Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

ACES 5® Next Generation Ejection Seat

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 08. 2018
  • The latest addition to the UTC Aerospace Systems family of Advanced Concept Ejection Seats is ACES 5®. ACES 5® incorporates advanced safety upgrades compared to the legacy ACES II®, which is credited with saving more than 650 lives since being introduced in 1978.

Komentáře • 62

  • @technowarriorstv
    @technowarriorstv Před 2 lety +6

    i am a living testament to the ACES 2 seat on june 21st 2012 i suffered a mishap in the air and to use your amazing seat my nieces and nephews are growing up and i get to see it because of you guys my family thanks you i thank you from the bottom of my heart thank you for saving my life that day

  • @garethessex
    @garethessex Před 5 lety +22

    Martin-Baker claims 7,545 lives had been saved by their seats from 1946 to 2016.

    • @Roomer645
      @Roomer645 Před 3 lety +2

      Yes, but Martin Baker has been fitted into hundreds of different model aircraft while the Aces II was mounted in just over half a dozen aircraft.

  • @ashly6606
    @ashly6606 Před 5 lety +24

    Damn if only goose was in an f-14 with THESE so he wouldn’t have freaking died

    • @technowarriorstv
      @technowarriorstv Před 4 lety

      meet your maker in a martin baker fly ACES

    • @billrobinson5122
      @billrobinson5122 Před 4 lety +8

      @@technowarriorstv We used to say if you have Pratt & Whitney behind your back you better have ACESII under your ass. Thrust you can trust.

    • @BoneyardBrigade21
      @BoneyardBrigade21 Před 4 lety +5

      If the f-14 had canopy rockets like the f-16 does then Goose would be alive and well. Also his STAPAC seriously failed him for him to turn face down and hit the canopy like that. I know just a movie...but I work EGRESS so ejection seats is what I do haha

    • @kinch613
      @kinch613 Před 2 lety

      @@BoneyardBrigade21 truth. Canopy thrusters wouldve saved his life! Lol

  • @leosypher9993
    @leosypher9993 Před 3 lety +1

    A vast improvement, hope it gets adopted!
    But a couple ideas, the neck protection is great, but why not use arm rest like arms to come down and hold the pilots arms in the chair from the start, rather than having a net to catch them.
    You may have seen this somewhere, its not my idea, search around you may find more ideas.

  • @mwbf109g
    @mwbf109g Před rokem

    Great seat but need to recommend base pressure mapping per airframe.

  • @garyvale8347
    @garyvale8347 Před 5 lety +5

    seems like an ejection " capsule " is what's really needed, as a protective enclosure around the fighter jets occupants would be safer even at mock speeds......

    • @user-mm1nt1it5v
      @user-mm1nt1it5v Před 5 lety +7

      Gary Vale mock speeds loll

    • @briancooper2112
      @briancooper2112 Před 5 lety +7

      B-1A and F-111 had capsules. Pilots injured and killed by them.

    • @george_3264
      @george_3264 Před 5 lety +1

      Brian Cooper what caused them to die from capsule ejection?

    • @briancooper2112
      @briancooper2112 Před 5 lety +2

      @@george_3264 B-1 and F-111 had capsules. F-111 crew died and B-1 low altitude high speed

    • @briancooper2112
      @briancooper2112 Před 5 lety +3

      Capules were bad design.

  • @seinfeld11123
    @seinfeld11123 Před 5 lety +8

    can I do some live testing on that test rig? id love to get flung forward at shitloads of speed :)

    • @KKhhoorrnniittee
      @KKhhoorrnniittee Před 4 lety +1

      Pass the G test and you are clear to (-;

    • @giannizen3775
      @giannizen3775 Před 3 lety

      It would probably ruin your life!
      The effects of an ejection are often catastrophic to the human body. Due to the extremely traumatic nature of the event, you may very likely endure serious injuries or traumas that could and will affect your life forever. Such traumas can range from bone fractures, to brain damage to spine traumas or neck trauma (the last two being the most common, and also the most long term debilitating).
      Taking a ride in an ejection seat should only be the option to taking a ride in a fireball

  • @user-ul4ko7ys8l
    @user-ul4ko7ys8l Před 4 lety +1

    Ok it is good

  • @Tolis_ae
    @Tolis_ae Před 4 lety

    1:27 Next generation ejection seat technology is based on fart

  • @technowarriorstv
    @technowarriorstv Před 5 lety +5

    ACES II beats Martin bakers mk 16

  • @yaris684
    @yaris684 Před 3 lety

    can you put this in a bush plane

  • @beacon1456
    @beacon1456 Před 5 lety +6

    Not as good as a Russian ejection seat. The Russian ejection seats use a gyro to make sure that the seat always goes up. I can not understand why the US has not incorporated this feature into all US ejection seats. Many US pilots would have lived if they had this feature in their planes including the first female pilot in an f-14 that crashed when it rolled over when she was approaching the carrier due to a single engine flameout. She was ejected downward into the water. She would have lived if she had a Russian ejection seat.

    • @johngalt2506
      @johngalt2506 Před 5 lety +7

      Doubtful she would have survived even in a K36D ( the best ejection seat in the world) she was probably way too low. The K36D is amazing, but its not magic.

    • @briancooper2112
      @briancooper2112 Před 5 lety +1

      Because of angle of plane, she would of hit water and died, her rio sustained injuries. Plus she wasn't the best pilot. John McCain was a terrible pilot, he wasnt kicked out because of his dad and war hero grandfather.

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 Před 4 lety

      You are WRONG about that, no gyro to make sure the seat always goes up, and a gyro wouldn’t do that anyway.

    • @stijnvandamme76
      @stijnvandamme76 Před 4 lety

      Theres no chance a Russian Seat would have done better at ejecting her so close and at that already inverted angle towards the water.
      No seat can save you if you pull to late while your plane is low and rolling like that.
      No time = No room = Shit out of luck

    • @stijnvandamme76
      @stijnvandamme76 Před 4 lety +2

      @@briancooper2112 She was good enough pilot to be carrier qualified for F14. Which is probably better then 99.9% of all pilots flying at that time anywhere on the world.
      And she had been an A-6E Pilot , had over 1000 hours including a defective gear landing in an A6.
      So Not the best pilot.. pff pointless statement from the luxury of your comfortable arm chair.

  • @RepukeinScapegoat
    @RepukeinScapegoat Před 5 lety +4

    Kinda of a simple question but harder to do I’m sure WHY DON’T U PUT A MOTORIZED FAN ON THE BACK OF THE SEAT OR ATTACHED SOMEWHERE TO THE PILOT yes EJECTION SEATS SAVE LIVES BHT NOT SO MUCH IF YOUR DOING STRAFING RUNS AND GET HIT AND GO DOWN IN ENEMY TERRITORY NOW YOULL BE down in the ground and the main target in war time with a bulls eye falling from the sky am I right has any one tried to put a Para-motor on an ejection seat to let the ejected pilot escape from the battle fire to a safer place to land? Gas electric just an idea probably save a lot more lives

    • @stijnvandamme76
      @stijnvandamme76 Před 4 lety +2

      Because it weighs to much and takes up to much space in the already cramped cockpit space.
      so then the ejection seat needs even more explosives to reach the same acceleration , which makes it even more dangerous.
      And if anything... a paramotor isn't exactly a high speed escape out of a combat zone.
      Anybody who likes claypigeon shooting would have a field day shooting at it.
      Probably better to get down to the ground and apply Escape and Evasion techniques , hide in the terrain..

    • @BoneyardBrigade21
      @BoneyardBrigade21 Před 4 lety +2

      Honestly most of the time the pilot will not be in right mind or even passed out from the ejection...

    • @RepukeinScapegoat
      @RepukeinScapegoat Před 4 lety +1

      surferboymikey I can see weight being an issue but if its used over only hazardous missions fly time adding 10 lbs or 5 lbs ... even a weed whacker engine (weighs less than “3lbs with fuel with out the boom arm and eat cycle engine and fade cann only )and last probably at-least a good hour or more with 2 stroke gas or it could be battery powered and less noisy, probably more conservative and efficient ,less weighted that’s enough time to keep a glide if your already in the air if you have air drafts and just using the propeller as a
      back engine/motor for altitude glide as a get out of enemy air space . Just until your “FRIENDLIES “ can get a reading on your crash site and a BEAKER on you to pick you. up I’d rather be up
      In the air with a reserve parachute than on the ground where every ENEMY knows where you are.
      Just CZcams ANY downed plane where pilots ejected over a battle or enemy territory
      ,
      Plane goes down ,
      huge boom
      and
      big smoke signal for all to see
      so every one looks up
      then every one sees a parachute FALLING NEAR BY
      THE SAME GUY THAT WAS BOMBING UOUR TOWN
      EVERY ENEMY YOU WERE BOMBING NOW YOUR GONNA MEET
      IT WOULD BE A MIRACLE IF YOU DIDNT GET KILLED FROM THE FIRST PERSON WHO GOT TO YOU
      very easy to surround and
      stupid if THE MILITARY
      have not thought about this yet today they can always drone strike the plane or strafe the plane if it has sensitive material but the pilots are much more useful in enemy’s hands WHICH IS WHAT WE WONT WANT THEM TO GET.
      I know some of you will say then let’s just get drones to do the job INSTEAD of putting people in the air ,but we will always need pilots over battle fields for situational awareness for the eye to send info immediately what a camera isn’t sure of what it’s seeing or too close to a friendly target to get a shot
      5lbs max with the engine and rotor blade a pusher prop design on the back of the seat can be its own with a internal battery or drop the seat after which most do now anyway and it can be installed in the pilots neck rest that disconnects down his helmet and all he has to do is turn it on if he’s UNCONSCIOUS then go back to square one LIKE THE OLD DAYS PULL THE GRIP AND LET IT RIPP
      I’m sure these days if the pilots Unconscious it would probably be able to fly on its own back to the closest friendly base or preset spot .
      sounds like a James Bond gadget but by today’s standards I’d think it wouldn’t be a big deal .and would be cheap for A MILITARY JET FIGHTER that cost 10-60million dollars depending on what roll and type it better suck my you know what make me food like a 6star chef chew it for me and wipe my Arse .

    • @benim3166
      @benim3166 Před 3 lety

      Do you understand how easy it would be to shoot the person down? And the military experimented with a similar idea using an inflatable plane (yes it's real, google it) but ended up failing because of how easy it would be to shot down.

    • @Name-ps9fx
      @Name-ps9fx Před rokem +1

      Rusty, put the hooka down and sober up.

  • @user-me4fb2xy8y
    @user-me4fb2xy8y Před 2 lety

    ตกลง

  • @bonesshed.
    @bonesshed. Před 2 lety

    Those arm restraints look a complex mess. So your man get his shoulders/arms wrenched backwards on leaving the cockpit, potentially arm tangled and ripped off on seat sep. Nice.

  • @sereganikonchuk385
    @sereganikonchuk385 Před 5 lety +2

    Russian ejection seat K36д is much better

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 Před 4 lety

      Serega Nikonchuk only for high speeds and altitudes.

  • @david69leonard
    @david69leonard Před 5 lety

    Sorry, but I've seen this turd first hand, modular my ass lol. Take a look at the US16E and the MK18. You can't compare MB seats to the ACES. The ACES has been passed around like a piece pipe over the decades and even the SSIP is nothing short of a mistake.

  • @dotnetdevni
    @dotnetdevni Před 3 lety

    Lol Can private people by these for DCS lol