- 111
- 20 926
xSparky Exclusives
Registrace 1. 03. 2022
Content on this channel will be about podcasts and full length uncut videos diving into all sorts on unreleased clips, leaks, drama and general topics not found on my main channel
Please note: uploads follow no set schedule
Please note: uploads follow no set schedule
Video
Past 3 PC Builds, enjoy!
zhlédnutí 380Před 7 hodinami
from nov 2023 to now too lazy to list specs ahhhh
YOU’RE LOSING BLOOD, STOP BEING DRAMATIC
zhlédnutí 166Před 12 hodinami
dry environments always hit me the hardest
RTX 4090 Tier List | 40 cards! (sorry for deep fried audio)
zhlédnutí 36Před 14 hodinami
create your own!: tiermaker.com/create/rtx-4090-40-cards-15494766
Slideshow #9 (Life Archive #20)
zhlédnutí 4Před 16 hodinami
weeb boi explorin da world! yielding good fruits!
Slideshow #8 (Life Archive #19)
zhlédnutí 4Před 19 hodinami
it was a short lived esteem, but well deserved, with the addition of countless lively encounters
Regarding Intel i9-13900K and 14900K stability/crashing issues
zhlédnutí 3,8KPřed 21 hodinou
going over potential fixes for these high end chips, mostly applies to asus board owners NOTICE: I AM IN NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM A PROFESSIONAL IN THIS FIELD, I WILL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR POTENTIAL DAMAGES OR DEAD CHIPS, FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN CAUTION pc specs: Intel Core i9-14900K ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III (420) Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO ATX WIFI 7 G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB 64 GB (DDR5-6000 C...
The BEST FEELING a kid my age can experience
zhlédnutí 841Před dnem
The BEST FEELING a kid my age can experience
playing with one hand in 2v8 resulted in salty post match (Identity V)
zhlédnutí 13Před dnem
playing with one hand in 2v8 resulted in salty post match (Identity V)
self clowning on another level (pause to read)
zhlédnutí 51Před 14 dny
self clowning on another level (pause to read)
Tryhard nolifing full SWF go FERAL over a quick match loss (Identity V)
zhlédnutí 3Před 14 dny
Tryhard nolifing full SWF go FERAL over a quick match loss (Identity V)
Random 2v8 | Breaking Wheel x Joker (Identity V)
zhlédnutí 12Před 14 dny
Random 2v8 | Breaking Wheel x Joker (Identity V)
My opinion: dont lock your cores. You have a really good cpu, sp 110 for 14900k is the best you can get. What is killing these cpu is the ring, not handling the voltage for p cores, e cores, and the memory controller. By your sp score, your vid table has likely very low vids for the p core frequency. I would let the bios on intel default, remove-enable limits and work on LLC, Dc and Ac LL. You will have low VID and will never go above 1.4v if not 1.385v based on your SP. You have a beautiful chip to lock at 5.0ghz.
PL 2 253 w intel spec , u sure u know how to use google? i dont believe u can hold 5 ghz on full load with 125 w ,at this point we wasting money buying a i9
You can just HOLD the del key.... USB keeps sending check requests. No need to spam.
If your system is already crashing with Intel 13th/14th Gen you need it replaced. Im a hardware engineer and see many red flags with this behavior on these chips. Intel needs to replace all of them because large server companies are losing money & switching to AMD Server chips quickly. If I had one of the chips I would RMA it ASAP. Only bad things can happen to Intel from this point forward without fixing the problem. Thanks
Nothing can fix it, it's a hardware issue not a software
any dx12 game would instantly crash for me but the recent bios update for my asus z790 e gaming wifi has seemed to fix the crashing issues. has run flawlessly for around a month now and i no longer have to force dx11 or undervolt the shit out of my 13900k
This has to be a troll video. I understand you want to protect your cpu but you literally just chopped its legs off and crippled it with those settings.
who wouldnt wanna protect & pamper their god bin? 56 is already a great enough clock, although voltage might be high for some ppl, preferences ig
If you just xtu and lock the cores to 5.0 instead through the bios and i dissable ecores and idle volts is 1.2ish
my bin is still better 😈
@@sparkyexclusives dang silicon lottery forgot to mention its a 13900k
feel yah , had lots of blood work this year and coming up on a second major surgery had SRS last month and FFS being planned for November. Game on! :)
you add 3 more fans for a push/pull on that 420 artic AIO get about 9-12C lower temps recommended if not.
Not sure why im here but i have been an intel user for years and just decently switched to my first amd just because i wanted to try something new and different and what do you know a few months after i build my pc i hear about all these intel problems. Wow i got some really good luck somehow lol.
Who even needs 3 PCs bro
clients, ROFL 🤣😅🤧
I have 3 as well 2 for multi box gaming and or one steaming one gaming and my main pc has a pc inside of it to run video in my case offloading my pc stress while gaming.
Spicy
You have a golden chip there. If it were me I'd be running it no lower than 5.8ghz P core and 4.6ghz e core at 1.35-1.4v vcore. You should be very safe under 1,4v vcore and under 1.3v on sa. The reason some of these chips are running into degradation issues is because they are overvolting the chip. I've seen as high as 1.6v on vcore. Rule of thumb for the longest time with Intel is don't go over 1.4v. Also, no one should be getting an i9 if they don't have sufficient cooling.
amen 😇🙏
I had to watch this at 1.5 speed
me too 😌
THE **FIX** PLUS EXPLANATION OF THE INTEL CPU PROBLEM: This is not a mystery or drama anymore. From J2C's BSODs, Actually Hardcore Overclocking, + many more, we've now observed multiple examples of EXACTLY what the issue is: The crashing and damage is caused when a single core goes into boost behavior. It can be two cores also, but it's the same problem. The CPU has a max voltage. But if you make ALL of that voltage available to one or two cores that want to boost to 5.8GHz, then they will get 1.55 or 1.6 volts. Whatever voltage is required to reach that frequency. That damages your CPU silicon. And that is an intentional design choice made by both Intel and AMD. It's not a manufacturing problem. Why doesn't this issue affect Xeon chips? Because most Xeon CPUs don't have single core boost clocks. When all cores boost together, the max voltage enforced by the chip's microcode is distributed across all cores, and no single core can get crazy high voltage. Anything over 1.5v has the potential to damage that core. Or possibly the cache package strapped to that core. The "FIX" is to lock/synch all the cores together, eliminate single core boost. This stops a single core from getting 1.6v. It's simple. If you already have damage, you may have to reduce your all core max boost frequency multiplier, because the damaged cores can no longer reach those freq. and will crash your PC. First, lock the cores together, no single core boost. I would recommend also putting a cap on the max voltage. Maybe 1.4v max, but because there's overshoot, personally I'd go lower. Not to mention the challenge of temps if all core turbo is too high. Validate what works with your CPU, what is a reasonable match between freq., voltage and temp. That's it. You're done. And no more damage. No more shouting into the void. The point of single core boost is stupid anyway. It's literally to get on the top of some reviewer's chart. But since both Intel and AMD allow their chips to do it, and we're at the limits of what the substrate can provide, we will keep seeing this. Lock/Synch your cores together, so when Win Update suddenly runs, a single stupid core isn't provided 1.6v so it can reach 6GHz. Problem solved.
The fix is to rma your degraded CPU and use upgraded BIOS which doesn't have this behaviour on the new one and everything should be fine moving forward
Just by activating Synch All Cores you have fixed the problem. What cooks these CPUs is when a single core, even for a background task, asks to boost to 5.8Ghz. Then, to reach that freq. it is given 1.55, or even 1.6v, depending on the individual CPU. THAT'S what's killing it. Even though the chip has power limits, when only one core wants to boost, all of the power is offered. This is a feature just so Intel can get a good CineBench score by reviewers. It's totally stupid. Lock those cores together and you're good.
u dropped this 👑
Exactly , i Feel like We Are Heroes By Doing Better Than Intel Itself . Lock That Shit And Live With Peace ! Cheers
Just to add to the statement, higher voltage allows for more current to run through the CPU cores to overcome resistance in the copper traces in the silicon. Better binned chips with higher SP numbers typically have more pure copper traces with lower resistance and thus require lower voltage to maintain stability. Resistance creates the heat as current (Amps) has a less straight path to flow through copper, voltage can over come resistance to provide more current flow if required. It's the current flow and heat that kills the chip, the voltage is like a mechanical lever that supplies more or less current (Amps) for a given resistance level based on silicon quality. I would avoid anything over 1.45V for Intel 10nm on single core boost, years ago I killed a 22nm Xeon 8 core running 1.48V OC after 6 months. Also the CPU input Voltage (PLL), powers the voltage regulators inside the silicon that feed your CPU, the motherboard feeds the vCore rail socket pads on 1.8V which is then stepped down to the vCore configured. Going below 1.8V increases temperature marginally as lower voltage means that more current flows into the CPU from the backside socket/pads. I run 1.88V on the PLL, reduced temps by 2C under full load for the 13900KS, and undervolted the vCore leaving it at stock core frequencies to reduce temps and power consumption further.
Cool
Just sell and buy ryzen.
im gettin tired of these bait+copium comments baha 🥶🤧💯
this is what i did to my 13700k immediately when i bought my 13700k: disable hyperthreadding, set max core voltages to 1.35v lock down clocks to 5.5ghzP 4.4ghzE. thing runs like a charm and wont be peaking 1.4xx+v during idle.
thats the dream! 💞💝❤️🩹 intel be like: 1.5 is fine! the reality: anything close to even 1.4 is mild panic zone
what settings?
All 13th and 14th gen CPU's are duds. Intel probably realized that they can't make silicon any faster, so now they want CPU's to be replaced like light bulbs. Every few years they fry and then you're expected to buy them over and over to just keep going. Technically, they should recall everything they've made over the last 2 years, but no chipmaker can afford that. Only reason they're not bankrupt yet, is because not everyone follows tech news. And as chip begin to fry in increasing numbers, class action lawsuits will fly. Since Intel can't offer non-defective replacements (all of them are equally defective), they have no options. And people built entire machines that they now can't use, if they switch to AMD. Additionally, before the CPU problem was admitted, a ton of RMA's have been filed for motherboards, power supplies and GPU's falsely blamed for blue screens. Turns out Intel caused people with good hardware to swap it out. They owe hardware retailers and manufacturers compensation for lost profits.
nerd emoji finger pointing up emoji book emoji, in all seriousness tho ppl should do their research and basically master the information prior to officially making their purchase to prevent time waste like this (looking up videos, reading forums, following drama etc)
can you show us the VF offset page in extreme/AI tweaker. i wanna see your 5.6/5.8 and 6.0 GHZ VIDs in bios. thats a crazy cpu at 110 sp
SP 110 IS CRAZY
altho the wild support is nice, the nolife copium comments is kinda...... depressing ngl 😅
This new bios bricked my 13700K haha
Wow why pay i9 prices for an i5 level of performance, if it does not work return it simple intel users need to punish intel for a defective product period. Imagine buying chocolate ice cream and getting vanilla 😂
ppl misunderstanding pretty hard like its literally a enthusiast chip but when u run into it blind (400a, unlim pl1 pl2, free single core boost, inadequate cooler) and complain abt it is simply laughable
@@sparkyexclusives Dude. You have just shown that you are the clueless one. Even if you do ALL the right things, you will still get a burnt out CPU. Point in fact, you have server farms with 50%+ failures of these CPUs. You going to tell them they have no clue how to run their core business too? The issue, confirmed by Intel, is a faulty algorithm in their CPU's microcode, resulting in incorrect voltage requests to the processor - ie causing excessive voltages within the CPU. And if your CPU has started to have instability issues, then it has started on the accelerated path to total failure. And any damage sustained by this over volting is irreversible - getting the microcode update is too late for that CPU. So yeah, it is not caused by the end user - it is fully on Intel.
@@sparkyexclusives cope
This not a fix in anyway. You gimped a i9 to run as an i5. Don't DO THIS to your CPU.
i dont understand these copium comments
The theory was halfway there. What should have been done is set a manual core voltage of say 1.35v or whatever he's comfortable with, then up the all core ratio up till it's unstable, then back it off one. Power limit and ratio didn't need to be so low.
Dude you should press f5 then load base default you are all mess up there
bro think he cookin :pepeskull: LMFAOOAOAOOAOAOO
Load the bios update for Asus microcode 0x125 to ensure eTVB operates within intel spec dropped my vcore to 1.341v in bios. Also sets other preameters 253 wats 400 amps etc
should be 307a shrug
@@sparkyexclusives 400A is correct for Extreme profile on KS chips. In practise you'll never even get close to that value in applications (or the lower 'application' value) as the voltage requested via the VID table will always make you power rather than current limited. Asus Z790 Hero running 2402 with 0x125 microcode with a 14900KS at LLC6 and 7200MTs RAM on a MoRa 420.
Dude burned his chip so bad that it’s only stable at 50 ….
LOL? cope cope cope i been freq limiting way before the drama
No issues here with my SP106 13900K. Just undervolt and lower clock speed. Do not use the motherboard built in AiOC, that is what is ruining CPU's. I'm running 5.5GHz at 1.34V and an offset of .05V. AiOC will run your CPU @ 1.45V to 1.5V+ which is crazy.
^THIS, INSANELY FAX
Funny you bought something and you downclocking and basically telling people not get what they paid for
Lol😂
YT channel "Frame Chasers" have good explanation about solution to prevent/stop degradation...
@@mrrexy4151JUFES IS KING!
To me the moment Intel stated that there are oxidation issues with their chips...it was game over, you can not recover from that.
True but only on the 13th gen. so if ur on 14th gen atleast u dont have that issue
microtechnologies all have that problem wym, at the micrometer level those types of defects are to be expected lol
That oxidation story is completely useless as it would affect only a small number of 13th gen cpus. The problem is with i7 and i9 of 13th and 14th gen, some say even i5. Besides intel would not give a official statement using reddit.
i thought it was sparkyadventures a well known and respectable overclocker, but no, is just a stupid gay guy making a misleading vid, great job
it’s not the i9 it’s all 13th and 14th gen chips.
4:10 lol i have like 45 - 52 °C Idle Temperature with a 360 AIO and undervolting
id be banging my head against the wall, I WOULD NOT sit happy with those temps idle 😔
@@sparkyexclusives but i have much better temperatures while playing Cyberpunk than before. Its very weard. Just like 72 °C average in 2K with a 4090 what means the 13900K have a lot to do. Before undervolting and a 240 AIO the temperatures were like 20 °C hotter in Cyberpunk but the idle temperatures were much lower. Ununderstandable :D Maybe because im using thermal-grizzly pads now. And i have like 33 °C in my room. I dont know
@@DeadCry1000 the problem with intel is that yndervolting isn’t going to help and it’s been known to make things worse
If you don't have a LGA bracket i'd suggest that, got my temps down about 10 degrees under full stress
^this (its a must)
my I7-13700KF be pulling 300Watts under full load. too damn much wattage
Compared to the i9 13 and 14th gens, the i7's REALLLLLYYY got a boost gen by gen. 12th is 12 cores, 13th is 16 cores, and the 14700k has 20 cores. Wth that's insane power from an i7. If I went 14th gen I'd go with i7 14700. Cheaper and almost just as many cores as the 9. Probably more stable and manageable also.
@@beardeddragon9255 nah I’d go 13700k. The 2 extra cores on the 14700 don’t really make a difference. Plus my 13700K pulls 300watts at full load somehow. Waiting for that microcode update
@@cademckenna863 Can't you change that in IntelXTU? I have i9 laptops, one being a 13980hx and I modify it's behaviour via IntelXTU. Voltages, wattage, etc.
@@beardeddragon9255 I can I think I just have to update to the last MSI bios update they put out like 2 days ago. But heard that only drops it down 30W
@cademckenna863 recently I changed to 13700k. With asus tuf. Have not had 0 crashes yet with xmp ram 6400. And default at 5.1 ghz. Benchmark on passmark cpu point was 46455. Overall top 98%
Bro you got an SP rating of 110! I’m over here with 96 sp, bloody Intel was using my chip as a door stop before it got to me lmao FML
so true!!! bintel moment ⛄️
I'm at 71 (when I last checked)
92 here, SP rating means fairly little from what I've seen so far unless you're direct die all-core ocing. What really matters is the IMC for everyone else
Shit my 14900k got an sp of 89…. I heard avg is 85-91 so you both got very good samples…
That being said my chip is 100% stable since I manually tune bios every upgrade and never use mb auto settings. I wouldn’t let vcore go above 1.35 (1.2 is default voltage) just something I have learned building pc’s for 20 years is you shouldn’t ever got .2 v past default voltage unless you want to degrade your cpu long term. Currently running a fixed 1.25vcore LLC7 @ x57 5.7pcore/x44 4.4ecore/x45 4.5 ring bus. Capped at a max P1/P2 of 253w. Maxes out at 87c in C23 with 38k score. Highest score in C23 is at 1.25vcore and 320w p1/p2 with 41k in C23. Daily use max P1/P2 is 253w for longevity.
looks cozy
Specs?
at the time: Intel Core i9-14900K Corsair iCUE H150i RGB ELITE (360mm) MSI PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB 64 GB (DDR5-6000 CL30) WD Black SN850X 4 TB Asus TUF OC GeForce RTX 4090 Deepcool MATREXX 70 (4f) be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 (1300w) ROG Herculx GPU Holder currently: Intel Core i9-14900K ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III (420) Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 DARK HERO ATX WIFI 7 G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB 64 GB (DDR5-6000 CL30) WD Black SN850X 4 TB Asus TUF OC GeForce RTX 4090 Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO XL (White) be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 (1600W) Thermalright TL-C12C (120mm) Thermalright TL-C14C (140mm)
@@sparkyexclusives wow😮
@@sparkyexclusives That's awesome i'm currently running older stuff, 1080 ti and i7-10700k with an older motherboard mpg z490 gaming edge wifi, im upgrading to a 4070 ti super and a i5-13600k since ive heard a lot of good things about those 2 components
hella rich parents
@@skysthelimit3553or just hard working 🥱
u rght !!
W
absolute music to my ears 😌😌
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Did someone forget about LFM?
masochists using lfm to chop off their speakers’ lifespans be drooling hard rn 😹
@@sparkyexclusives 😂💀
Are people this bad now? I played a lot like 3 years ago and people were way better than this.
2019 and previous patches>>>>>> 🥰😎
@@sparkyexclusives You’re bad too
@@BoltGoofusnever stated my skill anywhere plus i dont play the game 60hrs a day 500 days a year without taking any breaks, i dont even do tourneys nothing
@@sparkyexclusives I didn’t either. You are just really bad.
@@BoltGoofusmaybe he is doing the first time?
Old cnr gameplays >>>>
pre cnr (block force) days>>>>>>>>>>
@@sparkyexclusives and yh that also
Yo stud lemme play
denied
Old version?
theyre all archives, dates in desc
I prefer the old playstyle of cnr tbf
u mean physics?
Level 41? Bro how much do you play? 😭
not a lot actually, time efficiency is highly valued in this grind intensive game