Keep it up! I followed academy of ideas when they had no followers. Thank you for making videos about interesting subjects that people who are interested don't have time to delve into themselves.
Atheism is fundamentally flawed. As Carl Jung pointed out: “An atheist is a negative theist; naturally he would not deny a thing if he did not think it was there to be denied. He would not add the ‘a’. It is an admission of God when you call yourself an atheist, because whether you assert a thing or deny it, you confirm that it is: you cannot deny a thing without giving it a certain existence. It does exist somewhere even if you assume that it exists only in the minds of other people; that it exists in the minds of other people means that it does exist.” The author of this video obviously doesn’t like Christianity but instead of realising that it’s the Christian idea of God that is wrong, he stupidly concludes that it’s God itself that is false and that can be safely rejected. Nietzsche is actually one of the best proofs of all of God’s existence, as after declaring God was dead Nietzsche went insane and ended his life a a drooling vegetable. Carl Jung correctly diagnosed Nietzsche’s slide into madness: “So when Nietzsche declares that God is dead, instantly he begins to transform. With that declaration he is no longer a Christian, he is an atheist or it doesn’t matter what. He immediately gets into the process of that archetype of rebirth, because those vital powers in us which we call “God” are powers of self-renewal, powers of eternal change And as soon as this projection or this declaration, this creative god (whatever it is) is abolished, instantly that process begins in us. We are caught in those powers. If you don’t want to be caught in them, then don’t make such declarations; it is exceedingly foolish to make them, because you thus provoke the unconscious. Of course you think it is quite futile whether you make such a declaration or not, that you can say this or that about God and it makes no difference whatever. But I tell you it does make a difference in reality, only you won’t connect it with things.” God is on the other side of the unconscious - but it isn’t the Christian God.
Dionysus represents pleasure. Jesus represents pain Human animals are motivated primarily by pleasure! The will to power is the will to pleasure. The pleasure of power, the power of pleasure. It's all about mastery of desire.
It's actually not clear if he was an atheist or a deist btw. In his earlier works there's hint of theism. However his philosophy ultimately became about that the existence of God doesn’t matter. Aristotelean God also has that indifferent characteristic.
I've always wondered which Christians Nietzsche was mostly exposed to in life, and how he came about viewing them. By what lenses, what substantial doctrinal investigations, if any, etc. Actual Catholic Doctrines for example have always been interested in utilizing historical sources and investigation in relation to events experienced by Christians and impacted by Christ. There is no doctrine of blind Faith, despite the acknowledgment that mankind is drawn to higher Truths and therefore God. However as a continuation of that, the Story of Christ is then essentially linked to documented history. Catholic Doctrine don't proclaim that the material world is completely separate from the spiritual world. It doesn't consider the act of purposeful moral sex in line with Natural Law and procreation itself at all sinful whatsoever. Just the opposite. Even Nietzsche's charge that Christianity is the embodiment of weakness is a blatantly flawed and incorrect assessment. Within Christianity, ultimate strength beyond all human ability is gifted and exalted through humility and willing surrender, and therefore fulfillment with Chrst. Anyone has any ideas, please let me know!
True atheism cannot solely be compared in the shadow of Christianity, it is a too simplified in a manner to try "dummify" all atheists. If you were brought up in a society that ain't Christian and reject that religion doesn't mean you compared to Christians. Nietsche seem to have a sound approach but I have to give me more time to digest this and study further before embracing him totally. Another thing is that I don't agree on is that Christian morality is fundamentally different than others including atheists. It is like saying that all others are immoral in some sense. Golden rule is a good example of a majorly universal moral or at the very least what common people share (not "clergy" and rulers perhaps).
There isn't any alternative for Christianity or Christian values. That's mostly because no one has really attempted to find any meaningful alternative for the masses. The problem is invisible for most. Nietzsche was not concerned about what the masses believed. He never presented his philosophy as the solution for all. That may be a good or a bad thing depending on who you are. It think the value of it is in the showing of how we could overcome these values. Nietzsche is the first and only person to attempt a full replacement of Christian values.
Creating an alterative wouldn't be the most difficult part. If you had a meaningful alternative the real challenge would be in establishing that alternative in a way so that it didn't become just another outgrowth of Christian values. Christianity has dominated in the west for so long that Christian value feelings feel instinctive. This is why wokism has so much power and all other left-wing ideologies. You have to change the psychological orientation of great masses of people to establish any real alternative set of values. Nietzsche's argument is fundamentally that Christianity caused a physiological degeneration in human beings because of its opposition to instinctive activity. It is a movement that is heading towards a passivity of all instinctive striving. Christianity was so successful because the soil was ripe for it. Nietzsche says no one is "converted" to Christianity "you have to be sick enough for it". People were already exhausted with activity, with willing. Christianity's promise of a "beyond," or "salvation," are seen as a redemption from the instinctive activity that life requires. As long as this "exhaustion" or "weariness" with life is prevalent, no real alternative to Christianity will be possible.
@@TheMachiavellians 100%. Nietzsche was speaking to nobles. But if he wants a society that produces a few good men, an Ubermench, and he says the slaves always win, because the Maters are naive, then we must find a way to placate the masses so they don’t become resentful.
@@TheMachiavellians are you familiar with Ed Dutton’s Spiteful Mutant theory? … IMO, since the puritan SJWs have left the church to form a woke religion, there is a power vacuum, and that role can be filled with men or vitality. Strong Christian men can lead their churches with a vision of greatness. Men of will just push their values on the sheep. They will follow. Everyone likes a strong horse.
@@bryanutility9609 That's right. Nietzsche wanted to create a parallel society for the nobles. He would have just left the masses believe whatever they want to. I'm skeptical if its even possible to create a parallel society given our current political systems. Not to mention the elites are just as degenerate as the lower classes. Wokism got its start with upper class white liberals. I think a fundamentally new caste would have to emerge to replace them. Personally I think its the individuals responsibility to organize their own life for now.
Except Xtanity has no values of equality and mitigation of suffering. As always, it has the claims of such, the assumption of such. Sanctimony is the foundation of its duplicity.
I wonder if the morals that Nietzsche identifies with Christianity are of Christian origin. These morals have probably been around much longer than Christianity and are also known in parts of the world where Christianity plays little or no role. Being against something because it is used in Christian morality is strange to say the least. Moreover, the Catholic Church has amply demonstrated that they do not care about their own moral teachings. The whole reasoning seems rather flawed and forced. All in all more likely an obsession than a deep insight. Not his strongest body of work.
There are two sides to your instincts. There's your "higher self" which includes your heart, mind and arms that one uses to fight. And of course the lower self - the stomach, loins and legs used to run away. Of course the "fight or flight" response does not constitute all human instinct, which in fact directs our whole being. Christian doctrine slanders humanity as inherently evil.
"they say "judge not," and yet they condemn whoever stands in their way. In letting God sit in judgment they judge themselves; in glorifying God they glorify themselves; in demanding that every one show the virtues which they themselves happen to be capable of-still more, which they must have in order to remain on top-they assume the grand air of men struggling for virtue, of men engaging in a war that virtue may prevail. "We live, we die, we sacrifice ourselves for the good" (-"the truth," "the light," "the kingdom of God"):
In point of fact they simply do what they cannot help doing. Forced, like hypocrites, to be sneaky, to hide in corners, to slink along in the shadows, they convert their necessity into a duty: it is on grounds of duty that they account for their lives of humility, and that humility becomes merely one more proof of their piety. Ah, that humble, chaste, charitable brand of fraud!" - Nietzsche, referring to Christians.
@@Anon1gh3 I agree. Christianity is a slave morality. Instincts are like the beast however, they must be understood and trained. What better trainer than the Apollonian striving to achieve something greater than one already is?
the opposite of dionysus is apollo. the purple worm vs the golden android. dionysus represents rebirth and dying, living matter, so its not so rooted in the earth and its not atheism. its gnosticism. but nietzsche seems to be proposing hedonism and atheistic earth worshipping empiricism, which is paganism
Probably the guy on CZcams who actually gets Nietzsche
Yes and @essentialsalts
@@ethans.7653yes
@@ethans.7653I was going to say the same thing. @EssentialSalts is the best resource on CZcams for Nietzsche
The best interpreter of Nietzsche along with Eternalized.Very helpful, thank you.
@truthandhappiness2378 Thank you! I'm glad you are enjoying our Nietzsche videos. Eternalized is a great channel.
Keep it up! I followed academy of ideas when they had no followers. Thank you for making videos about interesting subjects that people who are interested don't have time to delve into themselves.
Atheism is fundamentally flawed. As Carl Jung pointed out:
“An atheist is a negative theist; naturally he would not deny a thing if he did not think it was there to be denied. He would not add the ‘a’. It is an admission of God when you call yourself an atheist, because whether you assert a thing or deny it, you confirm that it is: you cannot deny a thing without giving it a certain existence. It does exist somewhere even if you assume that it exists only in the minds of other people; that it exists in the minds of other people means that it does exist.”
The author of this video obviously doesn’t like Christianity but instead of realising that it’s the Christian idea of God that is wrong, he stupidly concludes that it’s God itself that is false and that can be safely rejected. Nietzsche is actually one of the best proofs of all of God’s existence, as after declaring God was dead Nietzsche went insane and ended his life a a drooling vegetable. Carl Jung correctly diagnosed Nietzsche’s slide into madness:
“So when Nietzsche declares that God is dead, instantly he begins to transform. With that declaration he is no longer a Christian, he is an atheist or it doesn’t matter what. He immediately gets into the process of that archetype of rebirth, because those vital powers in us which we call “God” are powers of self-renewal, powers of eternal change
And as soon as this projection or this declaration, this creative god (whatever it is) is abolished, instantly that process begins in us. We are caught in those powers. If you don’t want to be caught in them, then don’t make such declarations; it is exceedingly foolish to make them, because you thus provoke the unconscious. Of course you think it is quite futile whether you make such a declaration or not, that you can say this or that about God and it makes no difference whatever. But I tell you it does make a difference in reality, only you won’t connect it with things.”
God is on the other side of the unconscious - but it isn’t the Christian God.
You’re absolutely the best channel on philosophy! I am glad I found your channel.
Dionysus represents pleasure. Jesus represents pain Human animals are motivated primarily by pleasure! The will to power is the will to pleasure. The pleasure of power, the power of pleasure. It's all about mastery of desire.
Self-destruction.
Amazing video. Thank you
It's actually not clear if he was an atheist or a deist btw. In his earlier works there's hint of theism. However his philosophy ultimately became about that the existence of God doesn’t matter. Aristotelean God also has that indifferent characteristic.
Great job in the video.👍👍👍👍👍♥️
What came first? The idea of Christianity or humanism?
I've always wondered which Christians Nietzsche was mostly exposed to in life, and how he came about viewing them. By what lenses, what substantial doctrinal investigations, if any, etc.
Actual Catholic Doctrines for example have always been interested in utilizing historical sources and investigation in relation to events experienced by Christians and impacted by Christ. There is no doctrine of blind Faith, despite the acknowledgment that mankind is drawn to higher Truths and therefore God. However as a continuation of that, the Story of Christ is then essentially linked to documented history. Catholic Doctrine don't proclaim that the material world is completely separate from the spiritual world. It doesn't consider the act of purposeful moral sex in line with Natural Law and procreation itself at all sinful whatsoever. Just the opposite. Even Nietzsche's charge that Christianity is the embodiment of weakness is a blatantly flawed and incorrect assessment. Within Christianity, ultimate strength beyond all human ability is gifted and exalted through humility and willing surrender, and therefore fulfillment with Chrst.
Anyone has any ideas, please let me know!
True atheism cannot solely be compared in the shadow of Christianity, it is a too simplified in a manner to try "dummify" all atheists. If you were brought up in a society that ain't Christian and reject that religion doesn't mean you compared to Christians. Nietsche seem to have a sound approach but I have to give me more time to digest this and study further before embracing him totally. Another thing is that I don't agree on is that Christian morality is fundamentally different than others including atheists. It is like saying that all others are immoral in some sense. Golden rule is a good example of a majorly universal moral or at the very least what common people share (not "clergy" and rulers perhaps).
"Hitler has replaced the Devil"
Hitler was secretly leaned to Islam some claim which makes alot of sense when you consider his misogyny and racism like Islam.
19:40
Well made
Don’t see any alternative to Christianity for the masses. The threat of woke scientism is upon us.
There isn't any alternative for Christianity or Christian values. That's mostly because no one has really attempted to find any meaningful alternative for the masses. The problem is invisible for most. Nietzsche was not concerned about what the masses believed. He never presented his philosophy as the solution for all. That may be a good or a bad thing depending on who you are. It think the value of it is in the showing of how we could overcome these values. Nietzsche is the first and only person to attempt a full replacement of Christian values.
Creating an alterative wouldn't be the most difficult part. If you had a meaningful alternative the real challenge would be in establishing that alternative in a way so that it didn't become just another outgrowth of Christian values. Christianity has dominated in the west for so long that Christian value feelings feel instinctive. This is why wokism has so much power and all other left-wing ideologies. You have to change the psychological orientation of great masses of people to establish any real alternative set of values. Nietzsche's argument is fundamentally that Christianity caused a physiological degeneration in human beings because of its opposition to instinctive activity. It is a movement that is heading towards a passivity of all instinctive striving. Christianity was so successful because the soil was ripe for it. Nietzsche says no one is "converted" to Christianity "you have to be sick enough for it". People were already exhausted with activity, with willing. Christianity's promise of a "beyond," or "salvation," are seen as a redemption from the instinctive activity that life requires. As long as this "exhaustion" or "weariness" with life is prevalent, no real alternative to Christianity will be possible.
@@TheMachiavellians 100%. Nietzsche was speaking to nobles. But if he wants a society that produces a few good men, an Ubermench, and he says the slaves always win, because the Maters are naive, then we must find a way to placate the masses so they don’t become resentful.
@@TheMachiavellians are you familiar with Ed Dutton’s Spiteful Mutant theory?
…
IMO, since the puritan SJWs have left the church to form a woke religion, there is a power vacuum, and that role can be filled with men or vitality. Strong Christian men can lead their churches with a vision of greatness. Men of will just push their values on the sheep. They will follow. Everyone likes a strong horse.
@@bryanutility9609 That's right. Nietzsche wanted to create a parallel society for the nobles. He would have just left the masses believe whatever they want to.
I'm skeptical if its even possible to create a parallel society given our current political systems. Not to mention the elites are just as degenerate as the lower classes. Wokism got its start with upper class white liberals. I think a fundamentally new caste would have to emerge to replace them. Personally I think its the individuals responsibility to organize their own life for now.
Except Xtanity has no values of equality and mitigation of suffering. As always, it has the claims of such, the assumption of such. Sanctimony is the foundation of its duplicity.
Thanks. This video helped me to grasp why Nietzche is so overrated.
Lololol a salty Christian here
I wonder if the morals that Nietzsche identifies with Christianity are of Christian origin. These morals have probably been around much longer than Christianity and are also known in parts of the world where Christianity plays little or no role. Being against something because it is used in Christian morality is strange to say the least. Moreover, the Catholic Church has amply demonstrated that they do not care about their own moral teachings. The whole reasoning seems rather flawed and forced. All in all more likely an obsession than a deep insight. Not his strongest body of work.
Follow your instincts only and watch your life go to sh*#
There are two sides to your instincts. There's your "higher self" which includes your heart, mind and arms that one uses to fight. And of course the lower self - the stomach, loins and legs used to run away. Of course the "fight or flight" response does not constitute all human instinct, which in fact directs our whole being. Christian doctrine slanders humanity as inherently evil.
"they say "judge not," and yet they condemn whoever stands in their way. In letting God sit in judgment they judge themselves; in glorifying God they glorify themselves; in demanding that every one show the virtues which they themselves happen to be capable of-still more, which they must have in order to remain on top-they assume the grand air of men struggling for virtue, of men engaging in a war that virtue may prevail. "We live, we die, we sacrifice ourselves for the good" (-"the truth," "the light," "the kingdom of God"):
In point of fact they simply do what they cannot help doing. Forced, like hypocrites, to be sneaky, to hide in corners, to slink along in the shadows, they convert their necessity into a duty: it is on grounds of duty that they account for their lives of humility, and that humility becomes merely one more proof of their piety. Ah, that humble, chaste, charitable brand of fraud!"
- Nietzsche, referring to Christians.
@@Anon1gh3 I agree. Christianity is a slave morality. Instincts are like the beast however, they must be understood and trained. What better trainer than the Apollonian striving to achieve something greater than one already is?
the opposite of dionysus is apollo. the purple worm vs the golden android. dionysus represents rebirth and dying, living matter, so its not so rooted in the earth and its not atheism. its gnosticism. but nietzsche seems to be proposing hedonism and atheistic earth worshipping empiricism, which is paganism
Sounds like somebody had daddy issues.
I love how you through this YT channel through Nietzsche unmask so-called atheists like the unbearable Sam Harris and Dawkins.