Video

Excellent narration Anna!

I’m on the same boat as barneyhall2753 I tried but the AI voice is unbearable

Sorry guys, I wanted to give you a go, but the AI voice makes this unlistenable.

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🌌

Ghost 😊

Any thoughts on this episode? Your feedback would be much appreciated....thanks.

Really appreciate the shorter and concise content provided in the last couple of episodes. Makes it much easier to digest as a daily dose.

Please change the obnoxiously noisy intro and exit audio

Great episode as always, however I would caution you to not use the term "Dark Side" of the Moon even to mean unknown. Sadly there are too many people who believe the far side of the moon does not receive sunlight.

This comment is an offering to the algorithm gods

"High Delta 5 maneuvers"??? Make that "High Delta V maneuvers"!!!

At this rate Russia may launch one a year and be on the moon in 35 years.

which part of n. america is anna from - cannada ?

hello anna

Ya right , NEWSFLASH ! ain't no one believin this crap anymore man !! All CGI composites and images , we know the earth is not round , it's a stationary , level , plane , and no one ever has , and never will penetrate the firmament , GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD , WE LOVE YOU GOD

Not sure why there always seems to be 2 identical episodes released. This splits views and hurts the algorithm that gets this great information to the most people.

There is a clear explanation for "dark matter" It has to do with what exists at the center of galaxies. Mainstream thought today is that singularities exist there. Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. General Relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. Tis the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is one aspect of dilation. Dilation is the original and correct explanation for why we cannot see light from the galactic center. It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for "dark matter". The missing mass is dilated mass. Einstein wrote about dilation occurring in "large clusters of stars" which is basically a very low mass galaxy. For a galaxy to have no dilation it must have very, very low mass (or low mass in its center). It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter. This is virtual proof that dilation is occurring in common spiral galaxies, there can be no other realistic explanation for this fact. What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. It wasn't until the 1960's when television and movies started to popularize black holes that the idea gradually became mainstream.

poor mr higgs is barking in his grave

Well that's great they put up a telescope when their people are starving and dying. Concentrate on the ground first and then launch rockets.. But that's typical from a third world country

That would be nice.

amazing video but not for seo video views is too poor...you need to hire a seo expert

I am ready for the Lunar Earth Flyby

thank you

*Promo sm* 🔥

Here is a question. There are zero asumptions in my question. (It may be a good question, it may be a logical question, but simplistic, with known answers, and I am simply not educated in the field.) Say we observe light from a galaxy 10 Billion light years away. Are there not NUMEROUS disparate past factors, no longer active NOW, over the 10 billion light years of travel to us, that could have affected the light spectrem we prerceive now? If, say 9 billion years ago, something (anything, the expansion rate of space, the various gases of another galaxy that is no longer there, etc) was cause to a shift in the spectrum of light from said galaxy, and that causative factor was no longer active, would the light we perceive now not still carry that PAST spectrum shift message, despite the fact that the cause of said shift is no longer affecting the light? (Say in the first billion years of said light leaving that galaxy space WAS expanding very fast, and that billion years of red shifted light is only reaching us now, would the light still record that past expansion for the next billion years or so of our experience of it?) Is it possible that we are measuring how fast space was expanding over time? And, if the expansion of space has steadily slowed over our 13.6 biillion years, would not our observational time lapse observation of said red shift, give the perspective of ever increasing expansion as we look ever deeper into the past? In other words the steady decay of expansion rate over time, would produce the illusion of ever more rapid expansion, the further distance into the past one observed? It does not appear that the disparate "ladder" measurements of star and galaxy distance overlap, or confirm distance AND recessional velocity. Telling the standard candle brightness does not give red shift, and red shift can only give expansion rate of said light, over the TIME of its journey. Therefore it appears that a steady drop in expansion rate, would produce the hubble constant, and mimic an ever increasing expansion over distance.

I do hope NASA continues to find ways to extend the life of the Voyager probes. I have enjoyed checking in throughout my life to see what they have discovered.

Is Halley getting her news from her buddy ChatGPT? Second news clip into the segment seems to be talking about a test of the upper stage only from over 2 years ago and not the recent full stack attempt.