The Bair-Fulton Arithmetician Calculator No. 6

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 22

  • @aydink7739
    @aydink7739 Před 7 měsíci +2

    I like the fact that your software polyform puzzler played a role in finding a aperiodic monotile (Einstein) 👏🏽

  • @stephenfreeborn
    @stephenfreeborn Před 10 měsíci +2

    Looks good. What a unique design.

  • @HanhanPx
    @HanhanPx Před 10 měsíci +4

    This is probably the most beautiful calculator I have ever seen

    • @GillAndBurtTheCop
      @GillAndBurtTheCop Před 10 měsíci

      Have you ever seen a human brain?

    • @HanhanPx
      @HanhanPx Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@GillAndBurtTheCop it's moist and squishy

  • @ChrisStaecker
    @ChrisStaecker Před 10 měsíci +1

    Very cool design- I'd seen pictures of these but I never looked closely and assumed it was like a typical dial machine.

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Před 10 měsíci

      To be honest, so did I until I saw a photo of the No. 11 desk model (seen also in the ad at 07:48) which has three rows of dials, and grooves for the stylus connecting the left of one row to the right of the row above it.

  • @emdxemdx
    @emdxemdx Před 2 měsíci

    :) I remember playing with an addiator-like calculator (Magic Brain?) more than 50 years ago, and around the same time, I had a teacher who had a miniaturized plastic version of the Pascaline. I recall understanding instantly how it worked.

  • @DavidFrostbite
    @DavidFrostbite Před 10 měsíci +1

    I really like how compact the Addiator is for a fully mechanical thing

  • @tylerg8305
    @tylerg8305 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Excellent video. I love your channel. Thanks for what you do.

  • @TaramiBedona
    @TaramiBedona Před 10 měsíci +2

    Really appreciate the cleverness of the mechanism but yes it is a bit of a solution looking for a problem. It reminds me of what we In software engineering call the XY problem (or fallacy);: How can I do X (implement a slide adder) using Y (a dial mechanism)? The answer is that you probably shouldn't; you design a traditional dial adder instead.
    Enjoyable video as usual, thanks 😊

  • @speedydai8929
    @speedydai8929 Před 10 měsíci +7

    So no one’s going to talk about how 92+9 isn’t 202? What caused the skip?

    • @topaz-rn
      @topaz-rn Před 10 měsíci

      Good catch, idk either

    • @davidmason5163
      @davidmason5163 Před 10 měsíci

      Hadn't reset properly.

    • @artkek
      @artkek Před 10 měsíci

      Shouldn't it be 101? Where'd you grab another 100 from?

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Před 10 měsíci +7

      Oh dear. It did get to 201 instead of 101. What is happening here is that the two dials slightly rub against one another and just turning the tens dial caused the hundreds dial to click one step further.

  • @robertg8331
    @robertg8331 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Gosh, what an unusual mechanism - thank you for showing this one. Very ingenious (if ripple-carry is the main daily task).
    (My first reaction btw was; golly, where do you find these things!? :-)

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Před 10 měsíci +1

      I got this one on eBay from another collector. It was not cheap, cause due to its rarity it is one of the few that costs many times more now than when it was new.

  • @erintyres3609
    @erintyres3609 Před měsícem

    The wood frame is nicely finished. But if I had to add a column of numbers, I don't think that this machine would be much help at all.

  • @365Condoms
    @365Condoms Před 10 měsíci +1

    clip your nails, dude

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Před 10 měsíci +3

      Why should I? They are useful.

    • @365Condoms
      @365Condoms Před 10 měsíci

      @@jaapsch2 don't want to konw :)
      nice video though