Part 1 | Multiple Mediums | Columbian Exposition of 1893
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 08. 2024
- The inaugural episode in this series which will delve into the finer details of imagery based around the most grand exposition in American history - The Chicago World's Fair of 1893. We are trying to decipher if the image artifacts left behind were merely for cosmetic purposes or artfully distorting historical lines.
The images used in this presentation will be sourced below.
Interested in checking this out for yourself? Curiosity is good for your health!
Campbell's Illustrated History of the World's Columbian Exposition
archive.org/de...
Photographs of the World's Fair : an elaborate collection of photographs of the buildings, grounds and exhibits of the World's Columbian Exposition
archive.org/de...
Art and Handicraft in the Woman's Building of the World's Columbian Exposition
archive.org/de...
The Star (Reynoldsville, Pa.), May 17, 1893
www.loc.gov/re...
Pittsburg dispatch (Pittsburg [Pa.]), October 22, 1892
www.loc.gov/re...
History of the World's fair; being a complete description of the World's Columbian exposition from its inception
archive.org/de...
Iconographic Encyclopaedia of Science, Literature, and Art - Vol. 2
Latent Lexicon Video - • 171 Year Old Iconograp...
archive.org/de...
Some books/texts shown in these videos may be edited to feature the visual aspects. The photos may be in a different order than in the original text.
* Some titles are in different languages and are translated. They may not be an exact match. Publishing and summary information are directly from digital libraries and sources.
All images are courtesy of Public Domain and/or Creative Commons for educational/entertainment purposes.
Contribution To the Library
Wish to contribute to the library? Connect with me and send details on texts you may own or have digital links.
latent.lexicon@gmail.com
If you enjoy the content on this channel and wish to donate, please use the link below. Every donation goes to expanding the project and content. Thank you for your support!
Buymeacoffee - www.buymeacoff...
Music
Valley of Voices - AlanFrijns
This is not scandalous.
It’s always been this way. It reveals the dark side of self.
The Pharos changed the hieroglyphics when they they came into power to better suit their self image.
It has always been.
I admire your efforts to prompt people to the right path but it is (sadly) woven into our DNA.
I was a pressman for thirty years.
All magazines do nothing more than promote themselves.
Tobacco companies would use actors to look like doctors and look straight into your eyes and lie to you.
People try to make history, distort history and revise history.
We hade our flaws. I could keep writing forever.
It’s an ugly reflection we don’t want to see.
I understand.
Let’s make the world better by starting with ourselves.😢
Trailer for sale or rent, Room to let, 50¢ ...
-love that song. Thanks! ...King of the Road
I think you make a fair point certainly .. I also think that the underling implications of a pre-existing infrastructure being rediscovered also reveals the better nature ‘woven into our DNA’ .. the wrestling between higher and lower natures has surely been present through the ages and grappling over some sort of tipping-point between opposing ways of reigning over self-and-other.
It's a non sequiter to compare what you think the "Pharos" were doing in which was filtered thru 19th and 20th century British, French, German, and American Egyptologist's interpretations, who were people completely removed from these Ancient societies consciousness, did not live in their culture, and using a bogus, fabricated Rosetta stone interpretation to supposedly decipher their sacred language from non initiated Anthropologists, influenced by Eugenics, to what European's have simulated since the 19th century. For instance, I would suggest reading Symbol and the Symbolic by Scwhaller de Lubiczs, as he explained no one in the post modern era will ever understand what was occuring, nor interpret properly the Ancient Egyptian symbols, unless you have involved yourself in many years of study, and initiation into Alchemy, and a completly different consciousness than Western Educational institution's provides.
Therefore, what you have done with your false comparison is called "Cultural Reinvention," and Dunning/Krugger effect, as it is explained in finally in the book Simulation and Simulacra by Baudillare. You were reared in an artificial reality, based on a false, aliented self, alienated from nature attempting to correctly interpret a culture who were deepely rooted into the reality, and mysteries of Nature, what an arrogant Hubris.
I'm in the trucking biz. The logistics alone of sourcing the materials after designing the fairgrounds, to say nothing of transporting it all to one location and then actually building these facilities, is utterly mind boggling regardless how much moola was thrown at the project. This rabbit hole is deep. Thanks for pushing us over the edge 🙂
Phenomenal work again my man!!! What a beautiful masterpiece!!!! Much obliged💯🙏
A Nice bit of work Mr. First time I have seen anyone take this much time to really scrutinize these photographs, and I have to wonder if the highlighting was something that was a normal thing to do because of the nature of B & W photographs.
The seemingly endless vanilla skies are of concern, God, soo many questions and so few attainable answers.
But by now I think we can toss any questions for the need of soo many insane asylums in this time period. Many many people must have been just blown completely out of their minds by the sight of these things. Knowing it wasn't even remotely possible for the present occupiers to build these structures alone, not to mention the question of time for their construction and the degree of intelligence needed. I believe I have yet to see a true construction photo taken when the crews were hard at it, steam donkeys roaring and nuts and bolts flying.
Yes, none of the construction photos seem to make sense when there is simply a metal frame and no scaffolding, you simply couldn't build anything that way.
I absolutely love what you're doing!
I appreciate your time to watch and am very glad that you enjoy these presentations. Thank you so much!
I second that, incredibly interesting analysis sprinkled with different sources of info
Meeee tooooo
@@LatentLexicon I don’t buy the narrative whatsoever in that history book on the 1893 worlds fair about it transforming in 2 years from swampy marshy wasteland to the most magnificent thing ever created in mankind that is the biggest lie those buildings were there and people were kept away from them for a long time something happened where mankind was isolated and brought up into daylight most likely from underground the whole narrative is absolute fraudulent at its finest in 2024 we couldn’t achieve even 5% of that in two years doesn’t matter how big the workforce .it’s a lie I don’t think people understand how big the molds would have to be for some of the sections on these buildings I’ve done moldmaking and I can tell you the undercuts could get into the hundreds just on one section under cuts are different sections to a mold. None of this was made of plaster definitely concrete polymer blend it’s obvious how deliberate these worlds fairs were on creating a fake false narrative of history to erase The truth on the real past which we have been digging out of literally in 2024 figuring out with great research and the digging out back in 1800s where some catastrophic event that happened? I think the technology that they have is above and beyond and I’m talking about what they had back then. people who run this world are liars and deceivers.
@@LatentLexicon amazing that CZcams actually led me to you as my lunch break is usually my go to your work is really awesome and I enjoy watching all of your videos thank you for putting such a great research into the subject which is my number one fascination at the current moment
You seem to be comparing today's standards of documentation to that of 100 years ago - when there were no standards - and likely only a few people in the world having the skills to do this brushing. They had no standards, not concept of what is unethical - and very likely no intention to fool anyone. Rather intentions to present the most impressive view of the exposition that could. Also - they did not have the luxury of 500 cameras available on the site around the clock. They did not have many of the photos needed to present their stories - so they filled in as best they could. The photos they did have were often over/underexposed - so they fixed it - just like your camera automatically fix the exposure. All this analysis is very impressive. Indeed - there was no past.
They were all showing the hidden hand in that image at 24:10 and you said nothing. Great video
@Latent Lexicon - You did a phenomenal job of covering the Columbian Exposition of 1893 photographs, illustrations and engravings! I thoroughly enjoyed this episode! Thank you kindly!
Appreciate the kind words - Thank you!
Very interesting! I appreciate the way you superimpose highlights on your discussion points.
Excellent feedback - thank you. Appreciate that and very happy you enjoyed this one.
I love that you've gone down this rabbit hole... Many of the other channels simply assert their beliefs but here it is very beneficial that you take us on your own journey of discovery into the details of the images in the books which were printed at the time.
I appreciate your comment and glad that it came across as a true exploration. There are so many questions surrounding this event along with a plethora of theories and wanted to confirm the details for myself. Figured it would be best to document and show the process along the way. Glad you enjoyed it - much more to come.
Excellent presentation ! Keep them coming.
Thank you and the next episode is well underway - always appreciate your comments
Happy to have found your channel. ❤
I'm now 100% sure that the construction itself is fake. Now, whether the actual site of the fair existed, or if it is another composite, and this was a way to both steal money and see how they could fool people, it remains to be seen. Because it's not so much about moving that amount of dirt, or even the bs amount of work and men they should have shown but didn't, but to where did their material go, or the dirt they moved, and it's the lack of said things that for me shows THAT simply didn't happen. What's the story, they did it out of paper mache or something? Sure, and it snows in October.
Bah.
Also, at the very least 3 of those men were masons, the ones with their hands inside their jackets. I'm beginning to think they are called masons not because of their obsession with the occult and geometry but because they have literally formed our fake reality. Literally, even THEM are inserted on the photo, couldn't they just schedule a reunion to take it, or the one in the office? For all we know, even those people could be fake at this point, but assuming they are at the very least public actors, it's just weird.
Same with the other photograph, why not merely show the original? If you have thing to hide, why do this? Maybe that photograph of Colombus came form somewhere else. Was this part also on the old Spanish Empire? Is it possible that they could have constructed it before, or if our history is duplicated as I suspect, that this was originally some kind of Roman (Spanish) Villa or amusement park?
That last paragraph not only sounds incredibly threatening but also... suspicious. You make a bunch of very fake and retouched photos and then you go "YES, THIS HAPPENED, THIS IS A FACT! WE WERE VICTORIOUS!" Reality seems to be pointing the other way, and this was fake but they did conquer something, sold a lie, and whatever it was, they were very proud of it.
The nations fell to them, whatever they meant.
It's a valid question. The theory that none of it existed at all is possibly the most wild one of all that I've heard, yet I can't discount it.
Thank you.
I'm still on the fence, even after 4 years of being open for an alternate history. That's why i love channels like this. Moving on to the other two parts now i guess. Keep it up!
If u ain't woke up yet you never will. Time is up.
14:49 first impression was is that the "statue of the republic" in the background that they may have attempted to etch or remove out of the photograph? they may not have entirely been able to without irrevocably damaging the photo, was the statue already there along with some or most of the buildings and was this undertaking more of a restoration project than construction from the ground up? Makes more sense to think that it was restoration project, or maybe even just a fresh coat of paint on the buildings that were already there...especially considering the short timeframe this whole project was completed...(undesirable swampland to magnificent city with infrastructure!!) A lot if not all of the construction photos are obviously staged, altered, or manipulated, or completely manufactured in some way...
The guy in back of the room at 30 minutes doesn't look right at all, like he's been composited in. That might be the reason why they wrote that there were 2 visitors in the room.
Awesome! Loved it
It's important to know that there are actually multiple lakefront parks. There is also the north Island park, a few miles away. For example, did Burnham&co show the federal bigwigs who came to visit the empty north park, when in fact many of these buildings already stood in Jackson Park? Perhaps so they could then pocket the money provided for building the fair? If so then what were these buildings originally for?? As usual more questions, but at least it's a theory.
Can you elaborate please ?
The building were already there ?
This is only the second of your videos I have watched and already I am feeling that the whole Exposition was a visual fabrication. Did it actually happen?
Are you serious?
@@slimdot7031 I’m not sure anymore. It was 5 months ago.
On very rare occasions we receive snow in October. Apparently , half of all octobers since 1884 there has been snowfall.
I don't live in Chicago but I've spent 0a great deal of time there. I believe the railroad tracks overpass shown in the image which you hover over at 41 minutes it's still there. I'll look on Google Maps but it would be More helpful if someone from Chicago could take a look at this.
This is truly what is required in many cases - boots on the ground. If it was possible to correspond with someone to investigate certain areas it would make for an excellent addition to these presentations. I have a list of sites that need investigation.
I have yet to see convincing construction photos with the proper amount of people, materials, machines, and background to convince me that anything but a cleanup project happened at any of these sites. And, their time line is never believable.
The guys in 26:07 doing the Masonic thing with the hand inside the jacket… 😅
I have to wonder that at a time when photography was relatively new, people we're curious, so tended to stand still or look unnatural. I'm not saying that there isn't something unusual going on, I'm just saying that that might also be factored in.
Quite interesting and very possible. You can see this type of curiousness with some of the earliest footage of trams going through cities. Motion pictures were relatively new and people are genuinely interested - In some cases stand and stare.
OMG did you see what just happened from 18:46 to 18:56 of this video 😮 look in the far right of the black white Image and watch the gate appear 😮 or is that you lol
I’m like wtf lol ignore me
Welcome to the land of buzz & bullsh!t. Milk and honey through the gift store.
{17492
Brilliant work/series, of course;
...(?) haz anyOne explored the $$$ side;
'all-wayz follow the $$$'; thiz/theze prjx seem 2 me
(among other thingz) 2B an Insurance SCAM/SCEME
...(?) who waz payD after iT/They were destroyD/set-Ablaze
I totally comprehend the language of '[...] speaking to TWO'
despite NAMING 'FOUR': the Speaker & the front-wards TWO
'triangle' being the converser & guests; the [I AGREE] 'cardBoard-cutOut-guy'
in the backGround of the 'sanctum-sanctorum' iz merely an 'Assiastant' &
az such wouldN't Be a focus[ed member] of the discussion-group