Video

How can you possibly know the tiny rat is hungry by looking at it? What are you the moonkey whisperer.

Well, rats also have tails

Какое ещё дите? Макака часами может орать,корми не корми.

Люд,.без царя в голове,для них дичь вредитель,дете? Так а кто тогда ваши дети для ВАС? он дете для обезьяны.Вот если бы это " дете" жило рядом с жалейками то крышу бы снесло от вечного писка,вони,и вечной хотелкой дай пожрать.

3:42 большинство хозяев-садисты.

What, precisely, do you think is the point of discussing its needs and instinctive behaviors? The only scenario in which its needs could be met and its instincts could be both compatible and validated with/by its environment and the other inhabitants would be if it were still with its mother tree-rat, living in the wild, as part of her tree-rat troop. Once the mother is caught/shot and the little goblin poached and paid for, that's all out the window. Now it's nothing, which is the same, or worse than, being dead. It will always be too wild because the instincts are preprogrammed and irreversible. Thus, it can't be a pet or a person (in spite of all the abysmally-absurd, absolutely-aberrant, astoundingly-asinine & astronomically-anomalous anthropomorphism & perturbing-prevalence of prolifically-propagandized, purely-puerile, perversely-preternatural primitive-primate-progeny-personification fueling the "baby" monkey maternal fantasy-focused-fetish-fascination-fixation-fanatical-fanclub on countless CZcams channels & videos). Nevertheless, it will never be wild enough, due to lack of the survival-skills, abundance of species-specific socialization, wariness of humans and predators, environmental familiarity, understanding of the hierarchical social structure, the didactic, corrective, affirming/confidence-building & other crucial formative experiences, stable sense of self/identity, etc, etc, which are gained through imitation of the mother and troop members, social interactions across the span of the hierarchy, play and recreation, feeding/foraging and so on. An unaltered, undiminished state of wildness, which only develops in the absence of human interference, is essential for the little tree-rat to live the life nature intended for it. This is also the only life suitable for it, as all life forms are highly evolved/specialized over countless generations in order to fulfill their role and occupy their niche within an ecosystem & a food chain. Nature is incredibly powerful, but also quite fragile. That is why humans should not interfere with it. This little rodent has already been irreparably altered from its natural state, so everything else is a moot point. Whether it is snuffed out, "re-released" (meaning dumped at the edge of a forest completely foreign to it) or permanently chained to a tree in the dirt patch out front of the shanty-hut when it's usefulness for "baby" monkey-maternal-mania-material is spent, is immaterial. It's dead already :D get it?

@@tremainetreerat5176I respect that, even though you’re obviously averse to these monkeys, you at least see they play an important role in the ecosystem. In the wild, they have invaluable worth as seed dispersers, insect population controllers, and pollinators. In a person’s home, they are basically just traumatized, foreign, wild animals dressed as play things… or worse. Much worse.

​​@@tremainetreerat5176 I don't understand why anybody gives advice in the comments, especially to the monkey pimps. It's not like they really care about these animals, or that they're going to actually read or listen to any of the suggestions that they're given in the comments section!

No , I don’t get it. Please repeat what you said. 😂🤣

What's a Hugh cat?😂😂😂

"Asking" for help from what?

У людей-хозяев и этой обезьяны по-любому тоже.​@@dr.donnawalter4380

Who do you think was running the camera? Is everyone who comments in the comment sections of monkey videos as dense as you and others reveal yourselves to be?

Animals get along far better than many humans display.

You did not learn your studies well in school? Monkeys have been pets for far longer than dogs and cats.

@@dr.donnawalter4380 You can't possibly be an MD or a PhD. And most definitely not a DVM. Maybe homeopathy? Nutritional supplements? 😄 I suggest going back to school, and this time pay a little more attention to history, psychology, primate development, etc. Meanwhile, quit dishing out false information on topics you aren't qualified to talk about.

​@@billiedove528 - perhaps history that has not gone through revisionist changes would serve you well to study. Assigning human characteristics to animals is emotionally unhealthy and referred to as anthropomorphism. Monkeys have been pets for far longer than dogs and cats.

@@dr.donnawalter4380 Miss Walter, I'm older than you and I have degrees from The University of Chicago (that's a well-respected actual university), so you need not tell me about non-revisionist history. Milton Friedman, Saul Bellow, and Karl Weintraub were all amazing professors who taught us well. (You can look up who they were.) I'm sorry if I'm appearing rude, but I find it personally annoying when quasi-intellectuals get out of their lanes and start explaining things they clearly do not fully grasp. In this case it would be Southeast Asian History, Ethnic Folklore, Art History of the Ancient Mesopotamian Basin, and of course attachment development in non-human primates. Are you familiar with Harry Harlow's experiment at the University of Wisconsin-Madison? I wouldn't go so far as to say it proved that primates feel emotion; there's a great deal of wiggle room in Prof. Harlow's conclusions. But it's an excellent starting place for a discussion of such a nuanced topic as primate anthropomorphism. "Nuanced" means possessing many subtle characteristics.

@@dr.donnawalter4380 Now you're impinging the reputation of my alma mater, the U. of Chicago. I've forgotten more Edmund Burke than you'll ever read, sweetums. (n.b. "impinging" means to negatively impact something.)