How Concrete Will Revolutionize The Energy Storage

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 12. 06. 2024
  • Energy storage is becoming increasingly important as we move to more and more renewable energy. But batteries are expensive and have environmental issues relating to them, so many companies are looking for new ways to store energy. One of these is through gravity storage. This video looks at the technology from Gravitricity and Energy Vault to see how they compare to lithium-ion batteries for grid storage!
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 13

  • @robertescalante9858
    @robertescalante9858 Před 6 měsíci +5

    from an engineer, a popular form of a gravity battery is a Dam. like for water. the Water is stored potential energy in height and released through turbos to provide power during normal operation.

    • @hugegamer5988
      @hugegamer5988 Před 6 měsíci +1

      Those can easily store a million times the energy without needing expensive cranes that can’t work in wind or stack accurately from hundreds of feet up, and don’t emit massive amounts of CO2 to form the mass. This thing is a joke while pumped hydro is currently about 95% of grid storage.

  • @onebreh
    @onebreh Před 6 měsíci +2

    Best gravity battery is a goddamn DAM! This bullshit can not beat the cost efficiency, power and reliability of a dam. Even if the dam is built from scratch and water is cycled between high and low reservoirs.

  • @b0rnT00Slow
    @b0rnT00Slow Před 6 měsíci +1

    How reality will revolutionize someone's understanding of wind.

  • @harryjones5260
    @harryjones5260 Před 6 měsíci +2

    somebody call adam somebody

  • @ramonpunsalang3397
    @ramonpunsalang3397 Před 6 měsíci

    Drawback is maintenance cost of pulley system. IMO a Cryogenic air battery is worth considering as it can store energy for weeks before feeding the grid.

  • @xand3r853
    @xand3r853 Před 6 měsíci +5

    This concept has already been debunked. There are already better ways of storing energy like pumping water in lakes on top of hills then letting it flow down to harvest the energy. This concept is only attractive because of buzzwords. Completely useless. Whoever made this should stick to architecture and leave engineering alone.

  • @Oompa_Output
    @Oompa_Output Před 6 měsíci +4

    No.... this complex contraptikn actually does not work. Has many complex moving parts. Maintenance issues, and let us not forget lifting and lowering many tons. Therefore even if it did work not insurable. Batteries are going to be simpler and cheaper. Wasting my time

  • @thangchanh2932
    @thangchanh2932 Před 6 měsíci +2

    thunderfoot debunked sorry do more research

  • @ydnark83
    @ydnark83 Před 6 měsíci

    This is a terrible battery, grossly inefficient. People have been doing the same thing but much better with water for a long time. Its like reinventing the wheel as an octagon..