NYT Hard Sudoku Walkthrough | June 26, 2024
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- Solving today's The New York Times Hard Sudoku for June 26, 2024
SudokuPad link: sudokupad.app/...
Learn everything you need to solve a NYT Sudoku! • Learn everything you n...
Import any puzzle into SudokuPad: • Importing to SudokuPad...
Want more Sudoku? Here are some links!
Sudoku Adventure: • Sudoku Adventure
Advent of Sudoku 2022: • Advent of Sudoku 2022
Learn to Love Sudoku: • Learn to Love Sudoku
The Sudokult Discussion: • The Sudokult Discussion
My Live Streams: • Sudoku Live Streams
======= MEMBERS =======
Join as a member to get early access to most of my videos plus other perks!
www.youtube.co...
===== MERCH =====
You can also support me by buying my merch!
Check out my store here: rangsks-merch....
Enthusiast and Super Supporter members get a discount! See your member perks for the discount code.
Check out my store here: rangsks-merch....
======= DISCORD =======
Join the Puzzle Plaza Discord server to hang out and talk about Wordle, Wordle-like games, and other kinds of puzzles like Sudoku.
/ discord
#sudoku #puzzle #nytimes #hard #walkthrough #solve #today #daily
8:50. Fastest hard solve yet!! Thanks for all your help Rangsk 😊😊
Really surprised you don't go through each number (1-9) at the end of your band/stack scan - that way you easily spot stuff like the 1 in box 1. That said you've taught me a lot so cheers and hope you're feeling better
I do the same. I'm not as good at spotting crossing and such, so I rely on at least one brute-force traversal of corner-marks.
Rangst actually scans the grid in a specific pattern, not only looking for singles but other useful info. I'm very bad at seeing singles, I go 1-9 just looking for singles and corner marking. I say: I'm NOT scanning the grid like Rangst, I'm just placing singles. After that's done I follow his bands scanning method, looking for geometry etc.
@@calpurniabruchi5742 Understood. The approach that Rangsk follows works well for him. I'm not as good at spotting things that way, and so I follow a pattern similar to what I think you're suggesting -- I start by adding corner-marks (although I never mark more than 2 in a box) using a brute-force traversal of each digit. Any singles fall out of that traversal. His way is very fast, my approach is much slower. I also tend to look for occurrences of the "NYT Trick" as my first step in a given puzzle.
In my experience, after my first pass 90% of the time going through each number wastes 5+ minutes and I find nothing of value. I generally find what's needed in the first pass. In this case I did not but it was a pretty blatant oversight, not something I'd want to add a per digit scanning step to resolve. Going box by box again accomplishes the same thing but more efficiently.
@@Rangsk Indeed! You often see things that mere mortals do not. :) I agree with you, and I'm slowly evolving towards your approach as my scanning skills improve.
Pretty quick one for me today 6:36 😊
This was straightforward and fun for me. I'm glad that your malady appears to be improving.
10:58
#102
Flowed really smoothly.
Nice to see we’re back to easier puzzles with less random naked single hunting. 6:18 for me today
24:19. That was surprisingly smooth sailing.
yooo i got 24:19 as well...
Please do the Jun 26 medium solve, it's way harder than the "hard" puzzle today.
Tend to agree.... There's one pointing that resolves the entire puzzle but I didn't see it and was totally stuck for a while.
7:40 not too bad
7:59 for me today
kind comment
13:09 to solve.
11:09 for me today.
My time 36'22" Am I the slowest in the comments?
This was the easiest nyt hard puzzle I've seen.
7:29 for me today