PRR T1's Impostor? The SAR 520 Class (Trainz)

[ Update: This is the 2nd attempt to upload this video, the first one didn't work after editing and was deleted......] Designed by Frank Hugh Harrison, The South Australian Railways 520 "Northern" had a very similar form and shape of it streamlined shrouding compared with the PRR Class T1 Duplex locomotive.
It could have been a coincidence but if you heard about SAR history from the 1940s to 1960s, you would probably understand why some if not many steam locomotives appearance of SAR shared similarity with America's famed trains; It was an open secret.
In this video, the PRR T1 #5549 hauling the postwar version of the Broadway Limited racing with double-headed SAR steam engine consisted of SAR 520 Class and 500 Class, some dated model from the DLS.
==After this video, we would like to do at least two queuing viewer's request before Monday, but we have family affairs to deal with so please be patient and stay tuned! : )
PRR T1: Auran DLC
SAR 500/520 Class: DLS of Trainz
Postwar Broadway Limited: 3DZ Payware for Trainz only

[@TheBroughamGamer]

Great to see it wasn't all lost! If you need I can put the link back up for the QJs. ;-):-P

[@Jones3DModelingClub]

No worries, we remember your suggestion and your support messages, Brougham Gamer! Double-headed QJ vs any trains we want isn't it? : P

[@TheBroughamGamer]

@@Jones3DModelingClub precisely! My only regret is for some reason I can't access the QJs specs to change it's whistle.

[@Jones3DModelingClub]

@@TheBroughamGamer let us take a look! We only found one QJ from DLS so I think we are having the same QJ like yours. : )

[@TheBroughamGamer]

@@Jones3DModelingClub that might be if the name of the creator starts with a z. If not this link should be it.

[@TheBroughamGamer]

@@Jones3DModelingClub www.dropbox.com/s/8y0rqpm9ew...0TANE.cdp?dl=0

[@mikediesel928]

0:09 that whistle is funny

[@davisdavis175]

That whistle sound like a car

[@MidwesternRailfan]

They built SAR 520 Classes between 1943 and 1947. The Pennsylvania T1 Duplex Class was built during 1942 then 1945-1946, and now one had been under construction since 2014-Present and will be done around 2030.

[@alexthesouthernpacificmt4879]

-what the frick frack snick paclet

[@kentrobison588]

I think the 520s were designed for 60lb rail. A lot of lines in Australia were light to save government costs. There was not much opposition for the railways until the 60s.

[@SouthAussieTrainSpotter2024]

SAR 520 was only made around a year after PRR T1 was made but I’m on Team SAR

[@joshteshek1155]

Mom, can we have T1? Mom: no we have T1 at home T1 at home:

[@Planetrainguy]

520 is better

[@ItAbel-xy3xk]

@@Planetrainguy facts

[@TrajectoryT]

I have a idea
Ac-12 cab forward
VS.
UP big boy

[@marckbryanbalang9315]

When imposter is sus
*SUS INTENSIFIES*

[@regitayap8730]

lol it has another locomotive behind the impostor

[@FranzFerdinandVIII]

The impostor is cheating that way.

[@thegaminggallimimus4429]

it is not an imposter

[@brodster7042]

@@thegaminggallimimus4429 impostor*

[@JerzeyBoy]

PRR T1: Son?

[@archives-webnet]

520s brother: I think you are imposter-Ing her.

[@Thetrainfan-o1l]

@@--marshy-- bro I have some

[@colbeausabre8842]

Really an unfair comparison, the 520's had about 33,000 lbs TF - less than a 30 year old PRR K4 (44,000 lbs) - and the T1 had as much TF as both the SAR locos (65,000 ibs) - so no wonder the T1 walked away from the 520. And we're comparing 80 inch drivers versus 66 inch, so there's no comparison when it comes to speed. Not to knock the Australian, but to show we're comparing apples and oranges. Of course, the 520's had the valve gear the T1's should have had, Walshaerts vs Franklin Poppet (which didn't have all the bugs shaken out of it). We PRR fans can only dream of a T1a with the 520's valve gear or a 4-8-4 R2 instead of a duplex.

[@griffinrails]

What the foamers in the comment section don’t understand is that the 520 actaully worked, and wasn’t just the definition of wheelslip.

[@844SteamFan]

@@griffinrails lol

[@mcttnkn4700]

Does anybody know how to get the 520 on trainz 12?

[@SouthernerFloridain2006]

What route

[@alexthesouthernpacificmt4879]

Do u know where u get the t1

[@fernandoqueirozpopovic7024]

Ahh finally a nice piece oh train to see a unique train like this you don't see that every day nice work 👏👏👏😉👍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

[@reetaumroy815]

Nice and cool video

[@avatarthanosthelegendarysu5883]

Where did you get the Locomotive that has the numbers 520 on it from

[@grobterm]

Do you not read the title?

[@avatarthanosthelegendarysu5883]

@@grobterm i did read it im just wondering what webiste you downloaded them from

[@TheBlueShark]

@@avatarthanosthelegendarysu5883 the trainz download station

[@mcttnkn4700]

Does anybody know how to get the 520 on trainz 12??

[@mcttnkn4700]

Or how to even download locomotives at all?

[@TrajectoryT]

Except the 520 was made first....
PLOT TWIST

[@Jones3DModelingClub]

The T1 prototypes 6110 and 6111 were built in 1942, one year before the 520. : )

[@TrajectoryT]

*:0*

[@carverneuleib825]

@@TrajectoryT "We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've quite possibly... been bamboozled"
If your asking why I've edited it so much its because it couldn't' remember what the meme said

[@--marshy--]

Jones 3D Modeling Club as a t1 myself i declare it true

[@davidantoniocamposbarros7528]

"There's 1 imposter among us"

[@brodster7042]

no

[@Aqua_108]

YOU MY CHANNEL FAVORITE I'VE YOU BIG FAN

[@ephraimwatkins7229]

How much does the T1 costs? Awesome video

[@Jones3DModelingClub]

Thank you! The DLC of PRR T1 pack which including some Fleet of Modernism cars cost $10-12 USD in total on Steam, the real T1 prototype 6110,6111 cost $300,000 USD each in 1942. :P

[@irishtank42]

@@Jones3DModelingClub Today with the T1 Trust fund it cost $10 million. But that is par for the course if you want to build a steam locomotive from the ground up.

[@astraygalaxy2765]

@@Jones3DModelingClub dude what prr t1 cost that much

[@davidstrawn9272]

Let's not forget Daylight 4449's imposter behind the T1 Imposter, though the skirts are green!

[@normansilver905]

My family lives in Australia. They daily rode a South Australia Railroad powered by a 520 class steam locomotive. They told me it was powerful and also the design was eye pleasing.

[@jorgeorlandosabillon9178]

10:49 Jones 3D Modeling Club Why Is There A Blur On The SAR 520?

[@SouthernerFloridain2006]

Route?

[@JoyceLund]

Joe mama jk

[@southernpacificproductions5983]

What type of locomotive is behind the 520 ?

[@griffinrails]

Southern Pacific Productions 939 SAR 500 class

[@Toaster844]

There is an impostor among us

[@tjmfarming9584]

Correction the more unsuccessful one therefore making it the imposter is the T1 because the 520’s are still around today and the T1 has no survivors and is more alien than 520

[@thegaminggallimimus4429]

thankyou

[@CoyoteCoop]

The 520 is the copy because the T1 was around a year before it was

[@Planetrainguy]

@@CoyoteCoop T1 is copy but they made it have weird wheels

[@maxhighet4447]

@@Planetrainguy facts

[@mlptf]

I think the SAR 500 and 250 are pulling way too many coaches.

[@maxhighet4447]

yea

[@npk765fan]

T1 IS AMAZING!

[@yeoldeseawitch]

520 class is better in every way

[@Saltnprotein]

are you sure abt that?
SAR 250 top speed: 78mph
PRR T1 top speed:

[@maxhighet4447]

@@Saltnprotein 250 WTH 520s Aussie, looks better has more class survivors, sounds better 520 is BETTER THATS final

[@theextremeanimator4721]

At least the SAR 520 survived irl

[@dr.k9989]

Ouch

[@wtf-hc3tp]

Wait until 2030.

[@griffinrails]

no username that’s a whole decade away, you do realise that right?

[@wtf-hc3tp]

griffin rails Yes.

[@alans9806]

Two of the class survive: 520 at SteamRanger, Mount Barker which might run again some day and 523, static at Port Dock Museum

[@jorgeorlandosabillon9178]

0:01 That Sound From The SAR 520 And 500

[@TheIndrakumc]

are we playing among us or not

[@kaseyleitchnextgen3281]

Try telling that to the ARHS.

[@maxhighet4447]

yea team SAR we respect you

[@mariacristinareyes]

Prr t1 vs prr t1 junior

[@NikisSamsungGalaxyS22]

PRR T1 looks bigger than SAR 520 Class

[@maxhighet4447]

who cares 520s better

[@FranzFerdinandVIII]

(15-Nov-19)
Well, the SAR 520-class does have a helper, so they are cheating bc the PRR T1 does not have any helpers.

[@alans9806]

That's a SAR 500 class built in Newcastle on Tyne. Most powerful non articulated British built loco.

[@southernpacificproductions5983]

Well, the T1 Is an articulated, But The 520 Is Not.

[@Askial_Osial]

@@southernpacificproductions5983 no the T1 is a rigid frame duplex

[@sniper.93c14]

Did you see the number of cars as well? - 30! Australia and especially South Australia does not have the population to ever need so many. SAR 520-class was never envisaged to carry nearly as many cars on its own, at most perhaps 17 on a really packed Melbourne express, the T1 is twice as powerful, and has 80inch drivers vs 66inch that were only designed for cruising at 70mph not 100+

[@southernpennsyrailfan8579]

520s kinda sus ngl

[@cascas1672]

stop im gonna go crazy!!!

[@CoyoteCoop]

@@cascas1672 sussy amosng

[@southernpennsyrailfan8579]

@@cascas1672 sussy baca

[@cascas1672]

@@southernpennsyrailfan8579 no u

[@roberthartley904]

The 520 is very sus

[@jenniferphipps2012]

Warren and Solomon

[@griffinrails]

The 520 class looks much better, and performed much better too.

[@yeoldeseawitch]

and there are still 2 examples still surviving

[@tiernanflynn]

@@yeoldeseawitch Yeah, doesn’t mean anything in the scheme of things

[@griffinrails]

@@tiernanflynn how

[@tiernanflynn]

@@griffinrails They both served different purposes, on different gauged rail, in different social climates (which influences how many passengers ride trains, and so on), so performance is irrelevant. Furthermore, using looks to gauge the worth of an engine is subjective, so saying the 520 “looks much better” is a matter of opinion, and thus can be disputed.
As for my two cents on the matter, I’m not going to say which engine I prefer, but that I do believe the 520 was *deeply inspired* by the T1. I quote:
“The class featured extravagant streamlining, in the style of the Pennsylvania Railroad's T1 in the United States. The original streamlining was more closely based on the T1, and class members 520-522 were fitted with such. Members 523-531 were built with a narrower front profile, attributed to by the "crown" of grill around the chimney front. The earlier streamlined model had a lower front, resulting in a squat chimney profile extended from an otherwise graceful, albeit useless, streamlined casing. During their service life, some of the class lost the cowling around their front buffer beam, a move which simplified maintenance.”
Furthermore, the T1 prototypes 6110 and 6111 were designed and built earlier (1942) and 520, the first of their class, was built 1943, which would explain why she looks more like the prototype T1s *ahem* instead of the later ones (5500-5549).

[@maxhighet4447]

facts

[@FreighttrainDaniel1225]

That engine is a spy

[@maxhighet4447]

not true

[@ArnavKhode]

Shane in a nutshell

[@maxhighet4447]

not another word...

[@trainfan-ks5hk]

T1: I finally found you faker

[@Planetrainguy]

He ain’t a faker just a copy??

[@maxhighet4447]

@@Planetrainguy 520s way better

[@miroboss4982]

SAR 520 HAVE'S A FUNNY WISTLE

[@maxhighet4447]

Wanna bet?

[@KALL239]

AMGUS

[@Brime69]

sus T1

[@adil3085]

6110Vs520

[@thetoontrain6073]

sus

[@gearedloop3195]

_jeb

[@karinaheek]

Het

[@miroboss4982]

MAKE A VIDIO WITH THE NORFOLK AND WESTERN VS SAR 520 CLASS

[@miroboss4982]

BUT I SAW SO MENNY LOADS BEHIND SAR ITS WAY MORE THAN T1 THATS WHY HE LOST

[@user-xk8ef6lj1n]

Пассажиры казанского направления московской железной дороги охренели от таких заездов, вместо электричек

[@JoyceLund]

520 is sus 😳 !1!1

[@maxhighet4447]

Tell that to steamranger isn't so funny now IS IT

[@spingleboygle]

WHEN THE PRR T1 STEAM LOCOMOTIVE IS SUS!

[@miroboss4982]

ITS REALY THE IMPOSTER FROM PRR T1

[@miroboss4982]

WHATS THAT BLURHH ON YOU SCREAM

[@enginestheyreamazing4568]

Oof what a rip off

[@Planetrainguy]

Well guess which loco is still alive, then 520

[@tiernanflynn]

@@Planetrainguy Doesn’t mean anything

[@tiernanflynn]

@@Planetrainguy Well it was the Pennsy's choice to scrap them, it doesn't mean there was anything wrong. In fact, the only major problems were with the prototypes (6110 and 6111), and were fixed with all production units. The rest was human error.

[@maxhighet4447]

@@tiernanflynn They scrapped T1s cuz their usless

[@tiernanflynn]

@@maxhighet4447 If you’re going to call the T1s, and I quote, “usless,” at least spell it right 😂

[@karinaheek]

Het