The Runaway Train (Gare de Lyon Rail Disaster) - DISASTER BREAKDOWN
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2022
- If you found this video to be interesting, be sure to subscribe as there is a new video every Saturday. This video also went out to my Patrons on Patreon 48 hours before going out publicly. Consider joining here from £1 per month: / disasterbreakdown
Twitter: / chloe_howiecb
Music/Personal Channel: / @chloehowie
Twitch: / chloe_canariabird
On June 27th, 1988, 21-year-old Parisian Resident Odile Mirrior was making her usual evening commute to pick up her children from school. She boarded a commuter train inbound to Paris Gare de Lyon. One of the largest train stations in France, one of the busiest in Paris. Little did she know that this trip would leave a massive impact on French Rail Travel. Boarding this train in the second carriage she was expected to travel to Vert de Maisons Station, just a few stops from Gare de Lyon. The actions of Odile would become a pivotal point but still one of numerous in a disaster that would claim the lives of 56 people.
The Gare de Lyon Rail Disaster turned what was a normal Monday evening into pure devastation. How did this happen? Just what was going on, onboard that train?
Sources:
lesherosordinaires.tumblr.com...
www.washingtonpost.com/archiv...
content.time.com/time/subscri...
web.archive.org/web/201001040...
/ brakeless-into-the-bas...
• Well There's Your Prob...
If you found this video to be interesting, be sure to subscribe as there is a new video every Saturday. This video also went out to my Patrons on Patreon 48 hours before going out publicly. Consider joining here from £1 per month: www.patreon.com/DisasterBreakdown
I had stumbled upon your channel, as would often scoop for air crash or aircraft incident videos.
And now that we see the range of videos, the production quantity and the measured narration of your 🤍💙videos👌🏽.. it only makes us want more.
Thank you so much for your elaborate work.
And thank you to the Patreon subscribers too.
I too hope to chip in, but in my country the restrictions would only mandate a limited direct transfer to recipient's (your) bank account only.
I hope to be able to do something sooner though.
Thanks again.
While most here are deciding, judging, cussing and name-calling Odile Mirrior (the passenger who pulled the emergency brakes).
I, with my tiny little brain, am wondering as to how us South Asians/ Asians get unwarranted ridicule over our customs or cultures.
.
But here, in an allegedly "western" country, it was okay for teenagers to regularly get pregnant.
That too possibly underage teenagers at that.
.
For her kids to be school going (even if pre-school) and her being about 21 years of age.
Her kid or (multiple) kids obviously were born when she was a teenager.
.
For someone who herself was a kid, barely forced into adulthood (with her planned or unplanned pregnancy)...
... the people commenting here seem to be overly judgemental, I think.
The imbecilic morons calling her Karen, selfish and what not.. have themselves possibly erased their own conscience... and thus cannot see all the wrongs that they have done in their own lives.
.
And while I am in no way
validating what Odile Mirrior (the 21 year young kid/ passenger) did.
I can easily step into that person's shoes and reflect on my own life choices... prior to foul mouthing others.
.
That the company (despite being a PSU/ Public Sector Undertaking) could disown liability.. kind of goes to show how broken our legal systems are... when we need them most.
#gut #wrenching
Loved it 4:27 breaking mechanics was funny as it had 2 meanings brakes and breaking 🤣
@@sailaab ⁷⅝o⁹
Paris'Metropolitan is not operated by SNCF.
Tanguy was a hero. He could have left and saved himself, but he chose to stay and save others. That's absolutely amazing.
Good to see that he had a memorial built for him. But he should have got a Legion D'Honour for his act of true heroism.
No greater love.
I'm pretty sure he could have done both. Give two immediately evacuate orders over intercom fast and run like a wind. This could have saved his life well as passengers.
@@cccenturion4480 I saw a documentary on this accident long ago, I was positively sure that Andre Tanguy received the Légion d'Honneur for his actions, but now I cant find any evidence for this anymore
It happens a lot and everywhere, very dangerous profession.
It's very admirable that the person that pressed the emergency stop came forward, even if they do need a lesson in what an emergency is.
She was a young woman trying to pick up her children, who, presumably, were also very young-and the train was unexpectedly bypassing her stop. In her mind, that WAS an emergency, I would imagine.
The actual problem - was this:
The train crew, after resetting the ONE valve, didn't check all valves in that area, nor did they "perform" a required BRAKE CHECK, that most (I won't say all, as some railway employees never remember - and some others simply don't think) - should remember to do - after EVERY emergency application.
If the crew had performed an engine to end of train brake check - that incorrectly operated valve, would have been found & correctly fixed, meaning that t was the crew, in a HURRY that forgot to correctly check all brakes after flipping one valve off (and inadvertently closing another).
The passenger who activated the emergency lever, NEVER interfered with the other control, which the engineer or his guard "operated".
@@QUIX4U We know she is not the real resposible for the accident but... But she is the PIVOTAL POINT and remembering she is, that means “this disaster would not have happened if I did not do that”. Not blaming her... Just saying that it's a really heavy burden already.
Yeh, she shouldn't have pulled the chord. But she couldn't have reasonably forseen the consequences in this case.
I would say she should have been fined the penalty for pulling the chord in a non-emergency situation but that's ad far as any action should have been taken against her.
The driver amd guard on that service should have had the relevant training to know how to reset an emergency brake application and to realise something was wrong when the brakes were still applied after the reset.
Its WAS an emergency in her case since she was still getting used to the new timetable and didn't realize the train wouldn't stop there. You actually we all would've done the same thing if we were in her shoes.
There is no mention here of a crucial fact: the valve that caused all the problem was an obsolete model whose operation was contrary to standards, thus contributing to the problem: when positioned the standard way for open or close, it worked the opposite way.
Thank you for an important bit of information!!!🙏😢🚅
@@mauricedavis2160 You are welcome. I got it from an approximately one-hour long episode of a French series (could its name be Code Rouge? Code Red?) on catastrophes. It was very detailed.
@@wafikiri_ thank you!!!🙏👍
Everything is obsolete after they invented a new one.
@@mauricedavis2160 Although it made no difference, the details about the brake were back to front.
On railway braking, air is used to RELEASE the brake, rather than apply it. As well as not allowing the train to run away when it is shut down on the sidings and the compressors have no electricity supply, the same is true if the power is cut while the train is in motion, otherwise the train would have no way of stopping. The train would also have no brakes in event of a fracture in the pipework or a compressor failure.
What they did on the carriages was lock the air INTO the callipers, something that should only be done on one carriage in event of a fault, followed by careful driving. Or to get the train at crawling speed off the main line if more than one carriage is involved.
These valves are normally only used by engineers during brake maintenance and testing.
What happened on this occasion, showed that the driver did not understand the system.
However, after having problems, any right minded driver would have tested the braking ability of his train, rather than drive off at high speed.
Even a learner car driver after having problems with his brakes, would probably not fly off down the road at 60mph towards a downhill slope.
We should expect better from a professional train driver.
PS. Needless to say I am an engineer. 😊
It should be a no brainer but if you're on a train and miss your stop, or the train doesn't stop for any reason, just get off at the next station and go back on your self. I've done it a few times, it's a pain in the backside but don't do something stupid like pull the emergency alarm if it's not an emergency. If you're on your way to pick your children up from school, I'm sure being a few minutes late isn't going to get you in trouble.
She's probably the same kind of person who cuts people off to get onto a freeway exit instead of just taking the next one
And who opened the doors to let her off?
@@Avgeek1564 There's usually an emergency lever or button that opens the doors so passengers can exit the train during emergencies. Normally found above the doors, all she had to do was use that.
Once uppon a time, when I was travelling by a train as a teenager, I wasn’t able to open the train door on my station and the train left before I was able to leave. The next station was hour and a half away, I had 3% battery in my phone and I had no money- I was absolutely scared! What I did was go to a conductor and told her about the situation, and although she didn’t have to she managed to ask the train drivers to stop and contacted another train that was going the opposite way to pick me up and take me home. She saved hours of my time but she didn’t have to, and if she didn’t I would just go with the train to the next station. I was taught that emergency brakes should be used only if someone is cought between the doors on the outside. I would have never thought to hit emergency brakes for anything other then lifesaving situation. My comfort, even as a scared teenager, wasn’t a lifesaving situation.
Are stops not too far apart then? I don't use trains so I've always assumed there's at least a 10-15 minute wait for the next stop
Andre Tanguy reminds me of Casey Jones, the train engineer who sacrificed his life jamming the brakes on his locomotive when his train was on a collision course with a coal train spilling out a siding.
The driver who chose to give his life for others is a true hero, as brave as a man can be. Great story!
Emergency stop buttons are for emergencies 🤯 missing your stop does not qualify
Yes, it was silly of her to pull the emergency brake, and she should have been fined for improper use, but I think it's very harsh to blame the accident on her, there's no way she could have anticipated it to cause such a disaster, which was ultimately the fault of the driver not resetting the brakes properly
the driver of the outbound train was a great man, he deserves to be remembered
Imagine pulling the emergency lever because the train did not stop lol
Happened a few days ago in Italy, a man was sleeping and missed his station, pulled the emergency brake.
There are a lot more egotistical assholes than you'd think...
Woman moment
Here you will get a juicy fine for doing that without an emergency.
@@38911bytefreeHe did get a fine thankfully. Train was canceled due to the extended delay
Just in case you (or anyone else) is interested, typically EMUs have multiple forms of brakes. There are no engine cars as such; motive power is distributed throughout the train, between what’s called motor cars, and trailer cars are just that. The driving car may or may not also be a motor car, the two are not mutually exclusive. In normal service, the same motors that are used to provide propulsion, are used for probably 90% of braking demand.
The motors basically turn into generators, much the same way as your car’s alternator works, and they feed generated power back into the grid (or into giant resistors but this is less common). This is called dynamic braking. On a normal application, and up until full service braking, the motors are used to decelerate from speed, down to about 5 or 10km/h, at which point the pneumatic air brakes take over to bring the train to a complete stop. You can’t use dynamic brakes to completely stop the train-there’s a point in which the motors stop being effective for this. So, it’s motors for 90% or so, and pneumatics for the remaining 10%. This is called bended dynamic braking, and it is what is used for anything but emergencies.
In emergencies, the dynamic brakes may or may not apply, but with what I’ve seen, it’s usually that they don’t apply. When you shift from full service into emergency, in the trains where I’m from, the dynamic brakes are disabled, and the air is completely and entirely dumped out of the pneumatic system, thus jamming the pneumatic brakes on as hard as they will go.
Westinghouse brakes, which all trains use, are very clever. Unlike other applications, trains are more-or-less unique in that it takes air pressure to *release* brakes, not apply them. So, if you have a situation like this, all the driver needs to do, is pull a handle. Same thing for passengers. The emergency stop buttons are tied into the same system. When triggered, all of the stored air pressure in the onboard tanks is immediately vented to atmosphere. It’s extremely loud and you are absolutely gonna know when this system has been tripped. I would imagine that the train’s air compressors are also inhibited as well, so that they cannot switch on in reaction to losing air pressure, and try to pump into a vented system and providing even the remotest risk of allowing air pressure to build.
TL;DR train brakes work opposite to how you’d expect them to. Air pressure is required to *release* brakes. When air pressure is lost for whatever reason (blown hose, dump valve opened, whatever), then the brakes apply, and will not disengage until the system is allowed to build sufficient air pressure again.
P.S. Whilst all motor cars I’ve ever seen have pneumatic brakes, not all trailer cars do. Some may, some may not. They may also have park brakes, but this is a different thing again. Also, not all pneumatic brakes have shoes that contact the part of the wheel that contacts the rails. Some have separate brake discs. Bombardier TRAXX propulsion systems are known for having these separate brake discs. This actually caused a derailment in my city because the wheels got contaminated whilst arriving at the last station on the line, which subsequently sent the train straight through the buffers and into the toilet block said buffers were protecting. Had anyone been inside (as someone was two minutes earlier), they would’ve been killed. No serious injuries though, either on the train or off. These trains now have sand dispensers.
I hope this helps, and isn’t too egotistical of me to share or anything. I love your videos, and I’m a member of one or two of the same communities you are, Chloe, and I really appreciate the work that you do. But I’m just sharing this so that other folks can also follow along. Cheers!
And jeez that turned into an essay. Well, I hope it was useful and/or interesting regardless.
Possibly one of the best comments I have ever read. Thank you for taking the time to explain these things to us!
If an emergency brake is tripped, (especially by a passenger) - it is absolutely abnormal for a crew to simply disconnect the rest of the train from the lead/driven unit (even if accidentally).
PLUS, most if not all "crews" MUST PERFORM an immediate brake check - of all rolling stock - on their train - BEFORE they proceed.
That crew didn't GO THROUGH THE CORRECT PROCEDURE of making sure the brake systems were working correctly, before proceeding, and in their hurry to "make up time" totally overlooked the importance of a "slow rolling" BRAKE TEST, before proceeding at track speed. thus their sheer (arrogant) negligence caused the accident
It was NOT the actions of a single passenger operating the in-car emergency, but the inactions of the crew WHO ARE MANDATED BY RAILWAY RULES to ensure that they had ALL BRAKES WORKING, before proceeding.
The passenger was long gone - thus had NO responsibility at all.
As far as she was concerned - the train was stationary "when she disembarked".
It was the responsibility of the DRIVER & GAURD to ensure the safety of the train AND THE CORRECT FUNCTIONING OF ALL OF IT'S BRAKES, before they proceeded without doing a full brake check.
Fantastic explanation for the layman. Many thanks.
Whats a possible scenario for taking the emergency brake as a passenger? I cant image it rn….
"When triggered, all of the stored air pressure in the onboard tanks is immediately vented to atmosphere."
No, thats not how the Westinghouse automatic air brake works. Releasing all compressed air from the tanks means you disable the brakes.
Train brakes use compressed air to brake, its only the air in the brake line that is released, not the whole system.
When the pressure in the brake line is lowered, a valve between the tank and the brake cylinder opens, apply pressure on the brake, if the pressure in the brake line rises, the valve to the tank closes and release the air from the brake cylinder, the brakes release and the tank gets refilled, on the old Westinghouse brake via the brake line, on modern systems via the main air line.
What the train driver did was, closing accidentally the main air line and then releasing the air from all tanks to release the brakes, makeing them useless.
Road vehicles with air brakes have a spring loaded air tank, if the tank is empty, the spring closes the brakes mechanical, train usually dont have that, so they can moved without a locomotiv.
As a french I want to thank you for covering this disaster. RIP to all that lost their lives this day.
another case of a few minor things adding up and cascading into a genuine nightmare of a situation. great video, as always!
Thanks so much for watching!
Yep the Swiss cheese effect is usually the reason for these accidents. There’s usually more than 1 item contributing to an accident.
Disabling a safety feature on the brakes shouldnt have happened, it was in fact the only clue. IF the train wont move ... it wont move. It could be a false alarm ... but could be also a clue that something is seriously wrong. Just leave it alone and call for support. Better late than sorry. Trains are very rigurous at schedules .... but safety is first
@@ianpatgriffin Mentour's pilot favorite description
Sounds to me like there were a lot of systems that all went wrong at just the wrong times
EDIT: Okay so the driver got 6 months of a 4 year sentence or manslaughter? Knowing how much power French prosecutors have, I'm honestly shocked it wasn't more but I do agree with the union that in this case the driver was at least partially scapegoated.
yeah if anything the woman who stopped it suddenly should have gotten more
@@GiordanDiodato totally agree.
@@lv7603 Yeah no doubt and when the drivers of both trains knew they were in trouble salvaged anything they could do to save their customers from their lives taken away
@@GiordanDiodato Indeed. Missing your stop is NOT considered to be an emergency situation. Especially on a commuter service where the next stop is a few minutes away and there are many regular trains that could have gotten her back to her original destination in a fairly short time.
As an afterthought, it was her own action that she misread the new timetable.
@@GiordanDiodato While it was stupid of her to pull the emergency brake she wouldn't have known the consequences of her actions.
This channel deserves more recognition. It’s not made up with computer speech. Also the level of information is above expectations, with the cases being thoroughly combed and documented with facts and timeline. Thank you for your work 👍
Insomnia pays off for once lol. I enjoyed this as much as I do your airplane investigations, excellent job as always. It's always sad when panic hits and mucks things up.
Unfortunately, chaos brings out the best and worse in humans!!!🙏😢
André is an absolute hero. The very definition of one. He should be in the dictionary.
I was on holiday and came in on a train from Munich shortly after this happened. They were still cutting bodies out of the carnage. I'll never forget it.
Sad to see the individuals involved being loaded with all the legal blame for this tragedy, when it seems pretty clear that it was primarily SNCF's systems design, training programmes, and practice of skipping stops to make up lost time that were the key failure points...? I guess the government must've tried to avoid admitting any culpability on their part, for fear of losing consumer confidence in the network 😒
The item that really made me wince was the points being frozen in current position when the emergency alarm was activated? 😣 Basically guaranteeing that if you needed to redirect a runaway or shift a target train, you simply couldn't... Hopefully that was one of the lessons learnt.
Major kudos to André the driver of the stationary train, making the terrible choice to sacrifice his own safety to save so many others 🙏
The French having these sorts of failures in design at a time when Algerian terrorism was at a all time high, I shudder to think of the terrorists running about with that info
For the next train disaster, I'd recommend the Hinton Train Collision.
While the route itself is unavailable, the locomotives and cars are (CN SD40-2 and GP38-2, plus VIA FP9A (substitute an F9 in here)).
I'd recommend Kicking Horse Pass as it's the closest to the actual area.
As railway staff (in a different country) we still feel the echoes of this crash.
Our training includes specific communications tests including using the cab radios to make an emergency call. We cover
- what language we need to use (and what phrases to avoid as they might be confusing)
- how to indentify yourself and your train
We use the phonetic alphabet and read out numbers individually to avoid any misunderstandings.
We also ask for messages to be repeated back to us by the controller or signaller we are calling (and vice versa) so that we can be sure we have reached a clear understanding.
In the course of their 'traction' training - drivers and guards are also taught all the ways to stop their train in an emergency and how to let others know their train is in distress.
Drivers and guards are tested 3 times in their first year on the job (once to qualify, again after 6 months and a 3rd time after a year qualified). Thereafter all drivers and guards are tested every two years to maintain their competency.
I remember those old metallic trains from my childhood.
Went back to france after years, and YES our train system is a source of national pride
Great video nice to see yoi diversify
It WAS a source of national pride. Now... well...
the passenger who pulled the emergency brake… genuinely shocking. this really demonstrates the good and bad in people; the selfishness of the passenger and the courage and altruism of the parked train driver.
B/S - It is well known - world wide - that most children at some time or another have "operated" an emergency brake - yet in this instance where a fare paying passenger "thought" that their ticket gave them the right "to disembark at that station" - and that they observed that the driver had failed to slow down, was well within their right, to operate that emergency (in car) lever.
Nearly every railcar trip that I have been on, someone has "pulled" an emergency lever - it is standard practice - for panicked passengers who believe that their drop off station - has been over run.
LACK OF MAINTENANCE for the operation of the reset valves - is NOT the responsibility of passengers, nor is it the responsibility of a fair paying passenger - TO THAT LOCATION, after they leave - to go back and tell the useless train crew - to perform ALL tests on an emergency brake action.
It was purely that of a crew in haste (to make up time at excessive speeds) - who overlooked even the basic of "tests" that should have been performed - after all - they never asked the passenger why that was actioned - thus had zero idea as to what had happened..
BUT they never performed a pre-release brake check - nor a working brake check either.
In fact - NO STOP/GO & STOP AGAIN "brake check" was ever performed before they left that station, until it was far too late to find they had zero brakes at the disaster area.
How the train came to be stopped by the emergency brake is unimportant. It could just as easily been a genuine emergency. It is what happened following that matters.
@@geoffreypiltz271 and what if a train was coming on the next line and the passengers evacuating got hit? would that not be relevant either?
@@omiethamsia9009 Now you're just making things up. What if the passenger has stopped the train and saved it from a crash?
@@geoffreypiltz271 and how would that happen
Great video. Just for info, the system that saw the points stay set for the route into the occupied platform was actually worse than that, it actually was set for an open platform but the emergency system reverted them to normal automatically. And post disaster the emergency stop was changed into the “passcom” system you see now, leaving it down to the driver where and how to come to a stop
It's nice to hear some bts stuff that someone like me would have no idea of, like matching the simulations to the exact models of plane/train. It wouldn't have even occurred to me that that was something you had to think about. But you did, and it just goes to show that your meticulous attention to detail goes much further than the average layman can even dream about. No matter how much they appreciate the simulations that really give us visual cues to understand the engineering terminology etc
Another great video DB! Glad to hear you're feeling better
Paris to Melun route wasn't part the RER D in 1988, it became part of the RER where a tunnel was built between Chatelet-Les-Halles and Gare de Lyon in 1995 thus linking the northern suburban service from Gare du Nord to the southeastern suburban services from Gare de Lyon.
You are right
This video popped up on my feed and was hopeful! i enjoyed it thoroughly and was delighted to check out your other videos to find so many! I love disaster analysis and I'm happy to find more good content!
Wow, I have been waiting for this video for a long time, and you delivered spectacularly, as always. Thanks!
I drove trains for NYC subway for 6 and a half years before becoming a supervisor. This entire breakdown of what happened is very well done. Explains exactly what we experience as train drivers, and definitely highlights what you should NOT do in this situation. Thank you for this video.
Chloe's content is becoming more grounded, I see.
yeah, very much in a rush
@Benji P what so funny? That’s her name
@@orannotoren1 Who's the narrator then?
@@N.I.R.A.T.I.A.S. ..chloe is the narrator lmao
@@orannotoren1 Okay I am 100% missing something then because that voice sounds male to me.
Thank you Breakdown Disaster! That was a awesome video. Really liked hearing about this train accident. Never knew about this one. Got to watch it again.
Glad you're feeling better! No worries on the train type. Still a fantastic video!
Thanks!
Another great job! I’m enjoying the ‘extra’ uploads with disasters other than airplanes. Don’t get me wrong, your air videos are my favs, but these are really cool too!
👍👍
I much prefer the aviation ones
I've watched the Seconds from Disaster episode on this and this video is just as informative as the I watched. Well Posted 👏🏻👏🏻
I love your aircraft videos, but I do appreciate the variety of subjects, like this video. Thank-you for this.
I feel a little ashamed of myself. For the first time since I have been watching CZcams videos - I’ve even put a few up myself, I feel awful that I would like to support your well researched and interesting videos. The problem is that I am 70 and living on a pension. Anyway, I feelI shall see what I can do. Hope you are fully recovered and look forward to further posts.
From somebody who is young, dumb, and broke, dont be so hard on yourself! You deserve to have your pension, you earned it, and sadly those things are quite often not enough for folks. Don't worry, folks like me will gladly take up the reins for you to support the channel.
I love your "train videos". Great video. Keep up the amazing work.
For all those confused about the brake system, train air brakes actually work differently to truck air brakes, in that a truck will not be able to move if all air is released from the auxiliary tanks as it relies on springs to apply braking force (the air is used to counteract the spring and release the brakes).
In the case of a train, while it is a "failsafe" system, it does rely on the auxiliary tanks to be pressurised, as that pressure is needed to apply the braking force (a drop in pressure in the control line will operate a valve that sends air from the auxiliary tank to the brake cylinder, applying the brakes. High pressure in the control line will operate the valve to purge the air out of the brake cylinder and release the brakes, while replenishing the auxiliary tank). That means that if the air feed to the auxiliary tanks is closed by closing the control line valve, and the tanks are purged, the brakes will not be applied and will not be able to be applied.
The emergency brakes are applied by opening a valve that empties the air out of the control line. Which is the valve that needed to be reset in the case of this accident.
There is a pretty good article about how those work:
wikimili.com/en/Railway_air_brake
All that also explains why a parked truck with empty air tanks will not be rolling down a hill unless you start the engine to build up air pressure. While parked railway cars with empty tanks can be pushed around in shunting stations without needing to connect air hoses. And why those cars also have manually operated brakes, usually a big steering wheel kind of device that allows to apply parking brakes.
I love how technical you present the facts. I am grateful for you. Thank you.
Interestingly, the unit you used in your simulation is a Siemens Class 350 Desiro, as used on services out of Euston by London Northwestern. Until I retired three years ago I drove these units. The passenger emergency system on these units and all modern units in the UK works in a completely different way now. When the pass-comm is activated, it sets off an alarm in the cab. The driver then has five seconds to kick a button under the driving desk to acknowledge the alarm and de-activate the emergency brake. If the button is not kicked, the brakes come on. The driver then has the ability to talk to the person who has pulled the handle via the internal comms system, thus ascertaining what the emergency is and the best way to deal with it. In order to reset an alarm, either the driver or the guard needs to reset the alarm handle that was activated with a special key. This is something I have had to do many times during my driving career, yet I only ever had two genuine emergencies on trains that required me to take urgent action.
Excellent summary of this incident, very detailed and thorough.
I think this one stands out because it feels a lot more like an aviation disaster than a railway one. A lot of train crashes can be blamed on a single decisive factor: A signal failure, mechanical issue, driver error or an intrusion on the track. Having a cavalcade of mounting human and mechanical factors feels a lot more like it's describing a plane crash rather than a train one.
that isn't true, almost all failures are a cascade of factors and not one single event. A catalyst, maybe, but almost always are the causes multiple that contribute.
Loving the train disaster breakdowns. Keep it up.
Air powered brakes normally don't work like that. They open if pressure is supplied and close when there is no pressure. It's a simple fail-safe system. If there is a leak, breaks will close and the vehicle stops. It's the same with trucks. What were they thinking, designing it like that?
They didn't design it like that. The guy publishing the video got confused. What you said is the correct way it works. The drivers didn't just shut off the brakes but isolated the brake pipe circuit, negating any control of the rest of the train's brakes from the cabin.
@@yp2bcn AND they manually released the isolated brakes
The major failure...for me... was the driver not checking that he had, indeed restored the brakes (at a walking pace) before blindly roaring off down an inline..... That...is just so baffling.
As others have noted, even learner drivers check their ability to brake under control:
This guy and his guard just seemed clueless as to what what the correct procedure was after an "Emergency Stop".
But top of the list, just has to be:
"Do a rolling stop at low speed to ascertain that normal braking has been restored. AND YOU HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OF THE TRAIN:"
(And, No...that is not the fault of the woman who initiated the Emergency Stop.)
@@patagualianmostly7437AND he forgot that the train had dynamic brakes as well dont forget
I've only just came across your channel and I really enjoy the content and just subscribed
Great video! Glad you are feeling better!
Great disaster breakdown. I love your stuff, and Geordies in general. 👍
This is such an excellent video and I find myself coming back to it every now and then. It reminds me of the Gothenburg tram crash of 1992, where a traffic controller disengaged the brakes of a tram stuck without power, so that it could be moved - it ended up careening down a massive slope and crashing into a crowded tram stop, killing 13 people. It might be worth a video on this channel!
Very devastating that pulling an emergency brake caused this disaster. My goodness. If only the lesson of don't pull the emergency brake over a missed stop was learned the easy way instead of the hard way. Well done, Chloe. I'd be very interested to see a video on the 1989 Southern California Runaway Train incident.
don’t forget the emergency brake could have been used for a valid reason. so the cause wasn’t the emergency brake, but the actions done to the train brakes afterwards
Never put a vehicle in motion unless you know that you can stop it. I wasn't yet a teenager when I was taught to test brakes on a tractor before building up any speed. The train driver wasn't concerned with brakes; he was primarily concerned with meeting his time schedule.
Glad you’re feeling better, Chloe! Your content is truly top notch and I look forward to your uploads every week!
Brilliant video as always disaster breakdown. It feels strange to see a 350 that runs near me supposedly running to Paris though 🤣
Thanks for the video. Keep up the good work!
I saw a documentary about this one before, but im still happy you covered it
Great train video keep up the amazing work my favorite CZcams channel 👍🏽
Thank you very much!
Just wanted to say im a huuuge fan of your work 💜 and i love your voice 💜
2:57 I always do the same in my documents. Like selecting something that comes close or pick something at random. Great Video btw!
Im watching this on my holidays and im so hammered im seeing double to an extent.
Brilliant documentaries, that are informative,educational, how we can travel forewarned...and very humane, without being over criticle of human error, but highlighting mechanicle frailties, many of which ARE avoidable. We are happy you are
better too!
Terrific video! Are you also considering making video of ship/maritime disasters? Would be interesting to see:-) You are making some of the best flight/vehicle disaster videos out there 👌
The gare de lyon train disaster was tragic, thank goodness that locomotive engineer warned his passengers. I have a video suggestion, can you do the 1988 sorø train derailment or the 2019 great belt bridge rail accident both in Denmark
your vids are fun to watch and the fact we're both from same city makes them better
Yes. What could be more fun than watching a video about a crash where 56 people died?
@@SCLOUD3112 I did not mean it in that sense I meant in the way of they are somewhat entertaining outside of that really happened
You would think he would have done what you would do in a car after having any issue with your breaks, test them a bit before going max speed! Andre Tanguy was a hero
Brakes
Excellent as always, and the music choices compliment it incredibly~
Speedy recovery, Chloe!
they are better I think
SNCF runs "all trains in France" *except* - from 1:11 to 1:18, that's not a SNCF train, it's a Paris Metro train run by RATP and it's running on the right. Looks like Ligne 6, Sevres-Lecourbe station.
The RER is operated partly by SNCF and partly by RATP; RER trains run on the left, like the SNCF.
First non-aviation disaster breakdown I’ve watched. More diligent and excellent content, thank you. I’m forever worried and angry about members of the public, like the female passenger in this case, who put their own convenience before the greater good. Often that greater good is the routine and efficient service for others. But when that is broken, chain reactions can commence… How tragic.
Merci beaucoup pour le video! Thank you for this video. I was at that station, just 2 weeks before the disaster.
I was also caught up in the famous tube fire in London 5 months later. Ironic as by trade I learnt how to fix diesel locomotives at "Westrail" the former Western Australian Government Railways!
This was very interesting !
Do you plan on doing Gare Montparnasse disaster ? It is well known in itself, but not the detail.
There is even a of it representation in Parc Astérix.
Thank you for your videos, they are always very interesting
Thank you for your content
I like that you basically do TLDR videos of Well there's your Problem.
Glad you are feeling better 😊
I know a lot about this train accident thanks to a documentary. The driver wasn't at fault. He just panicked under pressure. Good job on this video. Perfect as always. Will you do the Paddington rail disaster? I know a lot about it as well thanks to a documentary
I mean he didn't call for maintenance that's not panicking that's an error bro.
@@Matt_matt1 I see that because the accident was caused by driver error. See the seconds from disaster documentary on this accident
If your work includes the safety of others, you need to be able to handle yourself in tense situations. Sure the error wasn’t only his fault, but he is one of the people at fault.
Remember, it all started when a woman stupidly pulled the emergency brake when she missed her stop.
The French seem to have a habit of doing that, panicking under pressure. It takes down planes and now trains too I see.
Love your videos! So informative and respectful. Happy to see you are branching to other transportation disasters.
I'm not.
I can hear the Parisians curse at the use of British Train Sim assests.
I appreciate that you noted that you are using a stand-in because the model that was involved in the incident is not in TS.
Can we get more train disaster breakdowns on the channel? I would love to see more of these!
A suggestion is can you cover Amagasaki derailment sometime please?
I was doing my commute everyday on the Paris/Melun line for a whole year circa 2011/2012. I saw that memorial everyday, like most commuters. In fact those stations (ticket halls, tunnels, etc) have not changed that much since the 80s, if you look a national archive videos about it. Those things were built to last. even the seats and signage have been there for decades.
By that time, they didnt use the "silver trains" as I called them for the Paris-Melun line, and replaced them for more recent models. But they were still in use for shorter distances. They connected stations around the city (villages and small towns) to the Melun station (where you could then take a train to Paris)
Anyway in France the SNCF is NOTORIOUS for their bullshit delays and zero accountability for it.
Hello, i to take the Paris/Melun line every day since last year and, it is still somewhat of a mess, tho, more and more train are geting replace or restore and the bigest delay were strike related (im not against, just saying) it is geting better . Also i heard of the incident for a family who i was next to in the way to full train, fun moment .
You couldn't done any better well done loved it
Tanguy was like the Casey Jones of France he had the opportunity to saves his own life but a real engineer always puts his passengers first
Nice Video
I have a few suggestions for the next video the Warngau Train Crash 1975, the Rüsselsheim Train Crash 1990, the Brühl Derailment 2000 and the Bad Alblingen
collision 2016 they are all interesting
I'm quite uneasy about the amount of people criticising the lady who pulled the E-brake, it was a self centred thing to do granted but she didn't spend 20 minutes walking the train manually bleeding the brakes afterwards. She deserved a fine for improper use of the E-brake but does not have responsibility for the cavalcade of incompetence that followed leading to disaster.
I'm 100% with you on this. What she did was wrong by pulling the emergency brake, but manslaughter? Jfc talk about railroading someone to escape culpability.
The kind of people who blame her totally are more selfish than her I'm ready to bet. She was a 21 years old mother I think she was already stressed in her life, she made a selfish mistake because in her mind it was like an emergency for her, but as said she is the PIVOTAL POINT, it means that the catastrophy coming after was still not supposed to happen and it mainly happened because of errors of the conductor, poorly designed system of stupid train network security program.
In theory you could say the moment the SNCF took delivery of the first of these EMU's in 1965 was the pivotal point as they had the flaw that meant the brake isolation cock was easy to set to isolate. To not think 'check the brake isolation cock' as a train driver before 'the system has air locked and I must manually purge the brakes on the whole train' to me is both cavalier on the part of the train crew and is also the absolute pivotal moment as once this is done and the train pulled away an accident of some sort is inevitable. There were options up to that point.
@@inglewoodea3149 lots of people are stressed and are a mum, doesn't give them the excuse to pull an emergency brake when no emergency has been established.
@@takers786 a justification doesn't mean an excuse. Are you gonna be an idiot and tell me she's responsible for the deaths?
I think the 1987 Chase, Maryland collision would be an interesting video
Great video
I had stumbled upon your channel, as would often scoop for air crash or aircraft incident videos.
And now that we see the range of videos, the production quantity and the measured narration of your 🤍💙videos👌🏽.. it only makes us want more.
Thank you so much for your elaborate work.
And thank you to the Patreon subscribers too.
I too hope to chip in, but in my country the restrictions would only mandate a limited direct transfer to recipient's (your) bank account only.
I hope to be able to do something sooner though.
Thanks again.
I wonder if you will do a video on freight train related crash?, like the murdock illinois train derailment or the 3 cajon pass wrecks in 1989, 1994 and 1996.
I'm French and didn't even know about that! Very interesting indeed! Your accent is cute on the French stations 🙂
If only they had not told him NOT to stop at Maisons Alfort, he would have realised he had little braking power. What a sad sequence of failings and coincidences.
That's an English one I think in London Midland livery which is now called London North Western.Intoduced by the late Central Trains also used by Silverlink.
Ok tbh when you posted having trouble with TS i thought you did eschede but this really great too
Please do the Mont Blanc tunnel fire. Keep up the great work
Can recomend a similar channel to this that recently covered the Mont Blanc disaster, Fascinating horror.
this video is just great 👍
What a gross lack of training. The carelessness is disgusting.
Ouch who would have thought that the emergency would have such an effect.
we're soo happy you're well again ... btw, what did you have for lunch today ?
Wow; never heard of this. Terribly sad and so needless.
Some of these trains still serves in regional commuter services in other areas of France 🇫🇷 as SNCF often shift their de-classified trains of ‘Ile de France’ to different « poor » regions .
From my experience, not being able to release the brakes with air would be a reason to not bleed off the applied brakes. If you can't pump off the brakes, you've got no air going to the cars. No air would also mean no brakes.
That's the mystery for me:
Why did the driver not do a low speed test of the brakes after he and his guard had manually released the brakes?
i.e. an empty train or carriages needing shunting in a yard....
They went beyond their remit to make the train move...then failed to test if indeed they had any brakes restored at all!
Have you ever thought about making the Big Bayou Wreck?
I remember seeing this on Seconds to Disaster