@@user-gg4dh7yj9l : The proper word is ''autochthonous" and is Greek, your small county was in Caspian and had nothing to do with the today's which 1/3 is Greek (North Epirus). Keep in mind that Illyrian coins had Greek depictions on them.
But then the Poles managed to defeat the Mongols! But one can also state the following about Poland in connection with the video. Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm
Such nonsense! Why should one favorite this failed attempt to found a united German state? They were ridiculous and fought each other for 1000 years. By the way the so-called Holy Roman Empire but correctly named Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. But they also fought each other before and after Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm.
Still you have to give it to that undying German spirit which enabled Germany to conquer all of Europe by herself and three quarters of the world's nations against her. Too bad the globalist mafia were already in control of the world's finances.
Yes, but not everything is correct! Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars also they were wrong about the Abbasid falling to the Safavids, it would the Samanids who would take over the Persian parts of the Caliphate but they still swore fealty to the Caliph in Baghdad, it also doesn’t show Ottoman conquest into Persia as they would have massive territory gains from the Safavids; that would later be lost to the Afsharids.
No they were allied with rome, then persia then rome then persia :) Besides that, armenia was and is still today in middle of 2 continents. If you want to invade persia, you kinda had to pass armenia
Great video! Right, I think so too. There are no distortions in shaping the territory of Poland. An example is East Pomerania. I greet you warmly: - *)
Petru Stefanescu Yes because the serben look for allied and they are the best slime !! they lost all of wars now try they try to win on CZcams hahaha What wallachei is concerned it gives it everywhere on early maps
You can add Volga Bulgaria. Volga bulgarians make bigger empire by Volga river. The last part of Bulgaria - Vidin kingdom was fall in 1422 official. In Central Italy the bulgarian count Alzeck make small country by langobardian rule.
I've noticed a lot of things missing in your video: 1.The soviet invasion of poland of the 1920's 2.The turkish war of independence. 3. Limburg was never belgian 4. Luxemburg seceded 20 years after belgium instead of at the same time 5.Memel being annexed by Germany in 1939 6.After ww1 saarland was independent for a short time 7.Isn't it a bit odd to recognize the turkish claim on northern cyprus while only turkey recognizes it and not recoqnizing kosovo while multiple countries that government, if you choose to include northern cyprus you should also include states like transinistra, south-osettia, abkhezia and kosovo. 8.Trieste was a free city for a short time after ww1 9. Finland was never part of the Russian Empire but rather a puppet state for a while 10. Austria-Hungary and Prussia jointly occupied schleswig-holstein in 1867 11. Iberia contained way more states in the 12th century 12. Britanny was NOT french in the 14th century, they would be conquered about 120 years later.
Coonkie the video is very inaccurate, there is a lack of a lot of tribes in the 500s , such as ilirians , dardanians , kosovo in 2008 independence , and there were no barbar forces that brought the roman empire down
Blank space you are right about that small war and that SOVIET RUSSIA *vodka and meme music activate* didn't exist then, but i thought it was the russians who invaded. better check the history
Awesome video! Clear, relatively detailed, considering the scope and looks nice. But interesting choice to include the annexation of Crimea and the n. Cyprus sepratist movement, but not the succession of Kosovo.
Yes like Germany is devided in small States like Netherlands Belgium Austria Switzerland Luxembourg Lichtenstein, and other parts are annexed by France Poland Denmark Italy Czech republic Latvia Estonia and Lithuania
I'm Bulgarian and yeah, my country was pretty great. but i feel like Poland was pretty freaking great, too! wow!! cheers to Polska and the Commonwealth :)
GREAT PRESENTATION! Reliable knowledge. Thanks for your effort. There are no distortions in shaping the territory of Poland, especially in relation to Pomerania. Can you? in the future, count on a separate detailed presentation of what happened in the lands between: the Baltic, Elbe, Havel and Oder in the context of the Łab Slavs: Obodrzyce - Obodrycki union, Wieleci - Unia Wieleck, Serbs - union of Serbian tribes. Yours warmly: - *
BaRaN6161_TURK The Netherlands is a kingdom right now but when it was born it started as a republic. In 1806 Napoleon’s brother became king of then called the Kingdom of Holland. After Napoleon was defeated Willem I of Nassau became the first king of the Netherlands
Attila's father's name was Muncuk meaning Pearl in old Turkish. In Turkey Turkish it is Boncuk. Attila's son's name Dengizich is Turkic too, It means 'Ocean-like', in Turkey Turkish Deniz = Sea. In Turkey Turkish the sound 'g' is almost vanished in 1000 years. But in Turkish villages you can still find Turks who talk like Kazakh Turks. Kazakh Turks still use the (g) sound. For example: In Kazakh Turkish 'teñiz' is sea. The ñ gives the sound 'ng'. So it is Tengiz/Dengiz. In Turkey Turkish it means 'Sea' but in old Turkic it also meant 'Vast'. They called sea 'vast place, endless, boundless'. So it meant 'Vast-Person'. When you use this title to describe a man it means 'All-able'. 'Engiz' in todays Turkish means 'a vast area'. 'En' means 'width. We do not use Engiz much, we use the other derived version which is 'Engin'. 'Engiz' also has a meaning like ''spaciousness'' in Turkish. and another derived versions of Engiz is 'Eniz', which means 'field'. Again the sound 'g' is vanished, At the beginning I said 'Muncuk=Boncuk'. In Kazakh Turkish, Muncuk is Monşaq. In Kazakh Turkish ''my''=Meniñ/Mening In Turkey Turkish my= Benim. Again the M turned into B, and the (g) is gone. Note: Medieval Byzantine sources called Hungary Tourkia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourkia In short, Huns were Turks.
The only difference between Hun Turks and Oghuz Turks is that Oghuz Turks migrated to Anatolia in large numbers and the migraiton lasted for 5 centuries. They made the majority of Anatolia. On the other hand Huns did not migrate in large numbers to Eastern Europe so they were assimilated by Slavs.
Modern day turks have less than 15% turkic DNA. Original turks look like asians Like the huns and mongols, modern day turks don't sееm to have any asian characteristics.
Of course hunGAYrians are not european native they go strong becuse convert to Catholicism and suck from pope like this they have suport them and polish to sluther russians becuse stay orthodox same shit do hunGAYrians with serbs and romanian
It’s funny how you can see the Russian empire and the German empire, and then you blink and Russia is now red and the Soviet Union, and Germany is in two
This version is better done on the version (1-2016), is seen invested a great deal for which I commend. It is possible to fix some ambiguities, but on the other hand, we can say that everything is done correctly.
i watched almost every video on europe history and i came to conclusion. Serbia is first seen in late 7th century while Albania is seen in 1913 after the collapse of Ottoman empire. just by looking at the map and seeing this we can come to conclusion that Serbia is older country then Albania. also one interesting fact is that Bosnia and Albania are the only muslim countries in Europe while the rest are Christian. if we watched every balkan countries history we can also see that they where all christian countries not muslim. only after ottoman empire conquered balkan countries we can see the spread of muslim fate. after the collapse of ottomans out of thin air comes a country called Albania and claims that its oldest. Kosovo area is very special thing since most people are albanians and minority is serbs. albanians say that serbs are very agressive people and full of hate but no one wants to say what they did on Kosovo in 2004 when they burned orthodox churches while waving the flag of albania and chanting "allahu akbar". if they are peacefull why did they burn over 20 churches?
keep doing propaganda you can think whatever you want but the reality you can't change we are autochthonous here when we fought with the Turk you became a Turk lover as much as you gave the king's daughter together with the greek which almost did not exist as a state but just a few principalities and you Serbs do not tell how old you are but go to your mother russia stupid people go on watch videos made by idiots like this here you are just a stupid child
Well no, Albania wasn’t in the Caucasus, those were Greeks and Turks. Serbia showed up in the year 1100 with its assimilated people. Albania has been in the balkans since Pelasgian times. And Kosova has always been ethnically Albanian. Of the 498 mosques in Kosovo that were in active use, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) documented that 225 mosques sustained damage or destruction by the Yugoslav Serb army. After the war, a list was compiled which documented that over 13,500 people were killed or went missing during the two year conflict. The Yugoslav and Serb forces caused the displacement of between 1.2 million to 1.45 million Kosovo Albanians. the Serbian government began a crackdown on the Kosovar Albanian population, raiding villages and expelling people from their homes. Massacres by the Serbian police were reported, and suspects taken into police custody were often beaten and tortured to extort confessions.
@@pyrrhus9725 Everything has a history. Kosovo was mostly inhabited by Serbs. Until the Serbs were expelled during the Ottoman and German occupation with the support of the Albanians. Also, the numbers you claim are wrong. The numbers you claim are wrong. The Humanitarian Law Center released a list of people killed or gone missing during the war, including 8,661 Kosovo Albanian civilians, 1,797 ethnic Serbs and 447 civilians of other ethnicities such as Romani people and Bosniaks. Both sides were equally violent only that the Serbs had a superior army. So that's why they were more successful in the expulsions! You have already described the crimes of the Serbs! Quote from Wiki Link: "War crimes in the Kosovo War" The (Albanian) KLA was responsible for serious abuses... including abductions and murders of Serbs and ethnic Albanians considered collaborators with the state. Elements of the KLA are also responsible for post-conflict attacks on Serbs, Roma, and other non-Albanians, as well as ethnic Albanian political rivals... widespread and systematic burning and looting of homes belonging to Serbs, Roma, and other minorities and the destruction of Orthodox churches and monasteries... combined with harassment and intimidation designed to force people from their homes and communities... elements of the KLA are clearly responsible for many of these crimes.
This comes to show how stable the Roman Empire was and how long lasting it was no wonder why it played a huge role in shaping the outcome of the history of the best continent on earth Long Live Europa!
Mr Nobody as group of polish tribes but not as political entity (kingdom fot exampke). the same with Rus: there where slavic tribes but there were no political power to unite them hence no one says that Rus existed before the beginning of lets say IX century
Pa da si istrazio i naucio nesto o srpskom caru Dusanu i njegovom carstvu znao bi da je papi poslao nebrojano zahteva da postane novi 'kapetan' hriscana i da pokrene borbu protiv turaka,a papa ga je naravno odbio te Dusan nema nikakve veze sa prodorom turaka. Medjutim, mi shvatamo da ste vi ljubomorni na nasu slavnu istoriju. Jbg nekome istorija traje vekovima a nekom decenijama...
Da poznajes malo bolje istoriju sine 'tisucljetne' , zlocinacke kulture, vrlo dobro bi znao da je Dusan bio u stanju da razbije bilo koju vojsku pa i nadolazecu Tursku, koja u to doba i nije predstavljala neku silu. Poenta je da je kriv papa , jer pravoslavnom caru nije dao ovlascenje da se u ime svih hriscana i na celu svehriscanske vojske bori protiv muslimana u necemu sto bi imalo odlike krstaskog rata! A ti bi, kao neko ko je drzavu, jezik i istoriju dobio od srpskog naroda, trebao vise da nas cenis, ako ne onda samo postujes. Na svetskoj mapi niste postojali od 'unije' sa Habzburgovcima koji su as tresli 900 godina. Zapitaj se malo o cemu pricas, jer vas mali, usljivi narod, kako su ga mnogi okarakterisali, nije merodavan da ocenjuje desavanja u Evropi kroz istoriju!
Nije uopste izgubio titulu nego je osvojii ceo hum ali je morao da se vrati zato sto je vizantiski car napao uspeo je da ga pobedi ali je vojska bila umorna i tek onda ste vi napali i vratili hum
![The History of Europe [2600 BC - 2020 AD] Every year](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P9YnYRk8_kE/mqdefault.jpg)
![The History of Europe [2600 BC - 2020 AD] Every year](/img/tr.png)
Who were looking only on his country? :P
I (Poland)
Yiade romania
I am looking at the freaky soviet russia and stronk duchy of warsaw also Great Prussia.😁😁😁😁
SimpleMelody me 🇮🇪
Poland
*1219*
Everything is fine. The Mongols are not even on the map.
*1242*
And Mongolia is invading Poland WTF!
this is how mongolia attacked Poland
👊🏻🇦🇱🖤AUTOCHTONOUS SHQIPTAR🖤🇦🇱👊🏻
@@user-gg4dh7yj9l : The proper word is ''autochthonous" and is Greek, your small county was in Caspian and had nothing to do with the today's which 1/3 is Greek (North Epirus). Keep in mind that Illyrian coins had Greek depictions on them.
*1264*
Golden Horde: "The Mongols? Never heard of 'em."
But then the Poles managed to defeat the Mongols! But one can also state the following about Poland in connection with the video. Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!!
If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used.
In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire.
Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong.
What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War.
The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871!
By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm
4:42 Spain: Where are you go?
Alejandro Moreno Napoleon
Oh yes everyone's favorite empire, the Small States of Holy Empire.
I prefer Hittites more.
what
Liechenstein my fav
@Gigachad same
Such nonsense! Why should one favorite this failed attempt to found a united German state? They were ridiculous and fought each other for 1000 years. By the way the so-called Holy Roman Empire but correctly named Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. But they also fought each other before and after Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871!
By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm.
5:02 Hi Germany!
5:02 Bye Germany!
Templarkiller and over 80M person have die
Hirntot he said that because the years in this are changing so fast, that world war ll went by in like an instant!!
Still you have to give it to that undying German spirit which enabled Germany to conquer all of Europe by herself and three quarters of the world's nations against her. Too bad the globalist mafia were already in control of the world's finances.
Hirntot ich hab ihn auch gemeldet
Templarkiller hahahhahaa i laught so hard 😂
This is a lot more detailed than most geographical timelines I've seen. Kudos to whoever made it. It must have taken forever.
Yes, but not everything is correct! Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!!
If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used.
In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire.
Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong.
What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War.
The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871!
By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars also they were wrong about the Abbasid falling to the Safavids, it would the Samanids who would take over the Persian parts of the Caliphate but they still swore fealty to the Caliph in Baghdad, it also doesn’t show Ottoman conquest into Persia as they would have massive territory gains from the Safavids; that would later be lost to the Afsharids.
@@timurthejerk9270 So another error!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars yeah, if this channel focused on empires or regions instead whole continents I think that would be more successful
@@_Kegasus You're exaggerating a little! But this topic also needs a detailed explanation! A book could even be written on the subject!
*WHEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED!!!*
2:52 Poland with Prussia and Pomerians looks like a heart!
prussians are not prussia
Shizofrenia
@@user-xh7wg6yn5o not it was there people
@@user-xh7wg6yn5o I think
Unbelievably well done. Good job.
where's kosovo.
And South Ossetia and Abkazia
kosovo is serbia
Samachablo and Abkhazia is Georgia
Nope. South Ossetia and Abkhazia were country's before Georgia
i just saw WW 2 flash before my eyes
Though Germany wasn't exactly that large, especially through Italy.
Michael Cychosz *_flashback_*
xenotypos it occupied most of Italy after allies captured Mussolini
@@xenotypos
Yes it was, Italy was Germany's bitch anyway
@@fabiana7157 (I'm Italian) Italy has a SHET army, he was beaten up by Greece, and nazi germany had to come to help italy
I love how Albania and Iberia are in the Caucasus at the start
roman empire transport albanian in balkan ottoman empire transport sqiptaria bro this is real stori
3:16 Knock-knock it's a Mongol Empire
😂
Ty jsi to zabil
Jono
Ес, бич
- Poland saves Vienna
- Austria occupies Poland
Logic 101
Makes me pissed I’m gonna partition Austria
Austria was treating Poland in far better way than Prussia and Russia.
@@royalyeen2845 I'm gonna annex it.
poland didnt save vienna polish *******
For around the first minute I was just watching Armenia getting invaded
Yep: Romans, Sassanids, Romans, Sassanids...
Tom Tom, armenia inside of the Ottoman empire. Asia and the half of the eu ruled for the 600 years without human zoo's.
No they were allied with rome, then persia then rome then persia :)
Besides that, armenia was and is still today in middle of 2 continents. If you want to invade persia, you kinda had to pass armenia
"Thanks"Stalin , you made armenians stronger by contributing them a land to increase
Tom Tom Armenia is great country and civilization, make Armenia great again!!
I'm sure a lot of research went into this
Great video!
Great video!
Right, I think so too. There are no distortions in shaping the territory of Poland. An example is East Pomerania. I greet you warmly: - *)
Clever stuff, brilliantly done.
Is funny to see how my life start at 5:09 and the video ends at 5:17.
We are just seconds in a 5 min video!!!
David Fernandez Mine started 5:13 lol.
Scandium
5:11
You have interesting prospective!
David Fernandez 5:10
mine started on 4:58
David Fernandez καληνυκτα
Finally. First ever mapping video to recognise Dacia as a country!
Petru Stefanescu
Yes because the serben look for allied and they are the best slime !!
they lost all of wars now try they try to win on CZcams hahaha
What wallachei is concerned it gives it everywhere on early maps
the only true video !
Vand cauciuc
Petru Stefanescu Sărumâna! :))
Great video! Astonishing detail!
My Armenia is the only one that is alive from the beginning ❤, Gods Nation of Ararat has suffered to much now
as much as you suffer you stand strong. 🇬🇷❤🇦🇲
Love Armenia from USA
Love Armenia from Serbia
Orthodox brothers and sisters
🇷🇸🇬🇷🇦🇲🇷🇺♥️
No such thing as Armenia in more than half of the video
You can add Volga Bulgaria. Volga bulgarians make bigger empire by Volga river.
The last part of Bulgaria - Vidin kingdom was fall in 1422 official.
In Central Italy the bulgarian count Alzeck make small country by langobardian rule.
Георги Димитров volga bulgarians were turkic ?
Пита та дали Волжките българи са били тюрки
Today Bulgarianians , hybit peoples. Missing children of the Russians
The volga bulgarians were not turkic, ffs.
bulgaria is oldest country then russia turkish idiot go to shool
as so your country it is formed 13 centery Otoman and finish whit Ataturk 19 centery
HOW MANY LIKES FOR THE BEST CONTINENT IN THE WORLD?
no one cares about you cherlyn
+Cherylyn Barnes: Can't spell Dislike without like ;)
xpto41 dude fuck our continent we always in war no wonder usa surpased us in just 500 years lol
how many likes for the possible origin of mankind www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
xpto41 You mean , the most EVIL 😈
Great job !
I like it, very well made
4:40 rip my country Poland ;(
Night Yoshi Its prank bro x)
Greetings from ottomans , polish !
StriKer Jake but poland was part of commonhealth
Mine too
(I am Slovak) Btw thanks for high Tatras :3 Poland (or Bołeslaw Chrobry) gives us bottom part of Poland. Thx m8
That France in 1813 which came to help Poland
JOhn CEna ummm... no
ummm... yes
Wormaf * 50 yes ,50 no
ummmmm... no
Uhhh....it was really just called duchy of warsaw.😐😐😐
Super gemachte Zeitreise !
Svaka cast, realan video.
Ive never heard of the Golden Horde, ive heard of some of these countries via turn based strategy games, but their name sounds really cool.
Is 50% of people watching this video are Polish?
Mati Mapping yes
Mati Mapping Yep
nice englando
Jacky Boy ?
your english sucks
Armenia 1-2019!!
Armenia 3000 BC -2019
Fuck armenia
@@ArmyNation000 Küfür etme
@@H.D.313 neden
@@ArmyNation000 edebe aykırı
awesome good job the next videos
I've noticed a lot of things missing in your video:
1.The soviet invasion of poland of the 1920's
2.The turkish war of independence.
3. Limburg was never belgian
4. Luxemburg seceded 20 years after belgium instead of at the same time
5.Memel being annexed by Germany in 1939
6.After ww1 saarland was independent for a short time
7.Isn't it a bit odd to recognize the turkish claim on northern cyprus while only turkey recognizes it and not recoqnizing kosovo while multiple countries that government, if you choose to include northern cyprus you should also include states like transinistra, south-osettia, abkhezia and kosovo.
8.Trieste was a free city for a short time after ww1
9. Finland was never part of the Russian Empire but rather a puppet state for a while
10. Austria-Hungary and Prussia jointly occupied schleswig-holstein in 1867
11. Iberia contained way more states in the 12th century
12. Britanny was NOT french in the 14th century, they would be conquered about 120 years later.
north cyprus is a country!!
OP also didn't include the Smyrni (Izmir) area in the Greek Territory, since it was Greek for a few years.
Coonkie the video is very inaccurate, there is a lack of a lot of tribes in the 500s , such as ilirians , dardanians , kosovo in 2008 independence , and there were no barbar forces that brought the roman empire down
Powa Crafters Kosovo is not a country.Its a part of Serbia. Its self declared
Blank space you are right about that small war and that SOVIET RUSSIA *vodka and meme music activate* didn't exist then, but i thought it was the russians who invaded. better check the history
POLAND AND LITHUANIA
Poland And lithunia and hungary :)
Nuke ツ Polak Węgier dwa bratanki i do szabli i do szklanki obaj zuchy obaj żwawi niech im Pan Bóg błogosławi
Poland Hungary forever
Russia and Germany, kekekeke)
yes lithuania nahui and poland kurwa
WHAT A GREAT VIDIEO !!!
One of the few people with accurate borders for Romania,props!!!
Awesome video! Clear, relatively detailed, considering the scope and looks nice. But interesting choice to include the annexation of Crimea and the n. Cyprus sepratist movement, but not the succession of Kosovo.
S&F is Serbian
Because S&F is retarded. Damn Crimea isn't Russia. It has been OCCUPIED
tarkan standart, so what? Napoleon's conquests were shown
Poland ♡👑
I Love Poland and England ❤
Hi
Hi
@@deepakgahar8971 why are you idiot?
I love poland too but in history england kills millions of innocent people so i dont like england
Wielga bolzga
3:44 Thug Life in Ottoman Style
4:40 Greece :Hallo Tourkey
@@user-ln1tj6gb8f I think Greece, which gained its independence with the help of Britain, France and Russia, has no right to speak.
When Greece was building Parthenon German people were living on the trees
chris alexiou Yes and now you owe money to Germany
Dame Nikitič This is dissapointing...
And now Germany is building world's economy and you're just their ass kissers. Karma is a biotch
Soon both gayreece and gayrmany will be overtaken by muslims :)
And today Germany is the most powerfull economy of Europe and Greeks live on trees...
Other nations:
What are your neighbors?
Thrace:
The Roman Empire
Other nations:
And?
Thrace:
The Roman Empire...
And the free dacians the part of dacia that was not conquered
Good job
Been looking for this frickin song
I'm proud that I'm an Armenian
Im proud that im not :)
bravo Suren. Armenians are amazing warriors
Nostalgia back. Good times of CZcams 🙂
3:07 : oh boy i sure do love being a country in 13th century europe
3:14 : What the fu'-
you can see the history repeats... powerfull nations grows up and then broke himself and get cut in other smaller nations.
Yes like Germany is devided in small States like Netherlands Belgium Austria Switzerland Luxembourg Lichtenstein, and other parts are annexed by France Poland Denmark Italy Czech republic Latvia Estonia and Lithuania
Одлично,само тако настави!
4:58 : Germany : I'm stronk !
Also 4:58 : USSR : Dmitry, hold my vodka
Фу стереотипы
Nice! Interesting
History is love, history is life.
I'm Bulgarian and yeah, my country was pretty great. but i feel like Poland was pretty freaking great, too! wow!! cheers to Polska and the Commonwealth :)
ВалькірыяXбледны you’re looking freaking sexy! Cheers 🥂 from Poland 🇵🇱 my dear 🇧🇬
Hey from Poland :)
Im polish! But learning croatian ;)
Thanks Bulgarian m8!
ВалькірыяXбледны Anybody noticed how France was powerfull for two time ?
Bon travail!
I blinked and missed the whole ww2
4:41 Greatest moment in mankind
Poland forever.
Przemo Pppp Respekt from Romania bro
*Random hungarian shows up
Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli, i do szklanki.
Poland-Hungary Forever.
No ok :-D
Poland &Hungry=frindes
🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪KINGDOM OF GEORGIA 🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪 🌍👋
Hungary
Mongoly XDD
Polak Węgier dwa bratanki
Im hungry if i speak of hungary xd
3:26 Ottomans is start
Best continent
Yep. Lots of history and culture and great architecture.
old continent who will disappear
Been lookin for dis song
GREAT PRESENTATION! Reliable knowledge. Thanks for your effort. There are no distortions in shaping the territory of Poland, especially in relation to Pomerania.
Can you? in the future, count on a separate detailed presentation of what happened in the lands between: the Baltic, Elbe, Havel and Oder in the context of the Łab Slavs: Obodrzyce - Obodrycki union, Wieleci - Unia Wieleck, Serbs - union of Serbian tribes.
Yours warmly: - *
Nice idea! But probably not interested! The only thumbs up, by the way, is from me! :) Yours warmly: - *
i came here just to watch the Poland
Buster 6404 Its because they are poles
i only ever watch these to watch poland :P
Sociophobic Borderline ikr most other countries stay still for a really really long time with occasional wars but poland barely stops moving xd
Poland is the Best. We won 2 world wars! JEST MOOOOC!
Because Poland and Polish people are immortals betrayed from USA UK France and we still here heart of europe ;)
4:08 a new Republic is born 🇳🇱 Proud of my country 🇳🇱
*NEDERLAND* oh ja niemand verstaat ons
@Marko Milivojević yeah
WHY NETHERLANDS?
YOU COULD KEEP THE ORANGE IN THE FLAG
BaRaN6161_TURK The Netherlands is a kingdom right now but when it was born it started as a republic. In 1806 Napoleon’s brother became king of then called the Kingdom of Holland. After Napoleon was defeated Willem I of Nassau became the first king of the Netherlands
I like this
Nice
Attila's father's name was Muncuk meaning Pearl in old Turkish.
In Turkey Turkish it is Boncuk.
Attila's son's name Dengizich is Turkic too, It means 'Ocean-like',
in Turkey Turkish Deniz = Sea.
In Turkey Turkish the sound 'g' is almost vanished in 1000 years.
But in Turkish villages you can still find Turks who talk like Kazakh Turks.
Kazakh Turks still use the (g) sound. For example: In Kazakh Turkish 'teñiz' is sea.
The ñ gives the sound 'ng'. So it is Tengiz/Dengiz.
In Turkey Turkish it means 'Sea' but in old Turkic it also meant 'Vast'.
They called sea 'vast place, endless, boundless'.
So it meant 'Vast-Person'. When you use this title to describe a man it means 'All-able'.
'Engiz' in todays Turkish means 'a vast area'. 'En' means 'width.
We do not use Engiz much, we use the other derived version which is 'Engin'.
'Engiz' also has a meaning like ''spaciousness'' in Turkish.
and another derived versions of Engiz is 'Eniz', which means 'field'.
Again the sound 'g' is vanished,
At the beginning I said 'Muncuk=Boncuk'.
In Kazakh Turkish, Muncuk is Monşaq.
In Kazakh Turkish ''my''=Meniñ/Mening
In Turkey Turkish my= Benim.
Again the M turned into B, and the (g) is gone.
Note: Medieval Byzantine sources called Hungary Tourkia.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourkia
In short, Huns were Turks.
The only difference between Hun Turks and Oghuz Turks is that Oghuz Turks migrated to Anatolia in large numbers and the migraiton lasted for 5 centuries. They made the majority of Anatolia. On the other hand Huns did not migrate in large numbers to Eastern Europe so they were assimilated by Slavs.
Modern day turks have less than 15% turkic DNA. Original turks look like asians
Like the huns and mongols, modern day turks don't sееm to have any asian characteristics.
Modern day turks are mostly slavic and have features from the countries they uses to rule. You barely see asiatic feautures in turks
Of course hunGAYrians are not european native they go strong becuse convert to Catholicism and suck from pope like this they have suport them and polish to sluther russians becuse stay orthodox same shit do hunGAYrians with serbs and romanian
All of them are mongols from central Asia.
476: meanwhile in china, the kingdoms changed to 1
Witch windos you use to make this game?
Epic
3:55 1492
The entire world changes forever...
3:38 what’s the song
It’s funny how you can see the Russian empire and the German empire, and then you blink and Russia is now red and the Soviet Union, and Germany is in two
*Mongols show up*
Mongolia: Heyyyyyy... I'll be taking all of this
Poland, Lithuania and Hungary are just a miserable imitation of what they used to be
But we do and are going to stand still! Bad times will always be but they do not rule every aspects of our lives!
Piotr Mosakowski how they used to be exactly? Poland has never been a powerful country in the past
Mattonella Scheggiata polish lithuania commonwealth??? It was one of strongest countries in europe
+StriKer Jake, because it was just Poland.
+StriKer Jake, this is reality. Deal with it.
5:02 in one second 60M humans died , epic
So Bulgaria is for real the oldest country in Europe! Great video, detailed and informative!
No way. Maybe only with the name.
Zuper
4:20 We are POLAND
Speedway Man POLSKA!!!
Zabory...
poland-LITHUANIA
This version is better done on the version (1-2016), is seen invested a great deal for which I commend. It is possible to fix some ambiguities, but on the other hand, we can say that everything is done correctly.
Does anyone please know the name of the song that starts at the year 820?
two thousand years of history sure keeps those cartographers busy....
i watched almost every video on europe history and i came to conclusion. Serbia is first seen in late 7th century while Albania is seen in 1913 after the collapse of Ottoman empire. just by looking at the map and seeing this we can come to conclusion that Serbia is older country then Albania. also one interesting fact is that Bosnia and Albania are the only muslim countries in Europe while the rest are Christian. if we watched every balkan countries history we can also see that they where all christian countries not muslim. only after ottoman empire conquered balkan countries we can see the spread of muslim fate. after the collapse of ottomans out of thin air comes a country called Albania and claims that its oldest. Kosovo area is very special thing since most people are albanians and minority is serbs. albanians say that serbs are very agressive people and full of hate but no one wants to say what they did on Kosovo in 2004 when they burned orthodox churches while waving the flag of albania and chanting "allahu akbar". if they are peacefull why did they burn over 20 churches?
keep doing propaganda you can think whatever you want but the reality you can't change we are autochthonous here when we fought with the Turk you became a Turk lover as much as you gave the king's daughter together with the greek which almost did not exist as a state but just a few principalities and you Serbs do not tell how old you are but go to your mother russia stupid people go on watch videos made by idiots like this here you are just a stupid child
Well no, Albania wasn’t in the Caucasus, those were Greeks and Turks. Serbia showed up in the year 1100 with its assimilated people. Albania has been in the balkans since Pelasgian times. And Kosova has always been ethnically Albanian. Of the 498 mosques in Kosovo that were in active use, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) documented that 225 mosques sustained damage or destruction by the Yugoslav Serb army. After the war, a list was compiled which documented that over 13,500 people were killed or went missing during the two year conflict. The Yugoslav and Serb forces caused the displacement of between 1.2 million to 1.45 million Kosovo Albanians. the Serbian government began a crackdown on the Kosovar Albanian population, raiding villages and expelling people from their homes. Massacres by the Serbian police were reported, and suspects taken into police custody were often beaten and tortured to extort confessions.
The only fact is that San Marino is the oldest country in Europe
@@pyrrhus9725 Everything has a history. Kosovo was mostly inhabited by Serbs. Until the Serbs were expelled during the Ottoman and German occupation with the support of the Albanians. Also, the numbers you claim are wrong. The numbers you claim are wrong. The Humanitarian Law Center released a list of people killed or gone missing during the war, including 8,661 Kosovo Albanian civilians, 1,797 ethnic Serbs and 447 civilians of other ethnicities such as Romani people and Bosniaks. Both sides were equally violent only that the Serbs had a superior army. So that's why they were more successful in the expulsions! You have already described the crimes of the Serbs! Quote from Wiki Link: "War crimes in the Kosovo War" The (Albanian) KLA was responsible for serious abuses... including abductions and murders of Serbs and ethnic Albanians considered collaborators with the state. Elements of the KLA are also responsible for post-conflict attacks on Serbs, Roma, and other non-Albanians, as well as ethnic Albanian political rivals... widespread and systematic burning and looting of homes belonging to Serbs, Roma, and other minorities and the destruction of Orthodox churches and monasteries... combined with harassment and intimidation designed to force people from their homes and communities... elements of the KLA are clearly responsible for many of these crimes.
Polska!!!!!
Franek Szefer :-)
Franek Szefer BIAŁO-CZERWONI!!! :D
Tak.:D
(XVI wiek) Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów. Piękne czasy...
Franek Szefer Polska gørà!!!!
Cool song
A lot of misstakes on the map but else really cool video 🙂
Vandals - Group Lehs - Vandal was river - today Wisła in Poland
Of course, you are right. Greetings from Poland :-)
Looks like bullshit, no similarity apart from V and W
finally Poland (union with Lithuania, before the partitions), Poland had greater borders
4:56
The world 3 seconds after the war: *its rewind time!*
Never would have thought Poland was so big
make lithuania great again
Poland and Lithuania
J o k e r Pauli
V1lly ツ You from?
J o k e r Pauli fuck poland lithuania da best
Xylo I m from Poland :D
4:45 Last blank part of the map disappeared.
This comes to show how stable the Roman Empire was and how long lasting it was no wonder why it played a huge role in shaping the outcome of the history of the best continent on earth Long Live Europa!
1776 : *America has joined the chat* : WHAT IS THIS MAP?!?!
100 years later in 1876 : Ahh, much better, more united.
ancient Greece : am i a joke to you?
Poland existed before 966
Mr Nobody as group of polish tribes but not as political entity (kingdom fot exampke). the same with Rus: there where slavic tribes but there were no political power to unite them hence no one says that Rus existed before the beginning of lets say IX century
Mr Nobody It did but not as a country.
Tord Larrson
Lol ask the Turks their first unification was over -1000/-500 BC the Xiongnu Khanate.
Neo Turkic Khanate Luls. Can't argue with that.
Tord Larrson
But you were unified as indo-europeans even before our existence.
Dusane necemo te zaboraviti...
Amon Ra Sta sereš Dušan Silni je bio veliki osvajac a ne neki pederski turski vazal !!! DUŠAN U SRCU
Pa da si istrazio i naucio nesto o srpskom caru Dusanu i njegovom carstvu znao bi da je papi poslao nebrojano zahteva da postane novi 'kapetan' hriscana i da pokrene borbu protiv turaka,a papa ga je naravno odbio te Dusan nema nikakve veze sa prodorom turaka. Medjutim, mi shvatamo da ste vi ljubomorni na nasu slavnu istoriju. Jbg nekome istorija traje vekovima a nekom decenijama...
Da poznajes malo bolje istoriju sine 'tisucljetne' , zlocinacke kulture, vrlo dobro bi znao da je Dusan bio u stanju da razbije bilo koju vojsku pa i nadolazecu Tursku, koja u to doba i nije predstavljala neku silu. Poenta je da je kriv papa , jer pravoslavnom caru nije dao ovlascenje da se u ime svih hriscana i na celu svehriscanske vojske bori protiv muslimana u necemu sto bi imalo odlike krstaskog rata! A ti bi, kao neko ko je drzavu, jezik i istoriju dobio od srpskog naroda, trebao vise da nas cenis, ako ne onda samo postujes. Na svetskoj mapi niste postojali od 'unije' sa Habzburgovcima koji su as tresli 900 godina. Zapitaj se malo o cemu pricas, jer vas mali, usljivi narod, kako su ga mnogi okarakterisali, nije merodavan da ocenjuje desavanja u Evropi kroz istoriju!
Hahah Dusan izgubi titulu kad dođe u Bosnu oko 1350
Nije uopste izgubio titulu nego je osvojii ceo hum ali je morao da se vrati zato sto je vizantiski car napao uspeo je da ga pobedi ali je vojska bila umorna i tek onda ste vi napali i vratili hum
For a second it looked like Poland was taking over 😄
Spoko