Undoubtedly, this is a necessary work, even if it repeats what others have already done more than once ... If it is not difficult for the authors to answer: when, in your opinion, will we see new aircraft with CYCLOGYRO - rotors, according to the scheme of 1909, if so far no one has them before you? Although small models fly and models up to 225 kg without payload were also in the air.
a damage at one of the engines and your are dead. all the people on the ground are in danger. its inefficient, what is with dirt, birds or something in the air and the "rotor". It will never go commercial. not safe, not efficient, too expensive. for ships yes for flight no. total fail for personal transport.
@@jamesdavid9390 its not negative, its realistic. im no ingenieur or something else and see 2 massive problems. its simply not for public transport. for drones ok or for ships like actually.
@@jamesdavid9390 physics, nature laws are the reasons. its so hard to understand? if one rotor have a defect the stability is gone and you going down. if a bird hit a "rotor" the same. its so hard to understand? a plan have wings and can glide but this thing going down instantly. a logical brain let u understand this.
Absolutely amazing engineering.
Super cool tech. Would love to see this in MSFS!
Undoubtedly, this is a necessary work, even if it repeats what others have already done more than once ... If it is not difficult for the authors to answer: when, in your opinion, will we see new aircraft with CYCLOGYRO - rotors, according to the scheme of 1909, if so far no one has them before you? Although small models fly and models up to 225 kg without payload were also in the air.
An electric vehicle using these cyclo-rotors for high speed controllability would be a real hell cat.
Instead of spoilers or aerodynamic rims
this is the future
Can you make the Cyclo bigger you can carry mores stuff?
素晴らしい❤
When scale model will com in the real environment
Why advertise a test...but NOT provide it??????????????????????????????????? Serious click bait. You should be ashamed!!!
a damage at one of the engines and your are dead. all the people on the ground are in danger. its inefficient, what is with dirt, birds or something in the air and the "rotor". It will never go commercial. not safe, not efficient, too expensive. for ships yes for flight no. total fail for personal transport.
What do you know being so negative. Give them a chance
@@jamesdavid9390 its not negative, its realistic. im no ingenieur or something else and see 2 massive problems. its simply not for public transport. for drones ok or for ships like actually.
@chrisr.5730 ok please explain your reasoning. What are the two argument behind your thought. I am listening
@@jamesdavid9390 physics, nature laws are the reasons. its so hard to understand? if one rotor have a defect the stability is gone and you going down. if a bird hit a "rotor" the same. its so hard to understand? a plan have wings and can glide but this thing going down instantly. a logical brain let u understand this.
@@chrisr.5730 what happens when the rotor on a helicopter is damaged?