Video

Indeed the people of the eurasian steppe having been trading and mixing for a very long time. Thanks

We never stated they were Vikings we said "Northmen" because they developed a culture in the north and influenced those south of them bringing light variants with them. The blonde genes and light eyed variants mentioned are from western eurasian populations. The particular mutations mentioned in the eyes and hair came from a western eurasian source population the Ancestral North Eurasians who were genetically UP european 70% and ancient east asian 30%. Their closest genetic relative Western Hunterer Gatherers also possessed light variants. Their DNA is still found in europe up to 20%. Native americans literally hold the exact european mutation for light variants in some cases. As for the Hmong people we don't know if its an independent bottleneck mutation or from the west eurasian source. Independent mutations do occur but we're talking about the gene spread in a particular population.

Some of that is true however they adopted mounted archery from steppe cultures. If you look at the figurines they don't resemble Yamato japanese more steppe like with the long beards. As for emishi and ainu it's said in the video they're related I know they're still around. However ancient genomes show they had west eurasian haplogroup c1a and facial alleles of Europeans before the 20th century. We have another video with the studies on this phenomenon, "caucasian element in japan" They also have even mtdna haplogroup hv at 0.5% from the Caucasus likely and ancient migration. And this same rare haologroup is found in indo-iranic Descendants of nuristani central Asian like groups. Edit: There was also a terminal upper Paleolithic culture in Hokkaido that had ANE ancestry that lived amongst and mixed with jomon thousands of years ago. There is evidence the caucasian facial alleles essentially were naturally selected even though it was a small percentage of the genome. There is evidence these genes even went to Taiwan in small amounts

Yes the 1 slide is Cumans and Scythians influenced eachother as steppe people. However the pointy hats was a distinctive characteristic of scythians going back to 2600 years ago in Etruscan Italy and Greece artwork Edit: The cuman are a very interesting group to study, thanks for your contribution

We had to reupload it because of many having trouble hearing it so we turned the music down for them but youtube has punished us for it. Thanks again though we really appreciate it!

How about Huns and Altai :) huns inhabited exactly the region of Great Moravia and the steppes of modern day Hungary? And they came from the Altai region where hunic language, proto-turkic, proto-Korean and proto-Japanese languages originated :)

@@trabantdelux The scythians actually mixed with the people of karasuk proto-turks and proto-mongols, the slab grave culture over there. Scythians and them each had their own steleas and influenced eachother. No denying huns were in great moravia and hungary, however scythians were just there earlier.

We are going to have to disagree there, but thanks for taking the time sharing your opinion

you are right we had a team member get a bit confused honest mistake, we just left it up here anyway. Hopefully you will see our new work

The map of where the genetics are? I can give you some sources for the blue eyed genes in the native populations

Agreed egypt has always been a melting pot, modern egyptians still have a lot of natufian as well. The black origin in egypt has been understated but people cant just claim you were invaders when its clear your people were there from the predynastic but the same goes for arabs to black people. People overall need to actually do their research instead of race baiting and confirming their own biases, thank you for your input.

​@@northmanskeep5996 what black origin?

@shafsteryellow Black people were there a part of egypt since its inception, they are a part of the origin. Im including ancestral north african in this.

@@northmanskeep5996 How many years ago are we talking about because anything beyond 6,500 years ago is irrelevant

@@shafsteryellow The pre-dynastic to early dynastic period A group nubians and upper egyptians had extensive contact.

It depends, the morphology of the Taforalt was markedly Caucasoid, while Afalou was more Intermediate, and in contrast Jebel Sahaba was Negroid. Yeah though, the Iberomarusians were insanely robust and Cro-Magnoid.

@@gamalnassertv Yea I agree, I tried to show the Afalou type as well at 5:44, when the kiffian culture developed . Some iberomaurisians were insane. Thanks for giving your time.

Lying? What other youtuber has mentioned the ONLY old kingdom autosomal dna sample? Gave credit to all the migrating tribes in and around Egypt. Proven and backed up by archeological and genetic studies. So many want to pander a racialistic ideology ignoring all of the facts and only cherry picking what fits their narrative. Egypts geographical position is in-between multiple cultures. The mixed race CUSHITICS likely represent the best example of ancient egyptians. Similar to the ibero-musarians whos culture spread out all over north africa. They were multiracial, more evidence will come out and it will put the racialist ideologies to bed

Care to explain?

No? Didn't think so😊

explain yourself ancient egypt was founded by mixing of tribes and cultures

@@northmanskeep5996 First of all, All hunter gathers were dark skinned, but it doesn't matter. Just because you hear Eurasian it doesn't mean Caucasian. You need to go back and do some more research.

@@northmanskeep5996 Ancient Ethiopian genome reveals extensive Eurasian admixture in Eastern Africa M. GALLEGO LLORENTE. Given that Mota predates the backflow, we searched for its most likely source by modeling the Ari, the contemporary population closest to our ancient genome, as a mixture of Mota and another West Eurasian population (6). We investigated both contemporary sources (3) and other Eurasian ancient genomes (5, 9). In this analysis, contemporary Sardinians and the early Neolithic LBK (Stuttgart) genome stand out (Fig. 2A). Previous analyses have shown Sardinians to be the closest modern representatives of early Neolithic farmers (10, 11), implying that the backflow came from the same genetic source that fueled the Neolithic expansion into Europe from the Near East/Anatolia, before recent historic events changed the genetic makeup of populations living in that region.

@@northmanskeep5996 4000-year-old hair from the Middle Nile highlights unusual ancient DNA degradation pattern and a potential source of early eastern Africa pastoralists Ke Wang. Despite the sparsity of the data, the PCA analyses conducted here clearly suggest a very close genetic relationship between Sudan_Kadruka1_4000BP and ancient eastern African pastoralist populations. To corroborate this finding, we also computed allele sharing rates with ancient populations from the Levant and Africa and present-day African populations at genomic sites where Sudan_Kadruka1_4000BP differs from the chimpanzee reference genome via outgroup-f3 (Sudan_Kadruka1_4000BP, population X; Chimpanzee). Figure 4a shows that Sudan_Kadruka1_4000BP shares the highest genetic affinity with ancient Levantine groups, ancient northern and Eastern Africans and modern Africans from northern Sahara and the Horn of Africa.

@@northmanskeep5996 Evolutionary Genetics and Admixture in African Populations Aaron Pfennig, Complex Spread of Pastoralism in Eastern and Southern Africa Recent genetic studies paint a complex picture of population continuity and admixture in eastern Africa since the introduction of pastoralism in northeastern Africa some 8 kya (e.g., Haber et al. 2016; Skoglund et al. 2017; Prendergast et al. 2019; Naidoo et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020a). Using DNA from ancient individuals from Kenya and Tanzania, it has been proposed that herding and farming spread in multiple steps into eastern Africa (Prendergast et al. 2019). First, in northeastern Africa, admixture between a population related to contemporary Nilo-Saharan speakers (e.g., the Dinka or Nuer) and a population related to modern groups from northern Africa or the Levant created a group of “early northeastern pastoralists.” This group then migrated to eastern Africa and admixed with local foragers ∼4 kya, receiving ∼20% ancestry from a group related to a 4,500-year-old ancient individual from the Mota cave in Ethiopia that is genetically similar to the isolated, Afro-Asiatic-speaking Aari (Gallego Llorente et al. 2015) and present-day Afro-Asiatic speakers (fig. 4​AA). Given the high genetic affinity of a pastoralist individual who lived 4000 years ago in northern Sudan with ancient individuals from Kenya and Tanzania, it has been argued that this initial dispersal of northeastern pastoralists into East Africa occurred rapidly

You're lying.

such as? explain yourself we can talk. Our argument here is egytians were mixed race since the founding of kmt

where did we claim she had white skin? she was likely light to medium brown

​@northmanskeep5996 the pic of the woman? Next to the sculpture. Look for the painted sculpture.

She could have also been olive skinned anatolians may have come in 5800 years ago, on average the old kingdom had more light to medium brown skinned though. Dark olive can turn brown in the sun anatalian Dna in the middle kingdom is commonly found in egypt she def could have had light skin. So far the only old kingdom sample had overwhelmingly natufian like though. @@Minptahhathor

@northmanskeep5996 tf does natufian dna have to do with skin colour? Indo Europeans took over cheddar man's population of dark skin individuals bruh. L8ght skin reached africa much later after the expansion of lighskin in europe, what about the asiatics and hyksos? They were olive skinned, but egyptians were generally black to light brown. If you call light brown olive skin this is represented in "black" african populations

@Minptahhathor Natufian like people came into Africa in waves over 20k years. There are old kingdom artworks showing light olive skin might have already been there at the time. Why are you so against that? Also cheddarmans color ranged from olive med like to medium brown, his DNA is still in european populations.

Appalled? Some fulani have proven anatolian and ibero-maurisian like DNA which contributes to their phenotype. Of course there is Intra Continental movement amongst africans. There are genetic studies out there that prove it, Theyre neighbors are Berbers and continental africans. There was lots of mixing just like anywhere else.

@northmanskeep5996 Yes but that Doesn't make those features Mediterranean? I feel like the Iberomaurusian Reconstruction is a bit faulty and look Too caucasoid. The skin should've been Darker. And also I don't think haplotypes determine race

@northmanskeep5996 Also A lot of Berbers up to this day are black

@@JamesAmadasun-xx1by maybe it doesn't but theres a good likelyhood that it does. The ancestors of the natufians were on the mediterranean and had crossed the sinai and mixed with local north africans 30k years ago. Early Anatolian farmers also came into north africa 5800 B.C I was quoting the anthropologist who labeled them as Mediterranean features. Most Ibero-maurisian DNA was 63.5 old West eurasian. That old west eurasian was a mix between "basal eurasian" like and West European Hunter gatherer. Contrary to what mainstream media shows West European HG like cheddarman were olive to medium brown skinned when run through newest evidence. The DNA calculators for skin on the ibero-maurisian talforalt individuals show most had intermediate skin, some had black. There was a range. Their skulls were mostly caucasoid however some appeared more negroid. One of the descendant populations reconstruction is posted in the video the mixed with people further south and had darker skin. It kind of goes into semantics they probably got the features from the natufian and anatolian like people which makes sense why its in their dna. The former has been in africa for 30k years so its native trait by now. Thanks for taking your time to watch and give your opinion 👍

@@northmanskeep5996 I feel u on this one. I still think they could Phenotypically still be called black. And tbf those Caucasoid features could also Be called Africans as many Africans who have no relations to Caucasians have those Features likely earlier so the word Caucasoid may be a misnomer. And it's Also unfair because people usually Call people only with the most extreme Features negroid and if they have some "Caucasoid features" (Mostly nasally based) it's almost always called cAuCaSoId. We also have to look at the biases and the time they wrote that. But yes Like modern Black Africans Natufians and Iberomaurusians, had a skinrange. My family for example being of fully southern Nigerian origin have dark brown ro light yeloow skin witbozt any Admixture. Also I disagree with that WHG point. Western Hunter Gatherers up until the event of Lightskin would've been Dark skinned or medium browned like many Africans but they indeed had some Caucasoid features. Another thing is Grimaldi people who show Affinities with Kjoisans

Thank you! ! It came as great surprise to us when doing the research how many different cultures and migrations contributed to the amazing Ancient Egypt, we wanted to share it

@whiteeagle6370 Champollion the Younger in his thirteenth letter to his brother...Describing bas reliefs from the tomb of Sesostris 1 of the Eighteenth Dynasty (16th Century BCE) , which is the oldest ethnographic monument in existence. Forgive this Neanderthal Champollion for Claiming a "dark Red" color, which is nothing but a shade of Black or Brown like ALL Africans. This is what you pink people do...Lie, even while telling truths....QUOTE: “Right in the valley of Biban-El-Moluk we admired like all previous visitors, the astonishing freshness of the paintings and the fine sculptures on several tombs. I had a copy made of the peoples represented on the bas-reliefs......It portrays the third hour of the day when the Sun is beginning to turn on it's burning rays, warming all the inhabited countries of our hemisphere. According to the legend itself, they wished to represent the inhabitants of Egypt and those of foreign lands. Thus, we have before our eyes the images of the various races of man known to the Egyptians and we learn at the same time the great Geographical or Ethnographical divisions established during that early epoch. Men led by Horus, the shepherd of the People's, belonged to four distinct families. The first, the one closest to the god, has a dark red color, a well proportioned body, kind face, nose slightly aquiline, long braided hair, and is dressed in white. The legends designate thi species as Rot-en-ne-Rome', the race of men par excellence, i.e., the Egyptians. There can be no uncertainty about the racial identity of the man who comes next: he belongs to the Black Race, designated under the general term Nahasi. The third represents a very different aspect; his skin color borders on Yellow or tan; he has a strongly aquiline nose, thick, black pointed beard, and wears a short garment of varied colors; these are called Namou. Finally , the LAST one is what we call flesh colored, a WHITE skin of the most delicate shade, a nose straight or slightly arched, blue eyes, blond or reddish beard, tall stature and very slender, clad in a hairy Ox-skin, A VERITABLE SAVAGE tattooed on various parts of his body; He is called Tamhou. I hastened to seek the tableau corresponding to this one in the other royal tombs and, as a matter of fact, I found it in several. The variations I observed fully convinced me that they had tried to represent here, the inhabitants of the four corners of the earth, according to the Egyptian system, namely: 1. The inhabitants of Egypt which, by itself, formed one part of the world...; 2. The inhabitants of Africa Proper: Blacks; 3. Asians; 4. Finally, (And I am ashamed to say so, SINCE OUR RACE IS THE LAST AND THE MOST SAVAGE IN THE SERIES), Europeans who, in those remote epochs, frankly did not cut too fine a figure in the world. In this category we must include ALL BLONDS and white skinned people living not only in Europe, but Asia as well, their starting point. This manner of viewing the tableau is all the more accurate because, on the other tombs, the same generic names reappear, always IN THE SAME ORDER.* (ALL CAPS MINE) WE FIND THERE EGYPTIANS AND AFRICANS REPRESENTED IN THE SAME WAY* which could not be otherwise, but the Namou (Asians) and the Tamhou (Europeans) present significant and curious variants.” END czcams.com/video/S_DD4nmyoss/video.html

@@northmanskeep5996 You're such a liar. Christopher Ehret (whyte guy) uses the latest in genetics, migrations, linguistics, iconography, cultural anthropology, archaeology, human anthropology etc..to prove 100% that KMT was founded by native BLACK AFRICANS of different ethnicities but ZERO input at it's primary dynasties 1-25, it's founding,culture, technology and knowledge from the Levant, Mediterranean or anywhere else outside of Africa. AND NO. THERE ARE NO INDIGENOUS whyte people in Africa, as ALL non Africans are Neanderthal hybrids. The Natufians who you straight lied about were free of ANY Neanderthal admixture. They were 100% Black Africans. Christopher Ehret is a scholar, not some anonymous @northmanskeep5996 nobody on youtube using AI generated voiceovers and fake names and fake research to perpetrate a fraud. Dr Ehret's research proves that virtually everything you posted in this video is unscientific poppycock, not based on ANY valid research and all lies. czcams.com/video/S_DD4nmyoss/video.html

Mixed race. The ibero-musarian samples were 36.5 black, 63.5 eurasian they then came over to the Levant and mixed with the locals creating the natufians. We have natufian head busts they appeared similar to the locals.

oh boy watch out for the hijack again!! The Natufians did not look like modern Asiatic, they were not a so-called mixed race. The original populations were black in levant. @@northmanskeep5996

If you want to talk about mixed euroasians and africans/blacks can you please do a video on the ancient Etruscans and Minoans!!! Or if you really want to peel back a white onion please do a video regarding the Colchians that Herodotus wrote about!!

Thanks for watching and sharing, We plan on making a video about the Etruscans. I know of a few palletes from minoans that have black africans on them . They were soldiers along with Minoan soldiers. They definitely had contact and probably exchanged culture, there was writings of not only egyptian cities but all through east africa in later greek writings. It's quite interesting, most of the genetics that i've come across has shown them to be very similar to italians and greeks. When researching for the video we will look more in depth, as we have learned from afro-centric channels that many moors were black or had black ancestry in europe. @@PharaohNY

@@northmanskeep5996 They were not, Mota was a Natufian, He was L3x2 and E2

Then what's the truth? How many studies do you need

they only keep doing studies to see how better they can hide the truth , got to be first is the moto of the whitewashing white supremacy, but never say leprosy was from having sex with animals.....everybody is african@@northmanskeep5996

This was ehrets opinion the Kerma culture may have been afro-asatic, or nilo-saharan

cant find it where is it?

The blind can't see the truth look at his tory

@@vincentanderson8435 check the dna studies of the samples natufians and ibero-musarian are the highest throughout North Africa. The Egyptians were mixed race face it.

Tat's greek bs but I wondered how long y'all would get to mixed just put a little more water on it it will change again but that's why kemet fell dealing with those they shouldn't havebeendealing with much like today

@vincentanderson8435 put a little water on it. I agree the blackness of egypt has been understated, but they've been mixed since the origins of ancient Egypt. Everyone asks for old kingdom dna well there a sample now it proves natufian related ibero-musarian like groups were there native to the area. African and Middle east came together. This was way before Greece was a thought

do some research, or better yet explain whats comical about the information?

whats so funny? explain yourself

thank you! I can see that too,, crazy how the phenotypes have continued through time

Native central Asians are bmac people a caucsoid people they mixed with East Asians due to Mongolians

​@@famitsus987 There was immigration from east Asia and Siberia to central Asia prior to the Mongol invasion. bmac people never pushed that much into central Asia and mostly lived in the southern part, the northern parts of central Asia was inhabited by another population and later Indo-Iranians. bmac genes spread after they were mixed with the Indo-Iranic people.

Even the ANE were around 70% Ancient European and 30% early East eurAsian. They mixed around 35-37k years ago and Formed the Genetic Group Ancient North Eurasian. They were mostly an old "caucasian" looking people revealed by the tarim mummies. If you're referring to native americans, Theyre mostly ancient east asian 50-70% and ANE 20-40% however theres an old melanesian like component as well. Most people are mixtures ancient groups. Thanks for watching!

So did most ANE look like the first reconstruction in the video? The one that shows a face clean shaven next to one with facial hair.

@@jonathanmenendea9326 We don't really know but I'd say something similar to that. It reminds me of some great plains indians. They probably varied a bit though, as seen in the tarim mummies.

@@northmanskeep5996 he does a lot like a Great Plains Indian, he could also pass for maybe a Inca or some native tribes in Mexico too. I’ve seen some with a somewhat similar look. I’m a native myself from Central America, that’s why I find it interesting.

Thats really cool thanks for sharing , I agree I've seen some inca that resemble him.

we've already stated this wasnt completely accurate and youtube deleted the comment

The truf will be revealed soon son

Knowledge should be shared regardless of its history. We can't let our past fears or even atrocities shroud the facts

@@northmanskeep5996 Youre using fascist symbols! I see what you're doing. This is a whitewashing fascist video!

Fascist? Lmao He's showing 🎉 historical links that have nothing to do with fascism. Obviously you're so brainwashed can't see anything without crying about something. Well guess what butter cup history is full of terrible thing and terrible people

@@Jimmybargingit’s with white supremacy that is the ultimate terror throughout history! Nothing matches it. Y’all are the evil trying to change the narrative in the video.

Modern genetic science doesn't lie. Only a vacuous radical leftist with a predictable manner of thinking would say something like this. Nobody is saying the myths are accurate (although the ancient myths do exist), but we can tell things about the phenotype and DNA of these people. Ancient North Eurasians did have fair hair and it wasn't uncommon for them to have light eyes either. And Europeans and Native Americans share common ancestry with them. You can easily verify these things yourself. And I bet you wouldn't have any issue with a video like this if it was with regards to people with sub-saharan negroid phenotypes. If that's the case, I wonder who the racist is here?

Thanks for the support!

Whose being lied to????

@@glendamartin8065 You're the deceived but think you're enlightened. 👏👏👏