Video

uugh! I took a System Dynamics course and block diagrams jumped straight into the use of negative feedback and laplace transforms only. And that's natural after all, because control is all about constraint, and that's what negative feedback loops actually do. But then I started on my own doing MIT OCW 6.003 "Signals and Systems" to understand better how programs like MATALB might actually be doing the work and stuff and wow does that book (Oppenheim, et al 1996) waffle around in its examples. Impossible to follow. Diagrams nowhere near the text talking about them, going back and forth between the example and tangents. There's a 2016 book, which is less problematic, but the structure is different, and just assumes students already know things like z-transform? Your playlist here is a big help, especially this part where the convolution section is the worst section ever.

This one Thevenin or Norton ?

why was gravity not used in calculation hydrostatic force?

Thank you

Can anyone show me how you would input these equations on a TI-89 Titanium?

How do I input the second equation into a matrix?

I put these equations into wolfram and I'm getting no solution. Someone help please

Lo necesito en español

You have to put it in 1.25 speed for him to speak in normal speed

thank you!

7:00 you're damn right it is black magic. my final is in 2 days. I hope I don't fail my dad is gonna screw me lol

I wish if this question come on my practical exam 😢😅

Confusing😢shouldnt we take -30v

Hello. Could you please maybe show how you got the values for Tcg and Tcd. Any sort of clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank You.

Thanks for the explanation!

Very clear explanation. Thank you!

I love your voice

thank you I finally understood this for the first time

I have been searching for something like this all day. This is a perfect example to study for my exam, thank you!

Thank you very much.

You are the best in world !

thanks

this is stupid af. but its what i was looking for

How do we know which point has the maximum of these internal forces acting on it if it’s a complex problem with 4 loads.

I hate this subject

Isn't that exciting? We got our first value here. Made me smile sooo wide :DDDD This video was so helpful!

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

SUPER HELPFUL THANK YOU!!!

this was so incredibly helpful thank you!!

your inverse laplace is wrong @ 13:05 you supposed to use the method completing the square for dinominator and and the answer would be e^-3sin(-3t)

You are the best, thanks so much !!!

thank you man

The TI-84CE is great in many areas but definitely not in this one. The Casio CG50 beats it hands down in this kind of problem. You would just enter the problem directly as shown. I don’t know why in the world the 84 doesn’t have an angle key to enter polar coordinates directly instead of this weird way.

ChatGPT sent me here

An excellent follow-up to the previous video to formalise the concept. Thank you!

Thank you very much! I am working on neural coding, and this concept is indespensable for neural response function, which features Dirac's delta function (or Kroenecker's). I have been having a hard time wrapping my mind around the formulas, but you did an excellent job explaining the concept.

God bless you sir. Numbers 6: 24-26. Thank you

Thank you

Thanks for the video man, good teaching never ages

got an 80 on my FT exam thanks dude

شرح كافي ووافي. يارب تسلم

This is a true hidden gem. wish I could access more of ur material but the links dont work

Thank you! it was to the point and well explained.

dude im ngl I have no idea what u did after 10 minutes but ur other vids have been super helpful

Thanks so much. Appreciate the video

Fabulous

thank man, even after 13 years your video is still pretty useful

Ga jelas

Thank you so much!

it helps a lot, thank you sir!!