Video

In the nose pointed end behind the dasboard a vacuum toilet set up and curtain to contain free floating mess in weightlessness. The apollo home movies shows a short film by the astronauts goofing around with gas masks filming a mock bathroom demonstration . Along with other space odduties like big drops of water floating to dring with a straw and a screwdriver spinning like a top and the lenscap of the camera tossed across the cocpit .

Iskra jest bardzo cicha

@@irydka22 tankowałeś to że wiesz?

Śmiem wątpić że np. taki mig 25 miałby być cichszy od iskry.

No i jaki to byłby sens produkować wciąż ponad 60 letnią konstrukcje?

Vacuum line used with electric razor isnt it ?

Nie uchwyciło dobrze koloru dymu ale owe PZL T-11 Iskra mają zamontowaną wytwornicę dymów ( smugacz)

Jak kto? Ci, którzy akurat byli przy korycie i mieli z tej sprzedaży korzyści jak wszędzie indziej.

@@mariusz3870 każdy polityk powinien brak pełna odpowiedzialność za swoje decyzje, taka ustawa powinna być.

@@Laczek10 O czym ty mówisz człowieku? Jaka ustawa? Konstytucję łamią w biały dzień a nawet pies z kulawą nogą nie wyjdzie na ulicę zaprotestować. Polski już nie ma, zastał tylko napis na mapie.

Pozwolili na to tacy sami ludzie którzy pozwolili na budowanie inflacji obecnie, upadek Ursusa, wybory kopertowe które się nie odbyły, wydali pieniądze na przekop mierzei którego nie można wykorzystać. Zmieniają się partie ale nie polityka zabierania z kieszeni podatników

so you saying you are smarter than all the scientist & engineers around the world?

bro is on a witch hunt

The shadow _does_ move during the video shot.

you have an attic? rofl!

Apollo 11 had about 20 seconds worth left.

What do you mean "how is that possible"? The engine exhaust blows the regolith away where it's touching it.

Actually no it doesn't. It looks like that yes but the moon surface is not moving. Pause it and you can see. Then watch the landing. Watch that rocket blast ripple over the "surface" but do nothing then when the engines cut off it is perfectly clear. During liftoff of the ground is always visible zero dust cloud. That is why I say that cannot be NASA moon footage.

@@findkip During liftoff? The liftoff was from the top of the Descent Stage - _of course_ there won't be any dust cloud visible!

But the rocket blast touches the surface. Watch the landing no dust cloud there either.

@@findkip _But the rocket blast touches the surface._ During takeoff? No it doesn't. _Watch the landing no dust cloud there either._ Wait up. You expect a dust _cloud_ in a vacuum?

The evidence that the moon landings were real is abundant if you bother to seriously investigate.

@@SEL65545 I want the film director, not self-perceived expertise.

@@ifawartburg Whatever you say.

Jim Irwin filmed it.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver Thanks! Did he film all those movies (Apollo 1 to Apollo 17)? Quite good special effects for its time but now it is laughable. That is why I need his incompetence for a film project.

"Undeniable proof"...yeah, if you believe an idiot. Hilarious! Oh, and why does the picture become blurry at 2:30 in this video? Yeah DUST!

@@HoudiniGTP 😂

@@shannoneckelbarger5566 "Buzz Lightyear told Conan O’Brien that he did not watch the moon landing because that was an animated recreation" And you didn't understand what he meant. He meant that because there was no camera on the moon at that moment, it was not possible to show the landing seen from the surface of the moon. However, the landing was filmed from the Lunar Module through a window, because there was a camera inside the Lunar Module, and this is also what we see in this video. The purpose of the animation was to demonstrate how the landing happened and to give people an idea of the procedure.

@@mikep9604 I saw that! It’s all BS EVERYTHING they taught you us. We are truly in the matrix

Yes, Apollo 15 had four EVAs!

You mean like this one? AS15-87-11740 I think there are 29 photos taken on the stand-up EVA. I'd post them all, but, if I put more than one catalog number, CZcams flips out and blocks the posting. Just go up and down from that number. Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.

Note: I was wrong, there are even more photos than I said. There's a series of B&W photos in addition to the color ones. AS15-85-11379 is one of them. Same deal, plus or minus a bunch of catalog numbers.

@@rockethead7 I was wrong too! Apollo 15 did FIVE EVAs--Worden's mid-TEI spacewalk!

There was never really going to be 2024 landings. Trump and Pence and Bridenstine kept talking about that date, because they wanted to have it happen in Trump's 2nd term (had he gotten elected again). But, congress never approved the funding at a pace to put anybody on the surface by then. They only ever funded it at a rate to get there by 2028-2030. And, yes, it's very difficult to make a suit last that long. The Apollo suits barely lasted through their short missions. Now, the Artemis missions are supposed to last at least 10x longer, perhaps more. Not so easy to do.

Not so smooth. Apollo 15 was by far the roughest landing of the lot, with the highest touchdown velocity

In addition to what Andrea said, Apollo 15 landed on a sloping surface with such an angle and smacked the ground so hard that the engine bell actually cracked and crumpled (it wasn't even supposed to touch the ground). Furthermore, it was at the edge of the design limits of the angle, and had the angle been any worse, there was a risk that it wouldn't have a safe liftoff. The true irony of it is that Dave Scott performed a textbook landing, far more textbook than just about every other landing, coming straight down for the last ~300 feet or so. But, the bad part of this was that he couldn't see directly under him. Cracked and crumpled engine bell: AS15-88-11882 Crooked angle: AS15-86-11600

@@rockethead7 It was said that the commander was too quick to turn off the engine once the contact light was on. That was intended to avoid damage from rocks projected from the exhaust but in this case, stopping the engine so early, the LM fell abrutly. On the contrary, Armstrong forgot to stop the engine at the contact light, and the resulting contact was the softest of all... but inadvertently risky.

@@andreabindolini7452 Well, any cutoff after the contact light was on was fine. Apollo 15's bigger issue was the meandering and sloping terrain it landed on. But, sure, I won't argue that he also cut the engine the moment the light went on. Apollo 15 was the first mission to have the longer/extended engine bell, so, it was a lot bigger of a concern than the first 3 landings. Armstrong and Shepard both left the engine on past touchdown. This was "wrong," but, I'd never dare say a negative word about either of those guys. With the shorter engine bell, it didn't matter as much anyway.

You're fake

There is a maroon in every box!

@@peatmoss4415 You are both fake and subhuman dingbats.

Idiot

Your brain is fake

LPD is the Landing Point Designator. In this mode, Dave can use his handcontroller to tell the computer to alter its target left or right, forward or back. From the computer readout, Jim will give Dave an angle (numbers Jim is calling out) which tells him where to look through scribe marks on the window to find the place where the computer thinks they will land. There are matching scribe marks both on the inner and outer panes of Dave's window and, if he positions himself so that those two sets line up, he will be looking at the proper point on the surface.

Dan is probably not the man but is in fact the woman. #neverbeendan

#dingbatdan_man

#danmandoesnotexist