UTM MCS Math Videos
UTM MCS Math Videos
  • 39
  • 288 903
Asymptotes Video 5
Asymptotes Video 5
zhlédnutí: 867

Video

Continuity Video 2nd 2
zhlédnutí 743Před 3 lety
Continuity Video 2nd 2
Derivative Project2
zhlédnutí 645Před 3 lety
Derivative Project2
Optimization3
zhlédnutí 576Před 3 lety
Optimization3
Quadratic Equations
zhlédnutí 512Před 3 lety
Quadratic Equations
Logarithms
zhlédnutí 750Před 3 lety
Logarithms
Functions
zhlédnutí 1,3KPřed 3 lety
Functions
Factoring
zhlédnutí 186Před 3 lety
Factoring
Exponents
zhlédnutí 737Před 3 lety
Exponents
Improper WithTOC 4
zhlédnutí 741Před 3 lety
Improper Integrals on Unbounded Intervals
Maximization and Minimization of Functions of Two Variables
zhlédnutí 9KPřed 7 lety
Just-in-Time Videos - Economics: Maximization and Minimization of Functions of Two Variables Presented and Prepared by Charlene Chu in Collaboration with Maria Wesslén and Lee Bailey
Maximization and Minimization of Functions of One Variable
zhlédnutí 6KPřed 7 lety
Just-in-Time Videos - Economics: Maximization and Minimization of Functions of Two Variables Presented and Prepared by Charlene Chu in Collaboration with Maria Wesslén and Lee Bailey
Method of Lagrange Multipliers
zhlédnutí 1,4KPřed 7 lety
Just-in-Time Videos - Economics: Method of Lagrange Multipliers Presented and Prepared by Charlene Chu in Collaboration with Maria Wesslén and Lee Bailey
Multistage Decision Trees
zhlédnutí 13KPřed 8 lety
Multistage Decision Trees
Introduction to Decision Trees
zhlédnutí 114KPřed 8 lety
Introduction to Decision Trees
Posterior Probabilities
zhlédnutí 43KPřed 8 lety
Just-in-Time Videos - Management: Posterior Probabilities Presented and Prepared by Charlene Chu in Collaboration with Maria Wesslén
Tableau Approach
zhlédnutí 1KPřed 8 lety
Just-in-Time Videos - Management: Tableau Approach Presented and Prepared by Charlene Chu in Collaboration with Maria Wesslén
Inheritance and Traits MCS
zhlédnutí 360Před 9 lety
Inheritance and Traits MCS
Conditional Probability and Chain Rule MCS
zhlédnutí 5KPřed 9 lety
Conditional Probability and Chain Rule MCS
Probability Product and Sum Rules
zhlédnutí 16KPřed 9 lety
Probability Product and Sum Rules
Probability Hardy Weinerg Equilibrium
zhlédnutí 527Před 9 lety
Probability Hardy Weinerg Equilibrium
Improper Integrals Bounded Intervals
zhlédnutí 2,4KPřed 10 lety
Improper Integrals Bounded Intervals
Trigonometric Substitutions
zhlédnutí 1,9KPřed 10 lety
Trigonometric Substitutions
Related Rates
zhlédnutí 3,1KPřed 10 lety
Related Rates
Integration by Partial Fractions
zhlédnutí 2,4KPřed 10 lety
Integration by Partial Fractions
Concavity and Inflection Points
zhlédnutí 2,2KPřed 10 lety
Concavity and Inflection Points
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
zhlédnutí 3,9KPřed 10 lety
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
The Definite Integral and Riemann Sums
zhlédnutí 4,9KPřed 10 lety
The Definite Integral and Riemann Sums
The Limit of a Function
zhlédnutí 11KPřed 10 lety
The Limit of a Function
Annuities
zhlédnutí 1,2KPřed 10 lety
Annuities

Komentáře

  • @oluwalamideborah4386
    @oluwalamideborah4386 Před 2 měsíci

    Wonderful

  • @abanihani
    @abanihani Před rokem

    Thank you ... super clear

  • @ilovehedgehog7976
    @ilovehedgehog7976 Před rokem

    I don't know how question 4 and question 6 are calculated, but my answer is different from the answer in the video. My answer is negative infinity and ln(7/5) for questions 4 and 6 respectively after double checking with desmos and wolframalpha.

  • @malikedjaffo1905
    @malikedjaffo1905 Před rokem

    Is this Newton method ?

  • @feed730
    @feed730 Před 2 lety

    wheres the Tableau? :/

  • @user-on5pc4zg8v
    @user-on5pc4zg8v Před 2 lety

    too much help full vedio.. thanks a lot

  • @jamesarcade
    @jamesarcade Před 2 lety

    Wonderful lesson, still reasonating easy and simple 6years later. Thank you for all you do.

  • @_GOUTHAM
    @_GOUTHAM Před 2 lety

    nicely explained

  • @slametsucipto6640
    @slametsucipto6640 Před 2 lety

    Oke thanks your information learning

  • @marioshabana2912
    @marioshabana2912 Před 2 lety

    Thanks for the educational video fellas😀

  • @arvinjkaazodi5345
    @arvinjkaazodi5345 Před 2 lety

    Hello MAT132 lol

  • @nihasohail2998
    @nihasohail2998 Před 2 lety

    sandwich om nom

    • @marioshabana2912
      @marioshabana2912 Před 2 lety

      doing the theorem made me so hungry I had to actually go and make myself a PB&J it tasted soo goood

  • @MacNcheez750
    @MacNcheez750 Před 3 lety

    Thx great video. How do you come up with the probabilities for success?

  • @Rex4sure6425
    @Rex4sure6425 Před 3 lety

    @3:37: Hi...Your choice is wrong because of a mathematical problem at 3:37. EMV node 3 should be 21,350Usd and not 40,250usd. Thus making the choice of Manufacturing a very bad decision. Please revise and repost. For the record, i learnt from you. So thanks anyway. Blessings! 2021 here

  • @andreanicole7035
    @andreanicole7035 Před 3 lety

    What is your mic?

  • @martinperu6207
    @martinperu6207 Před 3 lety

    Limit from formal definitions..

  • @elijahoitedjere7547
    @elijahoitedjere7547 Před 3 lety

    Thank you

  • @leusmaximusx
    @leusmaximusx Před 3 lety

    ms. Charlene , your voice is soothing but not domineering, helped me concentrate on topic not get a hard on. You're wonderful

  • @ericadelacruz7420
    @ericadelacruz7420 Před 3 lety

    Thanks po!

  • @FARANITSHISHONGA
    @FARANITSHISHONGA Před 4 lety

    THE BEST THANK U

  • @jovialjackson
    @jovialjackson Před 4 lety

    Thanks for sharing the knowlwdge

  • @harikrishnavaleti1159

    Thank you and well explained

  • @danielchen9565
    @danielchen9565 Před 4 lety

    love the Silicon Valley Reference with Hooli!

  • @abhijeetkelkar4681
    @abhijeetkelkar4681 Před 4 lety

    I have a question: In the Multistage problem given for practice near the end of this video, I see the final decision was only about choosing the first stage decision ( i.e. choosing of Investment A due its Higher EMV value than that of B ). Do we stop at that point? Or Should the final answer also include, the decision at the 2nd stage? ( i.e. after choosing Investment A, then we arrive at decision node 4. Which one to choose at that node? In short: Should the answer also speak about the consequent decisions after the main 1st stage decision.?

  • @scarlettq81820
    @scarlettq81820 Před 4 lety

    answer is wrong for question 3

  • @enividclinton8634
    @enividclinton8634 Před 4 lety

    Nice one but could solve a complex problem. Thanks

  • @Uax101
    @Uax101 Před 4 lety

    shut up nerd

  • @akshaydevkarama3277
    @akshaydevkarama3277 Před 4 lety

    NICE

  • @amberscheepers9566
    @amberscheepers9566 Před 4 lety

    why does she use 0.2 for P(fair | up) and not 0.18? (5:42)

    • @roguenealer
      @roguenealer Před 4 lety

      The condition is what is the fair condition condsiding the stock market going up.

    • @abdallahsiyabi4784
      @abdallahsiyabi4784 Před 3 lety

      0.18 is the product of P (A and B) so in the table she has calculated the product of P(A) * P(B given A), where A is price going up. By the way, P(B given A) for (fair market given price going up) is already given in the question which is 0.2. Cheers :)

    • @xaralabos
      @xaralabos Před 3 lety

      She did it wrong

  • @calculotv1
    @calculotv1 Před 5 lety

    Excellent.

  • @oakleywyatt1717
    @oakleywyatt1717 Před 5 lety

    Super clear!

  • @hamza07861
    @hamza07861 Před 5 lety

    Thanks (Y)

  • @ayamikbel1465
    @ayamikbel1465 Před 5 lety

    hi waffa

  • @saranguyen2279
    @saranguyen2279 Před 5 lety

    THE MATH MAN IS WRONG ON QUESTION4?!?!?

  • @lindaeze5536
    @lindaeze5536 Před 5 lety

    Hello. Could you help out with the problem below. . A large steel manufacturing company has three options with regards to production: (i) produce commercially (ii) build pilot plant (iii) stop producing steel. The management has estimated that their pilot plant, if built, has 0.8 chance of high yield and 0.2 chance of low yield. If the pilot plant does show a high yield, management assigns a probability of 0.75 that the commercial plant will also have a high yield. If the pilot plant shows a low yield there is only a 0.1 chance that the commercial plant will show a high yield. Finally, management’s best assessment of the yield on a commercial -size plant without building a pilot plant first has a 0.6 chance of high yield. A pilot plant will cost N300,000. The profits earned under high and low yield conditions are N12,000,000 and N1,200,000 respectively. Find the optimum decision for the company.

  • @serkalemtefera1910
    @serkalemtefera1910 Před 5 lety

    Nice thanks

  • @temibolabluegamplays5780

    question 5 answer is ln(7/5) not ln(7/2)

  • @johnnewman3221
    @johnnewman3221 Před 6 lety

    product and sum rules, cant think of an easy example?

    • @12WeMet1
      @12WeMet1 Před 4 lety

      yeah, the example was unnecessarily confusing

  • @johnnewman3221
    @johnnewman3221 Před 6 lety

    it is still unclear as to whether to decide independant or mutually exclusive, first child is boy and second child is girl can be mutually exclusive they arent happening at the same time. so how to decide

  • @unde-malum
    @unde-malum Před 6 lety

    thanks jaimal i will miss you in my tuesday thursday lectures T_T

  • @CreationSink99
    @CreationSink99 Před 6 lety

    veri nice i appreciate

  • @pinkman5358
    @pinkman5358 Před 6 lety

    the derivative of xcosx is cosx-xsinx

  • @moaazsalah6851
    @moaazsalah6851 Před 6 lety

    thank you

  • @zavedkhan2549
    @zavedkhan2549 Před 6 lety

    Excellent

  • @murtazaandhussain5012

    For example 6, the alternative method of differentiation- The steps were unclear. I do not understand how you reached that answer. Thank you.

  • @TidalMaker
    @TidalMaker Před 7 lety

    Where did the probabilities come from?

    • @brentward5739
      @brentward5739 Před 5 lety

      That's a good question! My understanding is they are estimates about the accuracy of the test market study. People always leave out where they get these from in the textbooks!!!. Where do you get the probabilities? I think it would come from historical data. You look at past studies and see which demand conditions materialized after the historical studies. In this case, 9.8% of the time, low demand materialized after a favorable study, 39.4% of the time Medium demand materialized after a favorable study, and .507% of the time, high demand materialized after a favorable study. These add up to one. You need history to do this. My hope would be that a good market research firm would have these probabilities available if they do these kinds of studies all the time. If they couldn't provide such values, I'd be pretty disappointed, and I'd wonder how many times they'd actually done such a study. If picking stocks based on recommendations from analysts, it might be easier to come up with the probabilities because they often publish their recommendations, and you can see whether their recommendations actually panned out. You could use this data to generate probabilities for say, low, medium and high returns based on favorable (buy) or unfavorable (sell) recommendations.

  • @LukeButtigiegMT
    @LukeButtigiegMT Před 7 lety

    Thanks

  • @funduino8322
    @funduino8322 Před 8 lety

    I need help understanding example 2, why is it not .03/0.8 ? I'm working under the assumption that all doctorate degree holders are master degree holders that is they are part of the .08(master degree holders ==all postgraduate) . if my assumptions are correct, wouldn't the answer be .03/.08 and not .03/.11?

    • @funduino8322
      @funduino8322 Před 8 lety

      nevermind, I just read "But not doctorate degree holders) silly me :)

  • @yichenliu6311
    @yichenliu6311 Před 8 lety

    Really help me out!

  • @napsxoxo
    @napsxoxo Před 8 lety

    great video. thanks for sharing the knowledge!!