- 167
- 772 047
NCCMT | CCNMO
Registrace 27. 05. 2010
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)
Who We Are
We are leaders in and champions for evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health across Canada. The NCCMT is part of a network of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs).
What We Do
The NCCMT facilitates and scales EIDM in public health organizations in Canada. We provide high-quality resources, real-world training and practical mentorship that respond to the evolving needs of public health.
Who We Serve
The NCCMT supports and engages those working in public health across Canada at all levels, from front line service workers to policy makers.
Value We Add
The NCCMT advances stronger public health, driven by the best- available evidence, to improve the health and well-being of every person living in Canada.
Who We Are
We are leaders in and champions for evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health across Canada. The NCCMT is part of a network of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs).
What We Do
The NCCMT facilitates and scales EIDM in public health organizations in Canada. We provide high-quality resources, real-world training and practical mentorship that respond to the evolving needs of public health.
Who We Serve
The NCCMT supports and engages those working in public health across Canada at all levels, from front line service workers to policy makers.
Value We Add
The NCCMT advances stronger public health, driven by the best- available evidence, to improve the health and well-being of every person living in Canada.
Spotlight Webinar: Critical Appraisal of Public Health Research Evidence
Critical appraisal is an invaluable step in the evidence-informed decision making process. However, it can be challenging to select appropriate critical appraisal tools and apply their use in practice. The NCCMT is excited to host Dr. Marilyn Macdonald and Dr. Lori Weeks from the JBI Centre of Excellence (www.dal.ca/faculty/health/nursing/research/JBI.html) to present a webinar on the critical appraisal of public health research evidence. This session will provide an overview of the importance of critical appraisal as well as an introduction to some of JBI’s critical appraisal tools (jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools).
zhlédnutí: 62
Video
Insights from the 2024 Knowledge Translation Student Award Recipients
zhlédnutí 50Před 3 měsíci
Join the winners of the 2024 National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to add...
ALL the evidence: Appraising and using evidence about community context and organizational resources
zhlédnutí 124Před 9 měsíci
Do you need help with quality appraisal of different types of non-research evidence? This webinar will walk you through case examples showing how to use NCCMT’s Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) (www.nccmt.ca/qace) and Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) (www.nccmt.ca/rpa) tools to assess the quality of contextual evidence, including local health issues, community and political...
Focus on Students: Resources to Prepare you for your Public Health Career (2023)
zhlédnutí 306Před 10 měsíci
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) hosts its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they use EIDM tools and resources. Watch this webinar to learn how the NCCMT’s accessible and informative resources can support your coursework, practicums and ...
Insights from the 2023 Knowledge Translation Student Award Recipients
zhlédnutí 105Před rokem
Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transfera...
Spotlight Webinar: A Guidebook for Social Media Crisis Communication
zhlédnutí 157Před rokem
High levels of uncertainty result from emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19, creating unique communication challenges that are different from other health communication initiatives. Effective crisis communication is essential to promote the recommended prevention behaviors (e.g., physical distancing, hand hygiene, mask-wearing, and vaccination) and to maintain trust during the crisis. The...
The role of public health working with shelters serving people experiencing houselessness
zhlédnutí 119Před rokem
NOTE: Due to a technical issue, audio for the first ~10 mins of this webinar was not recorded. This session provides an overview of a rapid scoping review on the role of public health working with shelters serving people experiencing houselessness completed in 2022 by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) in collaboration with the National Collaborating Centre for Infe...
Applying Action-Oriented Resources to Reduce Financial Strain and Promote Financial Wellbeing
zhlédnutí 146Před rokem
This session will provide an overview of two action-oriented resources to reduce financial strain and promote long-term financial wellbeing developed in an international partnership led by the Centre for Healthy Communities (School of Public Health, University of Alberta). The resources are meant to support organizations from diverse sectors and all levels of government in designing, implementi...
Spotlight Webinar: Evidence Informed Decision Making (EIDM) Competence Measure
zhlédnutí 301Před rokem
Join Dr. Emily Belita, PhD, as she describes the launch of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making (EIDM) Competence Measure. This self-report tool has 27 questions to help public health professionals assess knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours related to EIDM. Using this comprehensive assessment will help to highlight individual strengths and areas for development related to EIDM
Focus on Students: Resources to Prepare you for your Public Health Career (2022)
zhlédnutí 345Před rokem
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools hosts its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they are using EIDM tools and resources. This webinar features current students and recent graduates from Master of Public Health (MPH) and other graduate programs in C...
Insights from the 2022 Knowledge Translation Student Award Recipients
zhlédnutí 123Před 2 lety
Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading the field in terms of innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and feature...
The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Lower-Risk Nicotine Use Guidelines
zhlédnutí 274Před 2 lety
This session will investigate the Recommendations made in the Lower-Risk Nicotine Use Guidelines (LRNUG). We will describe the methods used in the development of Guidelines where there is a lack of primary evidence and explore the importance of multiple iterations to improve the work as new evidence emerges. Finally we will explore how the Recommendations may be applied in practice.
An Evidence-Informed Vision for a Public Health Data System in Canada (Presented in French)
zhlédnutí 153Před 2 lety
Ce webinaire présente une vision éclairée par des données probantes concernant l’établissement d’un système de données en santé publique pancanadien. Il a été commandé par le Bureau de l’Administratrice en chef de la santé publique (ACSP) à l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada afin d’éclairer le webinaire annuel 2021 de l’ACSP. L’objectif global de cette revue était de présenter des approche...
An Evidence-Informed Vision for a Public Health Data System in Canada
zhlédnutí 594Před 2 lety
Join Dr. David Buckeridge, in partnership with the Office of the Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) and the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, to learn more about approaches to establishing and assuring the components for developing a data system, along with consideration of overarching factors such as options for coordinating and leading the development and operation of a coordi...
Equity and KT: Insights from the 2021 Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Award Recipients
zhlédnutí 260Před 2 lety
Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading innovative, equity-focused knowledge translation strategies. This session will highlight their academic excellence and feature u...
Engaging Public and Patient Partners in Rapid Reviews
zhlédnutí 180Před 2 lety
Engaging Public and Patient Partners in Rapid Reviews
Focus on Students: Resources to Prepare you for your Public Health Career
zhlédnutí 343Před 2 lety
Focus on Students: Resources to Prepare you for your Public Health Career
Rapid Review Methods in a COVID-19 World
zhlédnutí 289Před 3 lety
Rapid Review Methods in a COVID-19 World
The Tool for Assessing the Effects of Local Intersectoral Action
zhlédnutí 199Před 3 lety
The Tool for Assessing the Effects of Local Intersectoral Action
L’Outil d’appréciation des effets de l’action intersectorielle locale
zhlédnutí 274Před 3 lety
L’Outil d’appréciation des effets de l’action intersectorielle locale
Promoting Early Childhood Development and Wellbeing with the Early Years Check-In and Play & Learn
zhlédnutí 800Před 3 lety
Promoting Early Childhood Development and Wellbeing with the Early Years Check-In and Play & Learn
Formation en ligne: Introduction à l'éthique en santé publique
zhlédnutí 698Před 3 lety
Formation en ligne: Introduction à l'éthique en santé publique
Online Course: An Introduction to Public Health Ethics
zhlédnutí 1,3KPřed 3 lety
Online Course: An Introduction to Public Health Ethics
Evidence-Informed Decision Making in the Era of COVID-19
zhlédnutí 465Před 3 lety
Evidence-Informed Decision Making in the Era of COVID-19
Master of Public Health Student Webinar
zhlédnutí 858Před 3 lety
Master of Public Health Student Webinar
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Courtney Primeau, PhD, University of Guelph
zhlédnutí 85Před 3 lety
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Courtney Primeau, PhD, University of Guelph
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Maureen Gustafson, MPH, University of Toronto
zhlédnutí 113Před 3 lety
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Maureen Gustafson, MPH, University of Toronto
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Conclusion
zhlédnutí 30Před 3 lety
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Conclusion
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Introduction
zhlédnutí 131Před 3 lety
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Introduction
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Henry Lai, MSc, University of British Columbia
zhlédnutí 70Před 3 lety
2020 Knowledge Translation Student Award Panel - Henry Lai, MSc, University of British Columbia
Hello, in item 2 when it says "justification of any deviation from protocol", if they don't say anything about deviations from protocol in the review, what i should do? I should check the box or not? And I have the same question also for item 4, when it says "Justified publication restrictions", if the review says that there are no language restrictions, or no restrictions at all, or just doesn't adresses the problem (it doesn't says anything about restrictions), what should I do? Check the box or not? Thank you and thank you for this video!
Hello, thank you for your question. If these issues are not directly addressed by the authors, you can use your judgement to decide whether you feel the authors have adhered to the protocol. Similarly, you can judge whether or not the authors were inclusive of languages. Oftentimes, if authors were inclusive beyond English, this will be explicitly stated.
@@nccmt Thank you a lot for your answer you are my saviour! But there is still a thing that I don't understand (Item 2), because, if they say "we did deviated from the protocol and that's because blah blah blah..." ok, that's obvious, I'll check the box, while if they say "we did deviated from the protocol." (without any justification) I won't check the box. But if instead they state "we totally adhered to the protocol", or, I feel that the authors have adhered to the protocol (so in the review they don't state "we totally adhered to the protocol" but I think they actually adhered to it), in this two cases, I'll check the box? Thank you again!
@@lucac682 Yes, in those two cases, you can check the box! Essentially, if there are no deviations from the protocol then there's no need to justify.
@@nccmt Thank you so much (in extreme delay) for your answers and the time you took to help me! You are a very kind and nice person hope you the best!
Merci pour cette video!
Should I use ROBINS-I for case control studies?
Hi Leire. As long as the case control study is evaluating an intervention, you can use the ROBINS-I tool.
Merci. Très pertinent et clairement expliqué
Metuculously presentwd and simple to undertand Odds Ratio. Thank you🙏
thank you very much, it made if very easy to understand and calculate
thank youuuuuuuuuuuu
amazing fact to you doc
You make it clear mother
Added to send me lianl
Excellent
Promo`SM 🤤
good explanation of ARR compared to RRR .....I bet the government uses one set when they want to prove they have done something effectively and the other set when they want to minimise what they have done something not so welll....like this the risk of getting infected by the coronavirus is reduced by 40% if you wear a mask....when in reality they used the RRR instead of the ARR...I bet for deaths they used ARR instead of RRR to show how good a job they were doing...ha ha...guess Twain wasn't wrong then....
Hello NCCMT | CCNMO Owner, I saw your CZcams channel, you upload very nice videos on your channel. I have watched all the videos and noticed that all the videos are beautiful. But your channel has many problems. But the problem is that your videos are not reaching your target audience! Because, your channel does not have SEO! If you don't fix the problem, your video won't get video views organically because the CZcams algorithm works on keywords, but your channel doesn't have any keywords! These problems can be solved by SEO techniques. Every video will rank on CZcams if you do SEO perfectly. Doing SEO will help your video reach the right people and increase views. Remember, SEO is not a single task, it is multifaceted. If you want to do SEO on your channel, I can help. I am an SEO expert. Thank you, have a nice day
great videos..thanks
Hello It was just brilliant. Thank you so much.
Perfect
I can proudly say that I have conquered SMD🤣
Hi greetings, I have some questions about this too. I am currently conducting a systematic review and plan to use this tool. Most of my studies are cross sectional and few case-control. Because of my research question I cannot use RCTs. The question I have is regards to withdrawals and dropouts, blinding and confounders. These questions don’t have an answer because of the type of study. The studies identify confounders and adjustments but doesn’t say the percentage, also the studies don’t mention blinding or withdrawals are they are cross-sectional. Does this make my studies weak? Because they are really good articles. This tool is the best I have seen CASP doesn’t have checklist for cross sectional studies
Thank you for reaching out! In this case, you may consider referring to the JBI suite of critical appraisal tools, as an alternative. This suite includes tools specific for assessing cross-sectional and case-control studies. jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Please feel free to email us at nccmt@mcmaster.ca with any further questions.
@@nccmt thank you for your response 🙏
Hands down, this was the best video I've watched on understanding the logic and visualizing what AR, ARR, RR, and RRR. Kudos!!
Thank you! We are glad you found this video useful.
ya t il un video en francais?
Bonjour Fanie, merci pour votre commentaire. Oui, je vous invite à regarder la vidéo en français ici : czcams.com/video/z6gW2-7Gjs0/video.html
merci merci merci inffffffffffffrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
its tooo good
So, Covid vaccines, masking, distancing, R/D? What's the OR?
This is gold, good for review... simple to understand
The CCCA did a much better job at explaining how people were bamboozled by this.
A 40% reduction , but still no effect! This is the problem of interpreting CI as a p value.
Thanks for this awesome video
😊😊😊😊
Thank you so much for this video! It helped me analyze my articles so much easier and I was able to write a great analysis. Thank you!!
And the 2023 Oscar goes to RRR !
wow.. so nicely explained.. thanks
Amazing explanation
Excellent thanks
Very good explanation!
Thank you great simplicity and clarity
Great and georgious presenter.
🙏🙏🙏👍🏽
Bonjour, je n'ai pas compris comment calculer le DMS: pour le cas du calcul de l'efficacité de l'intervention sur des ados pour évaluer leur état mental, s'il est la soustraction d'un score sur 10 à un autre, le DMS peut être supérieur à 1? Pourquoi indiquer qu'il est entre 0 et 1 ? Merci d'avance, Cyriaque
Merci pour votre commentaire. Pour calculer le DMS, la différence moyenne est divisée par l'écart type. Il est possible que le DMS soit supérieur à 1, ce qui indiquerait un effet très important.
Thankyou so much <3 this video has really helped make things clear
so just 45% above and under the mean is the confidence interval?
Thanks for reaching out. In the first example, the confidence interval ranges from 30% above to 30% below the relative risk. In the second example, the confidence interval ranges from 50% above to 50% below the relative risk.
This was honestly really good. Using the same example for all the risk ratios was so helpful. Seeing how it compares.
anda perlu menjelaskan kandungan
These videos are great. Thank you!
Really appreciate the way you explained it.
thank you
Why are all the vaccinated spreading stds???
Really enriching. Thanks
clear as mud
Today is the day that I conquered SMDs.