Cyberpunk 2077 - Extreme Settings - 5120x1440 32:9 [NVIDIA RTX 3090] [8K 60FPS]
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 12. 2020
- All settings are maxed out, 'Psycho' ray tracing enabled. DLSS is enabled and set to quality mode. Montor is the Samsung Odyssey G9 (5120x1440 32:9 240Hz).
My Hardware:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64C/128T PBO OC
NVIDIA RTX 3090 @2070Mhz OC
4x Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB 4700Mhz DDR4 RAM (128GB) OC
ASUS Prime sTRX4 Prime Pro ATX Motherboard
CPU + GPU Watercooled (EK CPU Block, Alphacool Eisblock GPU Block, 240mm + 120mm Rads)
Samsung EVO 980 Pro 2TB M.2 SSD (Game drive)
EVGA SuperNOVA P2 1200W Platinum
Thanksss, Love your videos for Odyssey G9 5120x1440
You're welcome! ❤️
For anyone viewing this on their phone. Just make it land scape and stick it close to your face and you would be close to how the experience is. It is amazing.
Ah the Odyssey G9, i also enjoy this monitor a lot
dude that g9 was the best decision in my life ! it feels like VR
Wow I just stood up and got right in front of my display, yeah 32:9 is sick. But from my distance, I'll have to rock 21:9. Doom in 21:9 looked amazing from the distance I play. My display is a 55" oled. That's why I'm experimenting on different aspect ratios, I bet my 65" oled would be perfect for the 32:9, the 65" is a curved display too. Might have to think about how I will mount the 65" so I can get the best 32:9 experience, once again thank you for you footage.
Would love to see some overlay explaining the performance and all. And exact settings used as well.
I will do a reupload soon. Nvidia has now fixed the recording issues for this monitor so I should be able to capture at true native resolution, and I will add some parts with FPS overlays. This was supposed to be more of a showcase rather than a benchmark.
As for the settings it is running on all maxed out, highest possible, RT included (psycho setting I believe it's called). Nvidia 3D settings for this game is set to high performance mode with low latency mode 'On' (not ultra).
just curious. did you found bug even with 3090? back then when it first release?
Ah man you got me excited to try my 75" to see how that would be.
RTX 4090 Ti will definitely be a beast on this display and game!!!
Can you tel me what resolution you set for record?I have same monitor as yours GPU RTX 2080Ti,but when I'm trying to record or broadcast video by res.2160 GFE doesn't run!Just let me to record in 1080p.
recording while playing a game on one pc is very demanding on the cpu or gpu (one of them i cant remember which) but most people use a second pc to record/stream their gameplay while playing on their main pc :)
How do you like HDR with your G9? I have the G9 but the colors looks washed out in HDR. It gets deeper blacks , and details in the image, but makes the colors look muted. I saw it only has 12 lighting zones vs unlimited zones on OLED or 512 on Asus's ultrawide HDR monitor.
Turn off local dimming, solved my hdr issues (windows hr on)
I have a similar set up. 12900k, rtx 3090 all under water. Samsung Odyssey g9. How are you getting 60fps with ray tracing on? My set up struggles to get 45fps with ray tracing at 5120x1440
hi! i have an ultrawide but i can't find the 5120 x 1440 resolution option... any help?
I love this game in 32:9. I have a 6900XT and a 1440p 32:9 monitor, I love gaming on it.
Once you go to 32:9 you can never go back! Enjoy!
how is the 6900XT running? Im thinking about either getting the 6900XT or 3080ti.
@@Guggeneck it's an absolute unit. I wish it Ray traced better, but I can live without Ray tracing. It's still worth every penny.
@@BigSoulja Yeah I agree. I have ran triple monitors in my previous two setups trying to use 1 and 2gb video cards like the 5850,6950,6970 etc. This was back around 2010 and on. Have always loved ultrawide gaming. I snagged a good deal on a open box Samsung CHG90 (original 32:9) for about $450 on Amazon. It's only half 4k resolution and a bit more than standard 1440p so reasonable GPU power can push it. I only had a GTX1070 to push it up until last month when i snagged a $450 6700XT. Pretty slick highend PC you have there. To rich for my gaming blood but i'm sure you use it for more than games.
@@BigSoulja I can see how this looks great in vr, but I'm viewing this at home, not sure how I feel. Like, I enjoy how 21"9 looks, but 32:9 seem to out of view for me. Maybe I need another game, like resident evil village to enjoy the wide field of view.
You using any mods or is this just ran on your system normal? I have the G9 Neo running with 3090 Intel I-9 and was gonna try this game out next. Looks great on your system
This video is just vanilla cyberpunk, no mods. Thank you, and very nice setup you have there yourself!
we get it, we are poor
Uhh its just a 3090 tho
may i ask which program you used to export 32:9 at this quality? ty
Adobe After Effects
have the same monitor this a gameplay I am wishing for
Ok now I'm understanding how it's ment to be viewed. So red dead looks amazing in 32:9 so I can imagine games like God of War, spider man, last of us, horizon zero, gta, thos look amazing, but I am unable to enjoy first person view games like, cyberpunk and call of duty because I can't see enemies that are further back In the distance. My reason is because I realize with a 32:9 set up you have to sit 3ft from the monitor, and yes the experience is mind blowing, because then it does feel like vr. But in my situation I have my display mounted by the upper conner of my room, thus I'm more that 5ft away from my monitor, I lose the indephth field of view. Which is why I guess the games that I mention that look great is because I don't have to rely on long distance enemies. Thank you so much for this experience. Fps will be my 21:9 experience, but third person will be my 32:9. Thank you.
Getting black bars on my 21:9 phone, thats one wide monitor! No need to set FOV anymore, i reckon
What the song at the beginning?
Hi everyone I brought and tried the Samsung Odyssey G9 but the screen was just to big and you had to move your head to see from the left of the screen to the right so I ended up taking it back becuase I game on a desk. Can anyone suggest a monitor thats better for gaming up close but has a high resolution like 4000k but have fast 240hz Refresh Rate?
Odyssey G7 27", the 16:9 brother of this monitor, it's identical to the g9 but cut in half size wise. 27" 2560x1440 240hz.
😍😍😍
g9 doesnt push 4k let alone 8k, but i have 2 of these monitors and ther are amazing. got that new neo and the older g9 as well . love the screen!
someday maybe samsung make an 8k equivalent to the g9 ;)
@@zac2877 G9 Neo 57" will be announced. Not 8K but its resolution is much greater.
@@socialreport2836 wow, thank you for this very informing comment. I looked it up, and now.....i know......what i must do now......my future is now clear.....thank you....for completing.....the destiny.....for my PC....for the Apex of ...the pc master race. Now I can finally ascend into cyberspace once i aquire the fabled G9 Neo 57".
Ok, I have the Odyssey G9. Now I need the rest.
UltraGear 5120x1440P 12 bit depth. 45 inch.
looks very blurry, what gives?
In 3 days I will be using G9 OLED 49" Ryzen 5 7500 F with 32 GB DDR5 6000Mhz RAM and rtx4060ti 8GB. Could bee play Cyberpunk 2077, for example at 50 fps? Or will I be able to play any game at all?
With 8GB VRAM I think your performance at this resolution will be quite poor unfortunately. The VRAM alone severely bottlenecks things like raytracing/path tracing and high texture resolutions/LOD etc. So I expect you will need to use a lot of upscaling for any chance of ray tracing on medium/low (definitely not path tracing) or just RT off completely for better sharpness image. Cyberpunk without ray/pathtracing still looks great. It just doesn't have that realness to it, makes it more stylised.
Yeah. I got a 32:9 5120x1440 and a 3080Ti. Maxxed out and DLSS quality, maybe 70+fps depending on where in the map you are.
BTW, 5120x1440 isn't 8K. It's called DQHD.... dual quad HD. Cos it's basically two 1440p monitors side by side.
Pixel count is still only 88.8% of 4K.
The video was captured at 8k though. While the content isn't native 8k, being able to watch it on CZcams at 8k reduces compression giving us a more accurate representation of the actual clarity.
czcams.com/video/pfXyuLkVxE8/video.html
You have turned off rt with dlss still on right ? The 3090 gets 40 fps with ultra rt and dlss quality at 5120x1440 from the above benchmark video in the link.U are just using dlss without any rt that's why your fps is 70+
@@dhaumyagango1076
RT Ultra, DLSS balanced.
70+... actually about 70 to 72 is the best case scenario in the more open parts of the map like Dam Viewpoint.
In NC, I get mostly mid 60s, dropping to high 50s inside areas like V's apartment building.
Running a 5900X with a 3080Ti. Not sure if the proc makes a diff.
@@rvs55 I have seen benchmarks of 3080 ti getting 50 fps avg with ultra rt and dlss balanced at 4k(3840x2160) while driving through a demanding area at NC. So 5120x1440 is easier to run than 4k because it has less pixels ? I saw a comment in this video that it runs worse than 4k.
@@dhaumyagango1076 That is correct. I run at 5120 x 1440. The pixel count is 88.8% of 4K. It will definitely run at a slightly higher frame rate than 4K.
In busy areas of the city, I get mid 50s. Usually between 56 to 58.
Not sure how and why a 3090 would run at 40fps, as you earlier mentioned. That's just too low. It should get about the same or slightly better performance than the 3080Ti.
How is it at 8k if the resolution only supports 5120x1440?
CZcams doesn't really deal very well with aspect ratios other than 16:9. It expects 1440p videos to be 2560 pixels wide. Because this video is 5120 pixels wide, it exceeds CZcams's expectations for both 1440p and 4k (which is defined as 3840 pixels wide), so it is automatically classified as the next higher resolution, which happens to be 8k.
Technically the video would also fit 5120x2880, but unfortunately CZcams doesn't have a preset for that. In general, anything (even marginally) taller and/or wider than 3840x2160 is classified as 8k.
I have a 32:9 monitor but When I set it to the max resolution it just makes everything look stretched out!? how to I get it to look normal like this?
Make sure the aspect ratio of the game is also set to 32:9. Resolution/Aspect ratio are seperate settings in many games. Sounds like its set to 5120x1440 (or equivalent res) but still at 16:9.
@@BigSoulja that was like the first thing I checked ! thanks though. somehow it ended up working after messing with it forever lol.
How did you do this.. when I set mine to 5120 x 1440 it stays in 2650x1440 with black bars! What settings in nvidia do I need to enable this?
Make sure the correct aspect ratio is set in the cyberpunk video settings
@@BigSoulja I don't see an option for the Aspect ratio, only the resolution!
Its super sampling from 5k to 8k?
It's 5K, I wouldn't call it super sampling. I just rendered the video in 8K so you can see a truer 5K video when CZcams is set to 8K as there's less compression involved.
How did u put it in 32:9, when I put the resolution to 5120x1440 it puts it in like a normal 27 inch aspect ratio? Idk how to put it in the right aspect ration, anyone could help?
Change the resolution and ratio in the video settings, next to graphic settings.
@@BigSoulja ye I found resolution but didn't find a ratio option
i am running a i7 with 32g of ram and a rtx4060ti on a g9. i can only get 40fps for some reason
8GB or 16GB VRAM?
actualy 5120x1440p is 5k, not 8k. 5k is less pixels than 4k, but still harder to run
I know, but recording at 8K means less compression artifacts from CZcams. It seems it still affected the quality though, playing in person it's probably over double the sharpness of this video.
@@BigSoulja Yeah, I can tell regarding sharpness, while using Odyssey G9
Is not 5k
Is 2k
5k is 5120x2880(16:9)
You can 5120 divide 2 then is 2560
@@leonpano thats not how it works
that warping on the sides looks annoying as hell
I've seen some people say "just don't look at the sides" but that kinda defeats the purpose of getting an ultrawide no?
Whats the point of the extra FOV if that FOV is warped and you can't look at it without getting nauseous.
it looks amazing in person, needs to be seen on an actual large ultrawide that curves to the natural curvature of your eyes. it doesnt appear warped when used on an actual ultrawide monitor.
@@BigSoulja
huh. interesting. How does that work tho? If the actual screen capture is warped then that means the digital output was also warped. If that's the case then it'd be logical to assume that adding the curvature of the display to the already warped output would make it look even more warped; not less.
@@DumKump ultrawide monitors are physically huge compared to normal 16:9 or 21:9. 49 inch and above. so the warped areas you are talking about are usually in your peripheral vision, not main center vision. your peripheral vision is naturally less in focus and warped in real life, the monitor takes advantage of this. it is quite similar to how high FOV VR headsets work.
@@BigSoulja
Ah I see, I think I've been misunderstanding the purpose of ultra wide for gaming. Because from what you're describing ultra wide adds nothing detail wise to the gaming experience compared to a 16:9 display. It just gives you a "feeling" of immersion by manipulation your peripheral vision.
I've been comparing ultra wide gaming to ultra wide productivity work and i realize now that's not a good way to compare the two. For productivity ultra wide is basically a larger working area. Bigger canvas.
You can fit two or three monitors worth of stuff in an ultra wide.
But for gaming your actual gameplay area is identical to a 16:9 display, with the remaining sides working not to add more detail to the game but showing your more stuff but to add immersion by manipulating your peripheral vision.
I think I get it now?
This discussion has been quite helpful, thank you
@@DumKump You're welcome - That's pretty much spot on yes, you seem to understand now. That's why watching 32:9 format video on a smaller monitor Infront of you is not indicative of the actual experience at all. As you said, I see everything in full clarity and zero distortion of a 16:9 monitor, a bit more even. But then the peripheral view is also full.
I am free to look side to side of course but for the most part you are looking forward at it like any traditional monitor. And then with normal applications there is of course no distortion whatsoever as this is purely game engine related, so the monitor is great for productivity too.
Never sure why 5120x1440 is stated as 5K... if you multiply Width by eight.. is actually about 1million pixels lower than 4K.... 5120 x 2880 WOULD be 5K
It's the abrevation for the horizontal resolution, NOT the surface resolution. Unfortunatelly marketing makes it even worse. 2k is 2048x1080, while Full HD is not 2k. Also 4k is 4096 × 2160, but TV companies just call their 3840x2160 also 4k. So yes, 5120x1440 is 5k. But thats too little info without telling the aspect ration.
@@Grimhood 3840x2160 is 4K (16:9)
4096x2160 is 4K (17:9)
5120x2880 is 5k (16:9)
5120x1440 is 2k (32:9) but your gpu need to be power enough to push 5K
And 32:9 can cut into 2 16:9 monitor
For this size, the FOV should be about 100, and you have it higher, it seems.
Yes. The fov is on the max possible.
Tried watching this on my 1:1 Screen Blackberry Passport.. it looks funny to my eyes
Sadly I'm only viewing this in 3840x1080 @ 60Hz :(
Don't you get annoyed by the stretched sides in the game? I've been testing my g9 for a couple of weeks and the only thing I hate is the stretching in games
It's kind of like putting the FOV on 120 on a 1080p Screen. IMO, been using the
G9 for a month now, and with the right tweaking in settings you can get rid of some of it. But it's not really a bother after some time.
I've had my Neo G9 for a few days now and hate those stretched images in games. I sit relatively close to the monitor but it still makes the image feel totally just bad. I am still thinking about sending it back.
@@Ripchip93 I already replaced my g9 and decided to go back to a 27inch I just couldn't stand the stretching in games and most games that I played didn't even support 32:9 I had to play on 21:9
Make report to NVIDIA GFE doesn't wanna to make record in 4K or 8K setting!Just in game setting! Your post looks like 1080p and not 4320p
This has been partially fixed now so I will make a reupload soon. You can record at 8k 30fps with this monitor now.
*how much is fps on 5K?*
on the samsung odyssey g9 you can get up to 240hz - fps depends on your graphics card. in the video hes playing at 60fps
@@Gurn33y No more like sub 50fps, that's why he doesn't show the settings.
Nah. I cant do 32:9. Its too thin and feels restricted. 21:9 is the perfect ratio.
Too thin? I don't think you realise how big the Odyssey g9 is to any other 21:9 monitor monitor lol. The height is like any other 27" monitor, but with the width of two of them.
To be honest, some games do feel a bit vertically constrained. Cyberpunk is not one of those. Playing “Deliver Us The Moon” and “…Mars” do because they do a poor job of scaling the content. During cut scenes, most of the time you’re staring at their chests because the heads are cut off. 😅
This is not 60 fps
I have 15 fps in 720p
does my rtx 3080 will work on this game, I have the monitor already
Of course it will! The 3080 is a beast. You might be a bit limited by VRAM though so I would not recommend very high textures etc, but you can experiment.
With this monitor I easily hit anywhere between 15-18gb VRAM usage in busy locations which is already over the 10gb the 3080 has.
@@BigSoulja thank for the tip.... I will try the game
Dislike fro Huge FOV.
Distorted perspective on the sides
Especially with this ratio of parties
Front car czcams.com/video/0BhyUzRSMxY/video.html
On the right hand - czcams.com/video/0BhyUzRSMxY/video.html
sorry aber mein Internet schafft keine 8k😂
der Monitor schafft das Locker, aber das Internet sagt tschüss😂
32:9 is too wide. I think 21:9 is the sweet spot.
Only someone watching this on a non-32:9 monitor would say this. It's an amazing experience, much better than 21:9 and it's very hard to go back to anything else after using it just once.
I have owned all aspect ratio monitors and I can say this with ease. 32:9 is simply beautiful.
@@BigSoulja I wanted to buy a G9, but in real life I've found that is wide enough but too small in height and that's why I think 21: 9 is better, because it's not x1440 but x1600.
@@silock I used to think that, but then I bit the bullet and got one. It doesn't feel small when your sitting just over 2ft away from it at eye level. However, if you don't have it parallel with your eyesight it does feel small, I see a lot of people use them where they look down upon it instead of straight ahead; it truly ruins the experience. It needs to sit up higher.
I thought Cyberpunk had better graphics, it looks like a 10 year old game :-/
This video is over 3 years old. Do you not think a lot has changed since then? It's received countless updates since I made this video, many of them to make the graphics very next gen. I now play it on a 4090 with path tracing etc. but I have not made an updated video (I probably won't). It's arguably the best looking game out right now.
I'll buy that for a dollar