She admitted getting paid $50 for every lawsuit filed. Ironically, the group starting all these lawsuits, does not have a disabled parking spot, and the building is not accessible.
@@bobberguy1 That is not always the case, business spaces are handled differently than housing. There are remodling clauses to the scope of the business ect. and alot of upkeep is transfered to the tenant. Our shop is responsile for the upkeep of our parking lot, curbside, and windows and such. Also any signage required for statute copliance is also our responsibility.
@Philip Kirschner - No, she’s a crook playing off of her disability to engage in what amounts to extortion against businesses. Try following the actual story, not just the pictures.
@@bradcrosier1332 In Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, you almost always have to pay legal fees if you lose, and its designed to explicitly stop this (and also so that a person who suffers gets all their compensation not just whatever's left over), provided its reasonable and not a "small claim". She'd also have to answer for Perverting the Course of Justice in Criminal Courts and (which also exists in the States) Malicious Prosecution.
@Philip Kirschner No she’s not, she answered an ad in the paper or online to be the disabled person on their payroll so these lawyers could scam businesses out of money. It’s cheaper for the mom and pop companies to settle out of court for $10 or 15K than to go to trial and that’s what they count on. That crook in the wheel chain wasn’t discriminated against in any shape, form, or fashion.
@Philip Kirschner So you didn't bother to watch the item or you are to dumb to understand.... She was part of a group of scammers who attempted to scam busines owners out of money. Calling her a victim is as dishonest as their lawsuits that were designed to extort people.
Then how about all the frivolous cases treasonous Trump and his treason supporting Republicans filing all those frivolous law suite over them loosing the elections, kn owing they lost and trying to get Republican governors to reject the elections and appoint treasonous, criminal Trump as president, with the support of the Republicans in the congress encouraging and supporting the attempt coup to overthrow the US government with encouragement of the treason supporting fascist propagandist and got away with it! Trump and his treasonous minions should all be hung so we can start the heel and start to make America great again! If the fascist really were looking for voter fraud, they would have been looking where treasonous, criminal Republican Trump and his treasonous Republican minions won!
@@nightlightabcd you just advocated for roughly 50% of the American population to be hung... Think about what you're saying for a second and than apply it to fascism...
I prefer the current system where egregious cases can warrant the plaintiff being ordered to pay the defendants court costs. Having loser always pays winners lawyer fees just stacks things to the rich corporations being the only ones who dare file a lawsuit. I do hope the state goes after the organization that was ordering the extortion attempts.
I’m willing to bet that her useless lawyer failed to inform her that if she ever won a big settlement, she’d lose all of her government funding. No more Medicare, Medicaid, or SSDI. The money from the settlement would run out quickly and she’d be SOL.
Galavanta, so basically you only want the super rich corporations to win in court. Because they would be the only ones that could afford to take the risk of loosing
She did not have to perjure herself to file a nuisance claim. The point of hiring her was for her to go to businesses and LOOK for violations and then be willing to be a witness that she was there and the violation was present.
the law should be written that if a individual/attorney/business that file 5 or more frivolous lawsuits in a year, they should geta felony conviction and 1 year per frivolous lawsuit. on top of the that pay all costs for the defendants. none of these debts can be written off in any kind of bankruptcy
I like that but no legislative body would be brave enough to pass a law penalized a "Marginalized" person. Certain people with a more "progressive' ideology would instantly be against it, without ever looking at it's merits.
the courts will call a lawsuit against their friends frivolous, so be careful about such a law. a law suit filed against the police department for failure to enforce the public safety laws, will be dismissed unless the race card is used. if it is based on wealth and not race, it will be dismissed as frivolous. if you try and sue a judge for their constitutional trespass, it will be dismissed as frivolous, get the picture???
South Florida has similar law firms filing frivolous lawsuits. I know of a small pizza shop that went out of business due to the same tactics. We all know the form titled "Power of Attorney".
The way to deal with this is to remove the ability to sue business for shortcomings. Establish an agency where reports can be filed, independent investigations happen and fines issued if not brought up to code within a reasonable time. A lot more efficient and you will get to see results.
In most cases the business owner has no idea there is a shortcoming. It's insane that there isn't a requirement that the business be notified and given a chance to correct the issue before a lawsuit can be filed! Even a municipality should not be able to issue a fine until they've been given a chance to fix the issue!
@@jblyon2 That is the way it is in Florida. You are first given reasonable time to fix the problem. Lawyers there would first offer to "settle out of court" but if the business decided to go to court they immediately dropped the case because they knew that once in court their scam would be seen for what it was. Basically the whole thing was a massive shakedown scam.
there was one doing this near me in the Sacramento area that caused quite a few businesses to go under. the "handicap" person would ask to use the bathroom and then would find any reason for a violation and sue. most businesses didn't even have a public bathroom but because they let him use it, it was argued in court that is was accessable to the public and thus a public bathroom and subject to all the ADA laws. I think the lawsuits stopped once someone got the guts to counter sue and won
The ADA has done more harm than good for disabled people. Many employers who would have been willing to hire disabled people in the past, won't touch us with a stick now because of the potential liability. And, I can't blame them one bit.
I was working with companies when ADA was being in acted. We helped companies make their work spaces ADA Compliant. This meant being able to have a workspace available to meet a disabled persons needs. The companies got great productive people. Unfortunately we don’t catch enough of the bad people who are abusing the law. Hopefully this person will not only lose her license to practice law but will be fined and in prisoned.
I disagree. It's just that the system has grown to accept the cynical misuse of ADA REGS at the hands of morally bankrupt lawyers and litigators as merely sharp practice, instead of recognizing it as abuse of the law.
You mean AID has done more harm than good because your statement is exactly why the ADA is necessary. AID is not an advocate for people with disabilities but they have inadvertently revealed a flaw in the law. Businesses should be given an opportunity to remedy any violations before legal action is taken. Also, a lawsuit should never be filed by someone who never had any real intent to be a patron at the business.
There is a recently unemployed fella in Florida who would love having this type of attorney represent him (so long as he didn't have to pay for the representation).
Yea, she has regrets. She thought she was gonna get rich for being disabled. The vast majority of ADA lawsuits are unfounded, frivolous, or in some way without merit. This happens all over the country with so called "activists" going around with measuring tapes, levels, etc. hunting for some slightly too high sinks, slightly too steep ramps, slightly too narrow sidewalks, etc. and filing suit seeking settlement. Businesses settle the nuisance suits for a few thousand dollars and the shysters move on to the next victim.
just because they went to college, does NOT mean they're educated. I worked with a bunch of PhDs who couldn't read or write -- I reckon they hired someone to take all of their college tests
Hadn't thought of this before concerning this stuff. But I wonder if the proliferation of security cameras everywhere and the ease of recording at a moment's notice with smart phones haven't made some of the "fall down artists" a littler leery abut what they can do or not do when they think no one can see them. Not exactly the same thing but close enough.
It amazes me how a lawyer can be this unscrupulous and put their law license in jeopardy. Lawyers have boundless legal cases they can work on without fraud. If you aren't a big corporate lawyer or Wall st. lawyer you can be hit with the broad side of the law. Maybe they are confused about their lawyer status in the big scheme of things.
4 years later, and this just came up on my CZcams top picks. No, I am not disabled, involved in law, or even American, but yeah, it peaked my interest enough to be here. The new CZcams Algorithms aren't great yet, but some good stuff pops up :) (Occasionally)
Wow a money addicted ambulance chasing style of lawyer. Doesn't reflect well on the profession at all. Espceially given the lack of prosecution by DA's in many states with their concern for criminals over victims.
No company should have ever settled with them, Let the courts figure it out. She had no looses how could she collect a cent. The companies should have time to correct the issues. Any payment made should have gone to the state not these people.
I hate to say this but how do people get from their place to wherever they are trying to get in? otherwise they have made and provided their own means to get from their house (inside) to wherever they are trying to access which I believe new places should be built to accommodate but old place the people should bring their own means to gain access. I am not being cold about this I just think that you should not inconvenience current business because of your own inconvenience which you do provide the means to get to their door step.
I was out of work because of the housing bubble burst and got two traffic tickets. One was for a headlight being out (that's why I was pulled over) and the other for expired insurance. Together both tickets came to just over $1,000 dollars. I didn't have that kind of money and even if I did it would've meant I'd have to go without eating for weeks. So, I hired one of those shyster lawyers you see that advertise in the news paper classifieds. I paid him $100 dollars and he went to court for me. He kept postponing my hearing for various reasons for over 3 years. Finally the cop that gave me the tickets didn't show up and the tickets were dismissed. And you know what, I don't even feel bad about it!
BS! You didn't get a lawyer to represent you in a traffic case for $100 (unless 50 years ago), first lie. You didn't get a municipal court to keep postponing for three years, second lie. But you needed to share that BS here.
I’m sorry as a disabled person with a disabled wife the woman whose name these cases were in should also have some culpability. Just because someone is in a wheelchair doesn’t automatically make them a good person or a victim. Anyone who is part of bringing 99 cases knows or should know there is something wrong. We strive to be treated as equals and that equality means being treated exactly the same as an able bodied person. Restaurants and meeting places that many disabled people probably used have been shut down. How does that help the disabled elderly, blind people who have learnt that environment or veterans with PTSD who use those establishments as meeting places? There is no hierarchy in disabilities.
Years ago there was a man who went around to night clubs that advertised "Ladies Night" giving women free admission and discounted drinks. He sued every single one of them until there were no more ladies nights...Now I like ladies as much as any healthy heterosexual man does ,I completely sided with the guy. The reasons to eliminate ladies night are endless. I don't think any explanation as to the reasons is at all necessary.
So if there constrution work and blocking the sidewalk for people that have wheelchair can they sue for not having it inaccessible? Or if the wheelchair person goes to a building but all elevators are out of order they can sue for inaccessible? This is what I call bullshit. There mistake was filing all those lawsuit if they waited finishing a 2 or 3 lawsuit at a time they would have never being caught. Just because your a lawyer and think your damm smart doesnt your going to get away with it. Even smart people do dumb/stupid decisions.
One of these ADA fraud mills tried to pull this same shit on me. They mailed me a one page form letter which made the accusations and had a space for me to fill in my insurance company/policy#. They even included a self-addressed stamped envelope for me to return it in. It was clear that their sole intent was to shake down my insurance company with a nuisance lawsuit. I ignored it. Later they mailed me the same form and a bogus boilerplate lawsuit with my name plugged in which was "ready to be filed" if I didn't respond. I ignored it. Later the shyster lawyers called me threatening me. I laughed in their faces and dared them to file the lawsuit. I never heard from them again. Much like burglars who skip houses with dogs and security systems, they moved on to easier prey.
She admitted getting paid $50 for every lawsuit filed. Ironically, the group starting all these lawsuits, does not have a disabled parking spot, and the building is not accessible.
Yeah. That report was funny to watch those slime balls do some mental gymnastics when the reporter told them their building wasn’t in ADA compliance.
Then Sue them!
True, but the non-compliance liability is on the building owner, not the tenant.
got a link to that one?
@@bobberguy1 That is not always the case, business spaces are handled differently than housing. There are remodling clauses to the scope of the business ect. and alot of upkeep is transfered to the tenant. Our shop is responsile for the upkeep of our parking lot, curbside, and windows and such. Also any signage required for statute copliance is also our responsibility.
Her regret is that she didn't see a big payday.
Absolutely I didn't want it to go down like this. I just wanted to extort people and move on.
I'm sure dicKtator-don would hire you -- if you work FOR FREE
They need to go after the lady in the wheelchair. She can act like she is a victim but she can't convince me she was not aware of what was going on.
Exactly. She and her attorney need to be held liable for the legal expenses incurred by the businesses.
@Philip Kirschner - No, she’s a crook playing off of her disability to engage in what amounts to extortion against businesses. Try following the actual story, not just the pictures.
@@bradcrosier1332 In Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, you almost always have to pay legal fees if you lose, and its designed to explicitly stop this (and also so that a person who suffers gets all their compensation not just whatever's left over), provided its reasonable and not a "small claim". She'd also have to answer for Perverting the Course of Justice in Criminal Courts and (which also exists in the States) Malicious Prosecution.
@Philip Kirschner
No she’s not, she answered an ad in the paper or online to be the disabled person on their payroll so these lawyers could scam businesses out of money. It’s cheaper for the mom and pop companies to settle out of court for $10 or 15K than to go to trial and that’s what they count on. That crook in the wheel chain wasn’t discriminated against in any shape, form, or fashion.
@Philip Kirschner So you didn't bother to watch the item or you are to dumb to understand....
She was part of a group of scammers who attempted to scam busines owners out of money.
Calling her a victim is as dishonest as their lawsuits that were designed to extort people.
The justice system needs to start giving people like this former lawyer incentive in the form of heavy fines as a deterrent to this type of behavior!
Public flogging and 20 years in the federal crossbar hotel might be a good place to start.
How about DISBARMENT.
Prison sentences would be better.
This kind of behavior sheds a shadow of doubt on real cases, and makes judges or jurors question the veracity of claims shame on her
Then how about all the frivolous cases treasonous Trump and his treason supporting Republicans filing all those frivolous law suite over them loosing the elections, kn owing they lost and trying to get Republican governors to reject the elections and appoint treasonous, criminal Trump as president, with the support of the Republicans in the congress encouraging and supporting the attempt coup to overthrow the US government with encouragement of the treason supporting fascist propagandist and got away with it!
Trump and his treasonous minions should all be hung so we can start the heel and start to make America great again! If the fascist really were looking for voter fraud, they would have been looking where treasonous, criminal Republican Trump and his treasonous Republican minions won!
@@nightlightabcd you just advocated for roughly 50% of the American population to be hung...
Think about what you're saying for a second and than apply it to fascism...
Lawyers involved in multiple frivolous lawsuits ,as an enterprise , should all lose their license and never be allowed to practice law again !
99 frivolous lawsuits dismissed. Loser should pay. Why is there any question about who should pay for this BS?
Because common sense isn’t common anymore.
As businesses are trying to stay open, it is stressful to have to fight such law suits.
Regrets because she got caught!
It is not frivolous it is a con game! Not just on behalf of the lawyers.
It is a sophisticated extortion racket, attempting to operate under the color of law.
It is funny how a lawyer would risk her career over this as there are plenty of legitimate cased to litigate. I hope she spends some time in jail.
It’s because she isn’t a very good lawyer and filing paperwork is easier than litigation.
So awesome: all those lawyers should be disbarred.
The lawyer that loses a lawsuit should have to pay the winning lawyers fees.
I prefer the current system where egregious cases can warrant the plaintiff being ordered to pay the defendants court costs. Having loser always pays winners lawyer fees just stacks things to the rich corporations being the only ones who dare file a lawsuit.
I do hope the state goes after the organization that was ordering the extortion attempts.
I’m willing to bet that her useless lawyer failed to inform her that if she ever won a big settlement, she’d lose all of her government funding. No more Medicare, Medicaid, or SSDI. The money from the settlement would run out quickly and she’d be SOL.
Galavanta, so basically you only want the super rich corporations to win in court. Because they would be the only ones that could afford to take the risk of loosing
If she did perjury they should convict her and charge her and her "parent company" for legal fees
She did not have to perjure herself to file a nuisance claim. The point of hiring her was for her to go to businesses and LOOK for violations and then be willing to be a witness that she was there and the violation was present.
They used to be famous for chasing ambulances , and now it's wheelchairs . Nice !
the law should be written that if a individual/attorney/business that file 5 or more frivolous lawsuits in a year, they should geta felony conviction and 1 year per frivolous lawsuit. on top of the that pay all costs for the defendants. none of these debts can be written off in any kind of bankruptcy
How about penalize malicious prosecutions?
life in prison sounds good to me for that offense
I like that but no legislative body would be brave enough to pass a law penalized a "Marginalized" person. Certain people with a more "progressive' ideology would instantly be against it, without ever looking at it's merits.
the courts will call a lawsuit against their friends frivolous, so be careful about such a law. a law suit filed against the police department for failure to enforce the public safety laws, will be dismissed unless the race card is used. if it is based on wealth and not race, it will be dismissed as frivolous. if you try and sue a judge for their constitutional trespass, it will be dismissed as frivolous, get the picture???
Even 1 frivolous lawsuit is too many. The filing of a frivolous lawsuit is a Criminal act, a Felony!
South Florida has similar law firms filing frivolous lawsuits. I know of a small pizza shop that went out of business due to the same tactics. We all know the form titled "Power of Attorney".
@ 0:48 Is that sexual harassment?!
She was asking for it
I thought the same thing!😊.
She definitely copped a feel!
The way to deal with this is to remove the ability to sue business for shortcomings. Establish an agency where reports can be filed, independent investigations happen and fines issued if not brought up to code within a reasonable time. A lot more efficient and you will get to see results.
In most cases the business owner has no idea there is a shortcoming. It's insane that there isn't a requirement that the business be notified and given a chance to correct the issue before a lawsuit can be filed! Even a municipality should not be able to issue a fine until they've been given a chance to fix the issue!
@@jblyon2 That is the way it is in Florida. You are first given reasonable time to fix the problem. Lawyers there would first offer to "settle out of court" but if the business decided to go to court they immediately dropped the case because they knew that once in court their scam would be seen for what it was. Basically the whole thing was a massive shakedown scam.
How about NO MORE "agencies". let businesses, customers, and free markets decide who they want to serve and buy from.
They are doing this all over the country now
This type of scam has been around. It seems like a lot of them in different states have been showing up.
You are lucky this was not in California. In CA that lawyer would win every lawsuit and force businesses to pay. I have seen it.
there was one doing this near me in the Sacramento area that caused quite a few businesses to go under. the "handicap" person would ask to use the bathroom and then would find any reason for a violation and sue. most businesses didn't even have a public bathroom but because they let him use it, it was argued in court that is was accessable to the public and thus a public bathroom and subject to all the ADA laws. I think the lawsuits stopped once someone got the guts to counter sue and won
The lady in the wheel chair should sue the attorney for sexual assault for grabbing her breast.
How about her getting some #metoo after groping her 😂
Ron Hickey Was waiting for someone to bring that up :P
The ADA has done more harm than good for disabled people. Many employers who would have been willing to hire disabled people in the past, won't touch us with a stick now because of the potential liability. And, I can't blame them one bit.
I was working with companies when ADA was being in acted. We helped companies make their work spaces ADA Compliant. This meant being able to have a workspace available to meet a disabled persons needs. The companies got great productive people. Unfortunately we don’t catch enough of the bad people who are abusing the law. Hopefully this person will not only lose her license to practice law but will be fined and in prisoned.
I disagree. It's just that the system has grown to accept the cynical misuse of ADA REGS at the hands of morally bankrupt lawyers and litigators as merely sharp practice, instead of recognizing it as abuse of the law.
@@davidkermes393 You are spot on David. They should get more than reprimands. Jail time should be included.
@@davidkermes393 You are spot on David. They should get more than reprimands. Jail time should be included.
You mean AID has done more harm than good because your statement is exactly why the ADA is necessary. AID is not an advocate for people with disabilities but they have inadvertently revealed a flaw in the law. Businesses should be given an opportunity to remedy any violations before legal action is taken. Also, a lawsuit should never be filed by someone who never had any real intent to be a patron at the business.
Take her and anyother lawyer like her Licenses away for ever, thes lawyers are just criminals.
That person is in a wheelchair cause she has no spine
And she since has died.
Hello Ms Gander, have you met Mr Goose?
Remember all those things you said would be "good for him?"
What about "TIMES UP", for Scum Bag Attorneys?
There is a recently unemployed fella in Florida who would love having this type of attorney represent him (so long as he didn't have to pay for the representation).
Someone should file suit over Costco adding over 1/2 their parking to handicapped use. Ridiculous misuse of legal means !!
Yea, she has regrets. She thought she was gonna get rich for being disabled. The vast majority of ADA lawsuits are unfounded, frivolous, or in some way without merit. This happens all over the country with so called "activists" going around with measuring tapes, levels, etc. hunting for some slightly too high sinks, slightly too steep ramps, slightly too narrow sidewalks, etc. and filing suit seeking settlement. Businesses settle the nuisance suits for a few thousand dollars and the shysters move on to the next victim.
"Esq" otherwise known as big feet and a hell of a liar.
Lock Her Up.
SHE WORKS FOR JONATHAN LEE RICHES LAWFIRM!!!!!!!!
It's always about the money!
totally needs to be dis-barred
Put them all in jail
Shouldn't be disbarred but behind bars.
Just because you go to school and get a law-degree, doesn't make you smart.
I see a lawsuit right now! At :45 a lady was groped by her lawyer lol.
thought the same myself. That'll be $250,000 for a titty-grab.
Several people should be going to jail, but won't.
Ha! I love lawyers who are educated & once they smell blood they are like honey badgers. They don't quit or back down. Well done Denver TV station.
just because they went to college, does NOT mean they're educated. I worked with a bunch of PhDs who couldn't read or write -- I reckon they hired someone to take all of their college tests
The sleaze is thick on this one. Use the slime lawyer. use the slime.
Hadn't thought of this before concerning this stuff. But I wonder if the proliferation of security cameras everywhere and the ease of recording at a moment's notice with smart phones haven't made some of the "fall down artists" a littler leery abut what they can do or not do when they think no one can see them. Not exactly the same thing but close enough.
I hope the attorney had to pay all the fines and fees out of her own pocket.
Looks like her scam didn’t work. Sorry to hear.
make both of them and the corp behind it all pay every last bleeding cent.
She is complacent in the crime!
It amazes me how a lawyer can be this unscrupulous and put their law license in jeopardy. Lawyers have boundless legal cases they can work on without fraud. If you aren't a big corporate lawyer or Wall st. lawyer you can be hit with the broad side of the law. Maybe they are confused about their lawyer status in the big scheme of things.
They tried to hit my business in Texas. We were given a heads up they were in town. Stopped them at the door and told them to get lost
Crooked judges and crooked lawyers. Politicians in training.
An ambulance chaser.
I wonder how many businesses settled?
4 years later, and this just came up on my CZcams top picks. No, I am not disabled, involved in law, or even American, but yeah, it peaked my interest enough to be here. The new CZcams Algorithms aren't great yet, but some good stuff pops up :) (Occasionally)
She hadn't a leg to stand on in court.
Wow a money addicted ambulance chasing style of lawyer. Doesn't reflect well on the profession at all. Espceially given the lack of prosecution by DA's in many states with their concern for criminals over victims.
She better call Saul.
Simple with all those fees, the two ladies n the group they're were part should pay
WHat is the difference between a dead lawyer in the street and a dead dog in the street?
The dead dog has skid marks in front of it.
YEEEEEEEESSS, YES, YES, YES!!!!!
Another Arizona crazy
These people have ruined A LOT of lives. They're digging their own graves with their behavior.
Coincidentally, the wheelchair lady died 2 years ago last week.
@@VidClips858 good
Wherever corruption and evil exist there are lawyers: Coincidence?
After she resigned she stud up and walked away.
Great example of how 95% of lawyers give the other 5% a bad name.
Just makes me think of all that desert and the places to bury bodies!
get her.
Frivolous lawsuits!
I thought it was going to be the stop the steal lawsuits.. lol
They should gave to pay back EVERY penny ever awarded
Ambulance chasers found a different ambulance to chase.
So glad
No company should have ever settled with them, Let the courts figure it out. She had no looses how could she collect a cent. The companies should have time to correct the issues. Any payment made should have gone to the state not these people.
Sleazy lawyer? Well I never! And the disabled “lady” says, “I have SOME regrets.” smh
Just saw Carton's obituary. She died 12/1/2019.
NOW GO AFTER THE COPS WHO GIVE TICKETS FOR A BLINKER....
I hate to say this but how do people get from their place to wherever they are trying to get in? otherwise they have made and provided their own means to get from their house (inside) to wherever they are trying to access which I believe new places should be built to accommodate but old place the people should bring their own means to gain access. I am not being cold about this I just think that you should not inconvenience current business because of your own inconvenience which you do provide the means to get to their door step.
Anyone who hires a lawyer to help will only be discriminated against by the lawyer in the first place.
Yeah yo some reporters doing legit reporter stuff.
pretty easy to figure out what to do with all the legal fees
this story is over 4 years old ... but wonder if it's still going on ...
I was out of work because of the housing bubble burst and got two traffic tickets. One was for a headlight being out (that's why I was pulled over) and the other for expired insurance. Together both tickets came to just over $1,000 dollars. I didn't have that kind of money and even if I did it would've meant I'd have to go without eating for weeks. So, I hired one of those shyster lawyers you see that advertise in the news paper classifieds. I paid him $100 dollars and he went to court for me. He kept postponing my hearing for various reasons for over 3 years. Finally the cop that gave me the tickets didn't show up and the tickets were dismissed. And you know what, I don't even feel bad about it!
BS! You didn't get a lawyer to represent you in a traffic case for $100 (unless 50 years ago), first lie. You didn't get a municipal court to keep postponing for three years, second lie. But you needed to share that BS here.
@@stevek8829 This happened in 1982. So STFU and troll someone else!
@@justdoingitjim7095 I said maybe fifty years ago. No municipal court ever dragged out a traffic case for three years. That's cartoonish, sorry.
Is it just me, or did her lawyer cop a feel?
It's appointed a man once to die then the judgement. Pity the man in the hands of an angry God.
Proof that handicapped people can also be obnoxious jerks.
Lawyers give themselves a bad name,
Wright brothers would be suit, and we would never have airplanes with these lawyers.
What about the fact that she turned back the ADA nearly 45 years?
1:11 "Yeah, absolutely I have some regrets."
Then WHY did you sign in to this scam in the first place?!
Being disabled, this really piss's me off! Throw the book at them!
Big Mon ting
Disbarment is the only way she will understand. She thinks she’s above the law, and maybe some jail time for her to think about her actions.
Give the businesses the same immunity given to Pharmacutical companies and police
I’m sorry as a disabled person with a disabled wife the woman whose name these cases were in should also have some culpability. Just because someone is in a wheelchair doesn’t automatically make them a good person or a victim. Anyone who is part of bringing 99 cases knows or should know there is something wrong. We strive to be treated as equals and that equality means being treated exactly the same as an able bodied person. Restaurants and meeting places that many disabled people probably used have been shut down. How does that help the disabled elderly, blind people who have learnt that environment or veterans with PTSD who use those establishments as meeting places? There is no hierarchy in disabilities.
If you are really concerned about whats fair, maybe you can focus on the Gay community trying to beat that baker into submission.
when lawyers write laws that are a scam, clearly not written for compliance
Years ago there was a man who went around to night clubs that advertised "Ladies Night" giving women free admission and discounted drinks. He sued every single one of them until there were no more ladies nights...Now I like ladies as much as any healthy heterosexual man does ,I completely sided with the guy. The reasons to eliminate ladies night are endless. I don't think any explanation as to the reasons is at all necessary.
99 problems and she's one.
So if there constrution work and blocking the sidewalk for people that have wheelchair can they sue for not having it inaccessible?
Or if the wheelchair person goes to a building but all elevators are out of order they can sue for inaccessible?
This is what I call bullshit. There mistake was filing all those lawsuit if they waited finishing a 2 or 3 lawsuit at a time they would have never being caught.
Just because your a lawyer and think your damm smart doesnt your going to get away with it.
Even smart people do dumb/stupid decisions.
What kind of scheduling is this? The news doesn't start on the hour?
This story started at 5:59 and ends at 6:02.
One of these ADA fraud mills tried to pull this same shit on me. They mailed me a one page form letter which made the accusations and had a space for me to fill in my insurance company/policy#. They even included a self-addressed stamped envelope for me to return it in. It was clear that their sole intent was to shake down my insurance company with a nuisance lawsuit. I ignored it. Later they mailed me the same form and a bogus boilerplate lawsuit with my name plugged in which was "ready to be filed" if I didn't respond. I ignored it. Later the shyster lawyers called me threatening me. I laughed in their faces and dared them to file the lawsuit. I never heard from them again. Much like burglars who skip houses with dogs and security systems, they moved on to easier prey.
That's one dumb lawyer.