- 673
- 316 593
AK Khan Tutor
Pakistan
Registrace 24. 06. 2022
Welcome to our CZcams channel dedicated to mathematics education! Whether you're a beginner, intermediate, or advanced learner, we've got you covered. Our channel is designed to cater to students from middle school (grade 8) all the way up to university level and beyond.
We provide a comprehensive range of educational content, including maths practice problems, lectures, and topic-wise videos. Our goal is to make learning maths fun and engaging, while also helping you build a strong foundation in the subject. We also offer resources for various exams such as GCSE, IGCSE, CBSE, SSC, CGL, ICSE, NTS, ETS, and ETEA. So whether you're preparing for your middle school exams or aiming for a professional career, our channel is here to support you every step of the way.
đ§đ”đźđ»đžđ đđŒđż đȘđźđđ°đ”đ¶đ»đ±đđ
We provide a comprehensive range of educational content, including maths practice problems, lectures, and topic-wise videos. Our goal is to make learning maths fun and engaging, while also helping you build a strong foundation in the subject. We also offer resources for various exams such as GCSE, IGCSE, CBSE, SSC, CGL, ICSE, NTS, ETS, and ETEA. So whether you're preparing for your middle school exams or aiming for a professional career, our channel is here to support you every step of the way.
đ§đ”đźđ»đžđ đđŒđż đȘđźđđ°đ”đ¶đ»đ±đđ
"Algebra Tutorial: Solving Algebra Problem Step by Step"
"Learn how to solve algebra problems easily and confidently! In this step-by-step tutorial, we'll cover the basics of algebra and show you how to solve equations, From beginner to advanced, this video is perfect for anyone looking to improve their algebra skills. Follow along as we break down complex problems into simple, easy-to-understand steps. You'll be solving algebra problems like a pro in no time!
#AlgebraTutorial #SolvingAlgebraProblems #StepByStep #MathHelp #AlgebraHelp #education #educations #mathematics #olympiad #olympiadproblems #matholympiad #exponential #math #maths #science #memes #mathmemes #mathematician #school
Basic Concepts of Maths:-
czcams.com/play/PLOpYQFuqRfcmo6ITEwy88kzpnzl28SSTn.html&si=Bt413q1_xhYgo_07
Olympiad Mathematics:-
czcams.com/play/PLOpYQFuqRfclptvUsnGhwF5fPCpgEWckt.html&si=hDPpRwmgpVFPwFk-
â€ïžNow You Can Followâ€ïž
đ) Facebook page:- profile.php?id=100085861781894&mibextid=ZbWKwL
#AlgebraTutorial #SolvingAlgebraProblems #StepByStep #MathHelp #AlgebraHelp #education #educations #mathematics #olympiad #olympiadproblems #matholympiad #exponential #math #maths #science #memes #mathmemes #mathematician #school
Basic Concepts of Maths:-
czcams.com/play/PLOpYQFuqRfcmo6ITEwy88kzpnzl28SSTn.html&si=Bt413q1_xhYgo_07
Olympiad Mathematics:-
czcams.com/play/PLOpYQFuqRfclptvUsnGhwF5fPCpgEWckt.html&si=hDPpRwmgpVFPwFk-
â€ïžNow You Can Followâ€ïž
đ) Facebook page:- profile.php?id=100085861781894&mibextid=ZbWKwL
zhlĂ©dnutĂ: 12
Video
"A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem":
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 8PĆed 2 hodinami
Hello Dear Students I hope you all are doing well đ€ đ€ "Join me as we tackle a challenging algebra problem from the Math Olympiad! In this video, we'll explore a clever and elegant solution to a problem that requires creative thinking and a deep understanding of algebraic concepts. Whether you're a math enthusiast, a student preparing for math competitions, or simply looking to improve your prob...
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 24PĆed 4 hodinami
In this captivating CZcams video, we delve into an intriguing math problem from the algebra Math Olympiad. Join us as we explore a challenging algebraic equation that will put your problem-solving skills to the test. Can you crack the code and find the solution? Tune in to find out! More Searches:- algebra problem algebra practice problems solve algebra problems algebra questions algebra word p...
How to Solve Basic Math Questions || Olympiad Algebra ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 12PĆed 7 hodinami
In this informative CZcams video, we delve into the world of basic math olympiad questions and provide answers to commonly asked queries. Whether you're preparing for entrance exams or job interviews, understanding basic math concepts is crucial. We also focus on basic math questions specifically tailored for class 10 students. Additionally, we offer step-by-step guidance on how to solve these ...
How to Solve this Algebra Problem || Algebra Question
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 8PĆed 9 hodinami
Hello Dear Students I hope you all are doing well In this video we will learn how to solve this math olympiad algebra problem and find out the value of 'X' in this math algebra problem. #algebra #algebraproblem #mathtutorial #education #mathematics #olympiad #olympiadproblems #matholympiad #exponential #math #maths #science #memes #mathmemes #mathematician #school Basic Concepts of Maths:- czca...
How to Solve Basic Math Questions || Olympiad Algebra ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 17PĆed 12 hodinami
Hello Dear Students I hope you all are doing well In this video we will learn how to solve this basic math olympiad algebra question and find out the value of 'X' in this algebra problem. #mathtutorial #algebratips #education #mathematics #olympiad #olympiadproblems #matholympiad #exponential #math #maths #science #memes #mathmemes #mathematician #school Basic Concepts of Maths:- czcams.com/pla...
How to Solve Basic Math Questions || Olympiad Algebra ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 33PĆed 14 hodinami
Learn how to solve basic math questions with this comprehensive tutorial on Olympiad Algebra. Improve your problem-solving skills and ace your math exams! More Searches:- math math questions basic math questions basic math olympiad algebra algebra for olympiad algebra math olympiad imo algebra olympiad functional equations topics in algebra and analysis preparing for the mathematical olympiad. ...
How to Solve this Olympiad Algebra Problem || Algebra
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 31PĆed 16 hodinami
How to Solve this Olympiad Algebra Problem || Algebra
Definite Integral || Mathematics Fun ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 15PĆed 19 hodinami
Definite Integral || Mathematics Fun ||
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Find the value of 'X' in this problem ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 20PĆed 21 hodinou
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Find the value of 'X' in this problem ||
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 12PĆed dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 38PĆed dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem || How to Simplify?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 29PĆed dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem || How to Simplify?
Find HCF By Factorization Method | @AKKhanTutor
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 11PĆed dnem
Find HCF By Factorization Method | @AKKhanTutor
Why e^lnx = x || Maths video || @AKKhanTutor
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 18PĆed 14 dny
Why e^lnx = x || Maths video || @AKKhanTutor
"The Ultimate Olympiad Algebra Challenge: Can You Solve this Problem?"
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 47PĆed 14 dny
"The Ultimate Olympiad Algebra Challenge: Can You Solve this Problem?"
How to Solve this Exponential Math Olympiad Problem || @AKKhanTutor
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 49PĆed 14 dny
How to Solve this Exponential Math Olympiad Problem || @AKKhanTutor
A Nice Math Olympiad Question | Can You Solve this!!
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 43PĆed 14 dny
A Nice Math Olympiad Question | Can You Solve this!!
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 23PĆed 14 dny
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
Cube Root of Unity || #maths @AKKhanTutor
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 37PĆed 14 dny
Cube Root of Unity || #maths @AKKhanTutor
A Very Interesting Math Olympiad Algebra Problem || Which is "BIGGER" ||
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 42PĆed 21 dnem
A Very Interesting Math Olympiad Algebra Problem || Which is "BIGGER" ||
Hardest Math | A Nice Olympiad Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 52PĆed 21 dnem
Hardest Math | A Nice Olympiad Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 35PĆed 21 dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 26PĆed 21 dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 38PĆed 21 dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
Matrix Inversion Method | Solving a System of Linear Equations Using Inversion Method |
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 12PĆed 21 dnem
Matrix Inversion Method | Solving a System of Linear Equations Using Inversion Method |
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 19PĆed 21 dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 54PĆed 21 dnem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem | Can you solve this ?
How to Solve this Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 63PĆed 21 dnem
How to Solve this Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
How to Solve this Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
zhlĂ©dnutĂ 31PĆed 21 dnem
How to Solve this Algebra Problem | Math Olympiad |
Not a number
100
â€â€â€
-80
So obvious when tutor explains. I could see that 729 = 3ⶠbut forgot the obvious tactic of getting the 2 bases equal: 9 ^ ( 2âx ) = 9Âł. Practicing algebra requires great peace of mind. đ Excelsior!
I can confidently say that 90percent did not fail. (People do this in 3rd grade).And also its -13
By applying which role, your answer became -13
_17
-13
â€â€â€â€
Error, 2(5-5)=3(5-5), it's 0=0
Hmm... If we anticipate - as we do at (2:50) - that the intermediate solution should consist of integer numbers, we could spare all the steps in between and directly go from the term written at (2:55) to the solution. The solution even directly jumps into our eyes since we have the "5" and the "2" already in the original terms. When we then set sqrt(5)^x == 5^2 and sqrt(2)^x == 2^2, it so happens that x comes out as 4. If we would NOT anticipate the intermediate integer solution beforehand, but instead solve for a general case of arbitrary bases on the LHS and an arbitrary value on the RHS, we would have to fall back to some approximation techniques. Which would as well not be that much of a burden, since we can guess a good starting point by just probing some integer values for x. In fact, doing so results in the shortest possible road to Rome in this specific case - without all the hassle of refactoring and intermediate solution at all -, since we pretty directly land at the correct solution immediately (because it is, in fact, an integer). Since the sqrt(5) part is the biggest one, we can estimate the coarse range of the contribution of that term by directly estimating the log(something around 20) / log(5), which yields 2, which in turn yields 4 for x. Entering that shows it to be the correct solution already. What would be interesting: Are there different roads to the solution allowed by the presentation of the exercise at the olympiad? Or do they always require the same (lame, because of using anticipation anyways) way?
Mashallah â€â€â€â€â€
â€â€â€â€â€â€â€
Math Olympiad: 144^âx = x^12; x = ? (x^12)^[1/(12âx)] = (144^âx)^[1/(12âx)] x^(1/âx) = 144^(1/12) = 144^(1/â144); x = 144
saved it for later
Aapko Dil Sy salam sir G
Sorry. 10(0) = 0. Nice trick though.đ
ĐĐŸ ŃŃŃĐž ĐŽĐ°, đ
đââïž+đââïž=đ¶ 3 total
3^2Ă2-2^2Ă1 x=2,y=1
Lgta he English mein fail ho, abbreviation hota he...
Ok Dear â€ïž
Hi
Why so complicated? Just gather at one side of the equation, getting (5/7)^x == 1, yielding x == 0 at first glance (or just glance it without any reformation - it's really trivial). No exponential curve goes through the same value of y twice - except if the base is exactly 1.
10(11-11)=11(11-11) (10Ă0)=(11Ă0) Increase your iq level
"Promosm" đ
sir ji Mai Aapki har video ko like krti hon aur Aapki video ka intazar rahta
What you do from 3:30 onwards, is a stipulation that all the roots are just distraction flares and the solution you go for shall consist only of integers. Which admittedly is not a wrong idea, since roots are generally irrational except the few cases were they are not. BUT: If you stipulate an integer solution ANYWAYS, you could have got on that road MUCH earlier, right from the beginning, by substitution. All that rewrite and squaring again was a complete waste.
Just czcams.com/video/pt7sktAGlzg/video.html
nice for a morning exercise but works as well for x= -9 and y= -8 then for (-9;8) and (9;-8) because of |x| and |y| lol prof ! ayala & yami, shamanes associate
Use fixed-point iteration, xâ1/5^x, starting with x=1/2 to obtain x=0.469621922936... This form of FPI equation converges slowly. An alternate form may converge faster or may blow up. If xâf(x) represents an FPI equation, then |f'(x)|<1 determines convergence rate where f'(x)=âf(x)/âx and |âą| represents absolute value. The smaller |f'(x)| is the faster the convergence rate.
Use fixed-point iteration, xâ2^(1/x), starting with x=1.5, to obtain x=1.559610469462369... on my pocket calculator. How was x=e^[W(ln2)] evaluated? You just wrote down 1.5596 and didn't explain where it came from. That's no way to teach. Did you use Wolfram-Alpha to evaluate W(ln2)? If that is the case then why not just enter solve x^x=2 and it returns x=e^W(ln2)=1.55961? What did I learn from that? Nothing. To solve real-world problems, fixed-point and Newton-Raphson iteration are the best choice.
100 caror
x^ln(x)=x^5 ln(x)ln(x)=5ln(x) ln(x)=5 x=e^5 x=148.413159103 Check: (148.413159103)^ln( 148.413159103 )=(148.413159103)^5 72004899339.4=72004899338.4
Solving problems like this is often easier using a simple trick. Memorize it. r=floor(ln42/ln2)=5. q=floor[ln(42-2^5)]=3. p=ln(42-2^5-2^3)/ln2=1. Try solving this problem: 7^p-5^q-3^r=820391, p>q>r, which seems hopeless. In this case we see that 7^p must be more than 820391, so use the ceiling function: p=ceiling(ln820391/ln7)=7. Then 5^q+3^r=7^p-820391, and 5^q must be less than 7^p-82039, so use the floor function: q=floor[ln(7^7-820391)/ln5]=5. Finally r=ln(7^7-820391-5^5)/ln3=3. This method works only if the exponent of the largest remaining term is solved for at each next step, which is the way this type of problem is usually set up. In the given problem, we know that 2^r>2^q>2^p, so solve for r first, q second, and p third. In my example, we know that 7^p>5^q>3^r, so solve for p first, q second, and r third.
5^x=1/x 5^xâąx=1 xâąe^xln(5)=1 xln(5)âąe^xln(5)=1âąln(5) W(xln(5)âąe^xln(5))=W(ln(5)) xln(5)=W(ln(5)) x=W(ln(5))/ln(5) x=0.4696219229356105441178030668907995994378529299815519288056339238 Check: 5^( 0.4696219229356105441178030668907995994378529299815519288056339238)=1/0.4696219229356105441178030668907995994378529299815519288056339238 2.12937248276=2.12937248276
Hmmm... This coarse result is around 5% off, thus really only a coarse estimate.
This method ignores other real solutions if they exist. In this problem, 1.2396277... is also a solution. It requires the Lambert W function to find this (or a numerical search).
Equate powers of 3: x-y=2 and x+y=3; 2x=5 yields x=5/2 and y=x-2=1/2
9(11/10)^2 vs 8(11/10)^3 or 9 vs 8(11/10) or 9 vs 8.8, so (3.3)^2 is larger.
Substitute y=2^k into the given equation and rearrange to y^2=16, giving y=±4. For real k, reject y=-4, so k=ln4/ln2=2.
Split this problem for easier solution: x=z+5/2 and y=z-5/2; (z+5/2)^2+(z-5/2)^2=2z^2+25/2=17 z^2=(34-25)/4=9/4; z=±3/2; x=z+5/2=±3/2+5/2=4 or 1 and y=z-5/2=±3/2-5/2=-1 or -4.
ln[x^(1/2)]=ln(x)/2=â[ln(x)]; ln(x)^2=4ln(x); ln(x)=4; x=e^ln(x)=e^4=54.598...
â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€
This is only half the way to the solution, since evaluating the Lambert function is not at all "business as usual". This function is up to day NOT INCLUDED in most pocket calculators, in most math packages for programming languages, or in table calculation programs like OpenOffice Calc. Thus, to evaluate it, you would have to resort to Wolfram Alpha or Mathlab or the like services. IF you are forced to use THOSE, you can put in the original expression straightaway. Thus, at least at the moment, the use of the Lambert function is still somewhat limited and exercises around its use are somewhat lame. You have at least to refer to the math library to use for resolving the function. (Python, for example, has one, PHP not, Javascript also not, for C++ and Java you can get one, but not in the standard libraries and so on...) Where you don't have that function build in, you have to manually program the approximation by something like newtons method and you have to solve all the details around that, too, as long as you want something remotely generally reusable. All that on top of that you have to be firm with programing and math at an engineering level and you have to dig in the appropriate public documentation for the approximation of the function... Pretty bloated stuff before you are able to solve that, isn't it? And lastly: If we are forced to approximations anyways, and forced to manually build them anyways, then we could equally well put the original expression without any further reformations (except giving the first derivative) directly into a general implementation of the newton method. That gives a drastically shorter way to Rome! :D
Mashallahâ€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€
In this case, i disagree: If you handle the root of "i" as possible "+45°" or "-135°" rotated, then you have to handle BOTH roots independently. Thus you may have for sqrt(i): unit vector "+45°" or unit vector "-135°", and you may have for sqrt(-i): unit vector "-45°" or unit vector "+135°". In this case, the solutions "+/- sqrt(2) * i" enter the stage, since you may combine the unit vectors of both roots in 4 different ways. In practical applications, you may of course have conditions where the allowed rotation of the roots is constrained. But then even the solution "-sqrt(2)" may become forbidden.
Why such a complicated approach? Just taking log on both sides in the original equation yields the exact same result. To split the 33 into 11 * 3 in between is an additional redundancy on top of the complicated deduction road. You do not save up operation number or operation costs. Just log(33) / log(3) - and you are done. At the same time: Nice to see all roads ending up at the same spot in Rome :D
This incremental approach is the way you can tackle any such problems with real numbers as well. As soon as you realize that an integer solution is not trivially in reach, you can switch to the generalized version (newtons method) with the best so far integer approximation as the starting point.
This equation has five roots, x=0, x=0, x=1, x=(-1+iâ3)/2 and x=(-1-iâ3)/2 How is that? Rearrange the equation to x^2(x^3-1)=0. Either x^2=0 or x^3-1=0 The latter equation may be expressed as x^3=1=e^(i2jÏ),j=0,1,2, and its three third roots expressed as x_j=[e^(i2jÏ)]^(1/3)=e^(i2jÏ/3)=cos(2jÏ/3)+i*sin(2jÏ/3),j=0,1,2
Getting the three roots out of x^3-1==0 is the much shorter road to Rome. But as always: It's nice to see how every approach leads to the same results in the end.
6=3
4