Video

Simply one of the most underrated bands ever

Wooooo, I was there!

I would only sit through video of quality this poor for Ricky Jay.

That pencil had one day left until retirement.

Such a great band.

Some of the best "equivoque" ever

I was busy playing...I wish that I would have followed these guys live back in the day. Super great band. So very musical.Thankful for these videos.

I love how pumped he got after hitting that trick! He's like "gimme 5!"

The part where they throw away cards is not hard to understand. He spreads the cards so that the top cards will always remain. He has already decided that his chosen card is one of the top cards. All done through commands that make it seem like the participants have a choice. But how he could write the card *before* she stopped shuffling is beyond me. That is the really skillful part. He probably picked a card near the top of the deck, wrote it down while he watched her shuffle some more to make sure that none of the last shuffles affected the top of the deck. But that is too risky. What if she cut the deck before she handed it over.

First 90 seconds is all one shot and one trick, that's crazy!!!

Ricky. Was. Great

If you disagree with this con man you are driven out of America's philosophy departments. His goal is to neuter the human soul, because he was a coward and a bastard his whole life.

Very dishonest intellectually to lay a problem, talk in such vagueness and then end by saying “let us not answer this question”. Not Derrida necessarily here but the way this was put together is really frustrating

love the sound love the hat where can i get one

Are we not doing phrasing anymore?

That's wonderful!

I was really putting effort into interpreting what Derrida was trying to say... But then the Women's voice ruined everything and now I'm here commenting instead of doing my homework.

3:46 best part

What would happen if he were to hit someone in the jugular?

Indoctrination.

Man, I miss Ricky Jay. Thank God we still have all of these great videos of him. Thank you for posting.

I'm ready to feast

RIP KJP with the millions of others..

He was incredible

WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU INTERRUPT HIM AND BEGIN TO VOICE OVER...LET HIM CONTINUE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!

Well disproven part of the trio of fraudsters imported from France.

Clay is a twit

No doubt he filmed this multiple times with different marks, and then only broadcast the first one where it worked. 😎

But can he defend himself against pointed sticks?

So profond what he says about the women condition. why a women couldn't be a philosopher earlier? Because of the phalloegocentrism. Women need to be able to think just like men regardless wether they are women or not.

Wu Tang!

Before leaving a comment here under this video, I would like to analyze this situation. When one writes a comment under a video, what exactly is being commented about? It’s possible for anyone to write about anything at all under a video. They certainly don’t have to write about the video at all. But even if the person writing the comment wanted to comment about the video. What is it that they are in actuality writing a comment about? Is it the entire video? Is it a particular section of the video. Is it a comment about the overall theme of the video? There are actually an infinite number of ways one could perform the action of “writing a comment about a video” And what can we say about the reader of the comment? What is the reader of the comment intending to get from the comment? Perhaps the reader is looking for an explanation of a particular aspect of the video. Perhaps the reader want to get some clarification of a particular aspect of the video. Perhaps the reader wants to read a joke about the video. Or perhaps the reader is looking to find the comment that they themselves would have made about the video before actually making it. Just like there are an infinite number of ways one could write about the video, there are an infinite number of ways one could read about it And what about the notion of infinity and the notion of expectation? When we expect to see something be manifest from the infinite, how can we still have this expectation without adding some constraints to the infinite. In other words, when we expect something from the infinite are we even expecting anything at all? It seems to me that one can only expect something to happen from a finite set of possibilities for to have an expectation from an infinite set is essentially to expect everything and nothing all at once. Therefore, when the reader makes his or her way to the comment section, there is an implicit finite set of expected comments. Now what is this set composed of? Do all readers have the same set of expectations when they are about to read the comments? Certainly, the culture and environment in which they grew up as well as their language and the language and culture of the video itself determine the content of those expectations. One would expect comments in english for a video whose contents were in english. Similarly, if the audience of the video is likely to be American, there is a certain set of possible types of jokes, references, and ways of thinking expected in the comments that would differ from a Latin American audience, for example. Anyways, I don’t want to go on with this. I feel like I could do this forever, jeez

This is what I sound like after smoking a good blunt, preferably a hybrid (Sativa/Indica) followed by an edible. This mofo was 4 sure an arse clown, a true charlatan/pseudo philosopher.

❤😎🎶 awesome!

Deconstruction: everything is wrong, buy my books, society bad, tearing down society good.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤Love it! 😊

Hi its 11:51 and the yr is 2023 👌

Alright! Classic Daniel Amos: Black Gold Fever!

Thank God Ron Jeremy isnt in the video

Whooo wee! If that dont light your fire youre woods wet son!!

Julia Kristeva can be my mom.

When he said in the first 22 seconds of the video, “Before answering the question, I want to make a preliminary remark…” gives you a hint as to what deconstruction is

This is beautiful.

This is such a brilliant clip, every time I watch it I find it to yield more fruits. I love this because he begins to deconstruct as he tries to explain the deconstructive strategy(I won't say method), by clearing out how this question appears and its predicate assumptions and pre-conditions for the question. Then he elaborates on what deconstruction does i.e show natural binaries to be actually arbitrary. This is true Derridian style on deconstructing as I explains the very act of deconstructing

Ricky is cheating! He’s using real magic.

On a side note Lone Wolf and Cub which is the movie he’s talking about and it kicks ass! 😁

One of my favorite tunes to drive people crazy and then to the Lord. Works great.

Everytime!

You certainly didn't put a lot of thought into this title. NOT the best choice, sir. NOT the best choice.

I'm Doing PhD on his Theory Derida the King . In Kashmir .