LIVE: Supreme Court hears Starbucks’ case against federal labor agency

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 04. 2024
  • AP is live with oral arguments from the Supreme Court in a case filed by Starbucks against the National Labor Relations Board. The case stems from Starbucks' firing of seven workers who were trying to unionize their store in Memphis, Tennessee. Read more: bit.ly/3Ua3q4n
    #scotus #starbucks #union #tennessee #unitedstates #news #live

Komentáře • 18

  • @dddebz
    @dddebz Před měsícem +2

    Justice Alito is totally fine withholding federal money for medical conditions or treatments he doesn’t like, but doesn’t want the sword to cut both ways. He claims he doesn’t understand how the spending clause can require a hospital to provide care for women to preserve their organs or health but certainly understands how it works to deny similar procedures for military and Medicaid recipients. Hypocrisy, thy name is still Alito.

  • @walthoward68
    @walthoward68 Před měsícem +1

    Wow! This is nuts. How is the government dictating such things? Unbelievable!

  • @campsiegrothendieck7857
    @campsiegrothendieck7857 Před měsícem +2

    I'm 30 minutes in and the has to do with US citizens being able to bring in their non-citzen spouses. Nothing to do with the union

    • @kylebeach4051
      @kylebeach4051 Před měsícem +3

      1 hour 37 mins in is second case (union)

    • @DiegoGuerrero-zy5ne
      @DiegoGuerrero-zy5ne Před měsícem +3

      That’s why they said “first the court will hear”….theres 2 cases here.

  • @lkaderogba6256
    @lkaderogba6256 Před měsícem +3

    Starts at 4: 16. 👍

  • @DiegoGuerrero-zy5ne
    @DiegoGuerrero-zy5ne Před měsícem +2

    NLRBA lawyer got eaten alive

    • @agoniaXdunya
      @agoniaXdunya Před 4 dny

      Uh oh… is this going to be a steamroll? Should I even bother or just head to the briefs?

  • @Flags.crosses.trailerparks
    @Flags.crosses.trailerparks Před měsícem +5

    Unionize or let the elites trample your rights.

    • @ramonabreu2882
      @ramonabreu2882 Před měsícem +2

      Or start your own business instead of trying to take over someone else’s.
      Also, I’m not sure how entering into a consensual working agreement tramples on your rights.

    • @jaysonflask1663
      @jaysonflask1663 Před měsícem

      @@ramonabreu2882 Start your own business against a global monopoly who steps over the red tape and regulation that crushes you... yeah, there's a reason small businesses have been disappearing for 20 years straight wealth expert... it's called different rules for different classes.

    • @ramonabreu2882
      @ramonabreu2882 Před měsícem

      @@jaysonflask1663 No. You're just wrong here. Small businesses succeed all the time. You may not become a national brand, but you can support yourself and your family.
      Small business, however, does become more difficult because of government regulations (which I'm sure you support) and unions (which I'm also sure you support) trying to take over business autonomy. These two things make it too expensive to operate. You're positions support the global monopolies you claim to be against.
      And if you are not willing to take the risks and do the work, quit complaining.

    • @themodfather9382
      @themodfather9382 Před měsícem

      Unionization is not real. The company has the right to shut down that store, and then you have nothing. The only real power is political power and ownership.

    • @dirtymcnuggets9933
      @dirtymcnuggets9933 Před 20 hodinami

      @@ramonabreu2882 Everyone starts a small business who works?

  • @tonyfan3
    @tonyfan3 Před měsícem

    Tell it Justice Sotomayor!!!!