Video

Lewis Hamilton: We still have unfinished business, Max!

Max has maximized the maximum!

This was a very fun song to make. It started out as a demo titled "midnight" for a producer friend of mine, RadiantCorium who didn't end up using the demo so I eventually ended up producing my own version of the track and this is the result.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

0:41: 🇳🇱🇳🇱

I don't know anything about this but I'm commenting to support you!! "You like the EFL? Name 3 songs and they can't be radio hits"

If everything leads back to science because the core of every science is philosophy, I'll have to assume the core of philosophy is the inescapable feeling of need of wanting to understand the human condition.🤓(that Englush sentence sounded funny, but I'm not going back to fix it)

Organism is another page that is part of a loop (I discovered it with mustard)

This doesn't say as much about the nature of reality as it does the nature of definitions

OMG (oo)

Fits perfectly

Casually max looking like a monke🗿

It really does seem to work, I tried: Anus, Mammals, Vertebrate, Deuterostome, Bilateria, Clade, Phylogenetics, Biology, Science, Scientific method, Empirical evidence, Proposition, Philosophy of language, Analytic philosophy, Philosophy.

Wow, this is a great video. At the time of watching, it had 67 views. There is a Wikipedia page about this phenomenon - 'Getting to Philosophy.' That Wikipedia page mentions how this is likely due to the way that Wikipedia articles tend to aim to classify and explain whatever the article is about, leading to higher concept terms being the first non-disambiguation and non-pronunciation related hyperlinks. As of 2016, apparently 97 percent of Wikipedia pages eventually link to philosophy! I do not know if there has been a more recent scan. One comment said this may be due to the Wikipedia style guide page for opening paragraphs of articles directly mentioning the goal of clarification of the topic talked about, but I feel like it is something more innate than that. When I watched this video, there were only six comments, two of which were stating that this did not work on Portuguese articles. Whether this is mere coincidence or informative of something deeper is a mystery. Is it due to the sentence structure of Portuguese vs English? Is it due to the style guide in Portuguese being formatted differently? After thinking for a minute, I realised that if you graphed out Wikipedia just purely by using the first hyperlink, you could make a map of Wikipedia where every node (article) directs to exactly one other node, while having either zero or one or multiple nodes pointing towards it. As you can always continue clicking hyperlinks, this must eventually make cycles. Philosophy is one article in an eleven-article loop, also including existence, reality, the universe, mathematics, and knowledge. I ran some simulations of randomized directed graph generation with the above conditions, and I found that if there are no 'clumpy' articles, like the 44 different categories of Wikipedia discussed in the video, like all football articles being 'clumped' together, and if there are no 'sinks', which appears to be philosophy and other highly abstracted concepts and fields, there should still only be a handful of ending loops. Below are some results I found related to the longest 'chains' in the directed graph, which are the longest sections of articles pointing to other articles before reaching an existing chain ending in a loop, or creating a loop themselves - a chain of single parent nodes starting with an orphan and linked downstream to a multiparent node. There should exist an article chain of length (sqrt(8n+1)+1)/2 which approximates to sqrt(2n), which would be length 4000 given Wikipedia's 8,000,000 articles, ending in a loop of some length <4000, and each successive chain should have length sqrt(2)(sqrt(kn)-sqrt((k-1)n)) where k is the number of the chain. On average, I found there should be n/2 chains, which is a result I am suspicious of, and I can't calculate easily a general expression for the number of expected loops but for the Wikipedia case of 8,000,000 articles there should be 5.3 ending loops with one having a significantly higher portion of all articles pointing into it. I calculated that 5.3 result using this formula: \sum_{k=1}^{n / 2} \sum_{j=1}^{\sqrt{2 k n}-\sqrt{2(k-1) n}} \frac{j}{n} if anyone wants to poke around with it. Of course, this is all assuming random connections between Wikipedia pages, no sinks and no clumpy articles, and yet there still emerges some loop of nodes which act as 'attractors' with virtually all other nodes falling into them, with the largest potentially being as potent as the philosophy node is on the real Wikipedia (around 97% of all pages terminating in that loop). The largest loop (and hence most attractive) being somewhere on the scale of 4000 nodes doesn't pass the sniff test so I will look further into what ways there are to rigorously show what sort of attraction abstracted classification has on article links. Time to download Wikipedia. Cheers for the video mate and hope anyone reading this has a good day or night or whatever.

You got it the other way around-most of science and philosophy is merely an attempt at explaining the world. Only a few, if any, are absolute truths.

"Hanseatic flags" leads you to wiktionary

Philosophy itself appears to go in an 11-article loop. Philosophy -> existence -> reality -> universe -> space -> three-dimensional -> geometry -> mathematics -> knowledge -> awareness of facts -> awareness -> philosophy

fascinating, just tried it myself, also found many paths intersected the article for language. Is there a way to quantify this phenomenon?

Nice video, nice hairstyle, nice everything.

Nice hair style bro, I like it. Greetings from Argentina :)

We gettin' a degree in philosophy with this one 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Look up game theory bro, nice philosophy

The video ur talking about is literally right above this one on my recommended

I tried it with escitalopram and fucking it worked 😭

holy, loved this

I'm going to try the memiest of Wikipedia pages. CBT

I just watched Brian May explaining how every page on wiki leads to one Wiki Article. This is amazing. Hahahaha

its possible to get a random wiki page by the way

make crazy wikipedia trick part 2

Thats cool

🤓 pretty cool

just watched the wikipedia graph, wtf is going on

There is a wikipedia page on this called: “Getting to Philosophy”

i legit just watched the graph video

how am i here, wtf, i love this

Defeat them all,Max!!!

Thank the algorithm gods

i have no idea how i end up in this video, but im glad i did, im going to test this trick in portuguese wikipedia edit: unfortunately the first link i tried end up in two different recursions and i just give up. nice video though

Tu Tu Du Du, MAX VERSTAPPEN

It's a meme but it actually looks good

you hear classical music when you are icolated. Me cryng for help as the duch anthem plays for the 387 time

I may or may not have been responsible for what happened at the Australian Grand Prix thanks to this video 👀

Do not use this bassboosted as it sounds like a vibrator inside your ears

Its even funnier when you remember that the dutch used to own some of the us and sargeant is american

0:29 Lando be like: bruh when is this gonna stop i am tired of it for real.

i love how it played louder when max was on screen

Be prepare to hear this 24 times this year

Nice

Great analysis from David Luiz

My country got colonized by the Dutch back then, and right now my favourite sport has been colonized by the Dutch again 😂