Video

Genes mutations which cannot be stopped , pushed the Homo naledi to new morphology that suited the environment , I suppose : from the short to the nowadays long neck giraffe as an analogy . By the way , if you measure these necks of the giraffes after being carbon dated and divided by the time taken you could get the rate ( speed ) of evolution .

Absolutely fascinating! ❤ I love all this new information coming out! Thank you 🙏

Mithraism indeed has astrological significance. It tells a story of an ancient event.

“Jamie Martindale” is a great name! :)

If this is suppose to be about scientific communication it shouldnt be so boring. Just constructive criticism- not saying its not important. Its just really flat.

Well im a Pesian and depiction of mithra killing a bull stands for Mithra defeating the god Baal aka the bull of heaven..

Guy misuses the word "literally" to mean "figuratively" just like most ignorant Americans do. Not a good start. Then he repeats a debunk hypothesis, that Roman Mithras is the same as Persian Mithra, which it's not. Mithras is Perseus in disguise. He wears all the same garb given to Perseus by the gods when he went to battle Medusa, and every known Mithraic temple contains a depiction of the constellations Taurus, with Perseus right above the bull just he is in the sky, the scorpion right below the bull, as it is in the sky, and s veral other depictions of constellations, right where they all were along the celestial equator in 2000 bc. That proves beyond any doubt that Mithras is Perseus. The Persian God Mithra never slew a bull in any surviving stories, as Mithras is slaying the bull in the Mithraic temples. How has this guy never heard that Cumont's Persian hypothesis is debunked?

Near the end someone suggests there is a gap between Homo erectus and later hominins, based on the chart which is on the screen before and after 1:24:00. I think the chart is a bit misleading, because the dots representing discoveries are bunched together. There are plenty of remains spread out between 1.5 Million years ago and the later bunch even just in Spain at Atapuerca - 1.4-1.2 Mya Sima de Elefante, 0.8 Mya Gran Dolina, 0.43 Mya Sima de los Huesos - let alone the rest of the world.

Language....

The religion of Mithraism comes from Iran/Persia!

21 minutes in this guy hasn't said one interesting thing. Mithraism is a star cult, imo, and the work of David Ulansey.

Perhaps, learn the Cause of Creation!

Wtf is this dude talking about??? The entire Religion is based on Astrology..

Thankyou sir from India ❤

Where are the stone tools? No stone tools, so I doubt Naledi harnessed fire, probably little more intelligent than chimps.

This should have also mentioned Milutin Milanković since the orbital cycles causing climate change are named after him.

Isn't saying "we don't know who the founder of Mithraism is", the same as saying we don't know who the founder of English is. There isn't a founder. It is an amalgamation. Like a language. We've got to stop looking at ancient religion as though they existed in their own vacuum.

asteróide mata dinossauro. mata asteróide dinossauro

Thank you for this beautiful presentation. Your article about midbody is my graduation project subject. Your article is really inspiring and unusual. This presentation will help me a lot obviously. I hope you can make a history...

"Any spelunking primordial dwarfs out there" she asked hopefully?

Yoshihiro Kawaoka is the guy that made GoF on h5n1 made a bioweapon

The cave workers including the boss who lost so much weight to fit in there are so brave. I get clostrofobic just watching

This guy is so boring

Sorry. Evolution is not happening. All of the 'examples' of adaptations to changed environments, diets, or threats are from a pre-enabled already-present biological system called the EPIGENOME. It works by gene MODIFICATION largely by methylation, not by natural selection of DNA mutations. The bottom line is adaptations are pre-enabled AND happen within the genome's created boundaries. Not evolution going outside of boundaries by natural selection of mutations happening upon new beneficial DNA configurations. In fact, in this light, natural selection has been selecting these epigenome-derived adaptations. This gives an intelligent design signature. Not the Godless one of the evolutionary theory. These were wrongly called 'microevolution'. Natural selection has been actually selecting these epigenome-derived adaptations. Then this faux cornerstone into the mind-constructs of 'macroevolution' were used as a sleight of hand into making evolution seem believable. Modifications vs. mutations are big in their differences. A pre-enabled epigenome and its MATERALLY FOUNDED 3RD ASPECT OF EPIGENETICS logistically has an intelligent design signature. The Godless-spinned theory of evolution by genome degeneration into evolutionary generation is laid bare here as absurd comic book science. We are from an intelligent design by Jesus Christ. His sacrifice on the cross was payment for OUR sins as we are imputed with 100% purity in exchange for our faith in it along with belief in his resurrection gives a FREE GIFT of eternal life. Do it today! Evolution is not an answer to our existence. God is, however.

This is exactly what i expect from paleoanthro archeaology. Nothing more or less. So im just a human being,i saw the later doc on Netflix wether they said it possibly made art or fire or burials...who knows?

@46:00, if there was a group of believer/practitioners with any common rites then there was either a means of communication for those common or standardized (to a greater or lesser extent) rites including the foundation rite for establishing a mithraeum. Why extrapolate that one would only "see the foundation rite once in a lifetime" when obviously the Roman Legions moved around the empire to make war or garrison? A single leader type might establish several mithraeum during a long active life.

There's bad information that has been passed around for quite some time. Iranian Mithra, or Mehr, and Roman Mithras are the same character. This should be rather obvious, but it needs to be stated. One of the largest arguments made to distinguish the two; it is often claimed that there are no depictions of Mithra as a bull-slayer other than the Roman Mithraeums which depict the Tauroctony. This is false. Reza Zarghamee, author of "Discovering Cyrus: The Persian Conqueror Astride the Ancient World (Iran's Age of Empire)" on pg. 20 lists a Mitanni royal seal from roughly 1450 BC that depicts Mithra as a Bull-slayer. Additionally, on Pg 28 of the same, Zarghamee reminds us that the ceremony of Mehragan, which held the same significance as Nowruz even into the Achaemenid period, culminated in ancient times with the ritual sacrifice of a bull. As the name Mehragan suggests, it is a ritual derived from and practiced in the Mithraic tradition. Richard David Barnett, former keeper of the department of western asiatic antiquities at the british museum from the 1950's-1970's, also stated that this aforementioned Mitanni royal seal depicted a tauroctony. In addition to these facts, Zoroastrian temples were/are Achaemenid appropriations of structures that were previously used as Mithraic temples. These temples, rededicated towards Zoroastrianism, are to this day referred to as as "Dar-E Mehr", which is literally "Door to Mithra". Upon being initiated, the Zoroastrian priest is given a Bull-headed "mace of Mithra", or gorz, with which Mithra sanctifies the ceremonies performed by the Priest. I wish that people would stop being so quick to dismiss things, and instead would strive to find the threads in history. Nothing happens in isolation. To try and claim that the Roman Mithras and Iranian Mithra are two entirely separate characters is a faulty argument from the start. Moreover, the worship of Mithra is alive and well. Many, if not near all major modern day religions can be traced directly to this character. Hinduism, Buddhism, Norse mythology, Greek/roman mythology, Christianity/Judaism/Islam, Taoism, etc. In the United States, we have a giant statue called the "statue of Liberty" which is directly linked to the personage of Mithra. The tradition of swearing an oath by raising your right hand is mithraic. Christmas is directly descended from Mithraism. The worship is alive and well. Not wanting to see the obvious connections in history does not mean they aren't there all the same. Further, not having yet found something does not mean it does not exist - it means it hasn't been found yet. Much love!

Perfect example how someone can take a few facts and string together a bunch of false conclusions.

I think naledi lived so far underground because they were delicious and just the right size for a family meal

That is the most claustrophobic space i could imagine. I just. Incomprehendable for me. Cant even express 😮

Much poetic license is being taken with these Fresh renderings.

How would the reconstructions look like if your presuppositions would be more human?

I'd speculate that prehistorial hominid movement was in part based on availability of DOGS.

I can't believe I only just found out about this last week and its now being discontinued. I am totally heartbroken. I loved the episodes I watched though. This was a fun topic for a final session.

Next time you make a video of a lecture please have someone do it who zooms in on the screen the lecturer is presenting data and pictures on. Viewers do not need to see the stage and the lecturer constantly. On my iPhone I can zoom in to the presentation screen but some people can’t do that on their cellphone or computer.

The first 15 minutes is a waste of time, but the rest of the talk is very interesting.

No way were they starting a fire 🔥 in a cave. They would be choking with the smoke filling up the cave.

I hope someone has read the parts of the urantia revelation....mainly papers 61- 64. Where it explains in evolutionary detail the basis of this transformation.

Didnt see any sut on ceilings, nor did i read about it either.

How did these creatures get in there? No lights. How did they ever make it that far into the system.

Its amazing that these cave systems are natural occurring. A whole world underneath our own.

How lucky we all are!! That this is right here at our finger tips! Thank you for posting this on CZcams. It reminds me of the public lectures by thinkers and scientists in the Victorian days and through to the beginning of the 20th century, and how in many parts of the world the normal everyday civilian would crowd into the halls to hear them talk. Darwin faced a crowd like that. I find myself feeling sort of down on contemporary culture because the only speakers we crowd in for are like self help gurus and pickup artists. But then I remember that it’s all here, and the numbers of viewers are often, especially over time, far greater than could ever fit in a university hall. Maybe we aren’t so bad after all.

Don’t like this guy

Thanks for your work!

What a great video! You seem rather open minded for scientists of today, which is so refreshing. I have contended for a long time that perhaps man did not JUST come out of Africa, or that humoids left Africa millions of years ago and progressed 'out of Africa'. With this comment, I want to comment on your video in detail: 1) You stated that the geology was the same back in you South Africa 'dig', but I see that the openings are so small, even for small people, that it really makes little sense that the geology was the same back then as it is now. I would ask WHY would anyone go down into such depths when it would take so much effort and be so dangerous? Also, how could they do that with no light? That would mean that they would have to have a torch in their hand to get down in the depths. So, I would conclude that the geology WAS very different back then, and that getting in and out back 200,000-300,000 years ago was a lot easier. I would also question that if it was the same back then, then going to the bathroom would have been a big problem for them as well. 2) You implied that the current scientific understanding today is that it is the brain that gives us emotions, such as remorse, grief, sadness, etc., and then showed us a baby gorilla showing grief over his mom. But I contend that the brain, and its size does not relate to emotions, including grief, sorrow, happiness, etc. I raised dogs while my kids were growing up, and I have first hand experience of them having all these feelings, and that they show them as well. In addition, I have watched many, many animal documentaries, and it it VERY clear that just about all of animals (at least mammals) experience sorrow and happiness and show it as well, even birds with pea sized brains. So, all of these emotions are NOT human only, and it does not take brain size or brain power to have these. 3) One of the big holes in modern science today is that the obvious, and some empirical data is often ignored or downplayed, especially in astronomy. But this is, or should I say, was the case with human history also. So, your dissertation here was very refreshing, since you really seem to be questioning previous notions and are really trying to look at the empirical data, and then make a theory. I look and see what mankind looks like today, with basically three distinct races, and with the European 'race' being so very unique and obviously so different from all other humanity. And that the Asian race is so different from Africans as well. So, the theory that all of mankind came from Africa makes no sense at all. So, it was very enlightening to me to find out that there are some humanoid remains in Southeast Asia that are over 2 millions years old. While the very first humanoid my have come from Africa with its great climate and environment, humanity probably developed all over the world.

I remember when he put out an advertisement for small female archeologists. We all knew it had to be a tight squeeze of a cave.

I was surprised that the augurial significance of the boxes might not have been discussed regarding the foundation of the site of the "cave", or that the idea of an outoor meeting in a place where a fire pit for making coals and cooking (grilling, spit roasting or even covered baking) might continue to be in edification a popular gathering place for a fraternal meeting of men who identified with the architypical outdoorsman who was guide by example and in humble service of and in friendship with Apollo toward the cultivation of a noble and meaningful life in brotherly love.

Good information. I'm doing a small oak woodland restoration on my property but cannot safely use fire here. The understory is bouncing back in blackberry brambles, is it best to clear those out or can they be tolerated by oak woodland birds such as Redheaded Woodpeckers and Whip poor Wills?

does nt darwin look a bit neanderthal? I thought I had featchers since a little kid thus whu hominids are my hobby.

This was a stupid modernist lecture.All of this is religion not cOMMunaL DinİNg.