Video

Sir your vedios are very informative....

Thank u.. will upload soon

Noted...

It is upto the ridge. Considering the slope of the building is not less than 0.5:10. The apex of ridge node will act like a rigid joint, so the LZ value can be splitted at that location

Thats a tricky question... You can consider the node to node distance as LZ for the truss members. Considering that the top chord or bottom chord will be transported only as an assembly. If it is going to be a fully bolted truss, then care should be taken at the time of transport and erection so that member does not deform due to slenderness..

U can write a code to change the support condition based on some toggle switch kinda interface.. But commenting and uncommenting the editor file is not yet available in OpenSTAAD

No.. the feature to incorporate American design is not yet introduced..

Will do for sure..

Don't know what might be the exact cause.. Need to check with Bentley support team for such errors..

The whole point of this video is to avoid modelling with stub and to go with Control/Dependency specification.

3 d model done in what software brother

U mean to ask about the images which is shown in the beginning of the video?

It is a paid tool. For costing and further process, do mail me in the following ID Email: jparishith@gmail.com

Thank u

@suniljatav1937 The rafter ridge connection is considered as a rigid node and the LZ value for clear span rafter of 25m will be 12.5m.

Daily series in STAAD or OpenSTAAD?

@@parishithjayan open staad

Will start doing..

It's a program which is in progress. Will be released soon. And will let u know. For further informations, contact me on my LinkedIn profile: www.linkedin.com/in/parishith-jayan-985b199a?

@cesayantan sure will do

It's not pinned at the top Mr. Mathew. It's actually free to translate at the top. As per the codal provision, the effective length factor for column is 2. Kindly check the desired clause in the code book.

Why we cannot consider the lateral support from connected members at top.

I meant members are connected at the top. So they restrict translation in lateral directions.

@@tominmathew344 No Mr. Mathew, if it is pinned at the top, then it should not translate at all. But in the actual frame upon having the lateral load, we will see the translation there na. Then in that case how could we consider that as a pinned support? If it is pinned, then it should not translate at all.. Hope u understand

The entire column and lateral members will be translating in that condition. If the column independently translates, then it’s not restrained.

It is not going to affect much of the result. STAAD performs stiffness matrix analysis based on the nodal positions and members. The final erected building will be of the shape in which the top flange will be exactly aligned to the desired slope. So analysing the model in that manner is going to yield the exact results that the structure is about to incur after erection..

U can contact me through mail.. jparishith@gmail.com

@ssr10001 Kindly mail me in the above I'd. We will get in touch..

Basically, the rods are slender members which are not intended to take any compression force. Once the bracing force reaches those points, they try to push the rod and since they are slender, they can't withstand this force or they can't transfer this force, so they buckle away means losing its capacity to transfer the bracing force through compression. Then the force tries to find the new path to reach bottom. So it travels along the line of action, and once it reaches the second rafter, the alternate pair of brace rods gets activated and resist the load through tension. The same for wall bracings as well.. go through the video once again and try to make a simple bracing model in STAAD and study the behaviour to understand the concept.

@@parishithjayan Thank U soo much Sir for your kind reply...

Thanks.

The program is not yet complete. It does not create bracing members. Once I configure everything the program will be made available to purchase at structures-simplified.com. Meanwhile, you can check out other programs in the store.

You r right. The idea is not to produce everything using ChatGPT. The video just shows one among the possibility on how we can utilize chatGPT. For more complex models, we might require a well trained independent local models. We can't find solution for all our problems at one place..

@@parishithjayan absolute!

@zahraagha3667 It will. Here we are just training the GPT model to recreate the STAAD input file. So, it will definitely work.

Thank u

Then the height of brick wall need to be considered as the unsupported length for the minor axis..

True that..

Was testing it's capabilities and reliability. Will definitely make one, if the testing goes well

Just follow code. As per IS 800, for the strut or bracing member subjected to wind or seismic loads where there is a possibility for the reversal of stresses, need to check the tensile slenderness ratio for 350

@@parishithjayan thank you !!

Sure.. will do..

@chetansonkar3601 Truly speaking, I dont know Hindi.

@maheshg5516 Will make a video on this topic soon.

@@parishithjayan thank you

It is not launched yet. M actually testing the program. Will launch it in the mid of January.

@@parishithjayan please upload soon, cause i am into PEB for few years, and it feels hectic to trial and error of build up sections to optimize

It's not yet available for purchase. Planning to release it within the first week of Jan 2024.

Get in touch through LinkedIn. My LinkedIn profile will be in the channel details.

Thanks, will do!

Yes. It is a regular Windows Form Application.

I don't have much of an info on this.. so no comments yar

Say for example, if the brickwall height is around 3m, and above cladded, then the unsupported length for the column on the minor axis can be taken as 3 + the distance of first girt (m assuming that the girts will be with flange braces). And to add on, some of the designers are following an approach of inserting one node at the brick wall level and assign the girt spacing as the unsupported length for the top portion. Generally I don't support that, since the column is going to behave as a whole.

@@parishithjayan can you give the values of same structure as you said in the video. With 3 m block work and 3 m sheeting. For column Kx, Ky, Kz, Lx, Ly, Lz. So that i can have a clear idea. Another thing you are telling about Indian code. For American code the Kx, Ky, Kz , Lx, Ly, Lz values are same or different. Please tell me brother

H.m? In the sense?

?

Combined roof in the sense, multi gable?

Surely will..

Drop me a mail to the following ID.. Will discuss the costing.. Mail: jparishith@gmail.com

Its a commercial tool for sales. Kindly mail to the following id to get the details. EMail: jparishith@gmail.com