Video

I am going to re-post this message as I did on Shawn's interview with Dr. Brug. """With your permission, Shawn, I will post a message for both of you. I did not know about your organization, EHV, Dr. John Brug, and interestingly enough I am also working on a revision (not a translation !) of the KJV. I am not a scholar, but I have studied some of these things since childhood. I also saw the need for some revisions of the biblical text. And my intent was to make use of the Paleo Hebrew text as much as possible, and especially the Aramaic Version of The New Testament. However there are a few other finer points that we need to make. First, however popular the idea is among scholars, and however useful it is for us today, Lord Jesus, Paul, the rest of the New Testament writers would have NEVER quoted from the Septuagint ! There is not shred of evidence of that happening. Second, I have read that the authentic Septuagint burned down in a fire at Ptolemy's library in Alexandria. Third, luckily, apparently a copy of The LXX managed to go to the Greek world, before the fire. Fourth, The Greeks "sanitized" it quite a bit, and that is why we have some strange additions to it that do not add up at all as Scripture. Fifth, and MOST IMPORTANT, The ORIGINAL Septuagint was translated from the ORIGINAL HEBREW TEXT, penned down in the PALEO HEBREW SCRIPT, which at some point is some 2500 years older than the Masoretic Text, not to mention that The MT was "sanitized" as well by the Judean scribes. HOWEVER ALL the New Testament citations of Lord Jesus, Paul and the rest of NT writers are in perfect concordance with the records of The LXX, just because it was translated from scrolls much closer to authenticity. As I said above, I am working on an edition of The Bible and I am making full use of both the records of The Paleo Hebrew, as found in a few still extant ancient translations of the Old Testament, and a few fragments found among the Dead See Scrolls, - AND the Aramaic Version of The new Testament - and in certain paces a great difference will be seen. Yes, it will look strange at first, but I am sure the honest believers will love it. It is now in a "beta" stage, I will most probably be ready by the yearend, but if you want it right now, I can send it to you both. Please send me a message at nairelavataoldotcom, subject "2024 Beta Digital Bible" and an electronic copy is yours for the asking - thus we might have a chance to exchange notes. But the final copy that I am working on will be ready by the New Year. Absolutely free. Choicest Blessings !"""

With your permission, Shawn, I will post a message for both of you. I did not know about your organization, EHV, Dr. John Brug, and interestingly enough I am also working on a revision (not a translation !) of the KJV. I am not a scholar, but I have studied some of these things since childhood. I also saw the need for some revisions of the biblical text. And my intent was to make use of the Paleo Hebrew text as much as possible, and especially the Aramaic Version of The New Testament. However there are a few other finer points that we need to make. First, however popular the idea is among scholars, and however useful it is for us today, Lord Jesus, Paul, the rest of the New Testament writers would have NEVER quoted from the Septuagint ! There is not shred of evidence of that happening. Second, the authentic Septuagint burned down in a fire at Ptolemy's library in Alexandria. Third, luckily, a copy of The LXX managed to go to the Greek world, before the fire. Fourth, The Greeks "sanitized" it quite a bit, and that is why we have some strange additions to it that do not add up at all as Scripture. Fifth, and most important, The ORIGINAL Septuagint was translated from the ORIGINAL HEBREW TEXT, penned down in the PALEO HEBREW SCRIPT, which at some point is some 2500 years older than the Masoretic Text, not to mention that The MT was "sanitized" as well by the Judean scribes. But ALL the New Testament citations of Lord Jesus, Paul and the rest of NT writers are in perfect concordance with the records of The LXX, just because it was translated from scrolls much closer to authenticity. As I said above, I am working on an edition of The Bible and I am making full use of both the records of The Paleo Hebrew, AND the Aramaic Version of The new Testament and a great difference will be seen. Yes, it will look strange at first, but I am sure the honest believers will love it. It is now in a "beta" stage, I will probably be ready by the yearend, but if you want it right now, I can send it to you both. Please send me a message at nairelavataoldotcom, subject "2024 Beta Digital Bible" and an electronic copy is yours for the asking - thus we might have a chance to exchange notes. But the final copy that I am working on will be ready by the New Year. Absolutely free. Choicest Blessings !

I’m getting it

1800 years of theology. We can’t stop! It’s our heroin

Shawn, how about reviewing books that challenge your perspectives, particularly those you might not agree with (besides the reformed stuff)? I suggest three books you might disagree with but surely are interesting: - God is Open: Examining the Open Theism of the Biblical Authors, by Christopher Fisher - The Fire That Consumes: A Biblical and Historical Study of the Doctrine of Final Punishment, Edward William Fudge - How God Sees Women: The End of Patriarchy, by Terran Williams (not suggesting that I agree with these authors) It is often very beneficial to consider different perspectives.

I love love love this book and found it hard to put down as well!

Even Pelagius wasn’t a Pelagian 🤷🏼

Have you ever reviewed a book on calvinism vs. arminianism?

I read the "book" and my conclusion is RANK HERESY

God is NOT a GOD of compromise

The sermon on the mount is the new covenant. God makes with man through his son. Christ Jesus.

From Exodus to Revelation, for anyone to rightly divide truth from truth within scripture, Paul gives the 3 as: Time Past, But Now, and Ages to Come. We live in the "But Now" age of what Paul also calls the Dispensation of the Grace of God. (DoG for short). If anyone can find me a singular "church age" in scripture, I've got $1000 to give them. This term was invented so soft replacement theologians can exert control over other men. To do this, they need to prove they share in the things prophesied to Israel in Joel 2 and explained by Peter in Acts 2. The Mystery, on the other hand, was given to Paul mid-way through his ministry and the proof that it was still being rejected 40 years after Christ's ascension is seen in Acts 21 by the mouth of James talking to Paul about the thousands in Judea all zealously following the law. Clearly RR continues to trump scripture with seminary fabrication's to some extent, but hey, don't stop sharing the gospel of grace.

Flaws=Flavian flavoured fake church

I think Dallas Willard would disagree with you... :)

Provisionism is not a branch of thought that refutes the monergistic gospel, because it would imply that the entire movement called Protestant Reformation was not led by the Holy Spirit, but by the Devil. If the reformers, who were serious pastors, freed us from Roman semi-Pelagianism, ancient and modern Arminianism, as well as Provisionism, do return us to semi-Pelagianism. Because they teach that in the end, it was I who chose God, through my libertarian free will. The Potter's choice is ignored, in order to center salvation on man who in the end chooses God, and not the other way around. If we look at the world of sects, all of them (without exception) believe in libertarian free will. But who is the only one who has free will, if not God himself, who is not influenced by anything outside of himself, unlike man. Man has freedom, but not free will, like God, this is clear and crystal clear in the Scriptures that the one who chooses is God Himself (Is 49.1, Jr 1.1-3, Galatians 1.15 etc etc) But for the heretics of our times it is preferable to listen to Leighton Flowers and so many others who deny the Scriptures, and the Absolute Sovereignty of God. Marcos Lopez - Naugatuck - USA - czcams.com/video/Ve49GTdZvK0/video.html

The church has always been around or at least since the jewish nation has been around,don't frustrate the Word of God with man made dotrines

The epistle definitely belongs in our bibles… personally I believe a new Bible needs to be put together with “BES KJV” translation as it base and what ever is missing should be cooberrated with the Ethiopic Bible.

Oh nice, good books

Interesting, thanks. Christopher J.H. Wright's "The old testament in 7 sentences" is great book (160 pages). As Disiple Dojo said about Wright's books, "have everyone you can get your hands on". Blessings 😊

It's another insightful and worthy review, my friend. I was intrigued by the characterization of the Sermon on the Mount as being a campaign speech. Since we are in a presidential election year, I suppose that the comparison should not be a surprise to me. It's not that I seriously disagree. Through the fifty plus years since our Lord called me to preach His Word, He has privileged me to teach/preach through Matthew's account in various venues, and most recently to a class in a local Bible college. The Holy Ghost has given me peace in teaching that the Sermon on the Mount has a triple application, although only one of them, of course, is the primary one. Although He knew that He would be rejected as King during His first advent, He made a legitimate offer, nonetheless. The Sermon on the Mount was delivered at that time to demonstrate precisely how He would administrate His kingdom. Though they rejected Him as King, the principles were inspired, perfect, and practical, even for that day: It had secondary value/interpretation during His first advent. During the Church Age, we do not look for a King or a kingdom. Yet, again, the principles are invaluable for both believers and unbelievers: It has tertiary value/interpretation for the Church Age. However, He is not returning at His second advent to take sides, but to take over. And, the Sermon on the Mount is what I call "the Constitution of the Millennial Kingdom." This is precisely (though not in complete detail) how He will administer His 1000-year reign on Earth, following His second coming: It will have its primary value/interpretation during the Millennium. This is quite close to the explanation which you presented, if I understood you correctly. Kudos on an excellent review! It sounds to be a well-thought-out book.

If we focused on the genealogy of Jesus Christ, before and after his manifestation in the flesh, you would conclude that he was not a perfect man, nor could he be God. Yet there he is perfect. The word of God is settled forever in heaven. All these linguistic champions with the original Hebrew and Greek arguments underestimate the Holy Ghost and the perfect work of translation. The scholarly stance and attack on childlike faith is an iniquity and arrogance that truly doesn’t want to submit to the absolute authority of the word of God. The contemptorary church has certainly been led astray, men leading others after themselves. Sorry, the Greek here means this, and this manuscript says this here so, what the KJV should have said is this. It is all nonsensical. It is a heart issue, and itching ears don’t want to hear. The division of the body of Christ has not been caused by the KJV only position. The issue in Jesus’s day is the same as it was during his ministry. The division was twofold: his person and his word: John 7:53 & John 10:19. The admonition was clear in Romans 16:17-18. And Paul addressed the situation 1 Corinthians 1:10 & 3:3.

Great review of what appears to be a book that recognizes that there has to be a separation between Israel under the law and the church free from the law. It seems most dispensationalists will say that, but then not use it in their exegesis.

Thanks.....not available in Finland 😳

Why force this to have some strained application today. As pointed out, Jesus is offering the kingdom (i.e., to restore the kingdom) to the Jews (4:17). This offer, also called "the gospel of the Kingdom" (4:23) finds further description in the Sermon on the Mount. But Jesus is not just telling the Jews what the Kingdom will be like--I think they would have already known that from the OT; Jesus is exhorting them about how they should now live because the Kingdom is coming. This is preparation for living in the Kingdom. Or, at least gives the implications of how you should living in light of the coming Kingdom. The commands in this passage seem to set this teaching in that day (not the future) although it is because of what will happen in the future (the Kingdom): 5:12, 16; 6:33 etc. Also, much of this passage is about living before, not in, the Kingdom (5:20 'enter the kingdom of heaven'; 6:33 'seek first the kingdom of God'). So I would take this passage as directly applicable to the Jews in Jesus day, but as result of their rejection of Him as their Messianic King, it will now only be directly applicable to the Jews in the Tribulation----This is because it is about how to live in preparation for entering the Kingdom. I see no real direct application to the Church Age other than the moralistic teachings that can also be found elsewhere in the Bible (just because Jesus said it does not make it more relevant). Peace Out

If you can find it, the work of Wilber Pickering on developing an accurate Greek text from which to translate is very valuable. He's comparing 300 or more extants, to come up with the most like the original. I don't think his translating ability is exceptional, but his methodology for determining what's the best in the Greek is outstanding. He considers the critical texts but shows through their own lack of internal consistancy, that they're not to be trusted. Generally they are only 66% percent consistent between themselves. Whereas the majority text is around 98%

The kingdom of God is inside you.

There are so many different takes on the sermon of the mount, and once you dig in, there's so much depth hidden within. I own several books solely devoted to the sermon, but my favorite is probably the one by D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones. The Bible podcast with Tim Mackie has also released multiple episodes of their podcast devoted to the sermon, and it's been fascinating to say the least.

Great review as always. Sounds like a very interesting read. Unfortunately I deleted all my social media accounts awhile back, so I'm unable to download it. Hopefully a physical copy becomes available at some point.

I'm guessing Dr. Aamon Hillman wasn't invited to partake in the new translation? Lol. Too bad. That's gonna be a big seller, someday.

The devil dismantles brick by brick so not to be noticed. Perhaps, every step away from the original is a brick removed.

So, if I'm understanding your reasoning for reviewing a book 'you couldn't read' is this, "I don't care what she says (remember, you only read two chapters in a book that contains 8 because I am psychic and know everything she going to say. Self righteous does begin to describe your attitude. The math tells me that you have absolutely no right to call your video " review of....." If you had however, read her extensive footnotes and where she got her sources, you would have found that her research is extremely thorough, unlike 90% of theology books try to read.

Prove that nonsense...

Thanks

Thank you 😊

Great video and I ordered mine a few minutes ago. Thanks.

Thanks so much for this amazing review!

Have you looked at the Majority Standard Bible? It is put together by the same group (Bible Hub) doing the Berean Standard Bible. It is in first draft and digital only at this point but I am interested in reading it. I would be interested in your thoughts on it. Thanks for the great content!

Blind leaders of the blind, NKJV IS NOT A KJV

@johnnyvans_77 • 25s ago KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD IM A FILIPINO AND TAGALOG BIBLE IS CORRUPTED AND GOD LEAD ME TO READ KJV BIBLE I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO PRESERVE HIS WORD BECAUSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS THE MOST SPOKEN UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE OF THIS WORLD EVEN ANY NATIONALITY READ KJV BIBLE BACAUSE KJV BIBLE IS PURE WORD PRAISE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL TRUTH PRESERVE PURE WORD, KJV IS MATHEMATICAL PERFECTION AND WITHOUT ERROR,KJV AROUND THE WORLD 🌍 🔥✝️🙌🇮🇱🇺🇸🇵🇭🇸🇪🇹🇳🇸🇷🇻🇺🇺🇿🇬🇧🇿🇲🇹🇭🇿🇼❤

As far as the religious side, can a nation really exist without any spiritual authority? Doesn’t scripture say that man can serve God or money? Is “no master” ever mentioned as an option anywhere in the Bible? Everywhere in the Bible, God demonstrated his authority through real power on earth. Some people can find faith from smaller signs in their own life, but I believe that most people take the world at face value. They can see what money rules every aspect of our lives, and place their faith accordingly. But as far as what you said about a ‘prince’, couldn’t it be an assembly of priests, or something like that?

So what changed with the Christian standard Bible?

Greetings! Thank you so much for subscribing to my channel, Brother! I truly appreciate your support and wanted to return the favor by checking out your channel. I found it incredibly interesting, especially your reviews of Christian books. Fantastic work! I watched your video on the book about grace, and I was really impressed by how engaging and insightful it was. You have a wonderful way of capturing the listener's attention and making the message of grace come alive. It's a blessing to connect with another Brother in the Kingdom. Amen! God has indeed provided a simple and profound way for all to be saved through the Gospel message. I love 1 Corinthians 15; it's one of my favorite passages to revisit. The Gospel never loses its power or relevance. We can rest confidently in Christ and His finished work on the cross. While religion often demands more, Christ has declared, "It is finished!" (John 19:30). Thank you again for sharing your knowledge and passion for these books. I've also subscribed to your channel and look forward to more of your content. God bless you! Sister Shelly, aka "MOM" MANY ON MISSION Sharing the Good News of God's Love Through Christ BE READY! 1 Peter 3:15 KJV But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear

Pelagius was a hero, Augustine a wicked servant of the Antichrist

You don't retire a product like that. As long as people want it they will buy it and should. It still sells more copies than all other translations ranked third and below. The fact it hasn't broken through the NIV #1 spot-- even once--in years and years and years is suspicious as all get out. The church isn't unified in any single thing where a definitive "retire it" command or consensus could be made or respected. In advocating for retiring the KJV one is simply being "Not KJV" only. It's God's word. And the translation will run its course when it runs its course. We like to manufacture everything instead of letting nature take its course. The fact it isn't faded into obscurity means it is far from doing so. And anyone who wishes it was any other way is being a partisan social engineering snob twit. There should be made a faithful update as an alternative.... One without critical text notes, one without altering the meaning of the text (like broad and "difficult." One that doesn't remove any verses. The reason we don't have a faithful modern update is because no one has done it honestly.

👎

I wish that Brother Andrew book was still in print. Keeping an eye out for a used copy.

So the 2020 is the “ woke “ version of NASB. Great 😂😂. I like it but I don’t like changing text to what “ we think it should mean “ due the changing the text because the times have changed , I don’t agree with one bit …. I’m pretty sure I learned in seminary , we are not allowed to add too the text or change it. So saying “ brothers and sisters “ is factually incorrect my friend !! The Bible is also clear that women cannot be pastors and deacons of a church. They can teach and play all kinds of roles but not leadership. Why , because God punished us for for eternity and the end result due to Eve being NIEVE and eating the fruit. We all are now punished with death because of Eve. This is also why women are not aloud to lead churches. Although I have seen way to many churches allowing women as pastors - soley to make everyone feel warm and fuzzy rather than abiding by Gods RULES. So many churches have went “ WOKE “ Very sad that all these pastors and churches are rebelling against Gods literal word !!! Kinda mind blowing to me …..

Keep preaching the one and only truth brother!

I been interested in learning more about the early church fathers I been looking into getting a book of them all to learn more thank you for video

Loved this book!! Must read for any Christian