Schubert - S. Richter (1978 live Moscow) Various Impromptus & Moments musicaux

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
  • Dédié au Vieux Mage et à Pianopera !
    0:00 : Impromptu in G flat major, D. 899- No. 3
    7:01 : Impromptu in E flat major, D. 899- No. 2
    11:41 : Impromptu in A flat major, D. 899- No. 4
    19:25 : Moments musicaux, D. 780- No. 1. Moderato
    25:04 : No. 3. Allegro moderato
    27:08 : No. 6. Allegretto

Komentáře • 55

  • @alexanderkutaladze5334
    @alexanderkutaladze5334 Před rokem +3

    Великий! Неповторимый! Единственный!

  • @user-pe2uc7sg3q
    @user-pe2uc7sg3q Před 7 lety +29

    Deeply impressed ! He is not playing but telling something by piano.

  • @AndreJorgeOliveira1
    @AndreJorgeOliveira1 Před 7 lety +27

    An uninspired Richter is always magic. He always had a lot to say in a very special way. A real artist, never repeating himself, never letting the audience wait for the same thing. It is called ART!

    • @affonsosantos5729
      @affonsosantos5729 Před 2 lety +4

      I have yet to come across an “uninspired” moment in Richter’s playing.

    • @antonellamajorano5348
      @antonellamajorano5348 Před 11 měsíci

      Richter non è mai banale ,ma sempre autentico e profondo.
      È quello che lo distingue da Guld, spesso paradossale , da Horowitz a volte indulgente a sentimentalismi eccessivi , a Schiff perfetto ma rimane più in superficie, per non parlare di Michelangeli il re del suono magico e perfetto, perfetto in brani di alcuni periodi ma piuttosto distaccato in altri....x citare solo alcuni.
      Richter ha proprio una marcia in più....proprio per la verità , la profondità e il timbro. Trovo questi aspetti in Radu Lupu.

    • @jamesnickoloff6692
      @jamesnickoloff6692 Před 7 měsíci

      Hard to say he is uninspired here. Are you referring to D-899 No 2 as well?

  • @jennyjang5894
    @jennyjang5894 Před 5 lety +9

    So beautiful ~ Richer is right..

  • @ursrieger1053
    @ursrieger1053 Před 4 měsíci

    Perfect sound control, clarity & precision. He makes the music speak for itself.

  • @margaritafoncueva79
    @margaritafoncueva79 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Magico , inexplicable... Un milagro...

  • @dejanstevanic5408
    @dejanstevanic5408 Před 2 lety +2

    Thank you.

  • @jean-mariedethier5495
    @jean-mariedethier5495 Před 5 lety +4

    C'est à la fois rêveur et tragique, la mélodie aspirant à elle tous les contours comme dans un effort qui la transcende...

  • @fatimacanche9081
    @fatimacanche9081 Před 3 lety +1

    Precioso Improunto ,se oia siempre en las audiciones ,cuando era estudiante de piano

  • @kresimiramodric2522
    @kresimiramodric2522 Před 4 lety +4

    hermoso!!!!!

  • @ursrieger1053
    @ursrieger1053 Před 4 měsíci

    It is as Glenn Gould said: when listening to Sviatoslav Richter you get into a state of hypnotic trance.

  • @zinam5795
    @zinam5795 Před 3 měsíci

    Темп ges dur'ного Экспромта удаётся не всем!😮😢😮❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @paolofranceschi6874
    @paolofranceschi6874 Před rokem +2

    27:08: my god... 😢😢😢

  • @alombredeslava2468
    @alombredeslava2468 Před 3 lety +4

    Il ne faut pas juger Richter sur ses interprétations des impromptus, mais sur celles des sonates qu'il rend comme nul autre.

  • @c.g.marseille4510
    @c.g.marseille4510 Před 6 lety +3

    I am listening....

  • @dimitridemetriades2637
    @dimitridemetriades2637 Před 5 lety +9

    Richter could sometimes be quite tense - but he had the Courage to Play slow tempi , despite the fact that his technique was trancendental , and so many Details came to life, especially in Schubert all the demonic and abysmal shadows that are there , just under the Surface .

    • @guidogaldini3446
      @guidogaldini3446 Před 3 lety +3

      Too fast is too easy

    • @antonellamajorano5348
      @antonellamajorano5348 Před rokem +2

      Concordo perfettamente! Richter non era un acrobata ma un poeta.
      Apprezzo in lui il non indulgere mai in facili sentimentalismi , con rallentamenti o riducendo il volume, come fa Horowitz o altri.
      Il canto di Richter è sempre terso e bellissimo..

  • @Yuriy1969ful
    @Yuriy1969ful Před 4 lety +1

    Рихтер играл Экспромт №3 в тональности G-dur. Так он писал в своих Тетрадях (к сожалению, неизданных).

  • @CarmenReyes-em9np
    @CarmenReyes-em9np Před 2 lety

    Exelente pianista.

  • @rubinsteinway
    @rubinsteinway Před 6 lety +7

    Too slow? My answer is that STR is again viewing the music with his proverbial magnifying glass. Very inspired, very convincing. A bit questionable the last chord in LH, meas.5 & 59.

  • @georgia_music
    @georgia_music Před 5 lety +3

    Probably before the concert he was playing these pieces in a different way.. maybe more happily and faster.. who knows.. Probably if he knew that his performance on this concert would be saved and spread to the world after that performance, he would have played in a different way. Every time his playing was unique, he usually didn't repeat his interpretations each time in the same way, but he could have many different types of interpretation each time he was playing each work. Just saying my opinion. I don't really know.

  • @mariaalicevolpe3648
    @mariaalicevolpe3648 Před 3 lety +3

    Ternura

  • @jamesnickoloff6692
    @jamesnickoloff6692 Před 7 měsíci

    And when and where was this performance?

    • @jamesnickoloff6692
      @jamesnickoloff6692 Před 5 měsíci

      Thanks for the information: May 3, 1978 in Moscow at the Moscow Conservatory Great Hall.

  • @gaboraranyi9936
    @gaboraranyi9936 Před 5 lety +3

    Interromper Schubert no meio da música é uma aberração! Aparentemente demonstra que o you tube não gosta do que faz. É só negócio.

  • @NecroSexy
    @NecroSexy Před 5 lety

    The 3rd impromptu is A flat minor (not major)

    • @albertoth
      @albertoth Před 4 lety +2

      No, it's major. You have to go to to the end of the piece to check it

  • @meredith218461
    @meredith218461 Před 4 lety +3

    Only Horowitz with his inspired live interpretation from Vienna can sustain such a slow tempo in the G Flat. Richter is good whereas Horowitz is simply mesmerising. I normally greatly admire Richter playing Schubert, however here I have to say he sounds somewhat disengaged.

    • @jamesnickoloff6692
      @jamesnickoloff6692 Před 7 měsíci

      Well, the audience loved the G Flat.

    • @Gottenhimfella
      @Gottenhimfella Před 3 měsíci

      I agree with you on this specific comparison. Anyone who has not heard Horowitz playing this might find it hard to believe, though. Parts of the Richter Gb are sublime, but parts are, I agree, "disengaged". Especially the slowest tempo passages...

  • @supawels3627
    @supawels3627 Před 3 lety

    Fast noch besser als Khatia Buniatishvili, noch getragener und noch intensiver.

    • @levim.3505
      @levim.3505 Před 2 lety

      "Fast"?

    • @MarkFarago
      @MarkFarago Před 2 lety

      😄

    • @affonsosantos5729
      @affonsosantos5729 Před 2 lety +1

      To compare Buniatishvili with Richter is like comparing a pumpkin with an orchid.

    • @supawels3627
      @supawels3627 Před 2 lety

      @@affonsosantos5729 Natürlich ist Khatia eine Orchidee, aber Richter ist ein etwas edlerer Kürbis.
      Die Russen neigen zum Kulturdrill.
      Wär:s ein Wunder bei der unaufgearbeiteten stalinistischen Vergangenheit?

    • @alexanderkutaladze5334
      @alexanderkutaladze5334 Před rokem

      😂😂😂

  • @berlinzerberus
    @berlinzerberus Před 9 lety +13

    Richter somewhat uninspired IMO!
    The first Impromptu in G flat played by far too slow - I prefer the Horowitz 'too-slow-version' from the eightees quite clearly. Even the second Impromptu seems a bit boring to me, faithfulness to the score but poor dynamics, the scales and passages like finger exercises, not very convincing! - Finally the third one in A flat sounds the same, stirile and not very inspired again. He seems to be better in the composer's Sonatas obviously, most of them are played truly wonderful by Richter.
    I am rather disappointed!

    • @steppinout67
      @steppinout67 Před 8 lety +2

      I actually agree

    • @c.g.marseille4510
      @c.g.marseille4510 Před 7 lety +4

      oh really ? becouse you were not so inpired and that 's a pity

    • @c.g.marseille4510
      @c.g.marseille4510 Před 6 lety

      not because but perhaps, sorry berlinzerberus, I am not English

    • @kitmcginnity6767
      @kitmcginnity6767 Před 6 lety +3

      I like the first impromptu very much, just listened to it. The dynamics and rubato are muted, yes - but I find that can sometimes be more powerful than a more sensitive, musical interpretation. Richter is speaking - and sometimes the most profound words search deeper said in a simpler, 'flatter', way. Consider Brando's 'I could have been a contender' monologue delivered by Lawrence Olivier - better, worse or just different? Some days I want Horowitz, some days Richter. Some days Gould, some days Schiff. And the same pianist who can play so expressively, sometimes playing rhythmically, cleanly and with very sparing emotion can move the most. It's so subjective anyway, who knows what it's about! :-)

    • @gnorn3607
      @gnorn3607 Před 6 lety

      Slava is trying to copy Sofronitsky's mesmerizing interpretation. Like Sofronitsky, he plays the piece in G rather than G flat.

  • @Manitwo7
    @Manitwo7 Před 2 dny

    엄청나게 섬세하네요...