Idea Cast Interview Series Episode Fifty Six Bernardo Kastrup Part 1
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2024
- My guest on this episode is Bernardo Kastrup, philosopher, scientist and executive director of the Essentia foundation.
This will be his third conversation on the channel, and it is a two-part series. Part two will be released in 24 hours, on January 7th, 2023. Check out his web page if you are not familiar with Dr. Kastrup, his site is a good place to learn about his background. I will also provide the Essentia Foundation website as well.
www.bernardoka...
www.essentiafo...
Essentia Foundation YT channel:
/ @essentiafoundation
Bernardo's channel:
/ @bernardokastrup
His list of published books:
www.thriftbook...
Here is the segment I couldn't think of in the conversation between Bernardo and Markus Müller, where the Rovelli interpretation is discussed. • Quantum physics and th...
Please also feel free to check out, Illumine Life at:
/ lifeillumine @LifeIllumine
I would appreciate your visiting our web site at Illuminelife.org as well. Supporting that site is the best means of supporting the totality of the work I am doing. Thanks!
I think its crucial he goes on Lex's & Joe's.
I agree, hopefully soon. Closer to Truth would be a good start too. Thanks for watching.
Yes
@@ideacastilluminate Yup, though I've noticed Kuhn tends to explore everything in depth but idealism. Not that its never mentioned but he seems to think that theology covers it or something. Looking FWD to part 2.
Traveling is a major issue for Bernardo. Rogan and Lex do not do remote interviews.
@@realcygnus Yes I agree, Kuhn moves between religion and phil of science with little room for idealism or its allies. I hope you enjoy pt 2.
Bernardo is awesome. Such a brilliant mind.
I love this channel, you do a great job at interviewing Bernardo
Thank you, I appreciate both your comment and your watching the content!
Bernardo Kastrup 🙌🏽❤is totally awesome. 🎉
Because you share a given name? :D
Thanks. Always love finding a new BK interview.
Thank you for watching!
Thank you very much! This interview was so insightful. I'll watch it again!
Thank you very much for watching Leandro!
Fantastic first part of the interview! The flow was disrupted for me however during the last 20-30min during the bit about not taking oneself too seriously and the spectrum of confrontation where it seemed like Justin was trying to convince Bernardo its okay to be fiery and that it would help him in the future after Bernardo implied he felt no need to be that way anymore because he has otherwise matured and doesn’t take himself so seriously as to warrant that kind of way of being. Seemed like a significant window of time in which some deeper psychological transference took over and became less an exploration and more Justin trying to save Bernardo the ego 😂 perhaps it was seemingly disruptive because I’m looking in a mirror 😅Anyways, not to take away from the value of this wonderful interview, I’m looking forward to pt 2!
In hindsight, you are right as I can see it as two confrontation junkies sorting out that terrain. I will likely never mature away from confrontational behavior, only aspire to bring it out only when it is needed, (maturity?😉) which is what I intended in that tete a tete within a dialogue. I hope part two bears some fruit for you and thanks for watching and commenting!
I feel you on that big time bro! I have no doubt it will be as fruitful as the first. Thanks for doing this 🙏🏼
@@ideacastilluminate I disagree. This was a conversation not a lecture, that is what made it human and enjoyable.
@@sarahjones4026 Thank you Sarah and thanks for watching!
@@sarahjones4026 Thank you Sarah and thanks for watching!
Superdeterminism actually makes a lot of sense to me because of causal determinism.
Does that imply that human freedom of volition is non-existent?
@@TheVeganVicar I believe so.
Bernardo is my ‘personal hero,’ in so many ways… he helped me solve my own dissociation problems, and recognize I was wrong about atheism
Thanks for watching, I hope you enjoyed the conversation.
My only question or thought is that Bernardo talks about how evolution is driven by fitness and I think that’s an assumption we make when studying evolution. Evolution is change and growth and expansion but I think natural selection does not necessarily mean “fitness.”
Otherwise I love Bernardo and have read all his books multiple times. An absolute genius and I recommend his works to everyone!!!!
Thanks, and I'll check in with him on this if I have the chance to speak with him again.
I love Bernardo, no one is better at giving a naturalist description of the divinity that suits our 21st century views. However, once we acknowledge the universe is mental, naturalism goes out the window. We are trying to explain the one-mind in terns our our extreamly limited 3d dimensional dashboard and it just seems insufficient. When we turn to introspection as Bernardo suggests, or even to near death experiences, language is almost always described as inadequate. Bernardo says the divinity isn't "metaconcios" or "good" but love and goodness are almost universally reported in these experiences.
This fellow Bernardo is trying to wake up people to the fact that we have been sold a bill of sale on this techno crap post-human crapola! I support him for the attempt. Sure hope he's not a double agent !🖖
currently addicted to BK
Thanks for watching, I hope this interview helped to feed your current addiction!
I know a VERY competent psychotherapist who may be willing to assist you in overcoming that diease, Senor Solero. ;)
It does what it does because it is what it is... When do I get to support Bernardo by purchasing merchandise with this tag line on it.
I think you hit the nail when you asked why does other intellectuals accept Bernardo's reasoning but doesn't accept his conclusions, or does not even consider it.
I think they should be able to consider it as a logical way even if they do not invest in it intellectually. Being unable to see this is very hard for me as a viewer. McGilchrists writes wonderfully and says he doesn't want to go there. ? What does this mean? I don't want to be a nitpicker but the topic usually ends there. I don't hear an argument or consideration to satisfy me. (Same goes for John Vervaeke and several others. The only exception is Chris Langan, and we know how it ended up)
I also think Bernardo has a bit much humility when he says scientists shouldn't embrace analytic idealism. We don't event see these brilliant people following the logic and considering the possibility, I think one should be able to say: "I see where you are going, that makes sense and it should be logically true (or untrue), I have a feeling that this is the way it is (or isn't)". Then making science is another thing. I think this should be more than enough.
Thanks for your insights, I agree with you. I think it may be a language game for some or a metaphysical assumption game for others. Thanks for watching, I appreciate it.
czcams.com/video/1adPLNCMBhA/video.html
I would put it, linguistically, that the idea of an instrument as observer or person as observer, is not-two; that humans can be understood to be instuments of (as) consciousness/the teriritory/divine mind and therefore instruments/observers/measurers/perceivers/etc are all the same 'thing' with the vocabulary being more about context than anything else.
In other words, beauty is in the I of the be holder.
Thanks! Looking forward to part 2.
Thanks PM!
10:20 so Bernardo doesn't want to share the subjects of his 2 new books? it's a shame. I would really like to know if there is some philosopher other than Schopenhauer or Jung that he is really interested about.
I was bummed that he wasn't more open, but I get that he may need to hold his cards close to his chest for now. At 41 minutes into part two he suggests that he may do for Von Cusa what he did for Yung and Schopenhauer. Thanks for watching!
@@ideacastilluminate you are problably right. and btw thank you for the answer...i still have to watch part 2
@@ChristianSt97 I hope you enjoy part two.
im not understanding why there is advocating for not atanding up to injustice. Despite that it is egoic, the fitness purpose of the ego is to be conduscive to survival
No process in nature is perfect, but conditions are perfect for mankind to exist on this little planet in this vast universe?
Keep it up ❤. Can you interview Buddha? :-)
Wow, that would be intimidating, but a wonderful opportunity. Thanks for watching!
Justin is UNQUALIFIED to do that, Manodaya.
What is the dashboard of a cat like 😹
czcams.com/video/wWX9SZmvGeM/video.html
Quantum physics is metaphysics in my humble opinion 🕉️
Bernardo left Twitter.. I hope he comes back. For me it is best platform. - Am I wrong, Bernardo is bit "woke" and so Joe Rogan is not where he want to go. Although Joe asked. Bernardo stay out of politics. Your message is above confrontation.
Bernardo is not woke.
@@oliviergoethals4137 He's certainly no reactionary conservative.
Bk should debate joscha bach
I think that would be interesting! Thanks for watching.
@@ideacastilluminate if You get to interview any of them in the future. Could You ask them if they would accept to debate one another? I feel there is antagonism between them, maybe hate or envy. Ive been followin them for long time and they keep saying the same things in every interview. Ive began to lose interest. I think a debate between them will bring us followers some fresh and new insight about their ideas.
@@quemidelquemide I will and I agree, they should hash things out. Thanks!
( 16'15'' : Alain Aspect ?)
I'm pretty sure you're right.
@@ideacastilluminate 😉😊
what's the ambient music in the beginning?
It's an ambient track I created. Another hobby of mine. I have a channel with a bunch of drones and soundscapes. Thanks for watching! Here's the channel. czcams.com/channels/bCkXz11UaJx_8_JLneZb4g.html
@@ideacastilluminate Thanks! Will check it out. Am currently finishing this episode, and i think you ask good questions! You should however stop labeling yourself as a person with no scientific background and is not an "intellectual". Being humble is good though, but you're quite fine!
@@sebastianvanced4425 Thanks for that, my performative humility is a defensive move that is not really necessary, but it shows up none the less. Something to work on in 2023. Take care and thanks again!
Agreed. One of the best, funnest interviews with BK I’ve watched. Saw an honest human side we don’t normally get to see. Just dial back the self depreciation, it comes off as something you need to do, more than sincere. And it’s frequency derails the convo a tad.
Think of this as a Dutch comment, lol.
@@gkannon77 I fully agree, the at times performative self-deprecation is a defensive move as a result of a comment or two from a previous interview with BK wherein folks were criticizing my input as punching above my weight. I indulged myself in a bit of padding in this one. I'm also a bit of a class clown and I don't mind taking cheap shots at myself to amuse people. It's a kind of a Rodney Dangerfield thing. Hopefully it wasn't too off-putting, I do care about how I handle public discourse. Anyway, I do appreciate the Dutch feedback, I strive to grow.