my first alternating telescoping series

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 18. 11. 2021
  • Alternating telescoping series 1/2-1/6+1/12-1/20+...
    A good supplementary video: Evaluate infinite series by using power series: • 6 Infinite Series You ...
    A good challenge: given 1+1/4+1/9+1/16+...=pi^2/6, what is the value of 1-1/4+1/9-1/16+...=?
    (solution video here: • 1-1/4+1/9-1/16+... (z... )
    The canvas print in the video: All series convergence tests: 👉 bit.ly/3GW8EJI
    Use "WELCOME10" for 10% off
    Subscribe for more precalculus & calculus tutorials 👉 bit.ly/just_calc
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    If you find this channel helpful and want to support it, then you can
    join the channel membership and have your name in the video descriptions:
    👉bit.ly/joinjustcalculus
    buy a math shirt or a hoodie (10% off with the code "WELCOME10"):
    👉 bit.ly/bprp_merch
    "Just Calculus" is dedicated to helping students who are taking precalculus, AP calculus, GCSE, A-Level, year 12 maths, college calculus, or high school calculus. Topics include functions, limits, indeterminate forms, derivatives, and their applications, integration techniques and their applications, separable differential equations, sequences, series convergence test, power series a lot more. Feel free to leave calculus questions in the comment section and subscribe for future videos 👉 bit.ly/just_calc
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Best wishes to you,
    #justcalculus

Komentáře • 24

  • @gurkiratsingh7tha993
    @gurkiratsingh7tha993 Před 2 lety +1

    This is an absolute masterpiece series

  • @robertveith6383
    @robertveith6383 Před 2 lety

    For a non-rigorous method: It equals
    (1 - 1/2) - (1/2 - 1/3) + (1/3 - 1/4) - (1/4 - 1/5) + ... =
    1 - 1/2 - 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/3 - 1/4 - 1/4 + 1/5 + ... =
    2(1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 + 1/5 - ... ) - 1 =
    2ln(2) - 1

  • @mr.doritos3669
    @mr.doritos3669 Před 2 lety +3

    Omg Its blackpenredpen again!
    Entertaining as always!

  • @GSHAPIROY
    @GSHAPIROY Před 2 lety +2

    I've got a video idea for you. I know you made a video where you do 100 integrals in one take, but maybe next time you should do one 100x-iterated integral.

  • @zerospeed6412
    @zerospeed6412 Před 2 lety +44

    I think ln(4/e) would look more pleasing.

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 Před rokem

    S(x) = sum(S_{n}x^n,n=0..infinity) = ((1+x)ln(1+x)-x)/(x^2(1-x))
    If you extract nth coefficient from series expansion of S(x)
    and then calculate limit(S_{n},n=infinity) you will get the answer
    I have got S(x) by integration of geometric series and then by generating function for partial sum

  • @captainhd9741
    @captainhd9741 Před 2 lety

    I notice that there is a pattern with the denominators 2 6 12 20 so add 4 then add 6 then add 8 and this second series is just add 2 each time. Is this relevant to the word/definition “telescoping”?

    • @soatnod
      @soatnod Před 2 lety

      You can try to watch mind your decisions' telescoping sum videos

  • @samsam4455
    @samsam4455 Před 2 lety +1

    Dear blackpenredpen,
    I would appreciate if you can check the convergence of the séries: ((ln n)^n)/n! And (n^ln n)/n!. Many thanks Sir

    • @samsam4455
      @samsam4455 Před 2 lety

      @Oily Macaroni i did it with ratio test but it is not "elegant" enough

  • @stapler942
    @stapler942 Před 2 lety +1

    I wonder if mathematicians have a rigorous definition of "...and so on." For example, how many terms of a sum are necessary to deduce the generating formula? 😉

    • @spaghetti1383
      @spaghetti1383 Před 2 lety +1

      1/2-1/6+1/12-...+(-1)^(n+1)/(n(n+1))+...
      I don't know if this is rigorous but it is practical. If you really want to be rigorous, you just would use summation notation.

    • @engelsteinberg593
      @engelsteinberg593 Před 2 lety +1

      Infinite many terms.

  • @SteelM4chine
    @SteelM4chine Před 2 lety +1

    2nd

  • @felixnotkjellberg
    @felixnotkjellberg Před 2 lety

    Me who literally forgot how to do this type of question my teacher taught me

  • @advaykumar9726
    @advaykumar9726 Před 2 lety +2

    Engineers would be like: Now by the fundamental theorem of engineering the greatest integer function of e is 2 so the answer is 2*1-1=1!

  • @davidbrisbane7206
    @davidbrisbane7206 Před 2 lety

    I'll just pretend there is no right answer and then right down and answer and claim it is correct. Too simple.