NFL Rarest Penalties #2
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 03. 2022
- (if any of the links don't work, check most recent video)
TalkSports Discord: / discord
Instagram: goo.gl/DerXkT
Twitter: goo.gl/ou6Rfv
Snapchat: savagebrick2
Gaming channel: goo.gl/vqRzn2
Archive channel: goo.gl/3dpp3v
Discord Name: Savage Brick#6101
Outro made by: @BlackoutCreates on twitter
Outro Song: AFX - 14 Cornish Spreek5b [St. Nectan S Glen Waterfalls Mix]
• Aphex Twin / AFX - 14 ...
Contact (business): If you want to contact me on business terms, use my business email (link in about section)
Contact (Personal): If you are a fan and want to casually talk to me or collab with me, contact me through either Instagram or Twitter, if it is urgent, then I will allow you to use my business email
(All rights go to the original leagues and their broadcasters, no copyright infringement intended. If I feature clips that you own and that you don't want me to feature, contact me via my business email (link in about section) and I'll take it down as soon as I can)
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." - Sport
That man really got off the bench and tackled him. What a savage.
That savage hit him like a brick. That’s sports.
I’ve literally always wondered if someone had done something like that almost from a movie, now I know 😭😭
that player kicking the ball out of his own end zone was actually pretty smart. better to take the safety than a touchdown
yes! i thought they would award a touchdown. the PLAN was to take a safety, that's not a penalty when it was the plan.
@@streetsareforpeople723 - You can't award a result on what might happen, only what did happen......
Unless a guy jumps off the bench in the 1940's, then you make it up on the fly.
@@streetsareforpeople723 Any penalty whose enforcement spot is in the offending's team end zone results in a safety. Rule 10-2, Enforcement procedures.
@@FHL-Devils That situation is even covered in the rules, under sportsmanlike acts. If the referee feels that the runner had a clear chance to score, a TD is awarded. So no, nothing is made up on the fly.
@@raulv0417 - I have a hard time believing that a loose ball in the end zone, where it hasn't been clearly recovered by either team, would spontaneously be awarded as a TD. That's like saying the penalty for Pass Interference could be a TD. There might be examples of *egregious* unsportsmanlike conduct resulting in that (such as in the video)... but doing that for an on-field 'football play' just wouldn't happen in any practical sense. Every sport has tactical-fouls... You can't invent the most extreme example for what you think might have (or even probably would have) happened.
The only counter-example to this is in the NHL where a goal is automatically awarded if a player commits a penalty against an opponent on a breakaway against an open net - and there's a player safety aspect to that - if the normal penalty was applied (a penalty shot with the goalie in the net), then players would be tacking each other and throwing their sticks down the ice to prevent the goal.
Since it went unnamed in the video, the penalty in the Cotton Bowl was a palpably unfair act, and it resulted in Tommy Lewis being ejected in addition to Maegle being awarded the touchdown.
And that's the correct enforcement of the penalty.
There was something similar that happened between the Boston Patriots and the Dallas Texans in the early 60s where a fan ran out on the field and blocked a pass except Dallas wasn't awarded a score on the play... :(
It almost was gonna be called in the Play. Had Cal not gotten the touchdown, by rule the Refs could have given it too them
I once saw a palpably unfair act for a shoe thrown
Another uncalled palpably unfair act was the Patriots snow plow in 1982.
How about the "giving him the business" penalties? Those are always funny and quiet rare.
and the penalty about the fake snap count
If you do a part 3, search up chiefs vs raiders 2003, there was a personal foul for “piling on a pile”.
I'll look into that!
@@savagebricksports1 it was the week 12 matchup and occurred in the 1st quarter
@@bendang6039 WHAT?!
That's actually somewhat common, I can remember that happening in a game in the last two seasons
@@TheCaptainJohn8 u have my old profile picture lol
Safety vs fumble recovery in the endzone. Kicking the ball is the right move 100% of the time in that scenario.
True, because whether the penalty is accepted or declined, the result is the same.
"Illegal kicking" in a game called football 🤣🤣🤣
Well theres a line of scrimmage that if you go beyond the line you arent able to pass or kick the ball and you have to run it
I think both y'all missed the joke
@@antonyzmolek1234 Thank you
That last clip has a discord notification in it that made me think it was my computer
Yeah sorry about that
Congrats man! I love these videos!
Really didn’t see any major movement from mannings hands in that last one
There's one I recall from 2015 season, but I dunno how rare it is to qualify. Bears vs Packers: Bears' offense committing an offsides penalty.
That happens all the time. Players, mostly receivers, get caught lining up in the neutral zone all the time.
There's was one I recall where a team was inside the 10 or so and the receiver motioned to the ref to make sure he was lined up right and the ref gave him a thumbs up. Once the ball was snapped that same ref thru a flag for being offsides lol
hell yeah!! palpably unfair act! love to see it
If there's a part three look up eagles v 49ers 1984 punter
I also found a rare penalty (leverage) aka leaping in a 1994 broncos vs 49ers game on a extra point.
Also In a 1992 Chiefs vs Eagles game, at about 1:42:30 there was a penalty on a field goal for a defender leaving through the end zone and entering the wrong side of the field.
thanks! This will come in handy for part 3!
3:40 An Offensive False Start penalty? Woooow, learning something new every day 🏈👍🏽
Something similar to the Manning play but more egregious happen with Donavan McNabb in the Giants/Eagles week 2, 2006 game. He was under center in the 4th quarter with the game close and faked like the snap came and got called for a penalty. The announcers were baffled why he did it
I was thinking of this play before it came up, only it was Dan Marino I saw called for it. He pumped his hands like he was catching the shotgun snap.
Can you put Florida A&M's illegal jerseys in part 3?
This is a cool video
When I was in high school, we were playing for the division championship. It was a close game, we were down by 2 and about to get the ball back with a little over a minute left. It was 4th and 3 or 4, can't remember. They punted the ball but there was a flag. Seems one my teammates left the field to the opponents sideline. They got a first down and ran out the clock.
Don't forget about illegal batting of the ball. That happened a few years ago in Chicago when a FG attempt at the end of the first half was blocked and returned to the one where it was dropped by the returner and the kicker batted the ball out the back of his own end zone.
please speak english.
…..
,,,,,
use those where needed
I'm still not seeing the last one. Maybe because now the defense could be called for inducing the false start. I'm not sure if that rule was in play at the time.
But, if you want to add one, Cleveland Browns helmet penalty (aka, the Dwayne Rudd penalty). As a fan, I darn near had a heart attack.
Manning moved his hands like he was catching a shotgun snap. A linebacker looking at him instead of the line might think the ball's being snapped. I've seen Dan Marino get called for it.
The one I have never, ever seen and it's in the rule book, both NCAA and pro, is the illegal fair catch signal. Video #1 displayed an invalid fair catch signal, because the receiver didn't extend his arm above his head. That's invalid. An illegal signal, though, is made when the scrimmage or free kick crosses the neutral zone, that is, strikes the ground. I only saw once a guy coming in from the bench and tackle the runner. The penalty in NCAA rules is clear although it appeals to the referee's judgement to award a TD or not. Very good series of videos. Thanks.
One other quirk of the fair catch rules: a returner has fair catch protection until (or if) the ball hits the ground. There was a college game a few years ago where the returner fair-caught, and then bobbled the ball. The gunner hit him and recovered it, but was flagged for fair catch interference because the ball was still in the air.
I seem to remember one where a kick receiver gave a fair catch signal but someone else caught the ball and was flagged. I don't recall if it was advanced illegally or if the fair catch itself was called illegal.
@@eauhomme The advance is illegal, because by signaling, you're agreeing not to advance the ball at all, including your teammates. An illegal fair catch signal, though, is one made after the ball has touched the ground, from what I recall.
Nice
When I was in high school football, we once got an intentional grounding penalty for spiking the ball in shotgun
Some more for part 3:
Illegal spike (intentional grounding due to waiting a second before spiking to stop the clock)
Double forward pass
Illegal forward fumble (fumblerewski/holy roller play, now illegal)
That discord notification got me checking my channels.
I would really appreciate it if you answered this, what song do you use for your outro?
Read video description.
@@ryanwilliams6221 thank you
3:40 ya got a couple notifications there buddy. - 8:32 PM 4/2/2022
What?
👍 nº 1
3:40 Maybe they mean Manning made an abrupt motion with his big brain to get them to jump.
False start on the QB was common for a while in the 2000s (you'd see it about once a month), but this one was a bad call.
Illegal snap infraction actually makes hella sense when you see these intentional fumble trick plays from the prior video
The one on Manning I actually wouldn't say is 100% that rare -- there's another name for it that's more common: Simulating the snap.
"Made a quick and abrupt motion with his hands". Ooooookay then....
Kicking the ball for a safety is actually a smarter move than having the opposing team fall on it for a touchdown.
DEN-SEA: A proto combination of horse collar and face mask.
Part 3 coming?
Yes
I don’t see how Peyton and Co. got fined when his offensive line didn’t even flinch
Because Peyton was the one who flinched. He moved his hands in a way as to suggest the ball is being snapped.
@@eauhommethat’s the ruling, but did he? I don’t think it was the right call
@@ttnnnaa4500 It was borderline, but it was there. I once saw Dan Marino do it much more blatantly.
Can you try and find a “disconcerting act” penalty?
Last video where the defense tries to imitate the offense's signals.
0:40 That is not actually that uncommon. Grabbing the helmet anywhere is called Facemask. Ref just explained it a bit more than needed.
My cowboys would be the team that gets delay of game on the defense
How is 1:15 an illegal snap? Looks like a fumble to me and I can't find a rule for it in the NFL rulebook.
#2
3:20 The penalty results in a safety? Better than the other team scoring a TD.
What made the snap at 1:15 illegal? The snapper hit *himself* in the tush with the ball, but since it didn't touch "another* lineman, I thought it would be legal.
Starting and stopping a snap is illegal. They killed the play rather than letting it play out like a fumble because it never made it to the quarterback.
@@eauhomme But he didn't stop the snap.
The ref called the wrong number on the QB kicking the ball out of the end zone.
So that second one is basically a reverse horsecollar?
No. It is called "Facemask" even though it is back of the helmet. All penalties of grabbing the helmet openings is facemask.
@@RoyalMela ah. Thanks for clarifying. I’m a bit of a noob when it comes to football
Can someone explain the helmet tackle penalty?
You can not grab any openings of the helmet to tackle someone.
@@RoyalMelahow is considered that a horse collar though, if he grabbed the outside of the helmet?
which one do you like
Do u like Indiana basketball
To me the illegal kicking to the back of the end zone isn't a "penalty". Like, ok, it went out of bounds back there. If it went out on its own because of legal actions, the other team would have gotten a safety anyway.
I feel like a penalty that will give them status quo should be "upgraded" so to speak. He kicked it to sacrifice getting a safety over a touchdown. Other team should have gotten a touchdown from that.
Or at minimum, penalty on the "kickoff" when they punt after the safety.
But the defense should not be allowed to kick a fumbled ball into the back of the end zone to prevent a touchdown and get a safety as a result when a ball rolling back there on its own would have given the same result.
Bruh what?! I had a stroke reading your comment
@@wehavethemeats4004 My point being: why should the penalty of kicking out a loose ball that's in the end zone be a safety when it's a ball that can be easily picked up by the defense for a touchdown?
You'd get the same result if it rolled out on its own. A penalty should penalize. Not result in nothing different, or give a team that is receiving the penalty an advantage by actually breaking the rules.
If you can get a better result by breaking the rules, your rules aren't written correctly.
@@JouvaMoufette But the rule is, if a offensive penalty occurs in their endzone, the result is a safety. The devensive team gets the points and the ball.
@@wehavethemeats4004 I don't know what you're complaining about. They actually spaced it out which is more than 90% of commenters do.
@@tygrkhat4087 Oh I'm aware. I'm saying that certain penalties seem lob-sided and feel it should change.
My understanding of the rules is that, if a player, coach, trainer, or any other member of a team on the sidelines makes a tackle, the ball carrier is awarded a touchdown, whether he would have scored one or not. If a fan or someone not a member of the other team does it, the player is awarded a touchdown only if the officials determine that he would have scored one if not for the tackle. As far as I know, this is the only way the officials can award a team a touchdown.
That last one was BS. Manning did not move his hands enough to draw the defence offside.
I've seen numerous quarterbacks kick the ball over the end line when chasing a bad snap deep in their own end zone. Not that rare. And while it is a penalty, it's effectively not - fall on the ball or get tackled trying to run it back out, it's a safety anyway.
Um that last call on Denver… neither of his arms moved, so I doubt his hands did wtf…
Not for nothing but kicking the ball out of the back of the endzone was a smart play penalty or not. Giving up 2 points is a lot better than 7.
that safety call is silly, because that was THE PLAN, take 2 instead of them jumping on it. Seems like a very pro offense call to award a safety, the weird thing would have been awarding a touchdown as the defensive player nearly had the ball.
last play was bad call. all calls should be reviewable, with challenge system.
A regular safety, you kick from the 20. While committing a penalty, you kick probably from the 10. Of course, get it out by any means necessary, but try to use your hands.
What was wrong with that botched snap?
Honestly, I don't know. I do know that Snap Infraction is a rarely called penalty so that's why it's in the video
@@savagebricksports1 snap infraction is a false start on the center for something like moving the arm or hand holding the ball.
@@savagebricksports1 I think it's because he was pointing with his other arm when he snapped it
I thought that the center was trying to snap it to the QB who is normally right behind him, but the QB was away from him in the shotgun formation. Center guy must've forgotten which formation they were in...
@@majorafan09 That's happened a few times before (such as buccaneers falcons 2014), but snap infraction wasn't called on those plays
"Football" but you can't kick it.
So you can grab the hair but not the helmet?😂
Everyone must have a helmet. Long hair is volunteery.
The Second is just a Facemask
That's right. A facemask penalty is defined as grabbing any opening of the helmet.
@@raulv0417 i feel like most americans do not know that
@@mclovin9148 Well, that may be because the penalty is also called "facemask" in the rules, but it¿'s defined as any opening in the helmet. Cheers. Even in Spanish, it's called "Barra", which is a direct translation from English.
@@raulv0417 how often has that penalty been called?
@@loganstolberg2743 From what I recall in my officiating days and from what I've seen in pros, not very often. In my 15-year career, I saw it only once when I was officiating a high school game. Cheers.
?, i dont see anything in the last clip
Yeah that last clips was a BS call in my opinion
@@savagebricksports1 it was total bs
Manning bobbed his head and shoulders forward a bit, but the hands weren't doing anything dramatic. Refs had it out for him I guess.
@@Surilan can't do that, I would've called it the way they did
If QB has his hands in front of him, he can use clapping as a snap count, so yeah, that was very unusual to see a penalty on that. If you have your hands to your side and then clap, that is a different thing.
Any fans of the 'automatic coin toss loss' rule?
What is that again?
Illegal kicking/batting such that the ball exits through the side or back of your own end zone should result in an automatic touchdown for the opposing team, not a safety.