A person who doesn’t understand football or conceptual art has no place commenting on a film about both. It’s a fantastic film on a sporting legend and the artistry of the man and player he was.
I'm a huge movie buff with an arts degree and I love football...I found the film quite interesting, but I agree, it was more of an installation than a movie..
He means talking something that is working class or something thats a bit rough around the edges (in this case football). Then trying to make it more digestible to snobs or art lovers. By making it out to be a graceful work of art, and hiding it's rough edges
I am not wishing to go against the grain, but I really liked the music (by the magnificent Mogwai) and I kind of enjoyed it-not as a film, but as the good doctor points out, as an art piece in a gallery.
Zidane was a mind reading dancer of a footballer, a genuine wizard and the most elegant player I've ever had the pleasure of watching. Didn't need a camera zoomed in on just him to see that, in fact just watch the full pitch to properly see the contrast between Zidane and the other 21 mere mortals. Zidane just had something superhuman about him and has got to be in the top 5 players ever and IMO the best to watch. Wonderful player.
@makaveli2989 In the Museum of Modern Art a few years ago, they were showing some of Andy Warhol's films on a constant loop in a dark room as though you were going to look at a painting. Do that with Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait. You know, makes sense...
Thanks for the 17 camera information. The rest is your angry opinion about what you hate: football and conceptual art... well, football is an art, this documentary is a film. It is a conceptual and artistic piece... the problem is you might have seen too much hollywood, cinema is beyond your considerations, thankfully. Stick to your podcast, but it would be much more interesting to talk about something you like and know.
@TulseLuper are you joking hero?!!! you are comparing Zidane a 21st century portrait to Andrew Warhola's work!!!! do you realy know what you are talking about?
The fuck is this guy on about? The film is a nice experience, but I'm willing to bet that part of the issue that he doesn't like football. If he loved football and loved film, like I do, he'd think it was great to watch and great to (read) Zidane's thoughts. But instead, he found it boring and way too experimental for the cinema. I'd like to see what his thoughts are on a Romanian film called 'Police, Adjective'
and tell me somthing Mr. Kermode. if the film shouldn't be in your cinema, where else should it be??? we are talking about a FILM here. not a picture. i don't care what kind of fim it is, movie, art, what ever you call it. it still a film. so stop whining and find another subject to pay your rents from!
A person who doesn’t understand football or conceptual art has no place commenting on a film about both. It’s a fantastic film on a sporting legend and the artistry of the man and player he was.
"You stick to your art galleries mate, and I'll stick to the movies" LOL!
Dont mess with the exorcist.
Bang on again.. Although you could have mentioned that the score by Mogwai is very good..
Watching Zidane was beautiful
I wouldn't watch a film of it, though.
the 4 minute video ''Football: Created By the poor, Stolen By The Rich | Jeremy Corbyn.'' ( by Double Down News )
24 hour psycho sounds like a good movie title.
By the real psycho is a masterpiece in normal time.
This film needs to come out in 3D.
I'm a huge movie buff with an arts degree and I love football...I found the film quite interesting, but I agree, it was more of an installation than a movie..
the most wankerish sentence of all time
@@dannytoots6635 What, is he not allowed to have an art degree and love football? Should he choose one or the other?
@@MacIntoshMann declaring ‘I’m a huge movie buff with an arts degree but I love football’ is pure Alan partridge. Objectively 🤣
I didn't know Mark owned a cinema?
*cinemarrr
He means talking something that is working class or something thats a bit rough around the edges (in this case football). Then trying to make it more digestible to snobs or art lovers. By making it out to be a graceful work of art, and hiding it's rough edges
I am not wishing to go against the grain, but I really liked the music (by the magnificent Mogwai) and I kind of enjoyed it-not as a film, but as the good doctor points out, as an art piece in a gallery.
Zidane was a mind reading dancer of a footballer, a genuine wizard and the most elegant player I've ever had the pleasure of watching.
Didn't need a camera zoomed in on just him to see that, in fact just watch the full pitch to properly see the contrast between Zidane and the other 21 mere mortals.
Zidane just had something superhuman about him and has got to be in the top 5 players ever and IMO the best to watch. Wonderful player.
you can buy this film in poundland now
I HATE FOOTBALL! I HATE CONCEPTUAL ART! fantastic and true.
@makaveli2989 In the Museum of Modern Art a few years ago, they were showing some of Andy Warhol's films on a constant loop in a dark room as though you were going to look at a painting. Do that with Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait. You know, makes sense...
So unless I've been head chef at a successful restaurant, I'm not allowed to complain that my Steak is overdone?
It is a film. It does belong in the cinema. It is good.
Back of the net!
i liked it
Why do so many people feel the need to make that stupid argument? You don't have to make a film in order to have an opinion on it.
@makaveli2989 An art gallery? As in Andy Warhol's films?
It was George Harrison, not John Lennon.
Thanks for the 17 camera information. The rest is your angry opinion about what you hate: football and conceptual art... well, football is an art, this documentary is a film. It is a conceptual and artistic piece... the problem is you might have seen too much hollywood, cinema is beyond your considerations, thankfully. Stick to your podcast, but it would be much more interesting to talk about something you like and know.
Its a raas claat peng film! He betta no imself!
boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The only good line comes from Mr Mayo (after endless ranting from 'the good doctor') "Can I get you a cup of tea or something".
brap brap
Its a raas claat peng film! He betta no imself!
@TulseLuper are you joking hero?!!! you are comparing Zidane a 21st century portrait to Andrew Warhola's work!!!! do you realy know what you are talking about?
The guy does come over as a bit of a fanny.
The fuck is this guy on about? The film is a nice experience, but I'm willing to bet that part of the issue that he doesn't like football. If he loved football and loved film, like I do, he'd think it was great to watch and great to (read) Zidane's thoughts. But instead, he found it boring and way too experimental for the cinema. I'd like to see what his thoughts are on a Romanian film called 'Police, Adjective'
and tell me somthing Mr. Kermode. if the film shouldn't be in your cinema, where else should it be??? we are talking about a FILM here. not a picture. i don't care what kind of fim it is, movie, art, what ever you call it. it still a film. so stop whining and find another subject to pay your rents from!
I love football, hated Zidanes movie. BORING.
This film did suck
AWFUL MOVIE.
This man is big wrong