Video

Yevgeny Prigozhin: "As long as these people who are responsible for the war are still here, none of them will do anything." Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu will continue to "fool around" and Chief of General Staff Valery Gerasimov will continue to "drink a full glass of vodka every morning, throw paranoid tantrums and shout and abuse everyone around him."

Slava cocaini 😂

Are you serious? The country is bleeding to death. Victory would be a peace which allowed them to retain Odessa.

​@@jamesgornall5731 I don't think Ukraine will keep Odessa. The best they can hope for is a transport corridor

@@mattsmith-ri3lp if they're lucky

Ha,ha,paper targets.

Your tripping.... what kind of drugs are you on .....

Ukraine ignores the situation on the ground in favour of using expensive and limited American-supplied strike weapons to hit targets (many of such weapons are shot down by interceptors, of course) which are utterly irrelevant to the fronts which are steadily collapsing? Isn't that simply a waste? Ukraine may be receiving US weaponry, but like all wars this will be won by both artillery and the blood of men on the ground. Don't you wince every time you hear that, "territorial defence brigades," are shoring up the frontline? These are raw, barely-trained cannon-fodder snatched from the streets and sacrificed to assist the escape of more useful units. It's as though you're applauding the strategic effect of the Dieppe raid (zero) while the battle of Stalingrad (Fall Blau) was in full swing on the Eastern Front, a key turning point in the war. Striking a few radars and some air defence assets near Sevastopol is part of what strategy? Opening Crimea for an amphibious assault? These may make good headlines but are of limited strategic importance. Russia can replace S300, S400, S500, Tor, Buk, Pantsir units and deploy decoys as well, if it attracts all the storm shadow and scalp missiles in existence (fewer than 1000 altogether before the war) they're then unavailable for performing the actual work of hitting useful strategic targets, unlike the JDAM-like FAB bombs being flung at Ukrainian targets identified by ISR beforehand, and used to support attacking forces in destroying infantry, armour and defensive obstacles. There seem to he two wars being fought here, the war for newspaper headlines and cash to pay Ukrainian civil servants and politicians, and the war on the ground where the Russians are now battle-hardened and have enough men and a war economy to support them, permitting attack through multiple vectors, diluting manpower available to defend each one. The Russians have no ambition other than to completely take the Russian-populated Eastern oblasts, and lack the overall manpower to secure the entire nation, the West of which is virtually a separate nation in itself and has more in common with Poland than it does with Russia. Thus far, I wonder what proportion of the Ukrainian population would like to wind the clock back, have agreed to a neutrality settlement early on and gone on to live their lives enjoying virtually free Russian gas imports, as they had done for decades before. I see the conflict ending in a nation partitioned, possibly losing access to the Black Sea via Odessa, and turned into what Professor Mearsheimer as referred to as a, "Dysfunctional rump state." You won't see big arrow offensives, the threat of drones has all-but eliminated those, as machine-guns ended actual human wave attacks in WW1, but incremental gains with defences being laid behind them are all part of the Soviet, now Russian playbook, unlike Ukraine which spent months failing to prepare for a Russia now armed to the teeth and niw faces having to use valuable units as rear guard to screen withdrawals to hastily-constructed defence lines of inconsistent quality? The Russians can blow the rear guard units to bits, leaving them scattered and broken, knowing that their next opponents will be ill-suited territorial units. As to losses, the Russians bombed half a dozen Ujrainian aeroplanes on the ground and the mainstream media si ply ignored it. The Russians are hitting any airfield remotely capable of hosting the promised F-16 (already heavily obsolete). Why have yhe game-changers not changed tge game, Chris, why does Ukraine bleed while half its able bodied men (including Denys effing Davydov) fled to the EU, knowing the impossibility of being sent home. If you see otherwise, I'd ask your GP for an antipsychotic medication prescription because you're clearly deluded. Chris, I know you look every day at the Ukrainian ministry of Information telling us that Russia suffers thousands of casualties per day, but a perforated eardrum is a casualty, a broken toe is a casualty, they can make these numbers up as thry go along while saying nothing of their own losses. It is phenomenally difficult to assess enemy dead and wounded, particularly when you're on tge back foot, so they're guessing, and trying to make their guesses look like victory. Ask them about their own losses (far easier to estimate those simply from roll-calls) and guess what? Stony silence, hundreds of thousands 'missing' but not listed in official records. It's okay though, an ATACAMS might blow up an S-400 launcher and save the day! First casualty of war: truth. Never forget that.

meanwhile NATO trying to do that not ucraine but failing to do so, so they invent twitter victories now for piar reasons

@@jamesgornall5731 goodness. Do you save such diatribes or pick them from a set collection? Most of this I’ll simply ignore. I will point out there are plenty of organizations who try to determine accurate casualty information and I’m well aware of the definitions. I’ll agree both sides are suffering heavy casualties but see no indications that Ukraine is suffering as badly as Russia. That new and inexperienced recruits are being sent to the front should be obvious to anyone who has ever served. It’s how war works. The difference appears to be how they are integrated into their units. Ukraine seems to have been forced to perform unit level training at the front before they can be used in combat. Of course they’d prefer to rotate off the line for that but they don’t have that luxury. You’ll probably deny it but by all appearances Russia simply dumps new recruits on the front line and if they survive they become the experienced troops. I wouldn’t say preventing Russia from being able to use Crimea for any military staging or to launch air strikes is useless. Russia is losing a number of aircraft that can’t be easily replaced.

Maybe it’s his Privete map and he will not share it with us. If you find it, please let me know.

Meanwhile most Russians wouldn't care about such temporary disruptions or USD rates.

Russia are gaining ground but not doing well. Its been 27 months now.

They’re still blaming the republicans and the pope and tucker Carlson and Gaza and Syrias Assad and the pink panther and those two spies that never talked throughout the whole cartoon and weenie the poo.. oops I mean Xi ding ping pong and speed racer and Johnny quest Not Johnny bravo. Ed Eddn eddy, the angry beavers. AND TIM fucking MCGRAW! Of all people. Wtf can you imagine being that coked out of your mind?? I sure can 😉

​@@CheeseLovingGuyRussia has destroyed 3-4 Ukraine and nato armies so far ...now there having a hard time finding anyone on Earth to fight ...even with all the money they offer the mercenaries from around the world 🌎

@@CheeseLovingGuy Feel free to hope but the Ukraine have not Net gained ground since what last Fall? They can have all the US money and equipment but the Ukraine people are not joining to fight. The men are hiding, feeling to other countries, and not volunteering to a degree that they would need to retake land. They are bleeding out and will lose more the longer they drag it out. Keep hoping though some one has to live in fantasy land.

Russia’s stock markets recovered this afternoon

Is the U.S going to sanction the world? Our petrodollar

@@sherrysnyder4195 lulz sure they did being cut off from using usd lulz. they shut off the stock market to prevent people from selling everything. that circuit breaker doesnt activate till next day earliest but likely russia wont allow it to be activated again to sell for a month because they know what is gonna happen. also secondary sanctions implemented today on countries using small vtb banks to help russia finance the war and circumvent sanctions lol.

A temporary impact unlike the Saudi decision not to renew the petro-dollar deal. Interesting times ahead.

@@fred4687 implementation of secondary sanctions on the small vtb banks that were helping russia is also interesting. i doubt any banks willing to be cut off from swft banking for russia now.

Heavy artillery support has always been part of Soviet/Russian doctrine, they learned through bitter experience that artillery causes between 2/3 and 3/4 of all battlefield casualties, unlike video games, and that quantity has a quality all of its own. Being able to saturate an entire area does t only dislodge and kill/wound tge enemy, the psychological impact of all those fires hitting at once must be incredible, causing men to break and head into the open, dazed and confused, terrified. Without deep trenches and shelters those sorts of bombardment take theur toll, as the allies learned during the Ardennes offensive in Winter, 1944. Men hospitalised with shell-shock, bleeding from the ears, only foxholes for protection, and this when the German Army was already undergoing its death spiral. Precision munitions have their place and Russia is learning this lesson, and possesses such munitions, but a pre-assault saturation artillery barrage is terrifying fir even well-prepared defenders. In 1916 the Somme bombardment drove some Germans mad, and had an acute psychological effect on all who experienced it, thus despite standing in deep, concrete-reinfirced trenches the like of which the Allies had nothing to compare with. I can only imagine what an 25-year old Ukrainian territorial soldier pressed into service must think being on the receiving end of modernised Katyusha barrages, with FAB-1500 munitions and the dreaded TOS-1 & 2, if those are in firing range then they must be acutely aware that they are in for a devastating hit. God, it sends chills through me, I've had a single .50 cal machine gun fire close to me and it felt like the wrath of God. I pray this all ends soon.

Yes, its coming from the two words Krasno (red) and gora (mountain), and a little, cute mountain is gorovka.

Russian's mighty bot is here 😂😂😂

Yea, very difficult to find unbiased coverage of this. There only 3-4 channels that I’ve found on here

Probably will have to go to previous video and pull the map from there

Info on troops movements is based on publicly available footage and geolocations

@@Theti chissà perchè le tue fonti sono diverse da mappatori piu' obiettivi e neutrali.

Well, their plan has some serious flaws as its just an artificial delay of delivery. They can't start from a military base abroad and launch an attack as it would be a direct involvement of that country into the war and that base would become a target. At one point in time, you have to bring them into Ukraine and as soon as they arrive, the airfields will get attacked. They could play a game of chicken and loose only 1-2 fighters at one time, but with so few in use, its even less effective than the HIMARS systems, making the whole discussion about the F-16 more than less a paper tiger.

which airfield is gonna host the f16 ? and the ru scientist needs to find a way to increase the range of tornado launched mlrs 300mm 9m5x series 200km glonas guided rocket by 100km to match the atacm = 9m544 with 552 HE FRAG submunitions the pc term of the west is DIPCM,std 40mm RHA penetration and the improved version 160mm RHA, the ru himar. gaddamn they will cry warkrime when getting hit by such armament , and btw wanna see how the stuff really performed guntuber perepolox is ur guy, 1st guntuber to review 148jav on yt, and all the other armament nlaw m72,at4, matador, etc. he got jav but he got no target , all these review must thanks to nafo donation. mines, mortar, artillery ,mlrs, getting ru weapons to play on ch is not a problem,

Yet, they wanted war with Russia, and eventually, China, then they should have been prepared for it...

to most Western Experts, reality is superfluous maybe the first thing about the Russian, that the Western omitted considering, was that Russian will have PATIENCE. no one believed Russians would have patience. no one believed Russians would approach this with PROFFESSIONALISM

Sun tzu said economic resources were most important, greater glory to the solider who gains an enemy chariot than one one destroys it.

Thank you so much man 🙏 I really appreciate the help

Russia stands in the way of the wests goal of neoliberal world domination through liberalization of the entire worlds markets and final goal of ushering in corporatocracy and total enslavement of mankind There can never peace until one of these forces is defeated if the west wins we will see peace on an enslaved world if Russia wins we will see multipolarity and national self determination for all nations there may be regional conflict to sort out but global totalitarianism will once again be nothing but the vain imagination of the most evil

It's impossible to talk negotiate with USA WARMONGERS ‼️ they tried for 30 years finally got surrounded by western demonic MASONIC west The US swamp runs deep in Ukraine. The western elitist criminal cabal will not, and cannot relent in their support, lest the profoundly heinous horrors of who they are will begin to be irreversibly exposed. Sex trafficking, adrenachrome, SRA, Luciferianism. The enemy behind the curtain. They are willing to nuke the world US tools of diplomacy: Threaten Blackmail Regime change InvasionNATO is a war machine for the elite. Here polish

Ru losses according BBC about 50k for all the time. 20-10x times less than ukr

Attritional wars require their own ‘Art of War’ and are fought with a ‘force-centric’ approach, unlike wars of manoeuvre which are ‘terrain-focused’. They are rooted in massive industrial capacity to enable the replacement of losses, geographical depth to absorb a series of defeats, and technological conditions that prevent rapid ground movement. In attritional wars, military operations are shaped by a state’s ability to replace losses and generate new formations, not tactical and operational manoeuvres. The side that accepts the attritional nature of war and focuses on destroying enemy forces rather than gaining terrain is most likely to win. The West is not prepared for this kind of war. To most Western experts, attritional strategy is counterintuitive.

Military Summary does....

I'm a one man team 🤣

Where were Moscow and Stalingrad relocated to 😂😂😂