Video

For the ages.

See also Aaron T. Thomas-Bolduc's 2016 paper on Cantor.

It’s really impressive that he as a continental philosopher has dived so deeply into mathematics and set theory- how many other continental philosophers know anything about mathematics? Very impressive.

If you look at the subtitles it’s pretty wild: Google Translate can’t decide whether he’s speaking French or English!

I don’t understand anything of what he’s saying, but it’s still interesting…

Sorry but the audio is just too bad

This was a good introduction to the fetish character of capitalism. One important distinction should be made. Marx, when he refers to religious fetish is making an analogy. The difference between religious and capitalist fetish is that religious fetishism/animism/totemism/idolatry is based on a mental subjective misattribution of animate powers to inanimate things. It is based on belief. But capitalist fetishism as he says is not a mental deception. It is a result of the real or practical inversion that occurs when humans take the products of labour to market to exchange for equivalent commodities. In placing unequal things into an equivalent relation of exchange the concrete labours and qualities are occluded by the abstract ratio that is established between them.

This was a good introduction to the fetish character of capitalism. One important distinction should be made. Marx, when he refers to religious fetish is making an analogy. The difference between religious and capitalist fetish is that religious fetishism/animism/totemism/idolatry is based on a mental subjective misattribution of animate powers to inanimate things. It is based on belief. But capitalist fetishism as he says is not a mental deception. It is a result of the real or practical inversion that occurs when humans take the products of labour to market to exchange for equivalent commodities. In placing unequal things into an equivalent relation of exchange the concrete labours and qualities are occluded by the abstract ratio that is established between them.

Brillant!

She's fucking great. I can see why the analytic philosophers paid in part for her appearance: clear, distinct, logical. Thanks!

so good Jan Hus : Luther =Bolzano : Cantor (Brentano )

Cavailles = Poincare x De Gaulle amazing character

Cavailles = Poincare x De Gaulle amazing character

I can't accept his critics of uno kozo.

How about Jindrich Zeleny?

Merci beaucoup

very good . . informative Longitude 127 Seoul Okinawa Soul Axis -- Bahai Faith Rael Jesus Huh kyung young

How is it poosible that no one has ever realized that atomism is false, being so simple? If an atom is indivisible, then there is no point in quistioning about its interior. Its interior is a void, and the atom itself becomes the same as its opposite: the void. My god, it is so obvious that atoms do not exist...

ok legend

nice

Elena Ultra!

Closing Pierce circle...mathematics as philosophical tool Semiootic and pragmatism finally arrived to its momentum A century to understand it... So?

6:45 Marx weapon against commodity fedishes and other bringing into LTV

It is very confusing that you put the title in English when the lecture is in Czech.

خلاصة كتاب الرد على المنطقيين لإبن تيمية : قسم ابن تيمية المنطق إلى قسمين : القسم الأول : المنطق البشري ، وهو الذي يعرفه الناس قبل ارسطوا . وهذا لا خلاف بين البشر جميعهم في صحته . القسم الثاني : المنطق الأرسطي ، وهو الذي ابتكره ارسطوا . والمنطق الذي ابتكره ارسطوا هو أمران فقط ؛ وهما : الأمر الأول : الحد المنطقي . الأمر الثاني : القياس المنطقي . وهذان الأمران هما الذان تكلم عليما ابن تيمية في كتابه الرد على المنطقيين . فقال في الرد على الحد المنطقي : أنه يستحيل أن يُعَرَّف شيء بالحد المنطقي . وقال في الرد على القياس المنطقي ، أنه قياس صحيح ، لكن طريقة الوصول به إلى المطلوب عَسِرة ، ويحتمل الوقوع في الخطأ بسبب عسره . وخير منه قياس التمثيل الذي يستخدمه الفقهاء في الإستدلال ، ويتكلم عليه الأصوليين في أصول الفقه ضمن الأدلة الشرعية....... ..

So, the price of gold is not based on the labor value of those that mine it?

I really hate that I lost one of these earrings, they were my favourite.

07 petr vopěnka bez diskuse

lumineux!

Wow. The best explanation I have heard of this relationship in clear language (and in 30 mins)

Ínter-subjectivity is the proof of infinite multiplicity (ramongsanchez@hotmail.con)

This is my dad 👁️👄👁️✌️✨

espero pongan subtítulos

44:20 There

This is an excellent exploration of the methodological insight central to Marx's critique of capitalism. Lange has done an excellent service to us in presenting this subtle aspect of Marx's critique so clearly.

How much wealth would be produced in the month of May, if the working class went on a general strike for the whole month? That might be a way of explaining the labour theory of use-value as it is proven in concrete terms. The labour theory of exchange-value is that the goods and services produced during a month when workers weren't on strike, would be exchanged in the market place of commodities on the basis of the amount of average socially necessary labour time embodied or crystallised in them. Thus, living labour becomes commodified dead labour through the operation of the wage system where workers are hired for the exchange value of their skills, the commodification of social relations in everyday life. Price fluctuates with supply and demand of and for commodities for sale in the market further obfuscating the relation between producer and product. The commodification of use-value obscures the fact that labour is producing the wealth, that labour is producing capital, that labour is reproducing the social relation of Capital via the wage system, the system where the value of labour power is paid with the money commodity in exchange for the ownership of the product of labour to which is paid for with the money commodity in the marketplace of commodities. The dialectical analysis of the commodity begins with the unity of opposites--exchange-value and use-value, the abstract and the concrete, living labour and dead labour. The negation of commodified wealth would be the association of producers establishing the production of wealth for use, not sale, with distribution of use-value based on need, not on the possession of the money commodity, in other words, the abolition of the wages system of slavery.

Naprosto legendární člověk. Zásluhou jeho unikátních a poetických výkladech o nekonečnu, antické geometrii, a množinových univerzech jsem se strašně zamiloval do matematiky a vstoupil jsem do závratných hlubin tohoto půvabného světa, ze kterých se nehodlám vrátit. Vopěnka nebyl jen prvotřídním matematikem a skromným filozofem, nýbrž byl i mimořádným učitelem který neustále inspiroval své posluchače a čtenáře a tímto tedy povzbudil čerstvou generaci matematiků a myslitelů svým poutavým vyprávěním a nekompromisním charakterem. V dnešní době se jen tak nenajdou díla jako jsou ty od pana Petra Vopěnky a proto je to neskutečný zmar že mnoha jeho monografií dosud nebyla přeložena do angličtiny nebo do jiného jazyka vůbec. Největší škoda ale bdí v tom, že se nemohl dožít toho dne kdy se jeho ideje a radikální vize vnořili do samotných základů přírodních věd a kdy tedy vlastně celá jeho "nová teorie množin a polomnožin" vyroste ze svého esoterického koutku a stane se rovnoprávnou axiomatikou úvah veškeré množinové matematiky. Abelova cena nebo Fieldsova medaile mu možná udělena nebyla, ale jeho vliv, pedagogický i autorský, bohatě svědčí jak znamenitý, skoro nutný byl jeho výzkum, bez ohledu na to jestli si to pan Vopěnka v té době uvědomil. Ruku jsem mu potřást nestačil, nicméně je zajisté že změnil život jak můj tak i mnoho ostatních. Díky za vše, Petře. Nezbývá mi než citovat konec jeho rozprav o teorii množin: "[Snažím se] znovu vše důkladně promýšlet, abych lépe poznal půdu, od níž by bylo možno opět se odrazit k nebesům. Vím, že je to marné, a přesto mne tam cosi táhne. Proč?"

...ET EN CE QUI CONCERNE LES ÉTATS SUPERPOSÉS ?

I wish Nick could read me bedtime stories. His voice is so calming.

I felt the pain .. will be patiently waiting for the joy

In mathematics, you don't understand things, you just get use to them. Cool.

J'aime Badiou mais comment en tant que Français ne pas se sentir désolé pour le public anglophone?

yo this was tight!

"the creation of agriculture created great climate change" - what a blatant lie, such opportunism, this pseudo environmentalist fashion everywhere is disgusting. If what he means is local microclimate due to changes in the biotop, he should say it precisely. Next thing we will hear, is that Egyptian agriculture was the reason for the drying of Sahara desert. How can a grown man expose such ignorance in front of others, boggles my mind.

Thank you for uploading this! Just wondering where is the presentation of David Rabouin?

tout à fait !