Fair Use - Copyright on YouTube
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 06. 2024
- We're here to answer your Copyright questions. In this video, we dive into frequently asked questions about Fair Use. We answer what Fair Use is, how it's determined by law, and things to keep in mind for Fair Use relating to CZcams.
For more answers to your Copyright questions, check out the whole series here: bit.ly/31U1AHU
And check out our Help Center articles on Fair Use: support.google.com/youtube/an...
Subscribe and hit the bell to see a new video each Tuesday: goo.gl/So4XIG
► Get step-by-step instructions: goo.gl/fBzr7
For more info, check out this article about Fair Use: support.google.com/youtube/answer/6396261
SB suw
2nd
Squad ,
@@BabluKumar-mr4rw ชชชชชช
😊😮 💩 ppip
Understanding Quantum Physics is more easier than understanding Fair Use
😂😂😂😂
Cuz it is based on laws on nature. I dunno what fair use is based on, but certainly not logic
True bro😀😀😂. My video blocked on CZcams .
Yeah
more easier
Don't let this distract you from the fact that companies can still false strike you
True.
Better remove any copyright videos and create original one.
Yep... Sadly
Right.
exactly. can and will!
@@veinteresting if my video is entirely my own work, that doesn't prevent you from claiming otherwise.
Honestly the "Fair Use" laws and massive corporate lawyers have killed my creative spirit literally it's hard to do anything without getting demonetized.
all my stuff is fair use under education and research, I'll have a successful business and a cool hobby at minumum
man i feel the same 😶
They seriously kill people's creativity
I don't care about being monetized. I just want to share my playlists...
I don't even care about monetization but I still wonder why videos that are clearly commentary which is under fair use get taken down just because CZcams is hiring freaking ai to tell if the video deserves copyright in the first place. The whole system is corrupt like bruh!!!!
“Fair use protects you, but even if you do all these things, fair use probably doesn’t protect you”
It amazing she can state that its a law twice and people still blame them lol. The law was intended to help people who WORKED on the original project. Examples are anyone who works on film sets, video games, or other entertainment that wants to put it on a reel or resume later down the line. IT WASN'T INVENTED to give youtubers rights to copy-paste and profit off of other peoples content exactly 40 years later....
Like your insurance company.
"even if you use fair use content, you're not protected" thank you.
that's the American viewpoint. YT staff in other countries (EU, SAC, and others) will say different things.
Translated into Thai or not, I do not understand
Even copyright holders can damage their own brand
@@teerasakchannel2309 don't worry. those reading and understand English like us also not able to understand.
@@user-iz9xk3kf3g correct.
The name of this video should have been "We will not take any responsibility whatsoever."
ya get what ya pay for. I would cancel your youtube account and stop paying that subscription if i was you
Hahahaha "On God we ain't helping y'all"
however this is their platform still they involve in it. that why they do so many auto detect system about copyright..
.
in simple word, they also want we to create completely new original video. but that also big problems for me croz lack of idea & shy to record myself.
maybe i should record my cat dance "tiger show" later.. 😁😁😁👌
@@LunaticMode Problem with the auto detecting algorithms is that it also picks up content that really is fair use. Using copyrighted material in the spirit of fair use does create new original content. This process that YT has hurts the creation of original content.
And why would they?
There are so many creators, like Thunderfoot, that constantly use copyrighted material and long clips in their videos, and claim fair use, but never have to take them down. I also see many people performing full covers of copyrighted music without their videos being taken down. I don't understand how this happens when it's so easy for others to get copyright strikes.
$$$$$
That sounds like corruption.
CZcams is run by bots and algorithms. The ones that figure out how to manipulate the system can easily get a pass.
@@nyx211 CZcams is run by people. Algorithm does not discriminate
They make CZcams a lot of money. "Case CLOSED!"
User: CZcams could you explain fair use.
CZcams: no, go to court for the details
CZcams is scared silly and they love to scare their users
lol
"CZcams doesn't decide what's fair use - only a judge can do that."
Ok...so then why would youtube take down a video without an order from a judge?
Hahahahah🤣🤣
EXACTLY
Because the compnay can be sued if they don't take down a video in a certian time frame, money basically.
CZcams will take it down, then you claim it is fair use, back and forth, and the end of that process you will have to go to court to defend our rights.
But, that is the point almost all the fair use claims by the claimers are dropped and your video is restored.
Why Would copyright even apply on CZcams? why are policies like the three strike's implemented for copyright?. If there's no fair use applied on CZcams any content should be fair gain.
Users: Can you please explain fair use
CZcams: Go to court
They are such stupid cowards...
Its not CZcams its the U.S Government wants to solve everything with courts!
เขาพูดอะไรอยากรู้จัง
CZcams loses
@@underdogtv2855 give community guidelines strikes to judges and lawyers
I have no idea why CZcams hasn't incorporated a revenue sharing system for copyrighted material based off of an algorithm that pays a certain percentage of a monetized video to the copyright holder based on how much was used! That would be a win-win for everyone!!!!
Use this as a dislike button.
bruh
Thanks for letting us know that there's nothing fair about fair use.
😂😂😂
just see
So true 😂😂
😂😂😂
😂🤣🤣😂😂
this doesn't explain why copyright holders are the ones who hold all the power regarding disputes. youtube's default "we dont decide fair use" statement is a convenient cop-out that absolves them of any responsibility to address a rampant issue of copyright abuse from big companies like UMG that's plagued the site for years.
Currently all the so called fair use claimant has to do is claim fair use and then CZcams restores the stolen video and the only other recourse is to take the person who stole it court..
We hold all the power? Only until the person who stole our video says they didn't by claiming fair us
They don’t. If they take down your video and you know you’re in the right, you can always file a lawsuit against them. Whether that’s worth it is up to you.
because they are the owner.............. You guys don't seem to understand that this is LAW, not something youtube decides, as she stated twice.... "Fair use" was invented to help people who WORKED on a project to be allowed to use it later down the line. Think of all the people who work on film sets and want to clip it later for their reels, ect. It wasn't intended for people to just take other peoples work to improve their own.
@@EricYoungVFXhow do you talk about a film without using clips from it?
CZcams doesn't decide anything, because no human looks at your claim/appeal. It's all done by A.I. routines. Google has worked very hard to insulate themselves from ever actually having to deal with the 'little people' who use their platforms and who create the content that make them profitable for Google.
The only time a human gets involved is if a dispute garners negative media attention.
Understanding algebra and calculus is much more easier than understanding fair use
So basically the “fair use” is *nonsense!*
Exactly! It is so confusing
Ofc
Since only a judge can decide if something is fair use, bigger copyright holders just have to threaten lawsuits or demonitization in order to win. Fair use (or any American law, really) is only as fair as the amount of money in your pocket.
@@thatguyyus7883 we want to talk to the yt manager
@@thatguyyus7883 exactly... mafia mafia...
- Why are you here ?
- I killed my wife because she cheated on me, and you ?
- I used a 10 seconds footage and i lost on court about fair use.
wow lol
CZcams dislike this
Ok men need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?
@@Jaa_morant I recently had a one-man band cover of Hotel California removed...and received a warning that future complaints could result in disabling my channel altogether.
@@OmniphonProductions thanx for the answer. Do you know anything about uing parts of other videos from youtube(maybe a few seconds) and parts of actual film in context of your video. Can youtube immideatly detect it and what are the consequenses ban or demonetization of its ok to use?
If only CZcams didn’t use automated bots to always side with the copyright owners
Yeah, today my video got claimed when I was using an anime clip for commentary😂
its hilarious you guys literally say "owners" and still get upset
True
How not to explain anything in 5 minutes.
i wanna go back to the old days of CZcams :(
Yeah i know, but the past is gone, this is the present..
How was the old days of CZcams like?
@@awemanyfit It was like the Wild West.
• Less rules to worry about.
• Videos prioritized entertainment before profit.
• Your only restriction was your imagination.
• Cat Videos and shitposts galore.
• Let's plays were starting to emerge.
Me too.
@@WrathKing47 there’s never been a problem cat videos moron
Of course my comment was deleted....
Hi
Hello
Why?
What was the comment?
ความจ
Im not even going to watch the video after I read the comments. These kind of videos from CZcams are the true reason they disabled dislikes. It’s a shame how less they care about their creators. People put their love, life and soul into their channels just to get them false striked and possibly deleted.
It seems impossible to find real world examples of CZcams videos that are and are not fair use. Even searching the US government's website for past court cases about fair use, there's only a tiny number of cases involving this. We need more examples to better defend our works
Just a question, if I dressed up as the Joker and do one of my videos normally, is this fair use?
Parody you mean?
Wouldn’t bother me cause I don’t know what the Joker should really look like.
I like your response Bec R
If you dress up as the Joker, act like the Joker and in no way change anything about it as well as monetizing your video... it would not be fair use.
WB owns the on screen likeness of the Joker and you could essentially cause them to lose money (not really likely) from their version. So not fair use.
If you parody the Joker in some way, it would be far safer overall.
If you dress up as Mario, Nintendo will take you down. They're very aggressive about their copyrights and most creators stay clear of them.
This is very informative. One thing though, When people complain that their entire video got claimed for a two second copyright protected clip, they aren’t necessarily suggesting that two seconds is short enough to be considered fair use. They are saying that it’s not fair that the entirety of the ad revenue for the video now goes to someone that only owns two seconds of it. Your platform desperately requires revenue share.
yes... if I just use a copyright music in my video, than the revenue from the video should be shared among the two... not the whole revenue should go to copyright owner..
+++++
They already have option like this, for covers and etc. (but how it works - who knows)
@TryHardNinja I generally agree with you, however I have exactly one viral video and another channel's author used a few seconds of mine video and of two other guys videos
a) without my and their permission nor notification
b) without any mention of origin
c) he added paid advertisement to his video
d) he made preview clickbate using stop frame from my video
e) he claimed my strike as fraudulent one
I won't go to court just because I have no spare time for that. I have less than $100 earnings for my entire channel a month, so I see no financial reason to sue that author. However it would be fine if he asked for reuse first, and added some link to my channel or my video he copied.
Am I asking too much?
@@Oxygen1um it works only if the owner of the song wants to do it. they don't agree and keep all the money even if you put hard work and effort into your OWN version of the song I do covers in my other channel and it's really annoying
@@peschex0d Legally speaking, yes you are asking too much.
They don't need to do any of the things you are complaining about under fair use, and yes it sounds like your copyright claim was a frivolous one.
I can almost guarantee that you would have lost if you would have taken it to court, so it was lucky you didn't. On top of that you opened yourself up to being sued yourself.
Sooo, basically, damned if you do, damned if you don't?
Got it.
I have to say I do appreciate the extra requirements CZcams has added for those trying to claim videos. Especially letting us know what the specific problem is when there is one.
No one likes seeing that yellow $ or getting that claim email.
Personally, I've found that "transformative" is the most important for video.
And I never ever use any copyrighted music. There's so much copyright free and creative commons 0 music out there!
I look forward to CZcams putting in place even more creator-friendly strategies regarding Fair Use.
The more transparency we get, the more creative we can be!
It's starting to feel much less adversarial with, and again, it's much appreciated!
Now, if I can just figure out how to get videos suggested 😉.
Cheers
ok but like not all of us has thousands of dollars to dump on a pointless court case
Exactly
Yo the horizon I'm a big fan SUP
@Crawford Klinner 4ऊ54ऊ
@@AlpineSkylar य
@Crawford Klinner छिघघघघ
I have to admit that CZcams makes it too easy to strike a channel, and zero consequences for a false claim lends itself to abuse.
@Connor Welch not everyone has the option to go-to court. It is an expensive endeavour, and there is no guarantee you will get enough money to break even , if you win. It is CZcams's responsibility IMHO. They made a system that is easily abused and have become complicit with it's abuse. There needs to be a built-in consequence for abuse. As it stands, I think CZcams should be labeled an accessory on the cases that go-to Court. Maybe after that, CZcams will reconsider the system in place.
Actually youtube ignores the real complaints, and then goes after those channels who do not deserve the strike
yeap 🙄
It really is time that this was standardised. How are we as creators supposed to do our work if we constantly get claims and strikes? I teach guitar. How am I supposed to teach a song that I'm not allowed to play? Even if I don't use the original video or audio and simply perform the piece myself, I still get copyright claims. This appears to be getting worse of late. Perhaps an Organisation the size of CZcams could be doing more to protect creators rather than passing the buck? Frustrating to say the least.
Yes very annoying. I’m just trying to make a compilation but this stuff is so intimidating and I don’t feel protected
When I’m using music in my videos, I normally just stick to copyright free music, but there have been songs that I’ve been using like a “You Spin Me Round (Like a Record)” remix made by Tallcat-Man I had been using throughout October, but in November, I was getting claimed for it, i’m not sure if they were falsely copyright claiming me though, it’s a remix of the original song, which means the content has been significantly transformed, so it doesn’t make sense that I still got claimed :/
When are you gonna respect this policy?
Can someone clear my doubt?-I used music in my gaming video
@@deathgaming4657 WHat was the song and was it from a video?
Because that's not my policy
I’m never going to
Lol
after watching this video,
I got scared, it turns out that my video content uses a lot of other people's rights :(
Let's be safe henceforth
@@SANDYSSKILLZ f2f2ddde g2d .
🤣
Can someone clear my doubt?-I used music in my gaming video
relatable
Ok so I used audio that was CROPPED AND SPED UP to avoid copyright in one of my videos. Unfortunately the video got a copyright strike. This makes no sense.
Can I use images that I altered in Photoshop? By altered I mean, I assembled several images, therefore creating a new image with several layers of those pictures.
I am sorry if this is confusing. I am just not that familiarized with this type of vocabulary in English.
Imagine this getting copyrighted
Emilol 1001 she’s copying a hairstyle, copySTRIKE
Irony.
This is actually covered by copyright and CZcams can decide what use is allowed. So even CZcams can go after thieves when they steal stuff.
The degree Google wants to be free of any potential responsibility is stunning
Bhoomika 's blog
That's smart of them.
It's understandable, but they bought youtube sooo
The rules of fair use seem to be at the whims of some esoteric algorithms decision. I've had music that claimed to be royalty free get flagged one once video while the same music was considered fine on another.
This was very helpful! I had clip of mine taken only 4 seconds of it, but now I see I do have some leverage. Thank you!
Thanks for trying to clear it up. Atleast now I know that no one knows.
Building America with jared goplen my thoughts exactly
You are top comment for me?
hehehehe
Semangat bikin chanel baru
So like for example I would like to have we re doing a sequel for my videos I have to go to court to get it right
What’s the point on doing fair use if CZcams will determinate you can’t monetize because reused content
I heard on other youtube videos that if you take copyrighted material and make enough changes to it to make your own there won't be any copyright isue involve. Is that accurate information?
2:06 Is footage of me driving with logos just passing by in the background considered fair use? If not then what should I do?
True story: Paramount PR invited me to a screening of one of their Mission Impossible movies for review. I made a video talking about my thoughts on the movie and ranking the Mission Impossible movies using some of their trailers video edited over me talking and criticizing the movies. Years later Paramount claimed the video - I disputed through YT and said it should fall under fair use but Paramount responded with a manual rejection. I ended up just deleting the video since the views weren't so high but it's annoying when a company invites you to something for review - you make a review video and then they basically kill your video (even after praising the movie).
We know where you are coming from but sometimes it can be hard to understand why a rights owner has claimed your video, but that doesn’t mean they’re not authorized to do so. You can always dispute a content ID claim that you believe was made in error: yt.be/help/LKJN. Hope this helps!
my guess is you violated one of the review rules
@@CZcamsViewers My guess is the system is being abused and I think you all know that.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥...I think if they asked you to do a review, they should have given you a fair use right to their music, in writing to protect your creative rights, using their work but authorized in writing.
in this way it defends you from any claim of copyrights
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Creo que si ellos te pidieron , que hicieras un reviews, deberían haberte dado un derecho sobre uso legítimo su música, por escrito para proteger tus derechos de creatividad,usando el trabajo de ellos pero autorizados por escrito.
De esta manera te defiende de cualquier reclamo de copyrights.
ہم کھڑے تھے ، ہم کھڑے ہیں ، ہم کھڑے رہیں گے ، یقین کے ساتھ ، ایمان کے ساتھ ، پاکستان کے ساتھ ، عمران خان کے ساتھ ، ان شاء اللہ 🇵🇰💯♥️🥀🌹👍
This made me even more confused and messed up my whole head. I don't think I'll understand it properly in my lifetime....
Don't worry. I don't get it either. LOL
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣same here bro. 👍👍👍👍👍
Shes like this is whats aloud but actually no
Thank you for keeping us within the loop with the CZcams Creators series. I have a copyright question that I was hoping someone could help me with. I'm currently working on a video and want to mention, within the opening, "In admiration of Sergio Leone" (the famous director) - is that ok to do? Within my video I will be using music from within YT's video library, the opening sequence of my video will be similar to one of Leone's openings, yet the artwork will be my own unique creation. Is there any sure way to know, beforehand, if I'm crossing any legal boundaries? I have read the YT TOS several times yet seem to feel that I may be within a gray area with this idea. Is there any way to know for sure, or have the video reviewed BEFORE I publish it? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated: Thank you!
I’m so tired of watching CZcamsrs try to comment on videos, but can’t because it has some background music. They always have to muted the video because of “fair use”, making the commenting impossible.
Here's a massive problem with CZcams's "fair use" approach, however. 02:41
"Companies are claiming just a few seconds of a video. How is that not abuse?"
Ignoring the "lol just use 3 seconds of audio and it's fine" nonsense people try to pull - copyrighted material for only a few seconds of a video DOES NOT at any point in licensing of copyrighted material result in ALL OF THE EARNINGS of that video being taken. There's so many elements of copyright-able work in a single video, that just copyright claim of the composition or recording of a song should NEVER take the entire revenue of a video. Period. This is a lazy, stealing method of not providing a tool for creators to license out these chunks of material. Sure, not every publisher will allow such licensing - but many do, CZcams just isn't facilitating that.
lol
Companies is much more VIP than there Creator
No hi Jo uuu hi uu
True, i have a half an hour video that i worked on for many hours. It contains about 17 seconds of copyrighted music (the curb your enthousiasm meme theme...) and the entire video gets claimed by that company. What??
Jn. Nij
How are music analysis channels even supposed to work then? Do you just talk about what you are referring to instead of playing at least a 5 seconds clip of it? That makes the video lose a lot of educational value, if not all of it. In the entire history of music teaching, teachers have always shown examples of everything they are explaining... this is still nonsense imo.
Official answer is "deal with it." you have to bear with it, get dmca'd, go through the process and argue fair use in court. The biggest argument will most likely be "Market Usurpation." example if its a song and people go to your vid just to listen to the song, you clearly usurped the songs marketability. And it would be up to you to argue in court that examining 5 sec of a song for educational purposes doesnt usurp the market. So yes, its abuse.. But youtube doesn't care
Unfortunately for the record labels out there they actually will lose in every court, and their only option is abusing the manual claim system and scaring people. The starting and stopping of the song, with your voice added with commentary about the music is in fact protected by fair use. By the same standard though you introducing a song like your a DJ or MTV VJ is not covered in anyway.
Education, Critiquing, and some forms of Sampling are protected, simply put using the entire raw audio in a video is not ok. There is a lot of ways around this but thats not the point.
@@TheGelatinousSnake can't deal with it when we can't go to court
you are allowed to show a short clip, that's fair use. Many companies just don't care about it and strike you anyway.
maybe try singing that song instead of playing it XD
There’s a lot of complaints here but I have to say, thank you so much. You confirmed my suspicions that someone used my content *without* fair use. Thank you.
I have a question and appreciate it if anyone can help❤❤, so would it be copyright safe if I download movies and then edit/trim them into a shorter version (10 to 15 min) only using the original video and audio? and is it safe to put the name of the movie in the title? so basically I wouldn't add any video or audio to the original content, it would be just trimming the whole movie and making a shorter version...
So basically, for my $20 a month... in 1000 years I could afford a lawyer to dispute some BS... great.
can you talk about the abuse of the copyright claim feature too? There are people out there claiming content that does not belong to them and do it constantly.
czcams.com/video/agGPx-z5M_s/video.html CZcams WINS LAWSUIT VS COPYRIGHT TROLL
Alex
YES THRY ARE DOING IT ON THE SAME VIDEO AGAIN AND AGAIN. I GOT FLAGGED ON THE SAME VIDEO THRICE ONE OF WHICH IN THE END WAS GETTING ME A STRIKE FOR SADISTIC PLEASURE IT SEEMS TO ME OR THE PERSON IS INSANE FULLY. I DON'T KNOW WHICH OF THEM AFOREMENTIONED IS TRUE, BUT I ASSUME THAT CZcams WANT'S US TO NOT USE IT INDIRECTLY
@@khannaankit102 It happened to me too for playing GD and it was MY gameplay
And yet all those godzilla stop motion youtubers manage to get soundtracks into their videos, yet when I try, I CANT?!
*Resume about this video be like* *
CZcams: It's not my problem
youtube: can not determine whether or not something is fair use or not.
Us: so why do you block our content anyway?
Because that’s just how DMCA law works. CZcams is siding on the side of safety to prevent another lawsuit like the one from Viacom all those years ago.
@@13Omood smh. something needs to be done about this. all of the mainstream youtube celebrities need to unify for change.
"Fair Use" can truthfully only be determined in court. As a platform for media hosting and sharing youtube can be held liable for the content they are hosting. Hence why things are the way they are on the site. If things are going to change it has to be done on a legislative level first
Rockeedee Is it okay to post a video of myself talking about another CZcams video if I’m making no money off it and I react to screenshots of the video instead of that CZcams video and put the screenshots in my own video?
@@AlexDYM331 That's something in the grey area. That's why the laws need to be cleared on these things
Yet UMG are literally just claiming any video with random timestamps. They claimed a stream I had as a vod with no music within it and the time stamp was when I was at the toilet and it was silent!!!!!!! Broken system
Gimme credit and you can most certainly use my music For Free (so long as your not making lots of money from it, then I would like a cut :P)
I always wondered when silence was going to be copyrighted. Now I know
@@JasonBlack66 no ones going to use your music either make it free or dont fucking advertise it
Yes, silence has already been copyrighted! If such silence is 4 minutes and 33 seconds long the estate of John Cage might come after you ! Just make sure no musicians are present...
@Rhino Gaming kek, amazing analysis!
This is easily one of the most informative breakdowns that every creator should know early on.
This is very informative. One thing though, When people complain that their entire video got claimed for a two second copyright protected clip, they aren’t necessarily suggesting that two seconds is short enough to be considered fair use right now thanks😍
Twice I pulled music from the CZcams Audio library and it was flagged as copyrighted. The second time, I went through the dispute process and had to wait 30 days for the video to be able to be monetized, even though it was CZcams's already-approved music.
Some songs require you give them a specific type of credit. That may be the reason why.
@@TreeBarkProductions how would anyone find that out for any specific song? if its on the public domain list, that's defeating the entire purpose of public domain. Id be curious which artists would upload public domain music just to fuckin strike it. That would be good content for a video actually.
@@skahg4771 They have different licensing requirements. Some are 100% public domain, while others require credit.
It’s also possible some random person claimed it, this happened with one of the fat rats songs
omg
CZcams is pandering so heavily to the corporations in this video. "Only courts have the ability to decide" is CZcams saying "We won't treat it as fair use until the courts decide". Look at how they threaten creators by saying "Even a few seconds may not be deemed fair use". This is how they convince you that removing content automatically without any legal action being taken by the corporation is reasonable. How can you have a fair use doctrine when every video, even those that fall under fair use, is swiftly removed from the platform when even a few seconds of material is caught by its copyright checking robots? This is "guilty until proven innocent", not "innocent until proven guilty", and it is truly unjust.
You honestly put it perfectly. Do you mind if I quote you in a paper I'm writing for my English class?
From what I can tell DMCA muddies the water. It forces CZcams to remove videos or risk being sued for inaction. So CZcams is playing it safe for themselves by going over board and removing fair use content. I think if the law was updated to make the type of copyrighted content you have to remove more specific it would help.
@@whompetgaming3881 screw the DMCA
Thank you for clarifying this help me a lot..
I'm curious how someone can use someone's content as "fair use" when google says "Downloading CZcams videos without permission is against CZcams's terms of service and may result in legal action, account termination, or penalties for downloading copyrighted content. However, CZcams does offer tools and settings that allow content creators to grant permission for others to download and use their videos. For example, CZcams Premium subscribers can download videos for offline viewing without restrictions."
Fair Use is a legal minefield. Just avoid all material that isn’t copyright free. Been there done that
No jail for this, just banner on CZcams!!
are we allowed to show pictures from tv shows? Or is that subject to fair use also?
Easier said then done...
I just wanna ask.. if we use a fair use.. is we still can monetize our channel?
@Sugma court orders? How wich?
Okay, CZcams... explain this: I received a copyright claim because I played a piece of copyrighted music even though it should clearly fall under Fair Use.
1. I played a piece of music the original artist submitted to me himself, for the sole purpose of playing it on a live stream and giving him feedback on the production.
2. The content was educational in nature and the original artist benefits from it by learning something.
3. His piece of music wasn't the only piece played and critiqued, there were many more over the course of the stream, meaning the sole purpose of the stream was NOT to spread copyrighted material.
4. The claimant and the artist being represented are based in the US, so US Fair Use laws apply and thus the above-named things should be taken into account.
I, of course, disputed the claim since this should be considered Fair Use, the dispute was rejected. I then muted the audio of that song in particular, because live streams and donations are a big part of my channel and I can't risk losing those. However, the fact that the claimant rejected my Fair Use dispute even though it's a clear cut case of Fair Use is what is a problem to begin with and this all ties back to the horrible system CZcams uses where claimants get to decide if my dispute is right or wrong.
So this video specifically says, that only a judge can decide if something is Fair Use or not. So why then is it, when I file a dispute because I believe the claim is indeed Fair Use, that the claimant gets to decide over that and not a judge as you say? There is no court case until it reaches the point where the damage to my channel is already done! The claimant decides if my dispute is correct or false... If they reject it, I can appeal that decision, however with the risk of putting a copyright strike on my channel, limiting my options for live streaming and receiving donations, which are the two things that keep my channel going. So, not a viable option to risk that. Only if my appeal is rejected again it'll become a court case, but by that time, my channel will already have a strike on it limiting my channel severely. So we can safely say, this is not a viable option for me to take. CZcams keeps specifically stating in this video they can't decide if something is Fair Use or not and that only a judge can, then why is that not happening when I dispute a claim based on Fair Use? You are literally proven yourself wrong with this exact statement in the video.
When you drag somebody into court, that is a fight between 2 parties and the third party, the judge, is the one to make an unbiased judgment. You are not going to let the defendant or accuser decide on the result of the court case right? So when I receive a copyright claim, why is there no third party to look over these? Why is the claimant the one to decide if I'm right or wrong? That is like having a court case and letting the accuser decide if the defender's arguments are false or correct. CZcams should have a team of copyright specialists looking into every single copyright case as a third party overlooking the process to make sure things go the way they should.
And then I haven't even talked about the copyright claims that I constantly receive when I'm making music on CZcams, claims on videos where the video itself already disproves the claim itself and therefore should never be appearing on my channel in the first place. The fact that I receive claim after claim on content which is clearly my own is a big sign something is horribly broken when it comes to copyright on CZcams.
So, instead of ignoring all my tweets, comments, emails and other forms of contact I tried, maybe it would be wise to at least come back to me with an explanation like you would expect in the case of a CZcams "partnership". We creators signed an agreement to be in a partnership with CZcams, yet we creators completely lack the amount of transparency and communication you would expect from a true partnership. So, is it really a partnership or does CZcams simply call it that when it actually isn't?
As a creator who has spend a lot of time on this platform since day one, I can sadly say that I'm reaching a point where IF a new platform equivalent to CZcams shows up, I would not hesitate one bit to jump ship. And as a creator who has put thousands of hours into his channel, that is a very hard choice to make. However, we've reached a point where things are so broken, CZcams is moving into a direction that is favoring big corporations over the independent creators who have been the reason of the success of CZcams, and I absolutely don't like that.
If during this entire wall of text I have understood something wrong, then please CZcams respond and explain it to me instead of ignoring me making matters a lot worse. I signed the partnership agreement years ago, but until this date, I have never received any help when it comes to issues with my channel, nor has CZcams ever responded to any of my questions I asked them... Now THAT is a great partnership... not!
Bravo! Well said.
💯
#Facts
No reply CZcams? Come on...
I'm sorry for your channel
I have 4 videos which I own the copyright to.. ( in other words, I made them years ago, filed the forms in the Library of Congress and have the copyright to them).. It's been about 10 years now and want to use my OWN CONTENT on YT to promote an old channel I have.. Do I just post it, then tell YT that I am the copyright owner? How does that all work? OR How do I grant permission to MYSELF to put these videos on my old channel.. What do I need to do here.. I have not posted them yet but intending to in summer 2022 ..
Also, can I 'monetize' my videos that are on one channel to my main channel.. I have two channels (hey you said that in your video so just asking.. )
Me: Can I use others videos?
CZcams: *Yesn't*
I always wondered how reaction YT channels do it.
😅😂
Ninja techniques...
Ikr they monitize their channel whole channel witg copyright claim i'm like how?!.
They get licenses
They aren't claiming the content but rather giving "criticism" (reacting)
Protect channels getting false claims before removing yourself from the "fair-use" argument.
Question: So I remade stranger things but in a vr game with a different storyline. But I feel very scared, should I just remove the vids or do something?
I have a question, my streaming do not use the copyrighted content, but it recognizes that I’m used the copyrighted content by mistake. How to solve it?
4:05 Automated systems like content ID shouldn't be able to automatically demonetise someone's video. It should be able to notify potential copyright claimants, but that's it.
Since fair use is in your own words "subjective case-by-case decision", you CANNOT use a guilty until proven innocent' approach. That is objectively wrong.
Ok man need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?
j travolto if u use copyrighted content thats not yours the owner most can do is take it down and give your channel a strike,but as you said you are going to use copyrighted songs then -you can reupload them but you most probably won't make any money from them as the video will get automatically monetized by the owner
@@seven4280 than mate,can we get away with using instrumentals most of the time?I mean pretty much everyone use them in videos in the background and it looks as if they are ok with that
j travolto when i say music it means anything sound if that is copyrighted you are not gonna make a single penny if u put thatbin your video,and also check youtubes new rules on what type of content can be monetize search on google ,read the latest post 2020 feb12 in yhat they said reposted content will never be monetized
j travolto also you can use copyright free musics,videos anything without any fear in your videos,
"The main focus of your video is copyrighted material"
So what happens to movie reviews/commentaries?
Yes... What happens to movie reviews??? Somebody pls clarify
Same, my channel basically focuses on commenting current tennis news, so I use a lot of images for this. Is this fair use?
Didn't they say that reviews was fair use? I'm not sure tho, I'm myself trying to solve the problem with fair use stuff...
@@goonjmotivational Criticism falls under fair use.
Delayed reply but here it is...
This will fall under another section known as "use for criticism and review" in "transformative content"
As long as you are criticising or reviewing the copyrighted material during its use..it is considered as fair use
Please note I am no legal advisor and I don't claim any liability for adverse effects to your channel...but the above message is what I found out from a few youtubers
I was always curious about this! This is great considering I do a lot of remixes of copyrighted music. A big goal I have with my uploads is to be sure that they're far from just straight copies. I like what it says about adding, "new expression or meaning" to the original content.
I want to know that If I download a video from someones Instagram story and upload it on CZcams before anyone uploads it, will it marked as reuse content?
Please tell me .
What is misleading title ..?
CZcams: Copyright Policy
Also CZcams: Now introducing CZcams Music and CZcams TV!
LoL this reminds me of when pewdiepie wanted to add his OWN song to a video and the youtube algorithm told him sorry, this is copyrighted owned by (don't remember lol), he wrote to youtube but they just answered that he can't prove that it's his music, ultimately after a couple of months he took care of it but this just proves that YT is broken.
I remember that
Music labers are scammy
But there are "fake music labels" that teake non coppyritted and steal their rights to scam everybody
There's recently been this "label" from russia that strikes everything and even spams false claims
Cose there is no way russian music label has rights to nightcore, bassboosted, sped up, and songs with Non coppyritted music in title
Thanks for this video lesson learned
The problem isnt that we/creators dont know what fair use it. The problem is that the ORIGINAL COPYRIGHT HOLDERS DON'T HONOR THE FAIR USE!
They don’t? Explain
@@MichaelGlennglennimages An example is when a really boring video is being used for the purpose of criticism, which is valid under Fair Use, and the original copyright holder being criticized makes a claim not only because they don't like what's being said about them, but also because the new, edited, and highly transformative video gets more views.
@@ursonate yes that is correct. The chance of losing a fair use case in that specific instance is unlikely. Although if one wanted to sue for it they could. It would cost them time and money.
Creators are copyright holders. People who use others work are copyright infringers. Aggregators. They aren’t creators.
@@ursonate Fair Use is not absolute simply because you claim it. Google it, or watch this video again.
Wow!!! Thank you so much for wasting 5:12 seconds of my life.
plus 20 seconds for commenting and reading this reply combined
Here, have a few extra seconds wasted from your life!
@@Valleystick🤣🤣🤣
@@madsubhash 😆😆😆😆👌
¿Se puede compartir la monetización con el creador, haciendo un video que tenga valoraciones y agregados extras del video original?
There should be a blanket allowance of maybe 3 seconds of audio and 5 seconds of video without copyright strikes. CZcams would probably be better off for it in terms of content quality. I get it's not that easy though.
So why are you allowing people to report videos, then they get to decide if it’s a good claim or not.
What is fair use?
H3H3 vs Matt Hoss. Your best example on the platform.
yes but media corps ignore it.. how many hollywood clips have you used and gotten away with it?
Good question. Fair use is a legal doctrine that says you can reuse copyright-protected material under certain circumstances without getting permission from the copyright owner. Learn more here: yt.be/help/3Zuw
It's not an example. Court cases often also rely on how good the lawyer is, so a small CZcamsr who doesn't have the H3 millions might lose the same case.
@@CZcamsViewers AKA bot that just attended the question without noticing it was a retoric question
@@TheOutThereChannel the keywork here is clips and assuming the clips were used in a transformative piece of content why is this claimable? you always have to ask is it: "transformative" is it "educational" is it "a critic" the problem here is most of the time these things are often debatable and youtube doesn't have the authority to say one way or the other, unfortunately they are between a rock and hard place and have to allow people to report such things and this reporting system is hugely open to abuse by people who don't care or simply don'y understand these things.
2:05 CZcams ads: I'm going to do that
Thank you sister I don't have any idia now days I found I am working cearfully youtube rules thank you happy merry Christmas in2022 and happy new year in2023.. 🙏🇳🇵❤️
This is just a nice way of explaining how great corporations are basically taking over youtube. Most of us, contents creators, know that companies have been striking us mercilessly for using a few seconds of their material in what would clearly classify as Fair Use. Those false strikes are being designed to actually take control away from contents creators.
राज यांन
Automated systems like content ID can't account for fair use, but they can automatically accuse you of being guilty by design.
Ok man need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?
If you plan to include copyright-protected material in your video, you’ll generally need to seek permission to do so first. CZcams can’t grant you these rights and we can’t help you find the parties who can grant them to you. You’ll have to research and handle this process on your own or with a lawyer’s help.
More info here: yt.be/help/xF5F
@@CZcamsViewers Need your answer: can i use parts of other videos briefly im ny own(2-4 seconds) are there sites where videos can be taken freely?
Happy to help, if you plan to use or include copyright-protected material on your videos, you generally need to seek permission from the copyright owner first. Copyright owners may choose how they want to enforce their rights on a video-by-video basis. More info can be found here: yt.be/help/j2xJ
@@Jaa_morant No, I uploaded a video featuring about 6 songs that sound similar; comparing 5 second clips each. I am not monetized and only have like 5 followers but YT deleted my video and gave me a 1/3 strike on my account. It was automated, nothing taken to reason
please help, i have created a song from scratch using an App on my phone to use on my videos, how do i copyright it to make sure that no one steal it?
Rick Beato and his followers need to watch this video!
I am glad that the content ID system is getting improved. I get tired of all the false claims.
I even had a claim on my voice, yes me talking.
Must be ur parents
You still can get false claim by company
@@basic_avarage_person hwy hi u r online at the same timw im here lol😂
Two years later, someone blocked my video with my own voice and my own image I created from a blank whiteboard animation app. It is a censorship weapon.
Is it considered false claim if it’s RIAJ that’s taking down my work?
I love how CZcams pretends now that original content is what made it successful. MOST of the time that I am on CZcams, I am looking for tribute videos of copyrighted work.
CZcams is turning into a tv channel.in future only music videos and videos created by professionals tv studios will exist iin it.
@@wisevoice5393 you only say that because your channel has no hits and no subscribers. You might get some activity if you were posting things that people actually want to see. Copying all the big CZcamsrs will get you nowhere because EVERYONE ELSE is also doing it. I only post things that I would want to watch myself.
@@rka1010 I make videos out of my opinions. Something that I wish people would care to watch.It doesn't matter if nobody watches them. I don't really care much about being a huge youtuber. I just love making videos and as I have free time, i will try keep making them.About CZcams they are definitely more into promoting channels that post movie trailers and music videos, which is not balanced on content made on CZcams. How to videos and motivational videos deserve their own place in this platform.
@@wisevoice5393 How to videos and motivational videos are the only things I ever get promoted to me these days. You need to realize that everyone on CZcams is seeing something different. They are promoting music videos and movie trailers to you because that's what you click on. If you want something different, you have to search for it and click on it, and keep doing that.
There are billions of videos on here about everything, and most are not going away anytime soon. They are encouraging us to do original content because it saves them the hassle of dealing with copyright strikes. The more we comply, the more carefree money they make.
@@rka1010 Pretty sure them getting no hits and no subscribers has nothing to do with no one wanting to see their content. With professional looking thumbnails like those, they should at least be getting clicks. Also you're not one to talk about doing things everyone else does. Clips of TV shows and movies and gameplay videos with or without commentary are a dime a dozen.
So, I did a video last night. I put commentary on it doing a reaction video to a video from the history channel about UFOs. Why did it get taken down? I talked through the video explaining and giving my thoughts.
here is thing CZcams PewDiePie don't have claim of his own video like bi*ch song t-series dis song
His song is claim by a company RepostNetwork as a represent by PewDiePie and he appeal got rejected. So we all know how good your system is.
Here’s my rules about copyright:
If someone uses my content without credit in the description, they will get a copyright strike.
If someone uses my content with credit in the description. They will not get a copyright strike.
Same here
There is no requirement under fair use to give a credit to the original creator. You could even be opening yourself up to being sued doing this.
i gave the credit to the owner in the description.....still i got claimed...help me someone : (
@@domesticlovergirl ask permission to the copyright owner
@@rairai9606 how can i ask bighit 🙃....they have more than 30 million subscribers and more than 100 million fans 🙂
She reminds me of 'Siri'😂
Thank you so much for this Information....
THIS IS GOOD NEWS TO CREATORS. THANK YOU CZcams Creators FOR THIS UPDATE. GOD BLESS 😊