Rahdo Runs Through►►► Isle of Trains

Help Rahdo Run: / rahdo ❤️ Code of conduct: conduct.rahdo.com 🙂 And now...
A video outlining gameplay for the cardgame Isle of Trains For more game info, www.boardgamegeek.com/boardga...
Part I: Gameplay Runthrough
• Rahdo Runs Through►►► ...
Part II: Extended Gameplay
• Rahdo's Extended Gamep...
Part III: Final Thoughts
• Isle of Trains | Rahdo...
------------
Hey Everybody! Today Paulo Runs Through "Rahdo's Goofs"
If you find Goofs I didn’t notice Please leave Timestamps :)
Thank You
4:44 7 Points!

[@patriciomendez644]

The extended gameplay link is actually the one for your final thoughts (and the final thoughts link is for the extended gameplay).

[@midshipsjsr]

Thanks Rahdo for your videos. Really clear explanation.

[@glenjust630]

Was in stock on Amazon.com in the U.S, now it is not... "Rahdo Effect" in play! : )

[@FishofMuu]

Seems like at the end you should have upgraded to the 3 cost train and then the 6 cost. You would have saved a card for one extra action, and you had tanker cards you could have saved

[@xenothonstelnicki597]

Dig the art style, love the map, game reminds me a bit of Yardmaster and Fleet- two of my faves-, BUT....I hate the graphic design on those cards. hmm

[@Dermott78]

19:55 it is no the same if you get two cards for 1 action (loading jens train with cargo - get 3 discard 1) or to use 2 actions to draw 2 cards. :-) You are faster with the first solution although you support jen.. but thats the deal here. faster and help your wife or slower but no support. :-)

[@brettn]

Is that Clark card misprinted on the back? (around the 17:00 mark)
On the front of the card it shows that 3 STONE and 2 OIL adds 10 points to the contract, but on the back of the card, it shows that being 3 STONE and 2 LUMBER?
and
On the front of the card it also shows 2 STONE, 2 OIL and 1 LUMBER adds 8 points to the contract, but on the back it shows 2 STONE, 1 OIL and 2 LUMBER.

[@rahdo]

***** yup, that's a known misprint issue with the first edition of the game. the front of the card is correct, not hte back. more deets here: www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/1289433/clarification-clark-contract-card

[@brettn]

***** Thanks did a search on BGG but didn't see that thread.

[@guinnesslee]

Thanks honeypie lol!!

[@matthewcozza610]

At 13:47, shouldn't the cargo have been discarded? I thought that upgrading/discarding the smaller car means you are forced to discard any loaded cargo.

[@rahdo]

Matthew Cozza discarding cars, yes. upgrading, no. the designer clarified this on boardgamegeek :)

[@matthewcozza610]

Good to know. Thanks.

[@JRufu]

"Isle of Trains.."
You love trains?

[@rahdo]

JRufu :)