Mu Prime Math
Mu Prime Math
  • 241
  • 2 845 202
Does the Gaussian integral trick work for other functions?
Proof for Riemann-integrable functions:
Robert J. MacG. Dawson. “On a “Singular” Integration Technique of Poisson”. American Mathematical Monthly, 2005. cs.smu.ca/~dawson/Poisson.pdf
We can compute the integral of e^(-x^2) using a very cool trick that lets us switch to polar coordinates and use the Jacobian for a u-sub. But does this technique work for any other function? In this video we turn that problem into a differential equation and find all of the solutions!
Mariano Suarez-Alvarez's proof: math.stackexchange.com/a/4517530/713547
0:00 The Functional Equation
4:23 The Differential Equation
7:14 Solving
12:34 Additional Notes
Calculus Problems playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJGFne7YhMi-4eYsUKzkITao.html
Subscribe to see more new math videos!
Music: C418 - Pr Department
zhlédnutí: 3 686

Video

Proof: Uniqueness of the Tensor Product
zhlédnutí 2,3KPřed rokem
Universal property introduction: czcams.com/video/vZzZhdLC_YQ/video.html This video proves the uniqueness of the tensor product of vector spaces (or modules over a commutative ring). This uses the universal property of the tensor product to prove the existence of an isomorphism (linear bijection) between any two "tensor products". Tensor Products playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJHCtzgzZyRq...
Tensor Product Basis With the Universal Property
zhlédnutí 3,3KPřed rokem
Tensor product universal property explanation: czcams.com/video/vZzZhdLC_YQ/video.html Generating set proof: czcams.com/video/KnSZBjnd_74/video.html timestamp 23:57 If we have a basis for each of two vector spaces (or modules over a commutative ring) V and W, then we can use that to form a basis for the tensor product V⊗W. The proof uses the universal property of the tensor product, which conne...
Complete Derivation: Universal Property of the Tensor Product
zhlédnutí 7KPřed rokem
Previous tensor product video: czcams.com/video/KnSZBjnd_74/video.html The universal property of the tensor product is one of the most important tools for handling tensor products. It gives us a way to define functions on the tensor product using bilinear maps. However, the statement of the universal property can be confusing if it is presented without background. This video is an explanation o...
How to Define Homomorphisms on Quotient Groups
zhlédnutí 1,6KPřed rokem
One way to define a function on a quotient group is to define it in terms of the coset representatives. However, this approach runs into problems of well-definedness. This video explains how we can address that problem. 0:00 Problem Introduction 5:42 Solution 10:34 Non-example: Integers mod 5 11:13 Example: Alternating Group Group Theory playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJHDvvls4OtoBHi6cNnTZ...
Why can we change lim n→∞ to lim x→∞?
zhlédnutí 2,2KPřed rokem
When computing the limit of a sequence, it's often useful to consider a limit of real numbers so that we can do things like take derivatives. But why is this allowed in the first place? Why can we change a limit of integers to a limit of real numbers? This video gives an explanation. Calculus Problems playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJGFne7YhMi-4eYsUKzkITao.html Subscribe to see more new ma...
A Natural Proof of the First Isomorphism Theorem (Group Theory)
zhlédnutí 7KPřed rokem
The first isomorphism theorem is one of the most important theorems in group theory, but the standard proof may seem artificial, like every step of the proof is set up knowing that we're trying to create an isomorphism. In this video, we show an alternate proof with no such tricks using the preimage map of a group homomorphism. Group theory playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJHDvvls4OtoBHi6cN...
Integral Formula for Natural Log (without knowing the derivative)
zhlédnutí 3,2KPřed rokem
This video proves that the natural log equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t dt under the assumption that ln(x) is the inverse function to the exponential e^x. We can do this without already knowing the derivative of the natural log! More details on why the integral is the inverse of e^x: We proved in the video that any right inverse to e^x must equal that integral. However, we didn't prove th...
Supremum, Infimum: Definition and Explanation
zhlédnutí 3,8KPřed 2 lety
Not all sets of real numbers have a maximum and a minimum. In this video, we introduce the supremum and infimum as a generalization of max and min. Sup and inf appear everywhere in analysis. Subscribe to see more new math videos! Music: OcularNebula - The Lopez
Topology Definitions: Connected and Path-Connected
zhlédnutí 3,4KPřed 2 lety
Connectedness is a key idea in topology and metric spaces that describes whether a topological space can be separated into two components. This video explains the open set definition of connectedness and describes the topologist's sine curve as a non-example that motivates the definition of path-connectedness. Timestamps: 0:00 connectedness 9:59 path-connectedness Subscribe to see more new math...
Does 1+2+3+...=-1/12?
zhlédnutí 3,6KPřed 2 lety
The answer to the question in the title is that it depends on how you define the infinite sum function. Until the infinite sum function is specified, the question is not well-defined; it's the equivalent of asking "what is f(5)?" without defining the function f. The sum of all natural numbers, and the sums of divergent series more generally, are often debated because it seems incoherent to say ...
Proof: Orthogonal Matrices Satisfy A^TA=I
zhlédnutí 13KPřed 2 lety
One way to characterize orthogonal matrices is to say that a matrix orthogonal if and only if A transpose times A is the identity matrix. In this video, we prove this result using basic matrix calculations and the definition of orthonormal vectors. Learning Linear Algebra playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJHNCfEiX6l5CKbljWayGEcs.html Subscribe to see more new math videos! Music: C418 - Pr De...
My favorite proof of the n choose k formula!
zhlédnutí 39KPřed 2 lety
The binomial coefficient shows up in a lot of places, so the formula for n choose k is very important. In this video we give a cool combinatorial explanation of that formula! Challenge Problems playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJGkzGsXMYQt8bi5ImYtiEMM.html Subscribe to see more new math videos! Music: OcularNebula - The Lopez
Epsilon-Delta proofs: Can't we make the limit equal anything?
zhlédnutí 4,8KPřed 2 lety
Epsilon-Delta definition explanation: czcams.com/video/JbbRaiXI6yw/video.html Proofs that use the delta-epsilon definition of the limit can be confusing because it seems like we can prove that the limit is anything we want if we pick the right value of delta. In this video we prove that limits are unique and go over some examples of disproving limits! Calculus Problems playlist: czcams.com/play...
Why can't we group the terms in 1-1+1-1+... ?
zhlédnutí 2,7KPřed 2 lety
We can group the terms in the divergent infinite sum 1-1 1-1 ... to get a value of zero or a value of one, even though the series doesn't converge. This video gives an explanation of why grouping terms in Grandi's series doesn't give the correct answer. Calculus Problems playlist: czcams.com/play/PLug5ZIRrShJGFne7YhMi-4eYsUKzkITao.html 0:00 Why the sum diverges 7:33 Why grouping fails 12:57 Whe...
When can we switch the limit and function?
zhlédnutí 4,5KPřed 2 lety
When can we switch the limit and function?
Topology Definitions: Closure, Boundary, Interior
zhlédnutí 20KPřed 2 lety
Topology Definitions: Closure, Boundary, Interior
Why can we do this to find inverse functions?
zhlédnutí 2,2KPřed 2 lety
Why can we do this to find inverse functions?
Bijective Functions Have a Two-Sided Inverse
zhlédnutí 2,3KPřed 2 lety
Bijective Functions Have a Two-Sided Inverse
Proof: Two-Sided Inverse Functions are Unique
zhlédnutí 2,5KPřed 2 lety
Proof: Two-Sided Inverse Functions are Unique
Sum of natural numbers equals n+1 choose 2!
zhlédnutí 5KPřed 2 lety
Sum of natural numbers equals n 1 choose 2!
Representation Theory: Irreducible Characters Are an Orthonormal Basis
zhlédnutí 1,3KPřed 2 lety
Representation Theory: Irreducible Characters Are an Orthonormal Basis
Matrix Invertibility With F[x]-Modules
zhlédnutí 1,2KPřed 2 lety
Matrix Invertibility With F[x]-Modules
Difference Between Normalizer, Centralizer, and Stabilizer
zhlédnutí 8KPřed 2 lety
Difference Between Normalizer, Centralizer, and Stabilizer
A Concrete Introduction to Tensor Products
zhlédnutí 47KPřed 2 lety
A Concrete Introduction to Tensor Products
Euler's Identity With a Limit!
zhlédnutí 6KPřed 2 lety
Euler's Identity With a Limit!
Why Are Odd Numbers Not Even?
zhlédnutí 1,8KPřed 2 lety
Why Are Odd Numbers Not Even?
The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem is Easy with F[x]-Modules
zhlédnutí 2,3KPřed 3 lety
The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem is Easy with F[x]-Modules
How the Matrix Characteristic Polynomial is Connected to F[x]-Modules
zhlédnutí 1,4KPřed 3 lety
How the Matrix Characteristic Polynomial is Connected to F[x]-Modules
F[x]-Module Derivation of Rational and Jordan Canonical Forms
zhlédnutí 3KPřed 3 lety
F[x]-Module Derivation of Rational and Jordan Canonical Forms

Komentáře

  • @jk00978
    @jk00978 Před 4 dny

    I am perpetually confused

  • @zuluzulu500
    @zuluzulu500 Před 5 dny

    automatic korean subtitles? kekeke

  • @grantmccotter8779
    @grantmccotter8779 Před 5 dny

    You explain this far better than my university lecturer.

  • @l.JAI.SHREE.RAM.l
    @l.JAI.SHREE.RAM.l Před 5 dny

    Is there not any theorem as - ℒ⁻¹{∫[s ∞] f(u) du} = F(t)/t

  • @daniiltonkonog186
    @daniiltonkonog186 Před 6 dny

    thank you for content . I hope you will continue make such content, especially about abstract theories (Group theory, Topology, Abstract Algebra etc)

  • @Parkenskiy
    @Parkenskiy Před 6 dny

    Thank you

  • @sarthakkhatale
    @sarthakkhatale Před 6 dny

    This came in jee mains 2016

  • @parniamotamedi2694
    @parniamotamedi2694 Před 7 dny

    perfect explanation

  • @karimshariff7379
    @karimshariff7379 Před 7 dny

    You have a deep understanding of the subject.

  • @Vengeance7-b1e
    @Vengeance7-b1e Před 11 dny

    That's what I just needed thanks

  • @krumpy8259
    @krumpy8259 Před 13 dny

    Please come back and enlighten us again :(

  • @handlebred
    @handlebred Před 13 dny

    Great video bro

  • @bilalabbad7954
    @bilalabbad7954 Před 14 dny

    Great work

  • @timandersen8030
    @timandersen8030 Před 14 dny

    Wow this video is the best explanation on Laplace transform! Thank you! Can you also do a derivation for Fourier Transform please ??

  • @shreyasujagar643
    @shreyasujagar643 Před 16 dny

    crystal clear, thank you!

  • @marale72uk
    @marale72uk Před 17 dny

    Excellent! Thanks a lot!

  • @pages.edits1
    @pages.edits1 Před 17 dny

    very nice 👌

  • @rivaille8867
    @rivaille8867 Před 20 dny

    Beautiful 🎉

  • @mansipatel8538
    @mansipatel8538 Před 20 dny

    I love you

  • @Samiul_007
    @Samiul_007 Před 20 dny

    pls collab with qncubed3

  • @archangecamilien1879
    @archangecamilien1879 Před 21 dnem

    Perhaps use the symmetry of ln(x) and e^x, lol, or something...it should be the same as the integral from -1 to 0 of e^x, no?...Lol...perhaps I'm making some mistake here...

  • @long8398
    @long8398 Před 21 dnem

    I am probably too stupid to understand this. Some people computing the curl, some people don‘t.

  • @jonnydobandliamried8094

    That was really clear. Good stuff.

  • @subrotobhowmik8085
    @subrotobhowmik8085 Před 24 dny

    Most cutest mathematics teacher ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @sudiptob
    @sudiptob Před 25 dny

    Fabulous 👌

  • @nuclearcatapult
    @nuclearcatapult Před 25 dny

    So the reason I was having trouble visualizing a surface integral is because I'm not a 4-dimensional being. That makes sense.

  • @Ehsanfarzin-iu9rh
    @Ehsanfarzin-iu9rh Před 26 dny

    Great

  • @ishikuultra8997
    @ishikuultra8997 Před 28 dny

    where can i get that shirt?

  • @TD-ev7uj
    @TD-ev7uj Před 28 dny

    This is fire thank you. Perfectly rigorous with great examples.

  • @MrCoreyTexas
    @MrCoreyTexas Před 29 dny

    Your remark at 6:25 confused me at first. You'd have 0 === 0 mod 0, and from that you'd say 0 divides 0-0, but the trick is, you can't divide by 0, so 0/0 is undefined.

  • @MrCoreyTexas
    @MrCoreyTexas Před 29 dny

    I found the third proof the most interesting and creative. How mathematicians figure out what to just "pull out of the ether" in this case adding -bc+bc is really astounding. What separates amateurs like myself from the pros

  • @MrCoreyTexas
    @MrCoreyTexas Před 29 dny

    So you can multiply both sides of a === b (mod) n by the same number or 2 special congruent numbers of the same n, but not necessarily any old set of numbers.

  • @MrCoreyTexas
    @MrCoreyTexas Před 29 dny

    Thank you for these videos, I was studying cryptography and it assumes you know a lot about modular arithmetic. I took a lot of math in primary school and college, and I don't seem to recall ever going through this (but I never took a cryptography course to be fair, and I could have forgotten about it)

  • @premdeepkhatri1441
    @premdeepkhatri1441 Před měsícem

    very good explanation. Thank You for explanation.

  • @elenazxd
    @elenazxd Před měsícem

    the way you hold the marker is very distracting

  • @MrCoreyTexas
    @MrCoreyTexas Před měsícem

    I just write a % n instead of rem(a,n) when I'm working out math on paper, I just use the C notation, it's succinct.

  • @ilyavolkov2556
    @ilyavolkov2556 Před měsícem

    I wish I found this video before my midterm.... I got it for my finals though 😃

  • @user-tinkers
    @user-tinkers Před měsícem

    amazing!!!

  • @minjoon316
    @minjoon316 Před měsícem

    Thank you

  • @ToanPham-wr7xe
    @ToanPham-wr7xe Před měsícem

    😮

  • @premdeepkhatri1441
    @premdeepkhatri1441 Před měsícem

    Very Good Explanation of Laplace Transform to Visualize.

  • @MuskaanMittal
    @MuskaanMittal Před měsícem

    At 7:00 , shouldn't the parallelogram's endpoints be r(u, v), r(u+du, v) etc?

    • @MuPrimeMath
      @MuPrimeMath Před 22 dny

      That's correct. As is implied at 4:09, I'm using the ordered pairs as shorthand for the corresponding points on the surface.

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 Před měsícem

    Sounds like the dot product of orthonormal basis vectors. Either 0 if they are distinct or 1 if they are the same... is there any relation?

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 Před měsícem

    I love how you always give a quick review on the process at the end 😊

  • @ojas3464
    @ojas3464 Před měsícem

    👍

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 Před měsícem

    6.6k views and only 17 comments? Let me fix that

  • @sihamamir548
    @sihamamir548 Před měsícem

    it's very easy to evaluate this intégral by parts you complicated it man

  • @ToanPham-wr7xe
    @ToanPham-wr7xe Před měsícem

    😮

  • @ToanPham-wr7xe
    @ToanPham-wr7xe Před měsícem

    😮

  • @adrianoseresi3525
    @adrianoseresi3525 Před měsícem

    Hi sorry what text are you working off of?

    • @MuPrimeMath
      @MuPrimeMath Před měsícem

      This video wasn't working off of any particular text.