Video

Exactly it would not fit my butt

Italy and France don't always have seats on their toilets

Yeah!

It is an odd choice

Yes definitely

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 this new one looks less sturdy and less comfortable too, so really underperforming compared to its predecessor

This new one seems an elongated Centoco (but it is quite modern)

@@aiaceoileo5342 maybe, you're probably right. I just don't know toilets seats at all

@@tigrozaplumbing4731I appreciate vintage ones only since they have that smooth contour resembling a pear that is much more anatomical than modern ones.if you tried the ones at your ex school, you surely felt the difference. Unfortunately i had no occasion to try one, but the here design makes the difference: modern ones feel unnatural to me. In this specific case tecnological progress doesn't always mean improvement

Thanks for the info, I changed the title. I don't really know crane toilets name since some of them are hard to find the difference

Yes they're are quite special. Sadly, I am now past highschool, in college. There are some good finds, but they're mostly very old and tank toilets which are not that good, but there is one beast like high school, I should film it very soon.

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 i am hoping for the next video!those are the plumbing rarities, a dive into the past. I just wonder if only they are as confortable to use as nice they seem: if yes, then why should they had been replaced? It makes no sense to me

@@aiaceoileo5342 yeah it's sad the seats weren't the same on every toilet. They might not have been able to replace them with the same model when they broke if the company making them just disappeared. I searched for the seats but I could not find anything like those seats, not even a description or an image

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 Viceroy is almost impossible to find . They were quite different in shape, too, because of the extended lip and the open back and most of all the were wooden inside coated with rubber: i suppose they were replaced because too rigid perhaps, comparing to a modern plastic one. If you have ever used those, how do they compare to a modern one?maybe their hardness has made them unacceptable to a modern user

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 viceroy still exists a brand i see, but the shape of their seats is now the same as others and they seem totally plastic (and horrible). Perhaps the company has a vintage catalogue with vintage models. The material change could be justified because of the hardness in my opinion: even if the look was infinetly better, looking and sitting are such different things and this could be the reason of the replacement (correct me if you think i am wrong)

Yes it is indeed

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 this is an advantage for its durability but in another terms i think it lacks, too hard to be comfortable

Sry, I'll get the names right one day

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 try to find out the seat brand too!

@@aiaceoileo5342 the previous video of that toilet, I showed the sticker, but the most part of it is scraped off. I could try to take a photo in two weeks when I go back to school

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 thanks!you could film a new video focusing on that! Especially this saneto seat is so rare it could deserve a video only on it with a frontal view too. Is it very wide in the central opening? It seems quite thick too,comparing to modern ones

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 there is a strange aspect because the sticker is scraped but the upper surface is perfect, it seems new, but actually you sit on that not on the lower one, that should have been preserved better. From the upper surface it seems never used even if it is so old!

Yes its the same one

@@tigrozaplumbing4731 that one has a unique design! If you had to use one of them which one would u choose? For me the open back remains the hygene topper

That flush doesn't seem too powerful though

I hope those vintage seats won't be replaced!

I wish those were still in production much better than modern ones!

Let s hope it won t be replaced