space, I'll stay down here. 😅 Space is a little terrifying to me, and the idea of things going wrong with the rocket or the landing back to earth provides enough existential dread to keep me grounded. But if the technology ever becomes as safe as a plane ride, I'd be willing to go then. Until then, I can always check out channels like this. 😁
Great comment, look at peoples behavior even during a plane ride, still gonna be nervous, now watch the iss jokers juggling fruit, laughing and joking around like no care in the world! It's so obviously fake!
Lol they couldn't go if they wanted to
I would go in a heartbeat. IDC where. moon, mars, idc
ONG 💀
I grew up desperately wanting to travel in space, following every Apollo and Skylab mission with passion. In more recent years, I have written sci fi about space travel, and that has fulfilled my wishes. No need to go up. Realizing what using the bathroom in zero g would be all about, as well as the possibility of throwing up a lot have taken much of the luster off it.
Basically similar effect is when one looks at the north-western sky at midmorning on a cloudless day from around 45° N. The sun is at one's back yet one doesn't see the stars; one sees blue. This us due to the atmospheric scattering sunlight. Only very bright objects can be seen like the moon and jetliners plus perhaps Venus at dawn/dusk.
I like how you conveniently cut out the part where Michael Collins said "I don't remember seeing any [stars]".
How beautiful is earth? Precious blue dot.
It’s the best. 😊
An astronomy professor of mine asked our class to think about about a version of this same question - why, if there are billions of stars in the observable universe, isn’t our night sky lit up with total brightness from them?
The discussion led to his explanation that if we could position our eyes perfectly still for hours, our motionless retina would perceive more light that we now do. Steadily the weak light from stars at greater distances would register on the retina.
I decided to test this out, and on a clear night I lay in my yard and remained as frozen as I could for several minutes. Sure enough a few more stars showed up.
I was questioning this less than a week ago and now this shows up in my recommendation, how convenient!
Nice content, wished the video was a bit longer. But anyway you have gained another subscriber today. 👍
Thank you! The goal is longer in the future. Working on that now
I'm not very familiar with this topic, but it seems like I've seen stars in the pictures that come back from the Hubble space telescope, and I just looked at a picture from the ISS that showed stars, even thought it was facing directly into the sun's rays. Can anyone tell me what might be different about those scenarios? Thank you!
The Hubble is looking out into the darkness of space where stars can be seen. Around any of the outer planets Hubble would not see stars around the planets because the exposure is set to see the planet not the stars behind it. If you wanted to include the stars in a picture with a planet from Hubble the planet would be over exposed.
If you saw a picture looking into the sun with stars also visible then it was altered picture. The stars were added in later in processing.
It was because the starlight was too dim for those cameras to pick up,you'll note the same effect in the Voyager photos from the eighties as well.
All about shutter speed and as far as voyager they were making sure the file sizes are as small as possible as well for transmission. Lots of reasons
Best answer. However, if the camera had been aimed straight up at the stars, the exposure could have been adjusted to easily capture the stars.
@@officialinterstellarnews I am sure we can capture the star while traversing space with multi camera system and algorithm picture to mesh 2 source of picture and combining it like what you explain to be still able to see brightest object and the star in the screen of future space cockpit
It makes sense, the picture one but I thought it was for something else entirely.
For the 100m picture (which is scary af) it made for sense. Space is black, light bounces off surfaces but in space, light doesn’t bounce off that well .
Thanks for the video. Lots of good historic information in there. Thank you.
For skeptics an easier experiment. Try to spot stars in a blue day (no clouds between you and the stars). Now wait to the night (you are now in shadow part of the earth). EASY it happens every day 😅
But they will still deny this. 😆
If they were going to do a conspiracy to fake the moon landing, wouldn't they just say "oh yeah! we saw all the stars it was beautiful!" Then what would the conspiracy theorists say? They would be confirming what those theorists thought they would see.
Yep, if it was fake, they sure did a shitty job of faking it!😂😂
I would do anything, ANYTHING, for a chance to spend a moment in space
I honestly can't wait for people to land and stay on moon to view the beautiful starts and milky way when the time comes.
You'll be long gone from this Realm and NASA will still be postponing the voyage to the Moon.Sad!
My thoughts before the video: it's because the stars are very, very far away
You’re not wrong.
then why on earth you can see them ?
@@ellenrodriguez-mb7xi exactly, it's all bs
@@ellenrodriguez-mb7xi it's not because they're very far away. It's because they're very dim, so it's hard to capture them. Since the cameras' exposure is set to daytime, it wont be able to capture the stars. At night, on earth, your eyes adapt to the low luminosity, so your pupils increase and it makes you capture more light, making you see the stars.
@@ellenrodriguez-mb7xi Simple, los gases que se encuentran en la atmósfera se comportan como un tipo de lente que deja que entre la cantidad exacta de luz que nos permite ver las estrellas.
Well, it's kind of like going stargazing in a brightly lit city vs. doing it in a remote area. You see the night sky in all its glory without the light pollution. In space and in the moon, you don't have the atmosphere to scatter that light, but the intense glare from the sun is what will block your view of the stars.
Baloney!
No atmosphere on the Moon.Stars should be visible .Try aiming cameras away from the Sun's influence.Globeheads are so gullible.
Its all about light pollution.
@@MegaDudeman21 Sheep support of lies.
@@ronpapi9539 decent bait, 6/10.
I never thought about how disconcerting it would be to travel into space and not see the stars.
The Apollo astronauts said it was so black that their depth perception senses went strange and they had to look away and back towards the light. Does nobody ever read the transcripts?
On the moon, the process is a little different than on the Earth, however.
Even though the sky was black when the pictures were taken, it doesn't mean it was nighttime.
The moon doesn't have an atmosphere, and therefore even though the sun is still lighting up the lunar surface, there is no blue sky to be seen.
The surface of the moon was "incredibly bright,".
Therefore, when taking a picture, the astronauts would have to make the shutter speed fast and narrow the camera's aperture to get a clear photo. By preventing loads of light from coming in and blurring the shots, the stars were omitted simply due to their light not being captured.
Its similar to being in city and cant see much stars and going to a place with no light pollution and seeing all the stars.
For the same reason the pictures I take of the Moon are way smaller than what my 👀 see
I was at the beach facing east. There was a beautiful Moon rising before sunset, so I thought I'd take a picture with my iPhone X. When I looked later, I discovered I couldn't see the Moon in the image. I thought that was quite odd. It had been a big, bright, full Moon. Perhaps what you are talking about - aperture, exposure, and ISO - is the explanation.
Woah man! this question was popping in my mind for quite a long time and finally i know the answer. I just thought that no one would have noticed this 🙃🔥💯
I mean seem to be the same reason why you can't see stars in broad daylight on earth.
the comment section is a conspiracy goldmine
I think people forget how our atmosphere kinda magnify things for us
My first guess was "well, it's day. You don't see stars during the day" so I got confused when you started talking about cameras until you said the actual reason.
@Nikki Namikaze-Uchiha-Hatake But the moon _is_ a rotating object divided into night and day. Everyone who has seen the moon knows that it's not always night there, otherwise we wouldn't have seen it.
Best explanation: It's like Light Pollution.
Like why you can't see many stars at night in the sky when you are inside the brightest cities
Man has never walked on the moon period.
You are stupid, period.
@@nunya_bizniz you are dumb as rock
@@nevergone111
prove it.
What finality in that statement! He put a period at the end of the sentence!!! 😅😂😅
In reality the period is used by some to replace their complete lack of evidence because they must know there is no evidence for such silly anti-science and irrational ideas.
lol after watching this it still makes me think its all bullshit
Why?
@@raptorwhite6468 we have this weird script we all fallow when it comes to advancement almost like a computer simulation meh not really saying its fake just saying its feels almost fake
@@madman026 uh so if someone else did something that you have never did, it's fake?
@@madman026 I'm telling you now, life isn't a simulation
@@Blackhole-TON618 maybe your life inst but mine is because I am a damn npc
Space is just amazing! So many mysteries.
Agreed!
yes, the best one is, it does not exist!
@@tfootball8704 prove it
Without an atmosphere to filter the light you can't see a star twinkle
First Comment
Because they film on simulation sites mixed with miniature models in the dark room... and few CGI animated video. Plus some augmented virtual reality... Cheap thousand dollars mockup in the desert, some post processing... just change the sky from blue to orange and you have mars mission....
Haha! Another flat Earther...
Is ur iq still with u?
I can tell from your comment that u always have failed in ur physics exams...
Are you born dumb or it happened later?
@@weird3604 I am not flat earther. Flat earth mania was launched in 2015 over youtube to discredit fake cosmic missions. As for physics... get real. To this day nobody gives exact explanation of how and what is gravity. What are mechanics of gravity. Gravity is effect and not a force. Its combination of several factors. Mostly paramagnetism, diamagnetism and static charge attractions. And final component in the soup 🍲 is motion. Newtonian gravity is the correct. No such thing as spacetime warp like Einstein propose. There is actual connection, a string. Sun 🌞 holds earth by magnetism. Planet orbits are locked in magnetic equilibrium.
Ok russian bot
@@totoitekelcha7628 I am Bulgarian not Russian and i am not bot.
I’m glad I decided to watch the entire video because the glaring error at the very beginning saying Michael Collins was on the surface nearly caused me to conclude the remainder would be just as suspect. You ought to pin a comment acknowledging the error.
i don like the idea of living forever, but if it meant i could go to space and see the things ive wanted to see since i was small, it would be worth everything
No Space, just lights in our Creators Firmament.
Most religious people will take this as an insult. This is biblicism at the max.
@@bco-fm5qu Religious people must agree with Genesis 1.14.If not that makes you an Atheist.
@@ronpapi9539 I'm assuming you're talking about the saying "lights in the firmament of the heaven" which means God is creating the sun, moon, and stars. "firmament" in the Bible refers to the expanse of the heavens or the sky. Clearly this is biblicism. This was made easier to understand in the ESV version and now refers to "And God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years". Let me guess you're one of the people who think everyone should use the King James Version
@@ronpapi9539 Roasted?
@@bco-fm5qu You're bypassing the Firmament.Seperates the Waters above from the eaters below.Splain?
Misinformation
no. real information that uneducated people arent capable of comprehending.
No
not at all.
I have always loved the Gold Foil haphazardly Scotch-taped on the flight module.
I believe the term for it is saturation contrast, due to lack of atmosphere to diffuse light the nearer objects being so bright it drowns out the dimmer light of the star and other celestial bodies.
I bet it really felt like "The Truman Show" effect when they first went to space and could only see a void of utter blackness
I am a Ham Radio operator and we are able to talk to the astronauts aboard the International space station. I will wait for their next pass and ask them if they see the stars.
THAT IS SO COOL!
Here's one... did you know it's possible to see the ISS from Earth of you look thorough a good quality telescope? I even see one picture that the photographer claims shows an astronaut doing a spacewalk outsided the ISS. So, conceivably you could see AND talk to someone up there.
When you are star gazing you make it a point to turn off lights around you and keep the light down as much as possible. Now imagine you are in full sunlight and the entire ground is pretty reflective too. Also even when it’s dark it take some work even with even modern cameras to take pictures of stars, you need to use bigger sensors/film and have to take long exposures, measured in not fractions of a second but SECONDS plural! With a crop sensors in DSLRs you basically need to take around 30 second exposure. Show even a tiny spot lit by sunlight and it would blow out the whole sensor at that exposure, making everything look white in the picture!
This was explained a long time ago and I thought it was common sense by now but it's surprising how many people still are getting fooled by this.
after I got older and went back to watch the film of Apollo 11. . I wondered the same thing and still wonder what happened to the stars in the background...
High up on the Big island of Hawaii the stars in the sky looked so big it felt like you could reach out and touch them. Sadly man has lost so many places like that
For the same reason you can't hear a humming bird flapping its wings next to a freight train
I got a question. Ok - so you can't see stars in space because of background light and high albedo's of the surroundings. When the command module was on the back side of the moon and the lunar albedo dropped to zero and cabin lights momentarily extinguished - were they then visible? -
What is the name of that music which you played at starting of the video ? Please reply me
👍Amazing explanation sir!😃
crazy how people will just write off all of astronomy and science just because of something as simple as not understanding how exposure works.
Well, that blows my theory that stars run when they see us coming.
Relative brightness. Same reason if you go outside and look at the sky you don’t see the entire Milky Way or every star. It’s why to capture those things you need long exposure shots and camera mounts that rotate so to prevent the stars from being streaks across the image.
This isn't difficult to understand but some people just refuse to believe the explanation.
But initially when asked they said they did not remember seeing any stars at all. That would be through their eyes, not the camera .
"We're going to explain why"
*proceeds to explain everything else*
100% explained why lol.
@@officialinterstellarnews I agree but geez that was a lot. Maybe it's just me but I was hoping to go straight into it