I’m watching this to understand how to be healthy. These lectures are so valuable to even people who are not going for a piece of paper but just for knowledge.
This is the 2nd lecture I heard. He talked about how the Scientific Method worked. Step 1: Question something you're interested in. Step 2:Do research on it. Step 3: Form a hypothesis on the subject your interested in. Step 4: Do an experiment to prove you right or wrong. Step 5: Make observations on your experiment. Step 6: Get your conclusion. Step 7: Express your ideas and share your findings. Those are 7 steps to the Scientific Method.
Your lectures are so helpful i appreciate you sharing them here! My professor doesnt explain these concepts half as well as you do nor does she have the enthusiasm you do. Thank you!
Alternators are so expensive… ffs. I tend to shop privately for my parts and then tell my mechanic to just use those to do the replacement. Comes out cheaper that way. But you do have to know what you’re buying. That’s the downside
So, this is interesting. The placebo should be designed to be a mechanism to disprove the hypothesis. So if the hypothesis is "This bacteria might be responsible for this gut issue", then the placebo group is scrutinized to see if their symptoms improve after being given a fake antibiotic. If they do improve, then maybe this bacteria isn't the cause, OR might not be the whole story. What if the bacteria IS the cause, but a high stress body producing a lot of cortisol (let's just say for argument's sake, idk if the details make sense) is a more favourable environment for the bacteria? And let's also say that the high stress bodies are in such acute stress due to farting way too much, or some other embarrassing thing the gut issue is causing? So when they're given a "potential cure", they destress, cortisol levels lower, and the bacteria die off? Huh? It seems that placebo control groups can put an experiment in danger in this way. What looks wrong may not be wrong, but just be more involved than initially assumed. So do you tweak your next iteration a little, little by little? What point do you have to get to before you can confidently say "I'm scrapping this crappy hypothesis"? Because one placebo group showing the same results as the control group doesn't mean your hypothesis is wrong. It could just mean you're missing something. I'm curious. I need to ask about that.
Also, question about standardized variables. Why is it not good to create isolated groups, then compare all the data points between them? This might be obvious, idk. Would it just take too many experiments, so its inefficient? I'd think having isolated data about every possible group, then comparing every single data point across each experiment, you'd see patterns emerging a lot more clearly. If you should look at one variable at a time (And I totally get that) then why not test one standardized variable at a time too? Then compare totally separate data?
@@BeckBeckGo I'm gonna guess cost is a big reason. I hear you and agree that we can always avgerage out the data later via true random selections. tin foil: I do suspect that drug trials document every minute detail of every test subject to enable the pharma group and regroup data based on what favorable outcome they want to show.
Hey premeds you won’t remember this. It will be familiar. It’s about getting qualifying grades. Your residency is what matters. Learn strategies to get qualifying grades. Fuck the rest. I don’t like how the system is either but that’s my 2 cents
You think that maybe that’s a little advanced to put into a biology 101 lecture? Especially the second lecture of the course. Maybe that’s beyond the scope of this class
Useful overview. The lecturer does not seem to realize his asides frequently contradict his thesis. Case in point, he is “pissed off” when people use science for their own agenda - he says science is neutral and does not give answers to social or political questions - yet earlier he demanded we “follow the science” to deal with climate change. We are not dealing with a Jacob Bronowski here.
I am dying at his jokes LAUGH PEOPLE IT is OKAY LAUGH PEOPLE!!!
😂 I would be cracking up if I was in this class loll
RIGHT?????
The students are serious 😂😂😂
I’m so happy I came across his lectures. He throws in some funny jokes and it keeps things interesting. I’m loving it!!!😂
Out of school for 11 years, decided to go in for nursing. Your lesson is superb.
Same here
Good luck! Bioinformatics hopeful here!
I’m watching this to understand how to be healthy.
These lectures are so valuable to even people who are not going for a piece of paper but just for knowledge.
same here dude
Same!! I find his lectures helpful
I'm having to take Biology online and these lectures are really helping! Thank you for making these lectures available.
I'm right where you are. Thanks prof!
Me too! These are amazing!
@@ItsMattA great course sir
I WANT THIS GUY TO TEACH ME. HE SEEMS SO PASSIONATED !!! I feel like his students must learn super well with him!
I JUST STARTED TODAY AND IM LOVING YOUR LESSONS YOU ARE THE BEST.
This is the 2nd lecture I heard. He talked about how the Scientific Method worked. Step 1: Question something you're interested in. Step 2:Do research on it. Step 3: Form a hypothesis on the subject your interested in. Step 4: Do an experiment to prove you right or wrong. Step 5: Make observations on your experiment. Step 6: Get your conclusion. Step 7: Express your ideas and share your findings. Those are 7 steps to the Scientific Method.
the amount of strays that mechanic caught had me in tears. i love these lectures so much. ty
Thank you for this wonderful lecture! It is aiding me in my learning this quarter. - Matt
A student coughing in a classroom in 2017 seemed insignificant back then. Annoying, yes, but still insignificant.
Your lectures are so helpful i appreciate you sharing them here! My professor doesnt explain these concepts half as well as you do nor does she have the enthusiasm you do. Thank you!
Thank you Professor😊
hes really upset about the car lol
Alternators are so expensive… ffs. I tend to shop privately for my parts and then tell my mechanic to just use those to do the replacement. Comes out cheaper that way. But you do have to know what you’re buying. That’s the downside
this whole class is him just trying to get ideas to fix his car lol
Science requires questions about questioning everything
Thank you so much!
Well said!
very good class
Thank u professor! Best biology courses!
So, this is interesting. The placebo should be designed to be a mechanism to disprove the hypothesis. So if the hypothesis is "This bacteria might be responsible for this gut issue", then the placebo group is scrutinized to see if their symptoms improve after being given a fake antibiotic. If they do improve, then maybe this bacteria isn't the cause, OR might not be the whole story.
What if the bacteria IS the cause, but a high stress body producing a lot of cortisol (let's just say for argument's sake, idk if the details make sense) is a more favourable environment for the bacteria? And let's also say that the high stress bodies are in such acute stress due to farting way too much, or some other embarrassing thing the gut issue is causing? So when they're given a "potential cure", they destress, cortisol levels lower, and the bacteria die off? Huh?
It seems that placebo control groups can put an experiment in danger in this way. What looks wrong may not be wrong, but just be more involved than initially assumed. So do you tweak your next iteration a little, little by little? What point do you have to get to before you can confidently say "I'm scrapping this crappy hypothesis"? Because one placebo group showing the same results as the control group doesn't mean your hypothesis is wrong. It could just mean you're missing something. I'm curious. I need to ask about that.
Also, question about standardized variables. Why is it not good to create isolated groups, then compare all the data points between them? This might be obvious, idk. Would it just take too many experiments, so its inefficient? I'd think having isolated data about every possible group, then comparing every single data point across each experiment, you'd see patterns emerging a lot more clearly. If you should look at one variable at a time (And I totally get that) then why not test one standardized variable at a time too? Then compare totally separate data?
@@BeckBeckGo I'm gonna guess cost is a big reason. I hear you and agree that we can always avgerage out the data later via true random selections. tin foil: I do suspect that drug trials document every minute detail of every test subject to enable the pharma group and regroup data based on what favorable outcome they want to show.
96% of our universe is *not* observable by us - cool!!
Second lesson, so far so good.
What a king
Lovely
great
Thank you!!!!!
He should really test on the media idea with scientific research.
Oh heck. I made a mnemonic for OHEC. Thank.
I happy to hear.
😅
@@joycechepkwony1645 chamgei
@@joycechepkwony1645 hi
12:54
is it just me study this for fun?
Same!
Lol all that damn coughing. Something I would never have even given much thought to prior 2020.
Hey premeds you won’t remember this. It will be familiar. It’s about getting qualifying grades. Your residency is what matters. Learn strategies to get qualifying grades. Fuck the rest. I don’t like how the system is either but that’s my 2 cents
I recommend passing out cough drops before class )))))
Right it’s the jokes
H3n3? Why does this week like those payphone 🍜☎jokes you used to hear?
11:00 you cant test climate change as a hypothesis lolol im dying
Are identical cousins possible
I would assume no because cousins have 1 parent that is not biologically connected to the other cousin
@@Megastone-yh3wl What about king George 6 and Nicholas 2
Patty Duke
technically..... Surrogate of the other half of the embryo?
Sure, but it would involve incest. There is no reason a brother and sister can't produce identical twins. I wouldn't recommend it, though.
Mathematic reasoning is different from scientific reasoning! Also, this ignores dialectical materialism!
You think that maybe that’s a little advanced to put into a biology 101 lecture? Especially the second lecture of the course. Maybe that’s beyond the scope of this class
@@colintidwell8902 I guess
😂
18:00-21:00 scary reminds me of how covid was
Can you reply?
Someone please give the girl coughing pills…
It's written by McGraw-Hill. Phil McGraw is a horrible person.
Useful overview. The lecturer does not seem to realize his asides frequently contradict his thesis. Case in point, he is “pissed off” when people use science for their own agenda - he says science is neutral and does not give answers to social or political questions - yet earlier he demanded we “follow the science” to deal with climate change. We are not dealing with a Jacob Bronowski here.
yeah. I hate when these professors do that shit. You are correct.